Before
Molotov Cocktails Rahman Interview Now
Support Letter $87000 Raised Before June
23 2CIR
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Soundcloud
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- FreePress?
FEDERAL
COURTHOUSE, June 19 –
Amid protests about the murder
of George Floyd, late on May
30 the U.S. Attorney for the
Eastern District of New York
got a complaint signed
by Magistrate Judge
Sanket J. Bulsara about a
Molotov cocktail attack on an
NYPD vehicle.
Inner City Press,
which covered the protests in
Foley Square and at One Police
Plaza on May 29 (video here
and edited here),
and aftermath
on Fifth Avenue on May
30, publishes the
complaint (later-written song
on Soundcloud).
On
June 5 the
Second Circuit
Court of Appeals heard
the
government's
appeal of the
release of
Mattis and
Rahman. Inner
City Press
live tweeted
it, here,
and see below.
Now on June 19
the prosecutors'
reply brief
says that
"Rahman gave a
video-taped
interview
earlier in the
evening of the
firebombing,
during which
she stated,
among other
things: “This
s–t won’t ever
stop unless we
f–kin’ take it
all down,” “I
think the
mayor should
have done that
[held back the
NYPD], because
if he really
cared about
his police
officers, he
should have
realized that
it’s not worth
them getting
hurt,” and
“This has got
to stop. And
the only way
they hear, the
only way they
hear us is
through
violence,
through the
means that
they use.” The
video is here,
from 4 hour
30 minutes.
A
letter is
being circulated
supporting
Rahman, with
more than 230
signatures,
and a
fundraiser
with $87,000
up from
$79,000
only the
night before:
"An Open
Letter from
the Fordham
Law Community
concerning
Urooj Rahman
‘15 and Colin
Mattis: As
current
Fordham Law
students,
student
organizations,
faculty, staff
and alumni, we
write to
express our
deep dismay
with the
federal
government’s
aggressive
charging and
pursuit of the
pre-trial
detention of
Urooj Rahman,
a 2015 Fordham
Law graduate,
and Colinford
(“Colin”)
Mattis. Urooj
and Colin are
attorneys of
color and
respected
community
members who
were arrested
on May 30,
2020 while
protesting the
murder of
George Floyd
and systemic
anti-Black
police
brutality. On
that day,
Urooj and
Colin took
part in an
unprecedented
national and
global
uprising that
comprised
hundreds of
thousands of
people.
Throughout
this uprising,
we have
witnessed the
Trump
Administration’s
attempts to
distract from
the reality of
police
brutality.
This includes
President
Trump’s
conspiracy
theories about
Martin Gugino,
the 75-year
old protestor
who was
hospitalized
after being
assaulted by
Buffalo police
officers; and
his
tear-gassing
of protestors
for a photo
opportunity in
front of the
White House.
The
disproportionate
prosecution of
Urooj and
Colin is
another
iteration of
the Trump
administration’s
attempt to
detract from
police
violence in
the US. And
indeed,
Rahman, a
Pakistani
Muslim
immigrant and
Mattis, a
young Black
man, are
convenient
scapegoats
given this
country’s
deeply
entrenched and
violent
history of
anti-Black
racism and
Islamophobia.
We believe
that the
Department of
Justice’s
prosecution
and efforts to
incarcerate
Urooj and
Colin are a
gross
overreach of
federal law
enforcement
power, and an
attempt to
stifle and
delegitimize
dissent
against police
brutality.
Urooj and
Colin are
facing charges
of attempting
to burn an
unoccupied and
already
damaged NYPD
vehicle during
nationwide
protests.
There is no
indication
that anyone
was in the
immediate
vicinity when
they allegedly
committed
these acts. ...
Urooj has long
been engaged
in advocacy on
the
over-policing
of Black and
Brown
communities in
New York,
particularly
around the
targeting and
over-surveillance
of Muslims
after 9/11.
She is a
graduate of
Fordham
College and
Fordham Law
School. As a
law student,
Urooj
co-directed an
LGBTQI human
rights
defender
training in
Cape Town,
South Africa.
She also
worked to
assist and
advocate for
refugees
fleeing to
Turkey,
providing
direct
services to
asylum seekers
in Istanbul.
In her final
year, Urooj
championed the
preservation
of our
constitutional
protections
through her
work at the
Center for
Constitutional
Rights and
Fordham Law’s
Center for
National
Security. As
an attorney,
Urooj worked
at Bronx Legal
Services,
providing
legal
representation
for low-income
tenants in
housing court.
Urooj is a
loving
daughter,
sister, aunt,
and friend.
She lives with
and cares for
her elderly
mother in Bay
Ridge,
Brooklyn where
she grew
up.
Like Urooj,
Colin is a
devoted
advocate for
Black and
Latinx youth,
and his
commitment to
race equity
has profoundly
enriched the
communities he
is a part of.
In 2019, Colin
was recognized
by Her Justice
for his
outstanding
pro bono
advocacy for
low-income
women. Outside
of work and
after the
recent death
of his mother,
Colin has
taken on the
responsibility
of raising
three young
foster
siblings and
has provided
for his family
with emotional
and financial
support.
We, the
undersigned,
stand in
solidarity
with Urooj and
Colin and call
on the federal
government to
drop these
politically
motivated
charges and
its aggressive
pursuit of
detention
without bail.
Two
well-respected
federal judges
both decided
that Urooj and
Colin should
safely await
trial in their
communities.
The federal
government
should not be
allowed to use
this
prosecution as
a weapon to
silence the
voices of
those
demanding the
change that
this country
so desperately
needs."
On June
5 Inner City
Press noted even
that
that the
forthcoming decision
might turn on
EDNY District
Judge Brodie's
failure to
mention the
applicable
presumption.
Now
after 5 pm on
June 5, this
remand: "The
Government
moves for a
stay, pending
appeal, of the
district
court’s order
releasing
Defendants-Appellees
on bond,
subject to
conditions
including home
detention and
electronic
monitoring. It
is hereby
ORDERED that
the stay
motion is
GRANTED.
Whether to
grant a stay
is “an
exercise of
judicial
discretion”
that requires
consideration
of the
relevant
factors,
including,
most
critically,
the likelihood
of success on
the merits and
irreparable
harm to the
movant absent
a stay. Nken
v. Holder, 556
U.S. 418,
433–34 (2009)
(quoting
Virginian Ry.
Co. v. United
States, 272
U.S. 658, 672
(1926)). The
United States
Marshals are
directed to
take
Defendants
into custody
forthwith.
Defendants
shall be
detained
pending
further order
of this Court.
It is further
ORDERED that
the appeal
shall be
expedited."
Full order on
Patreon here.
Watch
this site.
Live tweeted thread of appeal argument here.
On
June 2,
the appeal was filed, full
text on
Patreon here.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Past (and future?)
Office at UN:
Room S-303, UN HQ, NY NY 10017
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|