As
Ban Flies on
Qatar-Funded
Plane, Has No
Time "To Weigh
the Rules"
By
Matthew
Russell Lee,
Follow up on
exclusive
UNITED
NATIONS,
July 23, more
here --
Does the UN,
while claiming
to abide by
its own stated
ethics rules,
simply not
have time for
them and waive
them?
Based on
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
answer today
in Jerusalem,
that "we do
not have much
time to weigh
the rules," it
appears they
were waived.
But why has
the UN claimed
or implied
otherwise?
On July 21,
the UN
belatedly
answered Inner
City Press'
July 19
inquiry about
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon accepting
a free
Qatar-funded,
British
registered
private jet
for his
current travel
about Gaza. Video here and embedded below.
On July 23 in
Jerusalem, Ban
Ki-moon was
asked,"do you
think it’s
appropriate
for Qatar to
be paying for
your flight
here?"
And Ban
Ki-moon responded,
"No – ladies
and gentlemen,
this is the
15th day since
the crisis
began.
We do not have
much time to
weigh the
rules."
Inner City
Press, and now
the Free
UN Coalition
for Access,
have been
pursuing this
question,
including with
Transparency
International
which answered
"it would seem
that the
Secretary
General would
have had to
have been
previous
clearance to
undertake such
a paid trip by
the Qatari
government.
This question
should be
posed to the
Office of
Ethics."
And so on July
22, Inner City
Press asked
Ban's deputy
spokesperson
Farhan Haq if
the UN Ethics
Office was
asked about
accepting the
free
Qatar-funded
private jet
flights.
Haq replied:
“I'm
aware that as
a standard
policy, we
inform the
Ethics Office
of all such
offers...I
don't know
about this
particular
case. I know
it for past
cases, every
time I have
asked the
Ethics Office
about this,
they have
talked about
being informed
about this...
They do
approve these
on the case of
exceptional
circumstances.”
Inner
City Press
asked Haq to
get an answer
from the
Ethics Office,
if they were
asked before
Ban began his
current trip
in the
Qatar-funded
jet.
Haq
said, “I can
do this...
This is what
has happened
several times
in the past.”
But apparently
not this time.
Ban said, "We
do not have
much time to
weigh the rules."
We'll stay on
this.
Should the UN
Secretary
General in a
mediation
attempt accept
free travel
from a country
with a
particular
interest in
the conflict
to be
mediated?
What review
should take
place? What
disclosures
should be
made, and
when? From the
UN's
July 21
transcript,
video
here from
Minute 31:
Inner
City
Press: you are
saying that
the use of
private
planes,
generically if
necessary, is
signed off by
the ethics
office, but my
question is,
private planes
provided by
anyone? Would
the
Secretary-General,
would he
accept such
service from
any Member
State, or
would he
accept it from
corporations?
The question
becomes, given
that
particular
countries have
different
views of the
conflict, what
review is made
before
accepting a
particular
country’s
contribution?
Deputy
Spokesman
Farhan Haq:
Well, we do
have, like I
said, an
ethics office
and a legal
office that
can look into
these things
and see
whether
something is
appropriate or
not.
Inner
City
Press: Was
this
particular
flight checked
or you’re
saying there’s
a generic
ruling in
advance that
any private
plane is okay?
Deputy
Spokesman
Haq: No, I
don’t think
there’s a
generic ruling
about this,
but certainly,
if you need to
justify this
for essential
needs, and
something like
this, a trip
that the
Secretary-General
was able to
embark on and
made the
decision on
just at the
end of last
week and then
had to travel,
starting
Saturday
evening,
something like
that would
have been
extremely hard
or basically
impossible to
do in a
different sort
of way.
Inner
City
Press: I’m
asking because
in the budget
Committee,
often many,
particularly
developing
world
countries,
they say that
things should
be funded out
of the UN’s
general budget
rather than
taking
voluntary
contributions
from States
that then have
influence. So,
my question
is, isn’t
there a travel
budget? We’ve
asked in this
room many
times to know
what the
budget is, so
I’d still like
to know that.
But, if there
is a budget,
why wasn’t the
general UN
budget used
for this
rather than
taking a
specific gift
from a
specific
country?
That’s the
question.
Deputy
Spokesman
Haq: The worry
is, of course,
if you run out
of money
early, does
that mean you
can’t travel,
even if
there’s a
crisis? In
this case,
there was a
crisis that
necessitated
sudden travel.
Inner City
Press broke
the story on
July 19 -- credit
has been
given, for
example, by
Newsweek,
here -- and
has been
asking Ban's
spokespeople
for disclosure
and what
safeguards are
in place.
Lead spokesman
Dujarric
replied but
did not answer
on July 19.
When he called
in to the UN
noon briefing
from Cairo on
July 21, Inner
City Press
asked him
again on whose
plane Ban is
traveling.
This time,
Dujarric
answered that
Ban is flying
on a Qatar
government
funded, UK
registered
plane.
But he did not
answer if
there are any
safeguards
against
influence or
conflicts of
interest.
Would Ban
accept free
flights from
any UN member
state? From
anyone at all?
Inner City
Press asked
Deputy
Spokesperson
Farhan Haq,
who said the
the UN Ethics
Office said
taking private
planes is okay
when
necessary.
But private
planes from
ANYONE? Any
member state?
A corporation?
There have
been no real
answers, yet.
But there need
to be.
Diplomats
told Inner
City Press
that Ban would
fly -- on a
Qatari plane
-- to Qatar,
Ramallah (but
not for now
Gaza), Israel,
Egypt, Jordan,
Saudi Arabia,
Iraq and
Kuwait.
The diplomats
who complained
to Inner City
Press
questioned not
only Ban
taking free
flights from a
particular
country, but
also how the
use (and
landing) of a
Qatari plane
will play in,
for example,
Saudi Arabia
and Egypt.
Inner
City Press
asked Ban's
top two
spokespeople,
and the
spokesperson
listed as on
weekend duty,
the following:
"Please
state whether
the Secretary
General is
accepting free
transportation
from any
member state
or outside
party for his
current trip
to the region
concerning the
Gaza crisis,
and if so
please explain
the reason and
any safeguards
in place
against
influence or
conflict of
interest.
"Such
disclosure
should be
common
practice; if
necessary,
note that
former
Spokesperson
Nesirky did
answer such
Press
questions, for
example
concerning the
Secretary
General flying
on a UAE plane
(see sample
below). On
deadline,
thank you in
advance.
From:
UN
Spokesperson -
Do Not Reply
[at] un.org
Subject: Your
questions
To: Matthew
Russell Lee
[at]
InnerCityPress.com
Date: Thu, Jan
19, 2012 at
3:00 PM
- The UAE
Government
provided an
aircraft to
fly the
Secretary-General
from Beirut to
Abu Dhabi
because of
time
constraints.
Later on July
19, the
following was
received,
which we
publish in
full 25
minutes after
receipt:
From:
Stephane
Dujarric [at]
un.org
Date: Sat, Jul
19, 2014 at
5:30 PM
Subject: Re:
Press question
if SG is
accepting free
travel from
any member
state or
outside party,
as was
disclosed in
2012, on
deadline,
thanks
To:
Matthew.Lee
[at]
innercitypress
[dot] com
Cc: FUNCA [at]
funca.info
Dear
Matthew,
Thanks for
your question
and thanks for
the draft
answer. The
logistical
details of the
SG's trip,
including the
travel
arrangements
are still
being worked
out. Once we
are in a
position to
confirm them,
i will revert.
best
Stephane
Dujarric
(Mr.)
Spokesman for
the
Secretary-General
But obviously
the
"logistical
details" of
getting to
Qatar were
worked out -
Ban had
already been
to Qatar, then
Kuwait before
Cairo.
One asked,
what can you
solve if you
can't even say
how you got
there?
Inner City
Press thanked
Dujarric and
his colleagues
for the
interim
response and
asked, "both
Prime Minister
Netanyahu and
President
Poroshenko's
office say
they have
spoken with
the Secretary
General and
give
read-outs.
Will a UN
read-out be
put out? If
so, when? If
not, why not?"
On July 21,
Inner City
Press asked
Haq, who
confirmed the
calls took
place but
nothing about
the contents.
What is
happened with
the UN? The Free UN Coalition for Access is
pressing for
reforms. We'll
have more on
this.