UNITED
NATIONS, July
8, updated
with UN
response --
The UN asks
for patience,
which is fine.
But then it
doesn't
answer. Nine
hours after
UNTV and UN
webcast
silenced the Security
Council
briefing about
South Sudan,
there was
still no
explanation
why. The video
has been put
online, here,
with ten
minutes as
silent movie.
There
was no
response at
all as to why
the UN webcast
of a General
Assembly
meeting on
inequality
offered only
English and no
translation.
The UN
just soldiered
on, cranking
out propaganda
rather than
doing its most
basic jobs:
hosting
meetings and
making them
accessible to
people
impacted by
them, at least
to hear if not
participate.
The Free UN Coalition for Access first
raised the
silencing of
the South
Sudan meeting,
and UN
official Stephane
Dujarric to
his credit
replied,
citing an
unspecified
technical
glitch and
asking for
patience.
One assumed
that meant
that an
explanation
and some plan
to avoid
future
silencing.
A
request by
Inner City
Press for a
video file of
the July 5
noon briefing
led to a
discovery that
the file was
damaged and
could not be
used. Clearly
something is
going wrong.
At Monday's
noon briefing
Inner City
Press asked
this and why
the briefing
itself was not
being live
webcast:
Spokesperson
Martin
Nesirky: Are
you seeing it
there on your
screen?
Inner
City
Press: I’m
trying not to
be confused by
it, but it is
true it is not
just not on
EZTV, it is
also not on
the Webcast
and also now
the things on
the side don’t
have any
translation,
for example,
the event that
the
Secretary-General
attended, it
didn’t list
any
translations
for it, which
maybe there
were, maybe
there weren’t.
So since it
seems to be
not just EZTV,
but
system-wide,
whether it has
anything to do
with this new
contract given
to TeamPeople,
which I have
heard
basically the
staff has been
cut in half
and the
benefits given
are or have
been reduced
by 25 to 30
per cent,
I would like
an answer,
whether this
has to do with
that, rather
than just the
move back to
the
Secretariatbuilding.
Spokesperson
Nesirky:
As I say, I do
understand
your
frustrations,
and I do know
that there
have been some
difficulties
both today and
on other days,
and I am
waiting for a
response,
because
needless to
say, we’d
already asked
and I am
waiting for a
response from
those who deal
with these
matters to see
what we can
tell you. Yes,
Pam?
There
was no follow
up. Dujarric
and his
Department of
Public
Information
have not said
WHY these
things have
happened --
source tell
Inner City
Press the MAMS
system is a
waste, and
more -- nor
provided any
assurance they
won't continue
to happen.
Dujarric
re-emerged
Monday
afternoon,
tweeting
unrelated UN
videos,
referring to Pope
Francis'
visit to
Lampedusa.
It's nice --
but isn't the
UN's first job
to make sure
it provides
sound of the
South Sudan
mission's
briefing to
the Security
Council?
In
fact, Inner
City Press is
told by
sources that
the new low-bid
contractor
Team People
provided
editors for
the UN
programs
including 21st Century
that were not
suitable and
must be
replaced.
A TeamPeople
executive
observed
Monday didn't
know how the
stakeout
worked, about
Ban Ki-moon's
special podium
or rostrum;
the boom man
didn't raise
the microphone
for Rosemary
DiCarlo.
It's a
fiasco and
rather than
fix it, the UN
just blithely
pumps out good
news about,
well, the
Pope. Is this
the UN's job?
Similarly,
FUNCA
on Monday
morning
pointed out
another
mis-tweet by
the UN's
Washington
presence, @UNICDC.
Last week it
was a link to
health below
the belt,
taken down but
never
explained.
Today
it was a tweet
with, in
brackets,
[Placeholder]
and “craft
message” at
the end.
That's the UN
planning out
propaganda,
but still not
doing its
basic job. FUNCA
asked --
the tweet
disappeared,
again without
explanation.
This is what
the UN is
coming to.
Footnote
re-cast:
FUNCA began
its new @FUNCA_questions
Twitter feed
today. The UN
mission in
Mali responded
-- we
put Mali in
another story
later in the
day, here
-- and then Dujarric,
also to
@InnerCityPress.
Only
one problem:
Dujarric had
previously
blocked
@InnerCityPress
on Twitter.
Bygones? Not
really: the
Department of
Public
Information
has still
not rescinded
its June
24 threat to
suspend or
withdraw Inner
City Press'
acccreditation
for merely
posting a
single Free
UN Coalition
for Access
sign, when
it allows UNCA two
signs and
much more.
We'll have
more on all
this.Watch
this site.
Update:
now this UN
explanation:
"With regard
to the
question on
the missing
audio of the
first part of
Hilde
Johnson's
briefing to
the Security
Council on
Monday,
we have been
told that the
router that
feeds audio
and video from
the chambers
and conference
rooms to the
broadcast
facilities
underwent some
upgrading
during the
weekend by the
vendor.
"When they
redid the
setting
afterward,
among the
numerous
parameters
that they had
to check, they
apparently
missed one,
which caused
the audio not
to be embedded
in the video
for the first
15 minutes or
so before it
was rectified.
The remainder
of the
briefing
[about 12
minutes] was
recorded
We very much
regret this
human error.
"We are also
aware of the
delay of
posting videos
the webcast
page. The
webcast team
is working as
fast as
possible to
post the
videos but
there is a
technical
issue in the
retrieval
process. This
is due to a
technical
problem with
the new system
which is in
the process of
being worked
out."
FUNCA
notes: this
does not
explain why
the noon
briefing was
not on the
live webcast,
nor the lack of
translation in
the webcast.
Shouldn't the
UN focus on
this? To
be continued.