After
MONUSCO
Misstates Role
on FDLR,
Reuters
Misrepresents
UN &
Rights
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
January 30 --
The UN has
been
dissembling
about its role
in the
Congolese
Army's stated
attempt to
"neutralize"
the
FDLR.
Inner City
Press on
January 30
asked UN
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric:
Inner
City Press:
Since it's UN
Social Media
Day, MONUSCO
46 minutes ago
said
that —
I'll say it in
French: Les
operations
militaires
contre les
#FDLR, lancées
hier jeudi,
seront
dirigées et
planifiées
conjointement
par la
#MONUSCO et
les
FARDC.
So unless I'm
misunderstanding
this, they're
claiming that
it's a joint
operation,
“conjointement”,
on their
Twitter
feed. I
wanted to
know, why
would they be
doing that,
given what
you've just
said?
Spokesman:
I think
without going
into a deep
analysis of
French and
English, which
you obviously
are able to do
and I couldn't
try to keep up
with you, I
think it is a
different
characterization
maybe, a
different use
of words, but
I think the
point is that
it's an
FARDC-led
operation with
the support of
the UN.
Now Reuters,
claiming an
exclusive, has
again
misrepresented
the UN's and
Herve Ladsous'
(non)
enforcement of
the human
rights due
diligence
policy.
The anonymously
trolling
Reuters
correspondent
-- reviving
that on
January 26,
after Reuters'
Stephen
J. Adler et al
were told
but did
nothing --
"reports" that
"The
U.N.
peacekeeping
mission in
Congo
threatened in
2013 to
withdraw
support for
two Congolese
battalions
accused of
involvement in
the mass rape.
The mission
decided to
keep working
with the
battalions
after 12
senior
officers,
including the
commanders and
deputy
commanders,
were suspended
and about a
dozen soldiers
were charged
over the rapes
in Minova."
This is
propaganda --
only two lower
ranking
soldiers were
convicted. The
Reuters
implication is
that Ladsous'
DPKO is tough
on human
rights: false.
On January
22
Ladsous made a
speech about
freedom of the
press in the
Democratic
Republic of
the Congo
Thursday to
the US
Security
Council, and
made excuses
for not acting
to
“neutralize”
the Hutu FDLR
rebels as the
UN did the
largely Tutsi
M23.
Then
Ladsous came
to the
Security
Council
stakeout,
ostensibly to
take
questions.
Inner City
Press asked,
“On the
neutralization
of the FDLR,
what is the
hold up?”
Ladsous said
"I don't
respond to
your
questions,
Mister." Video
here and
embedded
below.
Then Ladsous
turned and
gave the
question to
Reuters, the
same trolling
correspondent.
When that back
and forth was
over, Inner
City Press
asked if any
of the
countries in
the UN's Force
Intervention
Brigade are
well than
willing to
attack the
FDLR, as
senior
diplomats at
the UN have
told Inner
City Press.
Ladsous
refused to
answer this
question, and
gestured that
Ban Ki-moon's
envoy to the
DRC Martin
Kobler,
standing
behind Ladsous
at the
stakeout,
shouldn't
answer it
either.
Reuters took
or was given
another
question,
distancing the
FDLR from
genocide.
Finally Inner
City Press
asked both men
what if
anything UN
Peacekeeping
has done as
the Kabila
government has
frozen the
accounts of
the Panzi
hospital for
rape
victims.
Ladsous waved
this off --
for months he
waved
off Press
questions
about mass
rape in Minova
by his
partners in
the Congolese
Army, video
here --
and walked
away with this
spokesman.
(One
can only
imagine the
advise this
“communications
professional”
is giving
Ladsous.
Perhaps he can
help Ladsous
address his
history with
Hutu groups as
evidence in this memo.
These are
Press
questions.)
Kobler to his
credit told
Inner City
Press he would
come back and
answer, and he
did, albeit
only some, and
off camera.
That will be
another story.
Because the
story here is,
how can a
person in
charge of UN
Peacekeeping
be allowed to
refuse
particular
media's
questions in
this way?
While, in
classic UN
fashion,
giving a
speech about
freedom of the
press,
elsewhere? The
weakness of
current UN
leadership
comes to mind.
But as many
ask, WHY does
Ladsous refuse
to answer
Inner City
Press? While
he has refused
to answer
that, too, it
began when
Inner City
Press reported
that Ladsous
was not even
France's first
choice for the
position -
Jerome
Bonnafont was.
Tellingly, an
Agence France
Presse member
of the
Executive
Committee of
the so-called
UN
Correspondents
Association complained
about this
Inner City
Press story,
and soon the
Executive
Committee of
UNCA, under
then and now
president
Giampaolo
Pioli, made
more complaint
about that
story, and another
about Sri
Lanka,
demanding it
be removed
from the
Internet.
Inner City
Press quit
UNCA and
co-founded the
Free
UN Coalition
for Access,
which demands
that all UN
Under
Secretaries
General answer
questions.
UNCA, for
course, has
said nothing
about Ladsous'
refusal. It is
the UN's
Censorship
Alliance.
More on this
-- including
video -- to
follow.
, 
