UN's
Media
Rules Are
Archaic &
Exclusionary,
FUNCA's 10
Reforms
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
February 10 –
The UN's Media
Access
Guidelines and
accreditation
rules are an
embarrassing
anachronism,
like UN
Correspondents
Association
which is a
party to them.
Why
does the UN
limit
accreditation
to
representatives
of
corporations
“formally
registered as
a media
organization
in a country
recognized by
the UN General
Assembly”?
As
Inner City
Press on
behalf of the
Free
UN Coalition
for Access
asked
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
spokesman on
February 5,
does
this exclusion
apply to
journalists
from South
Ossetia,
“Abkhazia,
the Turkish
Republic of
Northern
Cyprus [or]
Palestine
before 29
November”?
So
far, the UN's
only answer is
that it is the
General
Assembly which
recognizes
states. But
what about the
rights of
journalists?
FUNCA followed
up: isn't
it claimed
that “the
United Nations
recognizes
the rights of
journalists
wherever they
come from? But
in the
accreditation
guideline it
is limited to
journalists
from certain
territories
and that’s
what [we are]
trying to
explore,
whether
that is
consistent
with what
UNESCO said,
article 19 of
the Universal
Declaration of
Human Rights
on free
press.”
So
far, no answer
from the UN.
We also ask:
how did UNCA,
the UN's
“partner” as
it points out
back to the
time of the
League of
Nations, not
press to
change this?
Or are
members of the
UNCA
Executive
Committee in
agreement with
the exclusion
by politics
and
geography,
just as they tried to expel
the
investigative
Press in
2012?
Here
now are
FUNCA's Top
Ten Reforms
required of
the UN's Media
Access
Guidelines and
accreditation
rules, an
ongoing effort
by a number of
FUNCA members:
1.
The Preamble
to the UN
Media Access
Guidelines
requiring
accredited
journalists to
abide by “the
principles of
the
Organization”
and
“established
journalism
ethics and
standards” is
impossibly
vague, since
every day we
see nations
and
individuals
interpreting
those
principles and
ethics in
widely
different
ways.
This vagueness
gives the UN
unfettered
discretion to
exclude
journalists
with no due
process or
explanation.
2.
The process by
which the UN
may expel or
process
complaints
against a
journalist is
never clearly
defined in
either the UN
Accreditation
Rules or Media
Access
Guidelines,
despite a 2012
request by the
New
York Civil
Liberties
Union
after several
UNCA members
tried to get
the
investigative
Press expelled.
3.
Bizarrely, the
UN
Media Access
Guidelines
at "2.
Security
Council (d)"
state that “on
the record
questions
should be
addressed to
the Council
Members in
front of the
stakeout
microphone.”
This is
obviously
impractical
and not the
current
practice. To
be clear, it
is not the
role of the UN
or their
partner
organizations
to tell
journalists
and diplomats
how, where,
and on what
basis, to
exchange
information.
4.
The UN
Media Access
Guidelines
are described
as an
“agreement
between DPI,
DSS, OSSG,
OPGA, and
UNCA. It is
clearly
improper to
include UNCA
as a partner
on media
guidelines,
since UNCA has
repeatedly
sought to
expel
journalists
with no due
process at
all.
5.
The UN
Media Access
Guidelines
state that
“all
correspondents
are
permitted
access to open
meetings in
designated
areas within
the
conference
rooms.” This
has not been
complied with.
Most recently,
journalists
were banned
from Ban’s
speech to the
General
Assembly,
although this
was listed as
an open
meeting.
It
should be
(made) clear
that
webcasting of
a meeting does
not replace
the right to
be physically
present,
especially
since from at
least
December 2012
to the launch
of this list
of reformed in
February
2013, the UN
live webcast
does not work
on the Android
platform.
6.
The UN
Media Access
Guidelines
on Photo-Ops
must be
updated with
what
DPI committed
to FUNCA on
January 17 and
again on
February 5,
2013:
that there
will be no
more
restrictions
on which media
can go to
photo ops, and
no “pool” by
UNCA as took
place in the
North Lawn
Building in
2012. Since
many of the
current Media
Access
Guidelines
refer to this
Temporary
North Lawn
Building, they
need to be
revised
before April
2013 -- with
these reforms
included, and
UNCA no longer
a party to
rules to throw
other
journalists
out.
Likewise,
the
existing
Media Access
Guidelines
say that "all correspondents
may have
access to the
Delegates’
Lounge." This
must continue
to be the
case, despite
the
current UNCA
leadership now
trying to
limit access
to Resident
Correspondents.
UNCA President
Pamela Falk,
in a January
24 letter to
the UN,
wants access
only for
"Resident"
Correspondents,
a subset of
what is
currently
allowed.
Since Falk is
a lawyer, it
can only be
inferred that
her UNCA wants
to become even
more
restrictive
than the
current Media
Access
Guidelines.
7.
The UN
Accreditation
Rules give
automatic
access to
independent
broadcasters
and film
production
companies with
“a UN partner
organization
that supports
the
production.”
This amounts
to
favoritism for
productions
that portray
the UN
positively.
Productions
without a UN
partner face
higher hurdles
to get
admission.
This is, then,
yet another
content-based
standard.
8.
The UN
Accreditation
Rules
state, as to
online media,
that “the
website must
have at least
60% original
news content
or commentary
or
analysis.”
Since the UN
used this to
dis-accredit a
journalist who
has now joined
FUNCA, it is
time for
replacement
with a
standard for
minimum
original
content, not a
percentage
given that
website will
often paste in
the UN
material they
are analyzing
or
criticizing.
One
might also ask
of the wire
services'
re-typing of
statements
attributable
to the
spokesperson
of the
Secretary
General
constitutes
“original”
material in
any common
sense meaning
of the word.
9.
The UN
Accreditation
Rules'
repeated
statement that
non-profits
are
not eligible
for
accreditation
is outdated
and not
enforced. AP
and
NPR are
non-profits
but are
accredited;
more recently
a model of
non-profit
newsrooms,
from
ProPublica to
some
accredited at
the UN,
make it time
to remove this
archaic and
arbitrary
restriction.
10.
The UN
Accreditation
Rules
under "(1)
Note on bona
fide media
organization"
say that all
those applying
for
accreditation
must belong to
an
organization
which is
“formally
registered as
a media
organization
in a country
recognized by
the
United Nations
General
Assembly.”
This excludes
individual
journalists
from all
territories
and non-member
states. This
is a
real and
ongoing
problem which
has barred
many
journalists
from the
UN, even
including
American
reporters
working for
media
physically
headquartered
in such
territories or
non-member
states.
These
FUNCA
proposals are
being
presented, to
the head of
the UN
Department
of Public
Information
and elsewhere.
Watch this
site.