At
UN, Nuke Free
Latin America
Gets Award, No
Q&A
Allowed on
Malvinas &
UK
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
October 23 --
On Wednesday
the UN Office
for
Disarmament
Affairs, the
World Future
Council and
the
Inter-Parliamentary
Union
invited the
media to a 30
minute UN
press
conference "to
announce the
Future Policy
Award 2013 for
the world’s
best
disarmament
policies."
Seeing
in the front
row an
official
associated
with the
"Treaty for
the
Prohibition of
Nuclear
Weapons in
Latin America
and the
Caribbean,"
it seemed that
at least some
had been told
in advance of
the winner.
But
Inner City
Press live-tweeted
the naming of
honorable
mentions from
Belgium, Costa
Rica,
Mozambique /
South Africa
and Mongolia,
and
Silver
awards to
Argentina
and New
Zealand.
(The
description of
each
policy
provided in
advance is
below.)
The
UNODA
moderator said
there would be
time for
questions, and
Inner
City Press had
one, even tweeted
it to UK
Ambassador
Mark Lyall
Grant
in advance for
comment:
what about the
nuclear
protests of
the UK and
Malvinas /
Falkland
Islands?
The
prepared
statement
giving the
award
mentioned Cuba
hosting
nuclear
weapons. But
what about the
UK?
But
the prepared
statements
were allowed
to take up the
full 30
minutes.
Inner City
Press raised
its hand, and
prepared to protest
on behalf
of the Free
UN Coalition
for Access
@FUNCA_info.
A press
briefing must
allow
questions;
otherwise
journalists
are being used
as "extras"
in a made for
video
production.
But
grabbing the
first question
as has become
an untenable
routine, the
president of
the UN
Correspondents
Association,
Pamela Falk of
CBS,
proceeded to
THANK those
who gave the
questionless
press
conference.
Then she used
the privilege
to ask her own
question.
Her
sidekick, too,
wanted to ask
a question,
about the
IAEA. But the
main
question had
to be: how
could this be
organized this
way?
And if
about Latin
America and
nuclear
weapons, how
could the UK
and
Malvinas not
be mentioned?
Inner City
Press asked,
and the
panelist
agreed it
should be
raised, the UK
cuts its
budget but not
nuclear.
We
have yet to
hear back from
the normally
responsive
Ambassador
Lyall
Grant on this.
Here were the
seven short
listed
finalists:
1.
Argentina –
National
Programme for
the Voluntary
Surrender of
Firearms, 2006
[Silver]
2.
Belgium – Law
on
Anti-personnel
Mines, 1995
and the Law
regulating
Economic and
Individual
Activities
with Weapons,
2006.
3.
Costa Rica –
Abolition of
the Army,
Article 12 of
the
Constitution,
1949.
4.
Mongolia – Law
of Mongolia on
its
nuclear-weapon-free
status, 2000.
5.
Mozambique and
South Africa –
Agreement
between the
Government of
the Republic
of Mozambique
and the
Government of
the Republic
of
South Africa
in Respect of
Cooperation
and Mutual
Assistance in
the
field of Crime
Combating,
1995.
6.
New Zealand –
New Zealand
Nuclear Free
Zone,
Disarmament,
and Arms
Control Act,
1987 [Silver]
7.
Latin America
and the
Caribbean–
Treaty for the
Prohibition of
Nuclear
Weapons in
Latin America
and the
Caribbean,
Treaty of
Tlatelolco,
1967 [Winner -
Malvinas not
shown]
This
evening the
awards will be
given out,
alongside a UN
First
(Disarmament)
Committee
reception.
Watch this
site.
Footnotes:
At
the noon
briefing,
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
spokesperson
Martin Nesirky
announced
there would
only only five
minutes of
questions. For
FUNCA, Inner
City Press
asked why this
was, how the
questionless
press
conference
before was
permissible.
Nesirky
replied
not to waste
what little
time he
granted on a
"technical"
question --
Inner City
Press also
asked about
Sudan's
statement of
what the UN's
Herve Ladsous,
who dodges
questions,
heard about
visas
-- then said
tomorrow's
another day.
It
is, but the
shrinking of
media /
question
access remains
a pattern,
one not being
confronted (in
fact, being
allowed and
encouraged) by
the Gulf and
Western media
on the
Executive
Committee of
the UN
Correspondents
Association,
now known as
Ban's UN
Censorship
Alliance.
The
point here, at
a minimum, is
that the UN
must allow
another press
group to
exist, rather
than
trying to threaten
the withdrawal
or suspension
of accreditation
for hanging
the sign of
the Free UN Coalition
for Access
while its
UNCA has five
signs.
Before
the
disarmament
briefing, a UN
staffer had
put a
rain coat over
the "UNCA
chair," so
Falk could
occupy it
when arriving
late. But
occupy it for
what? Watch
this site.