France
Calls Bongo's Gabon Satisfactory, Its Oil Not Crucial, Guinea to
Council?
By
Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, September 29 -- With the son of long time Gabonese strongman
Omar Bongo having already been congratulated by French President
Nicolas Sarkozy for his victory in a now contested election, French
economic interests have been the target of protests in Port Gentil.
Tuesday at the UN, Inner City Press asked France's Secretary of State
for Cooperation and Francophony Alain Joyandet for his the Sarkozy
administration's view of the court challenges to Ali Bongo's
election, and about Total. Video here,
from Minute 14:28.
Joyandet
answered
that the constitution was "fully respected," the election
"only suffered from a few weaknesses or irregularities,"
and that "the institutional situation is satisfactory and we are
pleased with it." Maybe this explains the protests?
He argued
that Bongo pere gave "forty
years of stability."About Total,
Joyandet said that Gabon only represents three percent of its oil
supply "so Gabon is not strategically crucial." One wanted to ask about
Total in Burma / Myanmar, but Joyandet's focus is
Africa.
When
challenged
about the son taking over from a father widely accused of corruption,
Joyandet answered that "there are other democracies where the
son has followed the father... we're in a country where it happened."
M. Joyandet at
the UN in 2008, Bongos not shown
On Guinea,
where the death toll of protesters has risen past 150, Joyandet said
that his foreign minister Bernard Kouchner has called
for a meeting with other European countries, that ECOWAS should take
the lead but he expects the issue to be raised at the United Nations.
We'll see.
Footnote:
on Cote d'Ivoire, Joyandet said that UN envoy Choi has said that the
obstacles to an election at the end of November are only technical,
not political. Joyandet said, in essence, this is the last change for
Cote d'Ivoire and Laurent Gbagbo. Unanswered was: or what?
Guinea
Speaks at UN as Junta Kills 69 in Conakry, First Avenue Echoes
By
Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, September 28 -- As those in the UN General Assembly listened
to the foreign minister of Guinea-Conakry give a speech ranging from
his military regime's preference for Morocco over Western Saharan,
China over Taiwan, in Conakry his government shot and killed at least
69 people protesting the dictatorship.
Even just outside the UN's
compound on First Avenue, a throng of Guineans protested, with signs
calling coup leader Captain Moussa Dadis Camara a liar and a killer.
But most of the UN took no notice.
At
the September 28
noon briefing, the spokesman for the President of the General
Assembly was asked about the vote barring another coup leader, that
of Madagascar, from speaking. Inner City Press asked why, by this
logic, other coup leaders couldn't be barred. Video here,
from Minute
19:44.
The
response was
that the Madagascar was was unique, sui generis to re-coin a phrase
from Kosovo. But why?
In
July of this year,
Inner City Press asked
the UN's envoy to Western Africa Said Djinnit
what if anything the UN had done when previous Guinean president
Lansasa Conte used his diplomatic status and immunity to traffic
cocaine to Europe.
Djinnit said
that he had been working with the
leaders of the country, and appeared to blame Lonsana Conte's son(s)
for the coke. But what was the UN doing in the run up to this
bloodbath in Conakry?
Protesters rounded up in Conakry as Guinea speaks at UN, afp
Inner City
Press inquired with the UN
Spokesperson's office an hour after the Guinean speech, asking would
there be some statement coming about about the killings in Guinea?
There's something in the works, Inner City Press was told. Words but
what action? Watch this space.
* * *
On
W. Africa Drugs, UN Makes Excuses for Guinea's Conte and CNDD Coup
Leaders, No Shame
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
UNITED
NATIONS, July 8 -- As the UN system brags about its work against
illicit drug trafficking in West Africa, questions have arisen about
the UN's engagement with the past and present regimes in Guinea. When
previous president-until-death Lansana Conte died in December 2008,
UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon issued a laudatory statement about
Conte's rule.
Soon thereafter, it emerged that Conte's family used
diplomatic privileges to traffic massive quantities of drugs. On July
8, Inner City Press asked Ban's Special Representative for West
Africa Said Djinnit and UNODC chief Antonio Maria Costa about their
dealings with Conte and the CNDD military coup leaders who have
succeeded him, in light of Ban's statements against Honduras' coup
leaders. Video here,
from Minute 53:03.
Mr.
Djinnit at
first said he didn't understand the question, and then emphasized
that he dealt more with Guinea's prime minister than with Mr. Conte,
who he said was sick. Djinnit confirmed that he engages with the coup
leader CNDD president, who Djinnit says is "committed to deal"
with drugs, although he said the UN "has concerns about how it
is being done." Video here,
from Minute 54:08.
Mr.
Costa
recounted telling Lansana Conte about the drug trafficking of Conte's
son, and then getting a call three hours later from Guinea's prime
minister, who said that Conte himself had called to become better
informed. Like Djinnit, Costa essentially excused Conte for allow the
country's presidency to be used for drug trafficking by saying Conte
was ill, and couldn't control his son. The disparity of the UN's
statements about "coup leaders" in Honduras and its
"flexible" approach to Guinea could not be more stark.
UN's Ban and Said Djinnit: Guinea dictators and
Darfur post not shown
Inner
City Press
also Djinnit, Costa or their two panel members Andrew Hughes, UN
Police Adviser, Department for Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO); and
Harper Boucher, INTERPOL Special Representative to the UN, to comment
on the Liberian Truth and Reconciliation Commission's recommendation
that President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, so praised by the UN, be
removed from public life for 30 years for supporting war lord Charles
Taylor.
The
only response, such as it was, from from Mr. Hughes, who
said he was not the right one to answer. Afterwards, Inner City Press
asked INTERPOL's Mr. Boucher about the freeing of former Kosovar
prime minister Ceku from an Interpol warrant for war crimes by the
flashing of a UN document. Boucher said he wasn't that familiar with
the case, but that it might be "political" You don't say...
* * *
Amid
Liberian Calls to Bar Johnson Sirleaf, UN Says Nothing
Except TRC Not At Risk
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
UNITED
NATIONS, July 8 -- The UN system has praised both the Liberia truth
and reconciliation commission and Liberian president Ellen Johnson
Sirleaf. Now the commission has recommended that Johnson Sirleaf be
barred from public office for thirty years, in part because she
supported indicted war criminal Charles Taylor, including
financially.
Inner City Press on July 7 asked UN Secretary General
Ban Ki-moon's Spokesperson Michele Montas if Mr. Ban or the UN
Mission in Liberia have any response to the recommendation, given
both the UN's central role in Liberia and Sierra Leone and previous
statements about Ms. Johnson Sirleaf. It is up to the Liberians,"
Ms. Montas said, "not for the UN to decide." Video here,
from Minute 16:56.
From
the UN's
transcript:
Inner
City Press: The Liberian Truth and Reconciliation Commission has
recommended that President [Ellen] Johnson-Sirleaf be barred from
public office for 30 years for having supported Charles Taylor,
including economically. Does the… given the central role in
Liberia and Sierra Leone, what does the UN think of this
recommendation?
Spokesperson
Montas: This is a report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission
of Liberia, and the UN mission in Liberia (UNMIL) has received the
draft of the Commission’s report. It will be up to the Liberians
to determine how they want to take forward the reconciliation
process. It is not for the UN to decide; it is for the Liberians to
decide.
Inner
City Press: What about the issue… because I have seen a lot of UN
statements very laudatory of President Johnson-Sirleaf. She has
acknowledged apparently giving $10,000 to Charles Taylor rebels at
the time. Does that change the UN’s opinion at all?
Spokesperson
Montas: I will not comment on this.
But
the UN,
particularly the UN Development Program, has supported Johnson
Sirleaf including in her campaigns. Given reports that she gave
$10,000 to Taylor's forces, which recruited child soldiers and cut
off limps, shouldn't the UN have something to say now?
UN's Ban and Ms. Johnson Sirleaf, TRC finding
of support of Charles Taylor not shown
Inner
City Press
asked UN envoy to West African Said Djinnet, was briefing the
Security Council on Tuesday morning, what he thought of the
recommendation. Mr. Djinit declined to comment, noting that there is
a UN Mission in Liberia, UNMIL. Inner City Press then asked Djinnit
directly about what Inner City Press has quoted an African Ambassador
as saying, that the UN offered Djinnit as a possible replacement for
Rodolphe Adada in Darfur. Djinnit laughed and pointed at his ear.
On
July 8, Inner
City Press asked Ms Montas if the UN will be responding to the call
by the Liberian Human Rights Campaign that UNMIL provided protection
to the members of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
Ms.
Montas
wasn't sure; later in the day, UN Police Advisor Andrew Hughes
answered Inner City Press by saying he wasn't the right person to
ask. Said Djinnit thanked Inner City Press for not asking in public
about the possible Darfur post. (Separately, a concerned diplomat
told Inner City Press that "the West" likes Djinnet.) And
then the following arrived:
Subj:
Liberia and TRC Commissioners
From:
unspokesperson-donotreply [at] un.org
To:
Inner City Press
Sent:
7/8/2009 3:27:25 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
Regarding
your question at today's Noon Briefing regarding Liberia and the TRC
Commissioners: UNMIL already supports the Liberia National Police,
(LNP) in the police's primary responsibility for ensuring day-to-day
civil security in Liberia.Currently, there is no credible evidence of
threats to any member(s) of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission
(TRC). If any such threat was made, UNMIL, in support of the LNP,
would be available to assist in the protection of TRC Commissioners.
To date, no requests for additional security support have been made
by the TRC Commissioners.
But
still not
comment by the UN about the recommendation of the TRC Commissioners.
Some rule of law...
For
G-8 Spouses, WFP Flies in Ghanaian Children for "Simulated
Feeding," $500,000 Cost and Ms. Sheeran Disputed, re N. Korea
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
UNITED
NATIONS, July 7 -- During the upcoming G-8 meeting in Italy, the UN
World Food Program is flying school children from Ghana to Rome for a
"simulated food distribution" display for the spouses of
G-8 representatives. WFP has ordered staff not involved in the
display to not come to work that day. They will, however, received
"special leave with full pay."
Inner
City Press wrote about
this last week, quoting an internal WFP e-mail. On July
7, Inner City Press called in to what was described as a WFP press
briefing about the G-8 and asked for response to criticism of the
event as insensitive to beneficiaries of UN aid and for the cost, as
well as about limitations WFP accepts from the government of North
Korea.
The
WFP officials
on the conference call -- who will remain unnamed at their request --
at first did not answer the question, and then stated that the event
would cost only a fraction of the figure Inner City Press used its its July 2
story, $500,000.
Inner City
Press asked to be given on the
record WFP's figure, including staff time, accommodation and air fare
-- and carbon offsetting of the jet travel, if any. Four hours later,
after close of business in Rome, a WFP spokesman said that an answer
might be forthcoming. In the interim, WFP had scrubbed up and
approved a quote from the "background" briefing for a less
critical wire service piece.
And
so, beyond the
WFP e-mail below describing the event, here is the basis for Inner
City Press' estimate of cost:
According
to the WFP website, 'WFP employed 10,200 people in 2008 (91 percent
of staff serve in the field.)' That means about 1000 work at WFP
Headquarters in Rome. Even accounting for a satellite building that
will stay in operation -- though who knows how many staff will show
up or be able to get near it -- we estimate that 800 staff go home
and that the average grade is the mid range of a P4 (grades are
higher at WFP headquarters than in the field). The direct cost for
such a post is about $100,000 but one must add to that pension, staff
assessment and a large "post adjustment" because the dollar
is weak against the Euro. Therefore a more realistic annual cost for
a mid range P4 is perhaps $150,000-160,000.
The work year has 260
days, so a single day of labor lost costs the organization $576.
Multiplied by 800, one gets about $467,000 -- plus related security
costs, the cost of flying in the Ghanaian children to eat corn-soy
blend in view of the G-8 spouses, the construction of a fake
schoolhouse by WFP's pool, etc. In addition there is the Italian
government paying rent on a building that is not being used to manage
food aid but as a set for this theater. The last public figure on
the website for the building costs was about $45 million per annum
with a daily cost of roughly $123,000. So $467,000 plus $123,000
yields about $590,000.
Immediately
after
a senior WFP official on Tuesday's conference call said that costs
were only "a fraction" of $500,000, Inner City Press
formally asked for WFP's estimate of costs, and for confirmation that
a WFP staffer was expelled from North Korea.
UN's Ban and WFP's Sheeran, luncheon
June 2, 2009, 'simulated feeding' not shown
At deadline nine hours
later, the following arrived:
Hi
Matthew, On
the question regarding the planned event at WFP headquarters on
Friday 10 July, I refer you to the response given during the
teleconference earlier today. On the question of DPRK, I have the
following response:
A
senior WFP official said one WFP staff member in DPRK has had to
leave the country because his visa was not renewed by the
authorities. A number of other WFP staff members have been
reassigned, or rotated to new duty stations because WFP's operations
have contracted and the number of people required to support WFP's
activities have gone down.
"While
WFP continues to operate under the new conditions imposed by the DPRK
authorities, it has not formally accepted them, and WFP is continuing
to push for a return to the original terms of agreement negotiated
with the government at the launch of the current emergency
operation," the official added.
We continue to
wait for WFP's cost estimate. Inner City Press immediately followed
up on the above, asking for the costs, if the WFP staff member who
had to leave DPRK was from South Korea, and another question.
The
initial
questions were sent to WFP chief Josette Sheeran's e-mail address.
Ms. Sheeran, on whom Inner City Press has previously reported,
including where possible praising her work, has taken to hiring yet
more former colleagues from the Washington Times, most recently
Elizabeth "Lisa" Bryant.
Within
the UN system community in
Rome, many believe that Ms. Sheeran engaged in a quid pro quo with
FAO chief Jacques Diouf, hiring a relative of his for an information
technology post in exchange for FAO hiring the husband of her
personal assistant, Tanujah Rastogi. They snark that since Ms.
Sheeran Shiner bragged that while editing the Washington Times she
ran story after story about the Clintons and Whitewater, the Obama
Administration with Hilary Clinton as Secretary of State might want
to see a change at the top of WFP. Through in the snafu of the
$500,000 simulated feeding program and.... well, watch this site.
Rome
colleagues:
As
you know, Italy will be hosting the G8 Summit next
week and leaders from more than two dozen countries will be in
L’Aquila. We are honored that the Italian government has asked WFP
to host an official program at our headquarters on Friday, 10 July,
as part of the spouse program.
This visit is a profound testament
to the increasing visibility of WFP's work -- and an opportunity to
help the world better understand the important work we do. On our
premises, we are arranging a simulated food distribution and a
symbolic African schoolhouse, where a small group of Ghanaian
schoolchildren will help celebrate our work. (You may have noticed
the large exhibit being erected this morning behind the pool.)
Due
to the security precautions mandated by the Italian government
and the visiting delegations, only those employees involved in the
event or deemed necessary for critical operations by their managers
will be permitted on the main building premises during the morning of
July 10. Among other things, parking will be severely limited at our
main building and automobile access limited in Parco de Medici in
general.
But we encourage you to take advantage of this special
exhibit and bring your families, including your children, on the
afternoon of 10 July – anytime after 2:00 – so they can get a
taste of our field work and meet the schoolchildren. If you cannot
bring your family on 10 July, note that the tent and displays will
remain up on Monday, 13 July, so we invite you to bring family
members to see the display then.
Though
this is a special event,
we realize it might cause some inconvenience. We hope you can
appreciate what an historic opportunity this is for some of the
world’s most influential people to understand what we do and to see
the impact of their donations.
Here
are some guidelines for the
day: If you work in the main building, please do not come to the
office Friday morning, 10 July. The St. Martin’s building will
remain open. As much as possible, please work from home... We expect
the main building to re-open for business as usual at 2:00, so if
it's feasible for you to return, please do so. If returning to the
office in the afternoon is not feasible for you -- we recognize that
some of the Parco de Medici transit options do not run in the
afternoon, for instance – you are authorized special leave with
full pay. Thank you,
Steve Taravella
Chief of Internal
Communications, World Food Programme
Via C.G. Viola 68,Rome, Italy
00148
Footnote:
one WFP staffer, anonymous from fear of retaliation, asked if Josette
Sheeran would similarly "parade around Food Stamp recipient in
the United States," and went on to suggest that if the G-8
spouses wanted to see "needy Africans" while in Italy, they
could check out the camps on Lampedusa...
*
* *
WFP
In Pyongyang Has Korean Speakers Expelled, Flies African Children to
Eat for G-8
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN: Exclusive
UNITED
NATIONS, July 2 -- While the UN in New York announced that its World
Food Program will shrink what remains of its program in North Korea,
in the midst of declining donor confidence and missile tests by
Pyongyang, the UN was more quiet about the restrictions it had been
under and is accepting in the country. WFP in a memorandum from
Beijing notes that the Kim Jong Il government now requires that none
of WFP's remaining international staff should be able to speak
Korean.
Inner
City Press
is told that WFP - Pyongyang's main Korea speaker was expelled from
the country as persona non grata on June 20 and that this bodes badly
for UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon naming a new UN envoy to North
Korea. Reportedly, Ban had focused on a South Korean envoy, with an
eye toward running the candidate by members at the upcoming G-8
meeting. But if Kim Jong Il is expelling from the country what few UN
system Korean speakers remained, such an envoy seems even less
likely.
Speaking
of WFP and
the G-8, for the upcoming meeting WFP is flying in children from
Ghana to eat as a part of an "exhibit" for the spouses of
G-8 leaders on July 10. The internal WFP email is below. Several WFP
sources expressed disgust to Inner City Press at the event, which
they ascribe to WFP head Josette Sheeran. One asked, "Would she
parade around Food Stamp recipient in the United States?" They
put the expenses of the event, including the substantial closure of
the WFP headquarters on July 10, at $500,000.
WFP's Sheeran gives award to UN's Ban,
PNG and Eat for G-8 not shown
At
UN, N. Korea Test Reaction Veiled in Secrecy, P-5 Search for Leak
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
UNITED
NATIONS, June 10, updated June 11
-- Seventeen days after North Korea conducted at
least its second underground nuclear test, the UN Security
Council is scheduled this morning to circulate a previously-leaked
draft sanctions resolution. A belated reaction with belated demands for
secrecy, it will finally be made public on a volutary basis. For that
reason and those below, for now there was no need to have it published
here until circulated - now here it it.
North Korea has already denounced it, and
it is unclear who, if anyone would actually search North Korea ships.
Perhaps the U.S. will seize more of Kim Jong-Il's money, as it did in
Banco Delta Asia. But it could have done that without action by the
Council.
Early
in the process, Inner City Press got and published a
draft of the resolution, minus
substantive operative paragraph eight. Credit was given; there
was little push-back.
Then on
June 5 Inner City Press obtained the
near-final draft, which had been circulated to the capitals of the
Permanent Five member plus Japan and South Korea. Inner
City Press
put it online that Friday at noon, it went with credit to Japan,
the
AP, Times
of London and Washington
Post. The feedback, however, was
not all positive.
Several
Ambassadors approached Inner City Press to complain. You have made
things more difficult, they said in different ways. One, Rosemary
DiCarlo of the U.S., was to her credit willing to explain why.
Countries find it hard to back away from positions in a draft that
goes online, she said. Another had said, just summarize it, don't put
the text online. Ambassador DiCarlo said that it's easier to
back
away from a summary.
France's
Permanent Representative Jean-Maurice Ripert had an extraordinary
reaction. He summoned "the French press," how ever defined,
and insisted to them that the draft Inner City Press had put online had
not, in fact, been circulated. This had been contradicted by
others in the French mission, and by other diplomats. Still Ripert
insisted it was true, according to multiple sources in attendance at
his meetings.
Ripert held yet another news event for only portions of the press corps
on the eve of the North Korea meeting, this time about peacekeeping. He
focused on the Congo, yet the topic of the UN Mission there, known by
its French acronym MONUC,
constructively working with indicted war criminal Jean-Bosco Ntaganda
somehow did not come up. We'll have more on this.
The
U.S. mission took a different approach, grilling other Council
members and even Secretariat staff trying to determine the source of
the leak. To some, the approach seemed inconsistent with what Barack
Obama has said, about transparency and openness to the press. Several
journalists detailed to the UN during these past two weeks have
expressed surprise at the press relations of the current U.S.
mission. Perhaps a work in progress.
Secrecy at the stakeout, hunt for leak and
promises of transparency not shown
Tuesday
at six o'clock, the Russian mission emailed out comments of
Ambassador Churkin, that consensus is emerging. Then at nine a.m.
Wednesday, a meeting was scheduled for two hours later. It will be
live blogged here. Watch this space.
Update
of 11:08 a.m. -- one by one, or rather each with separate entourage,
they have entered. Susan Rice with security and spokesman; Vitaly
Churkin, like China's Deputy Liu, with a jaunty step. China's Permanent
Representative with a single political advisor and a smile.
France's Ripert, who reported told some journalists to only expect a
vote on Friday, stopped and said in French, hopefully "demain"
(tomorrow).
Update
of 1:20 p.m. -- the Office of the Spokesperson for Secretary General
Ban Ki-moon, true to form, held its noon briefing in direct conflict
with the Ambassadors who spoke at the stakeout. Perhaps so that even
fewer reporters would attend and ask questions at the Secretariat's
briefing. There were only three, and none of the questions were
answered. Afterwards, Russia's Vitaly Churkin was speaking at the
stakeout. He was asked why the draft has not yet been "put into blue."
Ripert, it was said, repeated his prediction of adoption tomorrow or
Friday. Several Japanese reporters expressed relief, that their two
week vigil of watching nothing happen appears finally at an end.
Update
of 7:53 p.m. -- a vote on Thursday is said to be unlikely, by a
non-permanent Security Council member, some of whom pushed back
against not having been included in the process of the P-5 plus Two.
As Swiss Ambassador Peter Maurer told the Press on Wednesday
afternoon, on the record, why do countries work for four years to get a
seat on the
Council only to sit back and wait to be given the menu by the P-5?
Update
of June 11, 11:19 a.m. -- A Russian diplomat tells the Press that there
have been a number of amendments proposed, presumably by non P-5
members, and "they must be considered." Asked if a vote Friday is
possible, he said, "I do not know... I have to ask my expert."
Update
of 11: 26 a.m. - Japan's Ambassador Takasu, more upbeat, said in
Japanese to the press from that country (which in turn offered this
translation to Inner City Press) that he is not aware of any
opposition, but that he will of course listen to any opinion. Asked if
there will be a vote Friday, he said he does not like to make
predictions.
Update
of 11 p.m. -- it has "gone blue," and a meeting scheduled for June 12
at 11 a.m., presumably to vote: watch this site.
* *
*
At
UN, Near Final Draft on North Korea Leaked to Inner City
Press, Arms Export Ban and Cargo Inspection Added
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press: Exclusive-Must Credit
UNITED
NATIONS, June 5 -- Thirteen days after North Korea conducted an
underground nuclear test, a near-final
draft resolution emerged
behind closed doors at the UN Security Council.
The six-page
draft, a copy of which Inner City Press obtained and puts
online here as a must-credit exclusive, has more than thirty
operative paragraphs, compared to the mere 14 paragraphs of the three-page
draft Inner City Press similarly obtained and published on
May 28. (AP, Japanese and other media appropriately credited Inner
City Press).
This time, Inner City Press is
told by its sources that the draft was circulated to the capitals of
the Permanent Five Plus Two -- these last are Japan and South Korea
-- with the deadline for comments on June 5 at 10 a.m. New York
Time.
The provision allowing North Korea to import light weapons, in
Paragraph 10, is attributable to Russia, according to a well placed
Inner City Press source who calls it the Kalishnikof or AK-47 clause.
Beyond the cargo ban, other provisions are weaker than
the proponents wanted. Paragraph
19, for example, merely calls
on "member states and international
financial and credit institutions not to enter into new
commitments... except for humanitarian and developmental purposes."
Paragraph 17 prohibits "bunkering services, such as provision of
fuel or supplies" to vessels. Paragraph 22 calls for reports
within 45 days.
At UN, media chases news of draft now published by Inner City Press
While
the draft resolution seems unlikely to change North Korea's course,
it has been the subject of intense journalistic interest for nearly
two weeks now at the UN in New York, particularly by Japanese media,
who have remained camped out in front of the Security Council during
meetings on Somalia, Bosnia and Tribunals and on June 5, Sudan and
Sri Lanka.
Non-permanent members of the Security Council complained to the Press
that they were kept in the dark throughout the days of negotiation.
On
the morning of June 5, Inner City Press obtained the draft
resolution
that, as a must-credit exclusive, it puts online here. Watch this
site.
Click here
for an Inner City Press YouTube channel video, mostly UN Headquarters
footage, about civilian
deaths
in Sri Lanka.
Click here for Inner City
Press' March 27 UN debate
Click here for Inner City
Press March 12 UN (and AIG
bailout) debate
Click here for Inner City
Press' Feb 26 UN debate
Click
here
for Feb.
12 debate on Sri Lanka http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17772?in=11:33&out=32:56
Click here for Inner City Press' Jan.
16, 2009 debate about Gaza
Click here for Inner City Press'
review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate
Click here for Inner
City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger
Click here from Inner City Press'
December 12 debate on UN double standards
Click here for Inner
City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN
Office: S-453A, UN, NY 10017
USA
Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's
mobile (and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com -
|