Indicted UAE
Lobbyist Barrack Argues First Amendment
Amid Sealed Docs No UAE Answers
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Podcast
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- ESPN
EDNY, March 15 –
Thomas Barrack and Matthew
Grimes, indicted for illegal
lobbying for the United Arab
Emirates, were arraigned on
July 26, 2021 before U.S.
District Court for the Eastern
District of New York
Magistrate Judge Sanket
Bulsara. Inner City Press live
tweeted it here
(and podcast here)
On August
3, Grimes asked the Court for
permission to travel to New
York where his lawyers are
based - and then to take the
train to Boston (the
conditions of release were
limited and car and common air
carrier, with private jet
access cited). Letter on
CourtListener here.
On November 2,
Judge Cogan
held another
proceeding in
the case - but
no listen-only
call-in line
was provided,
unlike the
in-person EDNY
guilty plea
the same day
in US v.
Daniel Rendon
Herrera, a
Colombian drug
kingpin
charged with
continuing
criminal
enterprise and
providing
material
support to a
foreign
terrorist
organization
before Judge
Dora L.
Irizarry.
Inner City
Press live
tweeted thread
here.
Why
less
transparency
on Barrack?
On March 15, 2022, with the UAE Mission
to the UN under Ambassador
Lana Nusseibeh
refusing to
answer
written
questions from
Inner City
Press and
documents
sealed in
EDNY, this Barrack
argument;
"while the
indictment
alleges that
Mr. Barrack
spoke
positively
about the UAE
in the media,
see Indictment
¶ 24, those
allegations do
not show he
was the UAE’s
agent, see
Mot. 7.
Otherwise, a
U.S. citizen
could never
speak
positively of
a foreign
government or
its objectives
without
running afoul
of Section
951, and could
not flatter
himself when
he did so, see
Indictment ¶
24(d)—a result
that would
clearly run
afoul of the
First
Amendment, see
supra 11-14.
Similarly, the
indictment
alleges that
UAE officials
asked Mr.
Barrack for
information
about certain
U.S.
officials, see
Indictment ¶¶
54, 56, and
informed Mr.
Barrack of
certain UAE
objectives,
id. ¶¶ 57,
60-62, 65,
71-74, 81-87,
but there is
no allegation
Mr. Barrack
agreed to
advance these
objectives or
complied with
the UAE’s
requests, see
Mot. 7, 17-18.
Merely
receiving
requests from
a third party
does not show
a duty to act
subject to the
third party’s
direction or
control;
“mutual
assent” to the
agency
relationship
is required." Full
filing here.
From July 26:
Judge Bulsara: Mr. Grimes, I
have a document that's called
an appearance bond. What's
your relationship with Matthew
Grimes? A: He's my
brother... I earn
$140,000 a year.
Judge
Bulsara: Mr. Grimes, I'm
prepared to release you
pending trial, provided you
understand the conditions.
Grimes: I do, your Honor.
Judge Bulsara:
You can only travel on a
common air carrier. Fund
transfers are restricted, as
set forth in the bond.
AUSA: This case
has been set down for a
conference before Judge Cogan
on September 2 at 10 am. We
request the exclusion of time
under the Speedy Trial Act
until then
Judge Bulsara:
Defense, do you consent? Yes.
Judge Bulsara: OK, we are
adjourned.
Both defendants
entered pleas of “not guilty”
to the indictment through
their attorneys. No
changes in their bond
conditions except that Barrack
is now also allowed to travel
to the state of Colorado where
he will reside at his home in
Aspen. Their first
appearance before U.S.
District Judge Brian Cogan
will be on September 2 at 10
a.m. The government will
begin turning over discovery
to the defendants.
Grimes’s father was present in
the courtroom in Brooklyn
today. Barrack’s
ex-wife, son and Barrack’s
friend were on videoconference
as suretors for his $250
million bond.
The case is USA
V. AL MALIK ALSHAHHI et al.,
21-cr-371 (EDNY, Cogan, J.)
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2021 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|