Inner City Press
Federal Reserve Report - January 10, 2005
Whats
missing here? In a speech to the American Economic Association in Philadelphia,
Governor Bernanke intoned that "The challenge for bank supervisors is to ensure the
safety and soundness of banking institutions -- that is, to minimize moral hazard and to
protect the deposit insurance -- without inhibiting economically valuable activities or
technological innovation by banks. What
about consumer protection? Or even, anti-money laundering?
As the Federal Reserve considers PNCs
Riggs application, the following, from the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette of January 6, may be
relevant: PNC spokesman Brian Goerke and Riggs spokesman Mark Hendrix declined
comment on a Washington Post report yesterday that Riggs was close to resolving its issues
with the Justice Department, which is conducting a criminal probe of the bank.... Analysts
had not heard of a pending Riggs settlement. But one said revelations that the bank had
significant ties with the CIA increases the chances of such a settlement. The Wall Street
Journal disclosed the relationship last week, citing U.S. officials and people familiar
with the bank's operation. That changes the whole picture dramatically, said
Dick Bove of Hoefer & Arnett. If the government was in fact the reason this bank
was doing a lot of the things it did, then the government is on the hook. The
purported link between Riggs and the CIA sent Riggs shares up 7 percent on Friday.
Lets get this straight: the stocks
goes up on news of the CIA link? Because it
makes a bank-regulatory cover-up more likely? But the Federal Reserve Board, to which
Inner City Press/Fair Finance Watch has timely commented on PNC-Riggs, should note: the
judicial process against Pinochet in Chile is moving forward (click
here for ICPs update on
this), so a cover-up here in El Norte may be for
naught, even, embarrassing.
Šopyright 2006 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editors [at] innercitypress.com - phone: (718) 716-3540