At
UN, Bolivia's Morales Hits Obama "Blackmail" and Lack
of Change, "Sign Kyoto"
By
Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, May 8 -- "Maybe the color of the skin of the U.S.
President has changed," Bolivian President Evo Morales told the
Press on Friday, "but nothing else has changed." Video
here,
from Minute 47:45.
Inner City Press asked Morales about reports
in the Latin American press that the U.S. had "blackmailed"
Bolivia and Ecuador by cutting off aid for not signing the Copenhagen
Accord on climate change. Video here,
from Minute 26:24.
Morales
confirmed
that "Ecuador lost $2 million, and Bolivia lost $3 million,"
but said these were more than made up for by money from Venezuela and
Brazil. "They took away the Millennium Account," he said.
"We don't have any trade preferences any more. But we're better
off than before."
Last
month Morales
convened an alternative Copenhagen meeting in Cochabamba, Bolivia.
Morales contrasts the non-binding Copenhagen Accord with the previous
binding Kyoto protocol. On Friday he said the U.S. is "making a
mistake" by cutting aid, that they could cooperate if the U.S.
just "signed the Kyoto Protocol."
Evo Morales at UN, change he can believe in not shown
To
Cochabamba, the
UN sent its Under Secretary General for Latin America, Alicia
Barcena, to attend. She was reportedly booed as she read a statement
from Ban Ki-moon, then offered "if you don't want us here, then
we will withdraw ... we also represent peoples."
Inner
City Press
asked Morales if, as requested in connection with the Cochabamba
"cumbre," he had raised the
issue of the U.S. blackmail to
UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, and if so what Ban had said.
Morales did not answer this part of the question.
Since Ban is
focused on obtaining a second term, which could be blocked by the
U.S., France, UK, Russia or China, it is unlikely he would issue any
criticism of the U.S., even about cutting off aid to countries like
Bolivia and Ecuador. Millennium Development Goals, indeed.
One
issue that was
raised in the Morales group's meeting with Ban was the upcoming
naming of a new head of the UNFCCC, to lead the UN climate change
talks into Cancun. Last week Inner City Press reported, based on tips
from well placed Ambassadors, that the UN's short list of four
consists of the candidates from Costa Rica, India, South Africa and
Hungary. The last is an inside candidate who already works for Ban
Ki-moon, Janos Pasztor, who has recused himself from much of his work
while seeking the UNFCCC post. We'll see.
Footnote: given Evo
Morales' direct attack on Barack Obama, in a televised and well
attended UN press conference, one might have expected the US Mission to
the UN to have issued some response. (Recent questions posed to the US
Mission, about Ambassador Susan Rice not going on this week's Security
Council trip to the Congo for example, have done unanswered.) But so
far, there's been no statement from the US. We'll see.
* * *
At UN, Ahmadinejad
Defends Iran's Treatment of Women, Mocks Obama & Ban Ki-moon
By
Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, May 4 -- When Iran dropped its candidacy for a seat on the
UN Human Rights Council last month, some described it as restoring at
least some credibility to the UN, as when Bosnia stepped in and beat
out Belarus for a seat two years ago.
But
when Inner
City Press asked President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad about Iran's
successful replacement candidacy, for a seat on the UN Commission on
the Status of Women, despite gender discrimination and repression,
Ahmadinejad had a different and lengthy answer.
He
said the switch
was procedural, that Iran had always wanted the CSW seat more than
the Human Rights Council, which within the Asia Group Pakistan was
supposed to run for. Due to a misunderstanding, Ahmadinejad said,
Iran temporarily made a grab for the HRC, before returning to the
seat promised to it, on the Commission on the Status of Women.
But
how does Iran
intend to use the seat, Inner City Press asked, since it has refused
to sign the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against
Women? We will never sign that, Ahmadinejad vowed. He went to on
paint of picture of "love and complementariness" in Iran.
Women
won't do
menial jobs in Iran, he said, nothing "like you and me, cleaning
the street or driving a truck." He said he had read that 70% of
married women in Europe suffer physical abuse, but refuse to complain
for fear of losing their families. Women are better off, he
concluded, in Iran than in Europe.
UN's Ban and Ahmadinejad, human rights not shown
Ahmadinejad's
answers came during a more than one hour long press conference held
Tuesday across the street from the UN. The room in the Millennium
Hotel was full, with journalists from the Daily News, Washington Post
and wires, and even Christiane Amanpour (who was not called on).
The
moderator had
taken a list of reporters who wanted to ask question, which Inner
City Press arrive too late to sign. But having covered Iran's Nowruz
receptions -- "be more positive next time," the Iranian
mission admonished, leading Inner City Press to ask "or what?"
-- the moderator nodded and allowed the question.
In
fact, many
journalists remarked that Ahmadinejad's press conference was more
open and democratic than those of UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon,
or the pre-screened
stakeout by Hillary Clinton the previous day.
There, the US State Department decided in advance which questions to
take. At Iran's event, alongside some very pro Tehran question,
questions were taken about for example the reports of North Korean
weapons intercepted on their way to Iran.
We
don't need
weapons from them, Ahmadinejad answered. If America finds and seizes
such weapons they can keep them. Regarding Ban Ki-moon, Ahmadinejad
said that if the UN were in Tehran and Iran had a Security Council
veto, Ban would never have spoken as he did on Monday. Asked
repeatedly about sanctions, he said that if they go through, it will
mean that US President Obama has "submitted" and been taken
control of by a gang. This order, he said, will soon collapse.
But
what of those
arrested and disappeared after the contested elections? Ahmadinejad
did not answer that question, fastening instead on the women's rights
part of the question. Whether the Iranian mission will in the future
allow such questions to be asked, and even answered, remains to be
seen.
Click
here
for an Inner City Press YouTube channel video, mostly UN Headquarters
footage, about civilian
deaths
in Sri Lanka.
Click here for Inner City
Press' March 27 UN debate
Click here for Inner City
Press March 12 UN (and AIG
bailout) debate
Click here for Inner City
Press' Feb 26 UN debate
Click
here
for Feb.
12 debate on Sri Lanka http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17772?in=11:33&out=32:56
Click here for Inner City Press' Jan.
16, 2009 debate about Gaza
Click here for Inner City Press'
review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate
Click here for Inner
City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger
Click here from Inner City Press'
December 12 debate on UN double standards
Click here for Inner
City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN
Office: S-453A, UN, NY 10017
USA
Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's
mobile (and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com -
|