UNITED
NATIONS,
December 10 --
With the
window closing
on a
bill to
improve the US
Freedom of
Information
Act, after
outgoing
Democratic
Senator from
West Virginia
Jay
Rockefeller
put a block on
the bill,
S. 2520 (statement
here),
which he then
removed, now
bank lobbyists
are in the
way.
And STILL
there's been
little
coverage by
media like the
New York Times
and Reuters.
Here
is
the Senate
report,
providing
multiple
assurances to
banks on FOIA
Exemption 8:
"Extreme
care should be
taken with
respect to
disclosure
under
Exemption 8
which protects
matters that
are 'contained
in or related
to
examination,
operating, or
condition
reports
prepared by,
on behalf of,
or for the use
of an agency
responsible
for the
regulation or
supervision of
financial
institutions.'
[FN 20: 5
U.S.C. §
552(b)(8)]
Here is the
official
summary of the
FOIA
Improvement
Act of 2014:
FOIA
Improvement
Act of 2014 -
Amends the
Freedom of
Information
Act (FOIA) to:
(1)
require
federal
agencies to
make agency
records that
can be
disclosed
under such Act
available for
public
inspection in
an electronic
format,
(2)
limit the
authority of
an agency to
charge a fee
if the agency
misses a
deadline for
complying with
a FOIA
request,
(3)
establish a
presumption in
favor of
disclosure and
prohibit the
application of
exemptions
from FOIA
based on
technicalities,
(4)
expand the
authority and
duties of the
Chief FOIA
Officer of
each agency
for promoting
compliance
with the FOIA
disclosure
requirements,
and
(5)
establish a
Chief FOIA
Officers
Council to
develop
recommendations
for increasing
compliance
with FOIA
requirements.
Requires the
head of each
federal agency
to:
(1)
review agency
regulations
and issue
regulations
for the
disclosure of
records in
accordance
with the
amendments to
FOIA made by
this Act, and
(2)
include in
such
regulations
procedures for
engaging in
dispute
resolution
through the
FOIA Public
Liaison and
the Office of
Government
Information
Services.
Expands the
program for
the efficient
management of
federal agency
records to
require agency
heads to
establish
procedures
for:
(1)
identifying
records of
general
interest or
use to the
public that
are
appropriate
for public
disclosure,
and
(2)
posting such
records in a
publicly-accessible
electronic
format.
Prohibits the
authorization
of additional
funds to carry
out the
requirements
of this Act.
Now,
even after
Senator Rockefeller
under pressure
removed his
block and then
the House is
lobbied not to
take it up, where
is the
coverage, for
example in the
New York Times
and
Reuters?
Back in July,
US Voice of
America as
propaganda was
belatedly
covered by the
Times, but
ignoring the
role of VOA
and its
Broadcasting
Board of
Governors as
censors,
trying for
example to get
the
investigative
Press thrown
out of the
United Nations
(where it and
the Free
UN Coalition
for the Access
are pushing
for a FOIA for
the UN. At
the UN,
Reuters is in
the business
of censoring
information,
such as its
"for the
record"
complaint to
the UN trying
to get the
investigative
Press thrown
out, via
ChillingEffects.org,
here.)
The Times
covered the
House of
Representative
bill which
Inner City
Press panned
in April,
focusing on a
split between
the union and
some who work
at VOA.
Alongside the
draft US law
to further
make "clear
that the Voice
of America
mission is to
support U.S.
public
diplomacy
efforts,"
there are
still claims
that VOA
currently is
more
independent
than this.
At the United
Nations, this
has hardly
been the case.
Significantly,
Voice of
America not
only at the UN
but from its
Washington
headquarters,
in a formal
complaint
submitted to
the current UN
spokesman
by editor
Steve Redisch
with the
approval of
supervisor
David Ensor,
asked the UN
to "review the
accreditation"
of the
investigative
Press, click
here for that.