Duly
noted, or at
least,
published. Overall,
the answer seems
strange when
compared to
Inner City
Press'
specific
question on
December 18
about Ban on
December 18 reading
a particularly
answer from
notes. UN
transcript:
Inner
City Press: I
wanted to ask
and I would
like to hear
your answer to
this, I wanted
to ask about
the press
conference
held
yesterday, if
you can
confirm or
deny that at
least certain
of the
questions were
provided in
advance to the
Secretary-General
and he read an
answer to
them.
And I ask this
because it
seems if we
are here
having what
seems to be a
press
conference, it
seems at least
important to
at least know
if it's
scripted.
Spokesman
Dujarric:
No, I think
the press
conference is
not
scripted.
It's my job as
the
Secretary-General's
Spokesman to
be ready for
this briefing
and to be
ready for… to
help the
Secretary-General
be ready for
his briefing.
Inner City
Press: On the
answer on the
Transatlantic
Slave Trade,
his entire
answer was
read
out. And
I'm saying
this with all
due respect,
but is this
normal?
Is it normal
in a press
conference to
have an answer
known in
advance and an
answer read
out?
Spokesman Dujarric:
I think, as I
said, Matthew,
it's my job to
be ready for
the briefings
and to make
sure the
Secretary-General
is ready for
his.
Inner City
Press:
Does that
include
knowing what
questions will
be
asked?
There is a big
difference.
Spokesman
Dujarric:
Those are the
only words I
can use.
So, anything
else?
Yes, I'll come
back to you.
So why respond
after a
question about
another
question with
a denial about
"Pam Falk"?
Pam Falk is Pamela
Falk of CBS
News, outgoing
head of the UN
Correspondents
Association,
whose past,
present and future
First Vice
President says
she is
responsible
for blocking
Inner City
Press from
UNCA's near
moribund
Twitter
accounts.
A world in
which that
(and this
sample audio)
is consistent
with freedom
of the press,
but the above
must be
emphasized, is
too complex by
half. There's
more to say,
but as noted,
we publish it
near-immediately.
On
December 17
after Ban
thanked some
of those in
the UN Press
Briefing Room
for inviting
and celebrating
him at a
black-tie ball
the previous
night, the
first question
was set aside
for the group
that
celebrated
him, the UN
Correspondents
Association. Video here.
Outgoing
UNCA
president
Pamela Falk
asked Ban
about Cuba,
“since you've
visit,” and
Ban said he
had been told
in advance.
While he
added, by the
US, he glanced
down and read
out a
statement. Of
course, Ban
Ki-moon has no
responsibility
for or power
over US policy
on Cuba. Video
here.
Ban
was asked a soft
question about
the US torture
report -- but
NOT
whether he
thinks anyone
should be
prosecuted.
Ban was asked
a question
about Ebola
and another
about the
transatlantic
slave trade
from Africa.
In
response to
the latter
question, Ban
read the
entirety of
his answer
from a script.
Video
here.
Yes, it was in
French. But if
he's getting
the questions
in advance on
this, why not
others? And as
another
journalist in
the room, not
Inner City
Press, said
afterward,
maybe he
wasn't called
on because he
hasn't been
willing to
give his
question in
advance.
It
is not
academic: the
way Ban's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric ran
the December
17 press
conference, no
questions were
taken on
allegations
that the UN
covered up
mass rapes in
Darfur,
and video that
UN
Peacekeepers
shot democracy
protesters in
Haiti.
The Free UN Coalition for Access, formed
because Ban's
UNCA far
from defending
journalists
tried to get
the
investigative
Press thrown
out of the UN,
believes that
questions
should not be
requested or
given in
advance of
press
conferences.
We'll have
more on this.
Watch this
site.
, 
