Watching
or
Whitewashing
UN's FIB, of
DRC Bombs
& Reuters
Spying for
UN
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
August 25 --
Who will watch
the UN's FIB,
its Force
Intervention
Brigade in
Eastern Congo?
When
the FIB's
component from
Tanzania
practiced
raiding a
medical tent
clearly marked
with a red
cross, Al
Jazeera was
there to film
it.
When it went
on-air, Inner
City Press at
the UN in New
York (before
Al
Jazeera America
became
UNviewable
there since
August 20)
saw it and wrote
a story,
dubbing this
practice for
violating the
Geneva
Conventions,
here.
In
fairness we
note that the
reporter on
the piece
told Inner
City Press
on August 25
that he "saw
it as
rehearsal
attack against
an
empty tent.
Not on a
medical camp."
While
some
humanitarians
who have
contacted
Inner City
Press
disagree, it
seems a fair
point, when
coupled with
recognition
that the UN's
FIB
needs a hard
look.
But
who will give
that hard
look? We have
shown, just
last week at
the UN
in New York,
that wire
service
Reuters was
willing to
channel an
unnamed UN
official's
spin that the
M23 rebels had
entered the
no-weapons
security zone,
even as the
acting chief
of UN
Peacekeeping
Edmond Mulet
told Inner
City Press and
a different,
less UN-useful
wire service
that there
had been no
violation of
the security
zone.
Compared
to
the re-type
shop (and worse)
its UN bureau
has become,
Reuters has
relatively
better
reporters in
Kinshasa and
Cote d'Ivoire.
The
latter, we've
met and so
held off
saying this.
But to
unself-consciously
say that
MONUSCO of
course must
respond to
protect
civilians -- "they
have a clear
obligation to
respond" --
without
mentioning
that MONUSCO
and UN
Peacekeeping
are
still
assisting the
Congolese Army
units which
raped 135
women and
girls in
Minova, seems
to require noting.
As
then does calling
the "UN far
and away the
most credible
source" or
observer --
after the UN
covered up and
stonewalled on
not only the
Minova rapes,
but its own
role in
bringing
cholera to
Haiti. (Al
Jazeera's
recent 30
minute
documentary on
the topic was
not
viewable in
the UN, as
protested by
the new Free
UN Coalition
for Access,
@FUNCA_info)
Deeming the
UN, from
the outset,
the most
credible
source may be
a less than
journalistic
approach --
for purposes
of this piece,
in the Congo,
but in Syria
and elsewhere
as well.
For now
on DRC this
still remains
outstanding: at
Friday's noon
briefing, video
here from
Minute 10:15,
Inner City
Press asked
the UN's
outgoing deputy
spokesperson
Eduardo Del
Buey about the
answer, when
Inner City
Press and
another
journalist
asked UN
Peacekeeping
acting chief
Edmond Mulet
Thursday if
the M23 rebels
had entered
the security
zone
established
around Goma.
"No,"
Mulet said.
"Just
mortars." He
went on to
refer to the
separate "red
line"
established
when M23
agreed in
Kampala
to pull out of
Goma. (The
portion of
that agreement
that gave M23
one
third of the
security force
at the Goma
airport
remains
unimplemented.)
But
later on
Thursday, the
wire service
Reuters reported
"a senior
U.N. official,
who asked not
to be named,
said that on
Thursday the
rebels entered
a security
zone
surrounding
Goma" -- which
Mulet,
the acting
chief of DPKO,
had just
denied. Inner
City Press and
the
other
journalist
waited to ask
Mulet again,
and got the
same answer.
So
who is this
"senior UN
official who
asked not to
be named"? In
UN
Peacekeeping,
only Herve
Ladsous is
senior to and
could
over-rule
Mulet.
Ladsous
has
in the past
spoon-fed
answers of
dubious
veracity to
this same
Reuters
UN bureau
bragging for
example about
the Congolese
Army
imposing
accountability
for the 135
rapes in
Minova in
November 2012.
But with only
a few
arrests for
the 135 rapes,
Ladsous' DPKO
continues
supporting the
391st
Battalion,
even as it is
now
implicated in
corpse
desecration.
That
the UN would
try to use
Reuters,
willingly,
resonates with
a
documented
instance in
June 2012 when
Reuters
UN bureau
chief Louis
Charbonneau
gave to UN
official
Stephane
Dujarric an
internal UNCA
anti-Press
document,
three
minutes after
saying he
would not do
so.
Story
here, audio here,
document
here, in
which
Charbonneau
tells
Dujarric, "You
didn't get
this from me."
So
is Reuters'
"senior UN
official who
asked not to
be named"
someone junior
to Mulet, or
as another
journalist
suggested, no
one
at all?
On August 23,
Del Buey said
he knew what
Mulet had
said, and has
"seen other
reports." He
said he'd have
to check. But
August 23 was
his last day
at the UN (the
Free
UN Coalition
for Access
wished him
well, video
here at
Minute
9:55).
So we'll see.
Watch this
site.
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2013 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|