UNCA
Insiders Tried
to Expel
Press, Now
Meet UN on
Space,
Illegitimate,
Need for
FUNCA
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
December 8 --
Amid the many
moves back
into the UN's
38
story tower,
the move of
the press
corps will
come nearly
last.
The
issue of media
space and
services is
set to be the
subject of a
December 10
meeting
between the UN
and some
members of the
discredited
UN
Correspondents
Association
executive
committee.
But
other UNCA
members, much
less UN
resident
correspondents
who are not
members of
UNCA, have not
been told
about it. Some
wonder if
their
rights can be
defended by
this selective
and secretive
process -- and
so an inquiry
by the new FUNCA, the Free UN Coalition on Access.
Having
been launched
only on
December 7,
after the
receipt of documents
under
the Freedom of
Information
Act which show
that UNCA
bigwigs
from Reuters,
Agence
France Presse
and Voice
of America
tried to get
investigative
press thrown
out of the UN,
FUNCA is not
yet at the
strength it
aims to gain.
But
its questions
include the
following: by
what right
does a small
group
of
correspondents
purport to
negotiate for
others they do
not keep
informed?
Who can
guarantee that
these insiders
don't simply
feather
their nests
and receive
closed door
offices, one
for each
media,
while others
work in a
bullpen?
Even
some elected
members of the
UNCA Executive
Committee were
not
informed of
the meeting
set for
Monday, nor of
other plans.
And,
FUNCA has
learned from
mission
sources,
despite formal
objection
within the
UNCA Executive
Committee in
late October,
a letter was
sent out on
November 8
purporting to
be for the
whole UNCA
Executive
Committee.
This
organization
has become a
sham. In the
future, their
letters cannot
be taken at
face value:
they simple
exclude even
elected
members who
disagree with
them.
These
are the type
of conditions
that lead to
the formation
of new or
split
off parties,
as in a bigger
picture in the
Arab Spring.
The UN and
even some of
these
correspondents
pay lip
service to
such
principles
but do not
live them.
The UN
Correspondents
Association's
executive
committee
including
Reuters and
Agence France
Presse helped
Voice
of
America to
file a June
20, 2012
request with
the UN to
"review"
the
accreditation
status of
Inner City
Press -- and
then never
deigned to
explain
themselves.
But documents
now obtained
obtained
from Voice of
America's
Broadcast
Board of
Governors
under Freedom
of
Information
Act requests
and appeals
show that even
VOA's overseer
Richard Lobo,
as well as
review
requester
Steve Redisch,
had to admit
in
writing their
anti-Press
moves were
"not
appropriate."
Still the UNCA
executive
committee
persisted,
leaving posted
on its
glassed in
bulletin board
its initial
letter of
denunciation,
going
secret with
their meetings
with the UN,
and setting up
scam
elections. As
reported
yesterday,
this
illegitimacy
must end, and
the
new beta FUNCA
-- the Free UN
Coalition for
Access --
aims to do so.
On August 8
and earlier
on December 6,
we reported on
some of the
documents
obtained from
BBG via FOIA
requests and
appeals; now
we report
more.
Once
BBG was asked
by Congress to
explain its
request to
disaccredit an
investigative
journalist,
Steve Redisch
and David
Ensor scoured
their
files for
support.
On July 29,
VOA's David
Ensor wrote to
Steve Redisch,
"The quote
from Reuters
will
definitely
help!"
The
reference was
to the stealth
complaint
filed by
Reuters bureau
chief
Louis
Charbonneau,
based on Inner
City Press
telling him,
"you
disgust me."
Later,
Charbonneau on
behalf of Reuters
said he was
willing to
have submitted
a letter to
get Inner City
Press
disaccredited.
Once VOA's
letter was
leaked,
Charbonneau
and
outgoing UNCA
president
Giampaolo
Pioli came to
ask Inner City
Press
to withdraw
its FOIA
request.
Moments
later,
the UN
official to
whom Redish's
request was
directed met
Inner City
Press and gave
a six month
extension of
accreditation,
along with a
written (and
separate and
different
oral) warning.
The
written
warning was
about Inner
City Press
signing in as
a guest the
Nobel Peace
Prize winner
Tawakkol
Karman, who
then spoke on
UN TV at
the stakeout.
But
later, to
justify
themselves,
Ensor and
Redisch crowed
within BBG
that Inner
City Press was
given a
warning - as
if it had
anything to
do with the
issues they
based their
anti-Press
filing on.
Richard
Lobo,
the head of
BBG, ended up
having to call
the request by
Redisch
"not
appropriate"
in an email to
the BBG board,
one of
whose members
Dana
Perino wrote,
"folks - I
believe this
issue
needs
addressed in a
more robust
way."
BBG
and VOA never
issued any
apology to
Inner City
Press, or
moved to
withdraw their
"inappropriate"
request. Nor
did the UNCA
executive
committee say
anything, or
explain the
documents when
Inner
City Press
sent them
three in
October.
Now,
again, we have
learned, some
on this UNCA
Executive
Committee seek
to have
another closed
door,
otherwise
secret meeting
with UN
officials on
December 10.
Watch this
site.