| On R.Kelly EDNY Says $200000
Royalties 1st Q 2020 and Social Media Aid
Urges Detention
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC
- Decrypt
- LightRead - Honduras
-
Source
FEDERAL
COURTHOUSE, April 17 –
There was an
R.Kelly status conference amid
the COVID-19 pandemic on April
16 before U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of
New York Judge Ann M.
Donnelly. Inner City
Press live tweeted it, here.
More on Patreon here.
Now on
April 17, the prosecutors have
again opposed any release for
R.Kelly (amid the release, for
example, Tekashi #6ix9ine),
stating "it is disingenuous
for the defendant to suggest
that he has “no means to go
anywhere.” (Mot. at 3). He
continues to have a
significant network of
individuals available to
assist him. Indeed, many of
those individuals attempt to
do the defendant’s bidding by
regularly posting and
appearing in videos on the
internet and publishing on
social media in support of the
defendant and overtly trying
to intimidate the defendant’s
accusers. Moreover, the
defendant still has the
financial means to flea and
commit obstruction. In the
first quarter of 2020 alone,
the defendant received over
$200,000 in royalty proceeds."
There was an indefinitely
postponement, but for a
September jury questionnaire,
of R.Kelly's previously
scheduled July 7 EDNY trial on
charges of racketeering,
sexual exploitation of a
child, bribery, kidnapping and
forced labor.
Judge Donnelly asks if R.Kelly
had waived his appearance. His
lawyer responded that he spoke
to Mr. Kelly who was
"despondent."
Judge
Donnelly replied, Let's keep
it simple. Did he waive his
appearance? The
defense lawyer said, Yes.
Judge Donnelly said, I think a
July trial is unlikely.
A lawyer
mused that even if the economy
is re-opened, it is
questionable if people are
going to be willing to serve
on juries.
Judge
Donnelly pointed out, Mr.
Kelly has to be arraigned on
new charges, by video... I
don't want to step on anyone's
toes out in Chicago. What
about April 30? What about
questionnaires on September
14? The defense lawyers don't
necessarily have to
come.
R.Kelly's lawyer
emphasized, We want the New
York case to go first.
Judge Donnelly continued, So
two weeks after the
questionnaire.
Lawyer: The 28th is Yom
Kippur. So let's do 29th.
Judge Donnelly asked, Why have
you made your bail application
to me, when it's about
Illinois? I've asked the US to
respond. But I'm curious.
R.Kelly's
lawyer quickly said, We could
re-file it in Illinois. We
didn't want him to be released
in Chicago and then for you to
jail him.
Judge
Donnelly said, That could
happen.
[In
fairness to some online
replies, the reality is if any
defendant is subject to two
judges' or jurisdictions'
detention orders, if the first
orders release, the defendant
would still be arrested on the
second order unless it is
removed.]
Judge Donnelly continued,
Anyway, I've asked the
government to respond. Let's
just go forward. Anything else
we need to do today?
Counselor
Greenberg said, You mentioned
April 30 for arraignment by
video, but they're not
bringing anyone to the court
in Chicago.
Judge Donnelly said, Here in
New York, they're setting up
video arraignments. I'll look
into it. Stay safe and talk to
y'all soon. And that was it.
Inner City Press will continue
to follow and report on the
case. It is US v. Robert
Sylvester Kelly, a/k/a R.
Kelly, EDNY Docket No.
19-cr-286 (AMD). More on Patreon here.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|
,
