On El Salvador
US Congratulates
Nayib Bukele
No Talk of
Caravans Or
Gangs in
San Salvador
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Video,
Q&A,
HK here
UNITED NATIONS
GATE, February 4 – On El
Salvador on February 4 US
State Department Deputy
Spokesperson Robert Palladino
said, "The United States
congratulates Nayib Bukele on
his election as the next
president of the Republic of
El Salvador. We salute
the Salvadoran people for
their commitment to democracy
and their participation in a
successful election. The
United States and El Salvador
share a strong partnership
based on our joint efforts to
improve security and our
mutual commitment to the rule
of law and inclusive economic
development. It is in
our common interest to reduce
illegal immigration and combat
transnational crime by
fostering economic growth,
good governance, and
security. We value our
cooperation and look forward
to working with
President-elect Bukele to
expand economic opportunity,
strengthen democratic
institutions, and redouble
efforts to make El Salvador
safer and more prosperous for
all Salvadorans." How will
Bukele, a former mayor of San
Salvador who was alleged on
BBC to have links to, or pay,
street gangs be cited in
upcoming US talk of caravans?
Back on January 16 on Moldova,
US State Department Deputy
Spokesperson Robert Palladino
on said, "The United States
urges the Moldovan authorities
to take all necessary measures
to ensure a free and fair
electoral process and a
transparent outcome that
respects the will of Moldovan
voters. We encourage the
government to implement OSCE’s
Office for Democratic
Institutions and Human Rights
(ODIHR) prior recommendations
for Moldova that remain
outstanding. Local and
national authorities should
ensure that candidates are
able to register to
participate in the elections
and carry out their campaigns
without fear of harassment or
physical harm. Media
outlets should provide equal
access to all candidates and
approach their coverage in a
fair, balanced, and impartial
manner, consistent with
Moldova’s media laws.
Ultimately, we believe, the
goal of all the parties and
candidates is the same,
ensuring a prosperous and
democratic future for Moldova
and its citizens. The
United States will continue to
help the Moldovan people
achieve this goal." Meanwhile,
with civilians still being
killed in Yemen despite the
Sweden talks (and the UN of
Antonio Guterres refusing to
answer Press questions about
it), US Secretary of State
Mike Pompeo in Oman had this
meeting read-out by his Deputy
Spokesperson Robert Palladino:
"Secretary of State Michael R.
Pompeo met today with Omani
Sultan Qaboos bin Sa’id in
Muscat. The Secretary
commended the Sultan for
Oman’s unique capacity to
create opportunities for
dialogue on difficult issues
at challenging times,
including by separately
hosting both Palestinian
Authority President Abbas and
Israeli Prime Minister
Netanyahu in Oman in
October. The Secretary
and the Sultan discussed ways
to promote peace throughout
the region. On Yemen,
the Secretary and the Sultan
agreed on the importance of
all parties continuing to
engage and working with UN
Special Envoy Martin Griffiths
toward a political solution to
end the conflict and bring
peace, prosperity, and
security to Yemen. The
Secretary thanked the Sultan
for hosting meetings on the
economic and energy pillars of
the Middle East Strategic
Alliance on January 9 in
Muscat. The Secretary
and the Sultan also discussed
ways to build upon the strong
bilateral U.S.-Oman economic
and security partnership."
UN's Patrick Cammaert was not
mentioned; he has lost
confidence of parties. Is it
any wonder, when the UN used
him, willingly, to cover up
its under performance in South
Sudan at the Terrain Hotel,
where the UN stood by then
stood silent on the murder of
journalist John Gatluak?
Pompeo has been on a tour
around the region. The
itinerary said that "in
Muscat, the Secretary will
meet with Omani leaders to
discuss ways to promote peace
throughout the region,
including in Yemen, and build
upon the strong U.S.-Oman
partnership. The
Secretary and Omani leaders
will discuss the Middle East
Strategic Alliance and the
importance of a united GCC in
advancing the peace,
prosperity, and security of
the region." Back on 5
November 2019 after Pompeo
spoke of new US sanctions on
Iran and eight exemptions on 5
November 2018, later in the
day he spoke with the foreign
minister of Denmark about
Iran, giving rise to this read
out attributable to then
Spokesperson Heather Nauert:
"Secretary Michael R. Pompeo
spoke by phone today with
Danish Foreign Minister Anders
Samuelsen. They
discussed Denmark’s public
announcement of an arrest
related to an Iranian plot to
assassinate members of an
Iranian dissident group living
in Denmark. They also
discussed the importance of
strong collective EU action to
hold Iran accountable for its
continued use of terrorism on
European soil. Secretary
Pompeo praised Denmark’s swift
and strong response and
reiterated that the U.S.
maximum pressure campaign
against Iran is in response to
this type of abhorrent
behavior from the Iranian
regime. Secretary Pompeo
stressed that the United
States stands with our
European allies and partners
in addressing the threat of
the Iranian regime’s support
for terrorism." Now on 3
January 2018, as UN Secretary
General Antonio Guterres
continues his censorship
and refusal to answer Press
questions on Syria and corruption,
another Pompeo call with
Samuelsen, this time read out
by Deputy Spokesperson Robert
Palladino: "Secretary of State
Michael R. Pompeo spoke by
phone today with Danish
Foreign Minister Anders
Samuelsen. They
discussed Denmark’s
contributions to Operation
Inherent Resolve. The
Secretary thanked Foreign
Minister Samuelsen for
Denmark’s outstanding
cooperation in the
international effort to defeat
the Islamic State of Iraq and
Syria across the globe." US
Treasury Secretary Steve
Mnuchin together with Pompeo
held a short US "Foreign Press
Center" briefing on November 5
about the new Iran sanctions
that went into effect at
midnight, the identities of
the jurisdictions given
waivers were public: China,
India, Italy, Greece, Japan,
South Korea, Taiwan and
Turkey. There were calls for
SWIFT to entirely disconnect
Iranian banks. Mnuchin and
Pompeo took very few
questions. The first was about
President Donald Trump's Game
of Thrones / "Sanctions Are
Coming" tweet. Another was
from Qatar funded Al Jazeera
English's UN
correspondent, who traveled
down from New York to ask how
Iran is worse than Saudi
Arabia. (Typically, the word
blockade was not used. The UN
of SG Antonio Guterres
fastened on Inner City Press'
June 19 criticism of Guterres'
spokesman Stephane Dujarric
spoonfeeding to Al Jazeera a
private briefing about the US
leaving the Human Rights
Council as a basis
to have Inner City Press roughed
up and still banned).
Later on November 5 Iran sent
a letter to Guterres
concluding, "The irresponsible
conduct of the United States
necessitates a collective
response by the international
community in order to uphold
the rule of law, to prevent
undermining diplomacy and to
protect multilateralism. The
United Nations and its Member
States, in accordance with the
Charter of the United Nations
and the international law,
should resist against these
wrongful acts and hold the
United States accountable for
such acts. It shall be
reiterated that the Security
Council in the resolution
2231, that was adopted
unanimously, called upon all
Member States, regional
organizations and
international organizations to
support the implementation of
the JCPOA and to refrain from
actions that undermine it.
I should be grateful if you
would have the present letter
circulated as a document of
the Security Council as well
as a document of the General
Assembly under Agenda items
66, 72 and 86.
Please accept, Excellency, the
assurances of my highest
consideration.
Gholamali Khoshroo, Permanent
Representative
H.E. Mr. Antonio Guterres,
Secretary-General." Back
on November 2 much of the talk
was about what the SWIFT
messaging system can and
cannot do under the sanctions.
Mnuchin, who used to preside
over OneWest Bank, said that
SWIFT should be very careful.
He predicted the European
Union's work-around will not
do any significant
transactions; it was clarified
that none of the eight
jurisdictions getting waivers
on Monday is the EU overall
and its 28 members. Pompeo,
asked of regime change, cited
Qasem Soleimani and said the
goal is to change Iran's
behavior. There will be 700
names put on the sanctions
list on Monday: 400 old and
300 new. And what if anything
will the UN Security Council,
headed this month by China's
Ma Zhaoxu, do? Even hindered
by UNSG Antonio Guterres,
Inner City Press will be
covering it all. Watch this
site. Following the
extradition from Germany to
Belgium of Asadollah
Assadi, "an
Iranian
official
working under
diplomatic
cover,"
US Secretary of State Pompeo
issued a statement, while
still no action from his US
Mission to the UN on the
revelation to imprisoned UN
bribery suspect Patrick Ho of
China Energy Fund Committee
also worked to evade Iran
sanctions, see below.
Here is Pompeo's statement:
"Authorities in Germany
announced yesterday the
extradition of Asadollah
Assadi, an Iranian official
working under diplomatic
cover, to Belgium for his role
in the disrupted Iranian
terrorist plot to bomb a
political rally near Paris,
France on June 30. The
scale of this plot, which
involved arrests of numerous
suspects across Europe –
including in Belgium, France,
and Germany – reminds us that
Iran remains the world’s
leading state sponsor of
terrorism. This plot
also lays bare Iran’s
continued support of terrorism
throughout Europe. We
support our European allies in
exposing and countering the
threat that Iranian-backed
terrorism poses around the
world. The United States
will continue working with our
partners and allies to
confront the threat posed by
the Iranian regime." Four
months after the arrest for UN bribery of former
Senegalese foreign minister
Cheik Gadio and Patrick Ho,
the head of China Energy Fund
Committee full funded by CEFC
China Energy, his ultimate
boss at CEFC Ye Jianming was
brought in for questioning in
China. Now in October 2018
court filings in the
prosecution make it clear how
corrupt the UN is, and why it
has banned Inner City Press
which reports on it: Ho bribed
not one but two Presidents of
the General Assembly, and
brokered weapons not only to
Chad but also Qatar, whose Al
Jazeera got the exclusive of
Guterres' selection as SG and
after getting spoonfed by
Guterres' spokesman Stephane
Dujarric on June 19
collaborated to get Inner City
Press roughed up and banned
since by Guterres' corrupt UN.
And STILL Guterres,
whose son does UNdisclosed
business in Angola, Namibia,
Sao Tomo and Cabo Verde, has
not even started an audit,
only roughed up the Press and
banned it now for 93 days.
From this week's filing:
"Evidence of Transactions with
Iran The evidence of the
defendant’s interest in and
willingness to broker
transactions in or with Iran
principally consists of
emails, spanning a
multiple-year period. To
choose a few examples: In
October 2014, the defendant
sent his assistant an email
stating, “I am going to BJ
[i.e., Beijing] this Friday to
see [the Chairman of CEFC NGO
and CEFC China] on Sat
afternoon. The documents I
want to send him before hand
in separate items are: . . .
7. Iranian connection
(brief).”4 On the same date,
the defendant sent his
assistant another email,
attaching a document, which
stated, in pertinent part: 7)
Iranian Connection . . . Iran
has money in a Bank in china
which s under sanction. Iran
wishes to purchase precious
metal with this money. The
precious metal is available
through a Bank in HK which
cannot accept money from the
Bank in China which holds the
money but is under sanction.
The Iranian agent is looking
for a Chinese company acting
as a middle man in such
transactions and will pay
commission. (details to be
presented orally) The Iranian
connection has strong urge to
establish trading relationship
with us in oil and products .
. . . The following year, in
June 2015, the defendant
received an email that stated,
in pertinent part: “The
Iranian team will arrive in BJ
. . . . See the attached.” The
attachment referenced in the
email was a PowerPoint
presentation entitled
“Presentation to Potential
Partners Iran Petroleum
Investments.” The next day,
the defendant forwarded the
email to his assistant,
stating, “For writing report
to [the Chairman of CEFC NGO
and CEFC China].”
The following year, in June
2016, the defendant emailed
another individual,
blindcopying
his assistant, and stated, in
pertinent part, “Will get [two
executives of CEFC China] to
meet with [oil executive at
company with operations in
Iran] in BJ, and [another
individual] also on another
occasion if he comes. You can
start organizing these. . . .
Other matters ftf [i.e., face
to face].” And also "an email
exchange in which Gadio asked
the defendant: “Do you think
CEFC can intervene with the
Chinese state to get an
urgent, extremely confidential
and significant military
weapon assistance to our
friend [the President of Chad]
who has engaged in the battle
of his life against the devils
of Bokko Haram?,” to which the
defendant replied, “Your
important message has been
forwarded. It is being given
the highest level of
consideration. Will inform you
once I hear back.”
The defendant also sought to
and did broker arms
transactions unrelated to the
Chad and
Uganda schemes charged in this
case. For example: In March
2015, an individual sent the
defendant an email, stating,
“I have the list and end user
agreement. Pls advise next
step.” On the same day, the
defendant replied, in
pertinent part, “Find a way to
pass them onto me and we can
execute that right away[].”
The individual replied,
“Attached. [W]e have the
funding and processing
mechanisms in place. If it
works nice there will be much
more. Also for S. Sudan.” The
attachment to this email was a
document entitled “End User
Certificate,” certifying that
the user of the goods in
question would be the Ministry
of Defense of the Republic of
Libya. The goods listed on the
document included numerous
arms. The following month, the
defendant sent an email that
stated in pertinent part: “It
so turns out Qatar also needs
urgently a list of toys from
us. But for the same reason we
had for Libya, we cannot sell
directly to them. Is there a
way you could act as an
intermediary in both cases?”
The person whom the defendant
emailed replied: “Qatar good
chance bc there is no embargo.
Libya is another case bc going
against an embargo is tricky.”
The defendant responded:
“Qatar needs new toys quite
urgently. Their chief is
coming to China and we hope to
give them a piece of good
news. Please confirm soonest.”
This is outrageous, that an
NGO still accredited under
Guterres was selling weapons
into South South, Libya and
Qatar. Resign. And, on
multiple PGAs: "among the
individuals whom the defendant
[Patrick Ho] is charged with
bribing is Sam Kutesa, the
Ugandan Foreign Minister. The
Government expects that the
evidence will show that the
corrupt relationship between
the defendant and Kutesa
developed between in or about
September 2014 and September
2015, when Kutesa was serving
as the PGA (specifically, the
PGA for the 69th session of
the UN General Assembly). The
evidence, in both the form of
emails and a recorded phone
call, also shows that, just
as he did with respect to
Kutesa when he was the PGA,
the defendant sought to
cultivate a
business relationship with
Kutesa’s predecessor, John
Ashe, who served as the PGA
between in
or about September 2013 and
September 2014. As he did with
Kutesa, the defendant began by
introducing himself to Ashe as
the Secretary-General of CEFC
NGO. And just as he did with
Kutesa when he served as the
PGA, the defendant invited
Ashe to visit CEFC NGO in Hong
Kong and to speak at various
events.
In mid-April 2014, Ashe
traveled to Hong Kong and met
with the defendant and others.
After the trip, Ashe’s aide
sent a letter to the defendant
thanking the Chairman of CEFC
NGO (who was also the Chairman
of CEFC China) for the
contribution of $50,000 to
support the PGA. The aide had
solicited the contribution
from the defendant prior to
the Hong Kong trip, and the
defendant had confirmed that
CEFC NGO would make the
contribution.
In or about early June 2014,
the defendant requested that
Ashe officiate over a forum
that
CEFC NGO was planning to hold
at the UN, and also attend and
officiate over a luncheon at
the UN the following day. (The
defendant made virtually the
same request of Kutesa once he
became the PGA.) The day
before the forum (July 6,
2014), the defendant emailed
two business associates of
Ashe, who assisted him in
raising funds, to invite them
to the forum and luncheon and
to request their assistance in
“urg[ing] the PGA to grace the
occasion with his presence and
to deliver a short remark.”
On or about the same day, the
defendant and one of these
associates (“Associate-1”)
spoke by phone. (See Ex. A
(draft transcript).) During
the call, which was recorded,
the
defendant confirmed that he
wanted Ashe to attend his
event. The following
conversation then took place:
Associate-1: So the last
question, so sorry if I ask
too direct. . . . [H]ave you,
made some
contribution to him . . . ?
The defendant: Yeah, we
already paid.
Associate-1: Oh you did?
OkayThe defendant: Well, not a
whole lot but it’s—it’s okay.
On a couple of occasions. But
I
think the major contribution
will come in after we talk
about what he can—what he can
help us with.
Associate-1: What you—what you
mean major contribution? It’s
after he return uh—
leave the job?
The defendant: Yes, yes.
. . .
Associate-1: Wonderful . . .
okay.
The defendant: That’s not
a—that’s not a problem. The
problem is—uh, it’s give and
take.
Associate-1: Give and take.
That’s—of course. This is
the—this is business, right?
The defendant: Yeah, right.
2 These two business
associates subsequently
pleaded guilty to bribing
Ashe, based on
conduct unrelated to the
defendant and CEFC. Ashe was
charged with tax offenses
arising from
his allegedly failing to
disclose bribe payments as
income. He passed away before
trial, and the
charges against him were
therefore dismissed." We'll
have more on this. On July 19,
the lawyers for Patrick Ho,
led by Benjamin Rosenberg of
Dechert LLP, argued before
U.S. District Judge Loretta
Preska that count after count
of the indicts should be
dismissed. Edward Kim of
Krieger Kim & Lewin LLP
tried to get Ho's emails and
text messages suppressed,
without success. On August 9,
Ho's appeal to the Second
Circuit Court of Appeals to
get out on bail was again
denied. Now the
prosecution,
opposing yet
another Ho
bail
application,
has written:
"Gadio has
been meeting with
the Government
for some time
and he is
expected to
testify at
trial pursuant
to a recently
executed non-prosecution
agreement.
And far from
weakening the
case, Gadio’s
testimony will provide
substantial
evidence of
the
defendant’s
guilt. As
the defendant
is well-aware
from a written
disclosure
made by the
Government
more than
four months
ago, Gadio is
expected to
testify, in
sum and among
other things,
that (i) the defendant
provided $2
million in
cash,
concealed
within a gift
box, to the
President of
Chad in connection
with a
business
meeting in
Chad in or
about December
2014, (ii) the
President
refused to
accept this
obvious bribe,
which Gadio
understood was
connected to
the
defendant’s
interest in business
opportunities
in Chad, and
(iii) the
defendant
thereafter
drafted a
letter to the
President, purporting
to pledge this
$2 million to
charitable
causes, but
the defendant
appeared to
have no interest
in doing
charitable
works in Chad,
and indeed,
the defendant
never asked
Gadio about
the status
of the
purported
“donation” or
made any other
reference to
the subject.
(See Def. Ltr.
Ex. A.) This
expected
testimony
considerably
strengthens
the
Government’s
proof beyond
the
already-strong
case reflected
in the
detailed
Complaint. The
Complaint
explained
that,
following a
December 2014
business
meeting in
Chad, the
defendant
drafted a
letter
pledging a $2
million so-called
“donation” to
“the people of
Chad at [the
President of
Chad’s]
personal
disposal to support
[his] social
and other
programs as
[he] see[s]
fit.” (Compl.
¶ 28(a).) The
Complaint did not,
however,
explain
whether—and at
what point—any
money was
actually paid.
Gadio’s expected
testimony
makes clear
that, in fact,
the defendant
provided $2
million in
cash directly
to the
President,
concealed
within a gift
box, and that
the pledge
letter was
drafted after
the bribe had
already been
offered. Thus,
the evidence
of the defendant’s
intent to
bribe the
President of
Chad is,
on the whole,
much more
robust in
light of
Gadio’s
expected
testimony." On
September
24, a letter
from May was disclosed: UN
accredited
executive of
an NGO still
in ECOSOC handed
Deby of Chad
$2 million in a
box, for oil.
This is the
UN, which
won't even
audit this
scandal. Guterres
is corruption
- and on September
26 even banned
Inner City
Press which reports on
this from a
human rights
event. We'll
have more on
this. On
September 15,
the day after
Ho's
co-defendant
Cheik Gadio
had the case
against him
dropped by
Prosecutor
Douglas
Zolkind, who
ask worked to
convict Ng Lap
Seng using
testimony of
apparently
still free
Francis
Lorenzo.
Sean Hecker, a lawyer for Mr.
Gadio said that “Dr. Gadio
looks forward to continuing to
cooperate with U.S.
authorities." But when Agence
France Presse reported it, as
picked
up in the media in
Nigeria, it was "Gadio Is
Cleared." Is that how they
report, for example, Manafort?
It is, you see, a serious UN
bribery case, even as UN
Secretary General Antonio
Guterres not only does not
start an audit of who else has
been bribed by CEFC and Ho,
but audaciously ousts,
roughs up and imposes a
ban on -- extended on
August 17 to
life
or at least #UNGA73 when
representatives of China and
Chad, Uganda and Senegal will
be in the UN -- the only
media, Inner City Press, which
asks him about it. Instead his
team solicits the same trolls
army as before, to monitor and
leak files to try to
post-facto justify Guterres'
censorship. This is
corruption, to the heart of
the UN. The trial of the still
incarcerated Ho begins in
November. Somewhere, one
imagines, UN PGA Sam Kutesa
worries, Chadian head of state
Idriss Deby less so. And the
UN of Antonio Guterres,
implicated, doesn't even audit
who at the UN took CEFC's
money, preferring instead to
rough up, oust and ban the
Press which asks. Fox
News story here,
GAP blogs I
and II,
Independent here.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Past (and future?)
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047,
Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|