Kerry
Tells Egypt FM
Apaches on the
Way, Libya
Airstrikes Not
Mentioned
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
August 29, more
here --
Amid
airstrikes in
Libya, when
outgoing UN
envoy Tarek
Mitri briefed
the UN
Security
Council on
August 27 the
airstrikes
weren't even
mentioned in
his more than
six page
prepared text
distributed by
the UN.
The
strikes are
widely
attributed to
Egypt and the
UAE. But on
August 29 when
a senior US
State
Department
official
provided a
read-out of
John Kerry's
call to his
Egyptian
counterpart,
they were not
mentioned:
"Secretary
Kerry today
called
Egyptian
Foreign
Minister
Shoukry as
part of the
ongoing
discussions on
the Gaza
ceasefire, the
struggle
against ISIL,
and regional
counterterrorism
efforts.
"The
Secretary
reaffirmed the
United States’
support for
the helpful
role that
Egypt played
in reaching
the ceasefire
in Gaza. He
also discussed
Egypt's
efforts in
countering
threats from
extremist
groups,
particularly
in the Sinai.
"Secretary
Kerry informed
FM Shoukry
that the
United States
intends to
move forward
on deliveries
of Apache
helicopters to
the Egyptian
military,
which we
believe are a
critical tool
that will help
the Egyptian
government in
its
counterterrorism
efforts."
So
alongside the
airstrikes on
Libya, the US
is moving
forward on
delivery of
Apache copters
to
Egypt...
Also not mentioned:
#FreeAJstaff
and the other
detainees.
Back
on August 19
and once again
since, Inner
City Press
asked the UN
if it knew
anything about
who was behind
them:
Inner
City Press:
Who did the
air
strikes?
General
Haftar?
What's the UN,
either Mr.
León or Mr.
Mitri or
whoever is
currently in
charge,
what's their
sense of who's
doing air
strikes in
Tripoli?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
I don't… I
think we
reported back
with the
Mission
yesterday, if
there's
anything more
I'll share it
with you.
But in the
days since,
the UN has
said nothing.
Now the Libyan
Dawn
group
has taken over
the Tripoli
airport
despite the
airstrikes and
alleged that
the strikes
have the
involvement of
Haftar's (or
Hiftar's)
supporters,
Egypt and the
United Arab
Emirates. What
does the UN --
or now
Bernardino
Leon -- know
and say about
that? Watch
this site.
On
Leon: To try
to counter
Libya's
lawless power
struggle, the
UN engaged in
one of its
own.
And unlike
most of the member states
that make up
the UN, and
most other inter-governmental
organizations,
this
UN does not
answer
questions,
at least not
directly.
After Inner
City Press
repeated asked
about it,
including at
the UN's noon
briefings on
August 11 and
13, on August
14 the UN said
Bernardino
Leon will take
over as its
Libya envoy on
September 1.
When Inner
City Press
asked if that
is really
Leon's
starting day,
given that
he's said
he'll go to
Tripoli as
early as next
week
representing
the UN, Ban
Ki-moon's
deputy
spokesperson
Farhan Haq
said Leon is
merely
"familiarizing"
himself with
the work he
will be, and
Mitri remains
in place until
September 1.
Really?
Ignoring the
previous
questions and
the
power-play,
wire services
like Reuters
merely retyped
("reported")
the UN's
August 14
announcement
that Leon will
start
September 1.
And now?
Back
on August 1,
Inner City
Press exclusively
reported
that UN envoy
to Libya Tarek
Mitri was
being "pushed
out" of the
post,
including by
UK envoy to
Libya Jonathan
Powell, and
cited his
brother Lord
Powell's
extensive
business in
Libya through
Magna
Holdings.
The UK
mission,
usually
responsive,
did not
provide
comment on
written Press
questions on
this; at UN
Ambassador
Mark Lyall
Grant's August
4 press
conference
Inner City
Press asked
about Powell's
and Mitri's
relationship,
without
direct answer,
see here.
Then the UK's
Ambassador to
Libya Michael
Aron has announced,
on Twitter no
less,
that Mitri is
out and Ban
Ki-moon has
installed a
new UN envoy,
former
Zapatero
diplomat
Bernardino
Leon Gross.
The UN, at
least at its
August 8 noon
briefing and
in emails
since, has not
announce
anything about
replacing
Mitri, much
less by whom.
Ban Ki-moon's
office said
that for
August 9 and
10,
"Spokesperson
on call:
Mr. Farhan
Haq." So Inner
City Press
wrote to Farhan
Haq, as
well as to
lead spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric:
Hello.
Now that the
UK Ambassador
to Libya, and
others, have
announced that
Ban Ki-moon
has appointed
Bernardino
Leon to
replace Tarek
Mitri as Ban's
representative
to Libya, head
of UNSMIL,
this is a
request on
deadline -
today - that
your Office
confirm that
this
appointment or
nomination has
been made.
Has
the letter
been sent to
the Security
Council?
Is
Leon already
confirmed?
If
not, how it is
appropriate
that P5
countries are
saying he
already has
the job? On
deadline,
today.
Given
many of the ongoing
Afghanistan
leaks are
about UN DSS
and UNAMA,
not UNDP,
there will be
further
questions. But
the above is
on deadline
for today.
Thank you in
advance.
But more than
four hours
later, by
"close of
business" in
New York, the
"spokesperson
on duty" had
not answered,
had not even
acknowledged
receipt of the
question.
What does it
mean to be the
UN's
"spokesperson
on duty"?
Isn't it for
Ban Ki-moon to
make this
announcement?
In fact, in
2011 when
France had
already gotten
its Jerome
Bonnafont in
place to
replace its
Alain Le Roy
atop UN
Peacekeeping,
Bonnafont's
bragging about
it in India,
where he was
French
Ambassador,
led to Ban
rescinding the
"offer."
France
countered
with three
time loser Herve
Ladsous,
Inner City
Press reported
each step --
including Bonnafont
in July 2011
being tapped
for the post,
and even congratulation
cards to
Bonnafont, here,
and threats
from AFP
then the UN
Correspondents
Association --
and the rest
is, well, a
type of
history (coverage
in UK New
Statesman,
here).
Ladsous
refuses all
Inner City
Press
questions, video compilation here; Ban
Ki-moon's
deputy
spokesperson
Farhan Haq on
August 8,
alluding to
Ladsous and now
UNDP, said it
is because of
"people
skills."
Or reporting?
So Ban has
accepted or
done nothing
to stop this
P3 power grab
to oust Mitri.
But can "his"
successor be
pre-announced
and Ban accept
that too?
Footnote:
Inner City
Press is
exclusively
informed that
UNSMIL deputy
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
also has
business,
literally:
fisshing
business. Ban
and those in
control of
this play
accept that
too? Watch
this site.
Background:
Inner City
Press on
August 1 asked
UN spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric what
UN envoy Tarek
Mitri is
doing;
Dujarric said
he was not
aware but
would check.
Inner City
Press had
reported that
Mitri, unlike
the other UN
international
staff who
relocated to
Tunis, went
back to his
native
Lebanon.
Sources in the
region
exclusively
told Inner
City Press
that Mitri had
been hoping
for a
government
post in
Lebanon,
describing him
as less than
committed to
remaining with
the UN.
Now we can
report more.
These
knowledgeable
sources say
that Mitri is
being "pushed
out," mostly
they say by
the UK's envoy
to Libya,
former Tony
Blair aide
Jonathan
Powell.
"Mitri was
expected to
take on a
mostly support
function," one
source told
Inner City
Press. "He
stood up and
said no,
headquarters
didn't back
him up and now
he's being
pushed out."
We'll have
more on this.
It was nine
days after
Libya's
foreign
minister
Mohamed Abdel
Aziz at the UN
Security
Council
stakeout told
the Press
his country
wanted
international
help to
protect oil
fields and
ports,
including
airports, that
the US
announced it
had relocated
its Tripoli
embassy staff
out of the
country to
Tunisia.
Inner City
Press asked,
where is UN
envoy to Libya
Tarek Mitri?
He briefed the
Security
Council from
Beirut --
sources tell
Inner City
Press he has
been on
vacation
there, and
this deputy,
too, was out
of the
country.
Back on July
17 when
Libya's
foreign
minister
Mohamed Abdel
Aziz emerged
from the UN
Security
Council to take
questions from
the media,
Inner City
Press asked
him to be more
specific about
what type of
“support”
force he is
asking for.
Mohamed
Abdel
Aziz replied
that the
request is not
for a
“military”
force -- but
then went on
to say say the
force should
protect oil
fields and
ports. If
that's not
military, what
is it?
Inner
City Press
also asked
Mohamed Abdel
Aziz for
Libya's
current
position on
the US
arresting Abu
Khatallah.
Compared to
the complaints
of others,
Mohamed Abdel
Aziz said that
even though
under
international
law it is
unacceptable,
since Libya
can't protect
witnesses,
maybe it is
okay.
Given
the current
state of
affairs, what
is “Libya's”
position?
Meanwhile
on
July 17 the
UN's envoy to
Libya Tarek
Mitri told the
Security
Council -- by
video from his
native
Lebanon, while
other UN
international
staff are in
Tunisia --
that the
fighting has
“cast a shadow
over the
election on 25
June of the
200 member
Council of
Representatives.”
Ya don't say.
Mitri
said
that barely
forty percent
of the 1.5
million
registered
Libyans went
to the polls.
He said 12
seats will
remain vacant;
41 candidates
were
disqualified
under the
post-Gaddafi
Law on
Political and
Administrative
Isolation.
Final results
are supposed
to be
announced on
July 20. Watch
this site.
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2014 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|