| Press Access To Live Cover
EDNY Unfair, On Barrack Stonewall
on Tillerson, Kafka So Far
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Maxwell
book
BBC -
Honduras
- CIA
Trial book - NY
Mag
EDNY COURTHOUSE,
Oct 3 – How does press access
to U.S. Federal courts work?
How should it?
In
the District for the District
of Columbia, you're allowed to
bring your phone and laptop
in. Inner City Press, which
does the same most days in the
SDNY, has covered proceeding
in DDC and then quickly
written them up, with laptop
and Internet hot spot in the
court's cafeteria.
It is different
in the U.S. District Court for
the Eastern District of New
York, the Brooklyn Federal
court, where Inner City Press
these days is covering, or
trying to cover, US v. Zottola
as well as US v. Barrack. They
take your phone, and even,
strangely, a laptop USB port.
You can apply, case by case,
to bring in electronics for a
particular trial.
Inner City
Press did just that for the
1MDB trial of Roger Ng (with
Jho Low on the run) held in
EDNY earlier this year.
And it seems
straight forward, to apply for
a similar pass to bring in
phone and laptop to cover the
current US v. Thomas Barrack
trial before EDNY Judge Brian
M. Cogan.
On the
first day of trial, September
21, Inner City Press submitted
an application to the EDNY
Clerk of Court, open 10-1 and
2-3. It was told to wait in
the document review room; it
gave its Manhattan press pass
to be copied in
support. Then it
was told, a phone call would
be coming. That's how it was
notified of the US v. Ng pass,
so fine. But no call came.
On Thursday,
September 22, it asked again
at the Clerk of Court and was
told, You will be
called. With no
call by September 28, a week
after applying, Inner City
Press checked again. It was
handed a yellow Post-It note
with the number of the EDNY
District Executive's office.
Without cell
phone, it called from the
payphone in the court - only
to be told it was not granted,
to write a letter to District
Executive Eugene J. Corcoran -
and that it could only be
delivered through the Clerk of
Court.
On Thursday
September 29, when Inner City
Press in EDNY covered not only
US v. Barrack but also two
sentencings before Judges
LeShawn DeArcy Hall and Ann M.
Donnelly, it turned in a more
detailed letter, attaching a
print out from Google News
showing Inner City Press'
stories prominent in a search
for Barrack and Grimes, and in
a search for EDNY. On that
basis, it is requesting an
on-going hard-pass.
At 4:30 pm
when the Barrack trial day was
over it called the DE's office
- but it was closed. It
left a voice mail,
wanting to bring laptop to
cover Friday's proceedings.
Receiving no
response of any kind, Inner
City Press amid the Zottola
and Barrack trials went to the
Clerk's Office again. They
called up to the 5th floor, no
answer. Later, Inner City
Press did, polite on both
side, "the papers are being
reviewed."
On October 3 at 9
am, before the appearance in
US v. Barrack of Rex
Tillerson, which Inner City
Press had reported on October
1, the DE's office was called
by Inner City Press. There
were questions by no answers,
even by 10 pm after Tillerson
testified. Note: The First
Amendment doesn't grade the
Press by corporate structure.
Now for twelve going on
thirteen days? The trial(s)
slipping away.Watch this site.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2022 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|
,
