As
UN Cuts Media
Access,
Questions Of
Its Partner's
Lack
of Legitimacy
UNITED
NATIONS, June
1 -- With the
UN Security
Council
mid-move back
to its
second story
chamber at UN
Headquarters
in New York,
and still
no
media table as
existed before
and during the
relocation,
a close
observer of
the UN has
written in
from overseas
to ask the Free UN Coalition for Access about the
(still draft?)
Media Access
Guidelines:
"How
come the
United Nations
Correspondents
Association is
participating
like some kind
of junior
partner in
helping to
formulate the
guidelines?
Has UNCA
called its
members in for
a general
meeting to
vote about the
guidelines? If
there was no
general
meeting for
the
guidelines to
be discussed
by the members
of UNCA, who,
without being
authorized by
the members,
has signed the
agreement
between UNCA,
DPI, DSS and
OSSG?"
These
are pertinent
questions, and
not only
because the
answers -- no
general
membership
meeting, UNCA
Executive
Committee
dominated and
used by
Reuters
(through
First
Vice President
Louis
Charbonneau),
CBS
(through
absentee
president
Pamela Falk),
Agence
France Presse
(through Tim
Witcher) and
others -- show
just now
debased UNCA
has
become.
Rather,
it
shows how this
UN does not
care about
legitimate
process or
transparency
-- it will
work with
anyone that
supports what
it wants
to do, and
then call it
legitimate.
The
Department of
Public
Information
has known for
some time that
UNCA
Executive
Committee
members were
involved in
anonymous
social media
accounts
falsely
accusing
others of
being funded
by terrorists
-- but
DPI did
nothing.
DPI's
overseer of
Media
Accreditation,
Stephane
Dujarric,
fields
requests
to get smaller
media thrown
out through a
non-UN e-mail
address. In
any other
context, a
body of the
Office of
Internal
Oversight
Services would
look into this
"Bad
Lieutenant"
behavior.
But not in
this UN.
Overseer
Dujarric is
apparently not
himself
overseen.
Instead,
Dujarric
was allowed to
take the lead
in eliminating
media
workspace
in front of
the Security
Council. Inner
City Press has
been reporting
on this as a
case of big
media versus
small. Others
have opined
that
this is UNCA
Executive
Committee
members', and
Dujarric's,
way of
"getting back"
for articles
they have not
liked.
What
kind of
correspondents
association
would not only
agree to, but
lobby
for, a
reduction in
media access?
One that is
finished. Or,
one at
the UN.
Inner
City Press
asked DPI, and
asks again:
who drafted
and who agreed
to
this
paragraph:
"f.
The Security
Council
stakeout area,
including the
Turkish
Lounge, is
not to be used
as a permanent
workspace for
the media.
When the
Council is not
in session,
correspondents
should
minimize the
amount
of time in the
area, unless
interviewing
or conversing
with a U.N.
delegate or
official."
We'll
have more on
this. Watch
this site.
Footnote:
Of
Falk, the 2013
president of
UNCA, we must
again note
that when the
UN conducted a
non-consensual
raid on Inner
City Press'
office on
March 18,
2013, Falk
stood and
ghoulishly
took
photographs.
When
the
question was
raised in
writing WHY
she should
photographs, Falk's
response
was a legal
threat, from
her
CBSNews.com
e-mail
account, to
cease and
desist even
asking the
question.
This is
journalism?
The
question still
stands.
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-253, UN, NY 10017 USA Tel:
212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2012 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|