By
Matthew
Russell Lee,
Exclusive
UNITED
NATIONS, July
24 -- The work of
the UN's
Somalia
Eritrea
Monitoring
Group is
taking fire
from all sides,
but the United
States and
United
Kingdom do not
want the
Security
Council to
state this.
In
closed door
consultations,
a short
statement was
proposed that
"some
delegations"
expressed
concern about
methodology,
reliability
and "validity
of
information."
Inner City
Press has
obtained a
copy of the draft
press elements
that the US
and UK
rejected, and
is putting it
online here.
As a proponent
said, if you
want
transparency,
there should
be
transparency
about Council
members' positions
on reports.
Inner
City Press
heard that UK
Permanent
Representative
Mark Lyall
Grant
admitted in
consultations
that the SMEG
report was
"not
brilliant,"
and so went to
ask him about
it. Lyall
Grant told
Inner City
Press that he
had meant that
since the
Group could
not get
into Eritrea,
it could not
be brilliant.
Since
the Somalia
report
directly
alleges that
the US and the
United
Nations have
violated the
sanctions
regime,
and implies it
of the UK,
Inner City
Press asked
Lyall Grant
about that. He
said it was
good
that the Group
was critical,
and that the
UK had "some
response,"
that he didn't
know off hand.
As
Inner City
Press reported
yesterday,
"the UK among
other things
brought in
weapons for
its private
security
provider, G4S
Security
Services."
Reuters, of
course, in its
breathless
spin of the
report did not
mention this.
We
have previously
noted that
since Reuters
bureau chief
Louis
Charbonneau
has been
conclusively
shown to have
leaked to a UN
official an
anti-Press
document that
was labeled
and promised
to be
internal to
the ostensibly
independent UN
Correspondents
Association,
him reporting
leaks that go
the other way
must be seen
in that
context.
See document
here, story
here, audio
of Charbonneau
here.
Reuters
did
report
on one
country's
disagreement
with the
Somalia report
--
Norway's. It
did that
without any
analysis.
In fact, as
Inner City
Press reported
at the time,
when Norway
paid for
Kenya's "Law
of
the Sea"
filing to get
some of
Somalia's sea
rights,
many in
Somalia
surmised it
was not
unrelated to
StatOil.
Now even the
SEMG
says it;
Norway
disagrees and
Reuters,
supposedly a
financially
savvy
wire service,
prints it
without
analysis.
Savvy indeed.
Watch this
site.