On January 23,
there was a UN
Security
Council
meeting about
human rights
and UN
Peacekeeping
missions,
including
MONUSCO. But
the meeting
was closed to
the public and
press. Inner
City Press for
the Free
UN Coalition
for Access
asked and asks,
Why? The
old United
Nations
Correspondents
Association,
on the other
hand, not only
doesn't
protest such
closures - it
scheduled its
only "faux
fighters"
meeting for
exactly the
same time.
This decayed
UN
Correspondents
Association,
run by
president Giampaolo
Pioli who has
himself
demanded
censorship,
held its
annual meeting
on January 23,
and even by
its own
account, not a
work about
access
problems or
lack of
information.
Here was the
agenda,
annotated, now
with "minutes"
as provided by
disgruntled
members who
say the UN
"makes" them
pay UNCA,
added in
italics:
Space,
"including
journalists on
the waiting
list for
office space"
-- on January
23, UNCA's
"leadership"
said that "that
after meeting
with DPI
working space
on the 4th
floor will
become
available to
6-8
journalists
beginning in
February."
Even or
especially if
this
representation
is true, there
is a problem:
UNCA is
essentially
selling or
trying to sell
these UN
spaces. UNCA
tells
correspondents
that if they
pay money to
join it, they
will be helped
in getting
office space
from the UN.
Is this
proper?
Less
than a quarter
of those UNCA
took $66,485
from attended
this meeting;
numerous
Executive
Committee
members did
not attend.
Pioli bragged
of "a larger
number of
sponsors," but
the minutes
did not list
them. There'll
be more on
this.
Meanwhile,
UNCA
leadership is
proposal to
downgrade some
with "white"
UN passed to
"green,"
requiring them
to go through
a separate
entrance and
metal
detectors.
UNCA is
responsible
for Banning
many from
entry into the
UN.
"UNCA
room
activities,
press
conferences
and events for
2015" -- Pioli
in his last
tenure granted
the Ambassador
of Sri Lanka
Palitha
Kohona, a former
tenant of
Pioli in one
of his
Manhattan
apartments,
the use of
UNCA to screen
inside the UN
a film denying
Rajapaksa
government war
crimes. It
was reporting
about this
that Pioli
ordered Inner
City Press to
remove from
the Internet.
There have
been no
reforms since.
Now UNCA brags
that HRW will
use or be used
by its space.
This is
shameful - and
we'll have
more on it.
Pioli sat in
on the January
26 noon
briefing,
apparently to
see if any of
these outrages
would be
aired,
typically
asking no
questions at
all.
"Social
media" -
despite Ban's
UN purporting
to use UNCA to
reach all
journalists at
the UN, the
Press is
blocked from
UNCA's
moribund
social media
presence. Is
this
attributable
to all 15
Executive
Committee
members? Just
Pioli?
On
January 23,
Pioli said
that the
Reuters
correspondent
who grabbed
two questions
after Ladsous
said "I don't
respond to
your questions
Mister" is in
charge of UNCA
tweets.
"UNCA
soccer" -
this involved
providing a
craven photo
op for, yes,
Ban Ki-moon
"UNCA
Awards 2015" -
in December
2014, UNCA
gave out an award
about Haiti
with no
mention of the
UN bringing
cholera there,
or UN
peacekeepers
shooting at
democracy
demonstrators.
Ban Ki-moon
was in
attendance and
they had him
take pictures
with another
of their
awardees,
which was
mischaracterized
as UN
award. As
with office
space, it
seems that
UNCA sells the
UN.
Similar to the
claim that UN
labor issues
are handed in
happy one-way
meeting with
staff during
country
visits, it is
with this that
it seems the
UN will
partner to say
it has
listened on
media access
issues.
The Free UN
Coalition for
Access has
told MALU, but
repeats: if
they even
aspire to
legitimacy,
the UN and
those in it
must reach out
to all
journalists,
at the UN and
ideally
beyond, and
not that
subset which
pay UNCA
money. On
January 30,
there was an
expression
"will try."
Well, efforts
at access are
(more than)
half of the
battle.