By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
October 17 --
Press access
at the UN has
continued to
decline under
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon.
During the
October 16 UN
General
Assembly
session to
elect five new
members to the
UN Security
Council, the
UN's Media
Accreditation
and Liaison
Unit came into
the GA
photographers'
booth and said
that only
"wire service"
photographers
could remain.
But MALU has
not offered
any definition
of "wire
service," in
this new media
age. The new Free UN Coalition for Access has
demanded such
a definition,
most recently
of Ban's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric at
the October 17
UN noon
briefing. Video here.
Dujarric,
saying he was
quoting a
Supreme Court
justice on
another topic,
said, What
is a wire
service? I
know one when
I see one.
This is, as it
were, the
definition of
arbitrary.
Tellingly,
Dujarric's
office two
hours later
promoted a
meeting
ostensibly to
discuss
"access
problems," by
the UN
Correspondents
Association
a/k/a UN's
Censorship
Alliance.
Sources in the
meeting -
explicitly
limited to
those paying
money in dues,
and meriting
boycott
regardless
given the
group's
recently
record - say
that the issue
of the UN's
lack of
definition of,
but use of,
the term "wire
service" was
not even
discussed.
Nor, also
tellingly, was
the UNGA press
conference in
the UN's Press
Briefing Room
of French
president
Francois
Hollande, from
which all
non-French
journalists
were ordered
to leave.
FUNCA
resisted,
and stayed;
the UN Correspondents
Association
representative
present left,
and the group
has never
raised it
The
UN while
throwing out
media from
workspace
gives its UN
Censorship
Alliance a
large room,
which it then
limits to
those that pay
it money in
dues. Here's
how it works:
a new media at
the UN is
told, from the
pinnacle of
the UN's
Censorship
Alliance, to
pay UNCA $90
and UNCA will
get the UN to
give the media
UN office
space.
Today's UN
Censorship
Alliance is
unlikely to
get any
meaningful
media access
problem
addressed --
members its
Executive
Committee
have, in fact,
caused or
colluded in
many of the decreases
in access.
They drafted
a rule with
MALU to
eliminate journalist
workspace at
the Security
Council
stakeout;
they withheld
audio tapes and
transcripts
of a Ban
"interview"
with them,
even from
their own
members.
During last
month's
General
Debate,
journalists
weren't even
been able to
go to the
General
Assembly
stakeout
without an
escort from
MALU -- an
escort that
often did not
come on time,
or come at
all.
There was, as
well,
substantive
censorship.
Most recently
of October 16,
media
photographing
the UN General
Assembly vote
for new
Security
Council
members were
ordered NOT to
photograph the
tables of the
voters. Inner
City Press for
FUNCA resisted,
and discussed
this issue
along with the
elections (and
Cambodia) on Huffington
Post Live's
"World Brief"
on October 17,
here.
On
September 27
while Inner
City Press
filmed from
within the GA
stakeout area,
UN
Peacekeeping
chief Herve
Ladsous came
over and
blocked -- or
Banned -- the
filming,
demanding to
know what it
was for. Vine
here. Then
Ladsous
canceled the
scheduled
public Q&A
stakeout on
Mali.
While the new
Free
UN Coalition
for Access
challenged
this
censorship, on
September 27
at the
stakeout and
following up
the next week,
the old UNCA
has done
nothing about
it. In fact,
UNCA big wigs
have been
happy to take
private
briefings from
Ladsous
and others, as
access at the
UN for less
"insider"
correspondents
has continued
to decline.
The Free
UN Coalition
for Access
targeted these
censorship
practices in a
September
29 flier,
online, in the
UN including
on the "open"
bulletin board
it got the UN
to install
(the flier was
torn down, one
can only
imagine by
whom, but has
gone back up.)
Now, in a
typical UN
charade, the
very UNCA
which oversaw
this decrease
in access
belatedly says
it is
concerned and
conducts UN-promoted
meetings that
are akin to
faux, scripted
wrestling
matches with
fake punches.
This is the UNCA
that played
softball
soccer with
Ban, promoting and allowing him a photo op.
Many of these
promotions are
signed by UNCA
figurehead
Pamela Falk of
CBS, nowhere
seen during
noon briefing
fights about
media access.
Meanwhile the
UN
Spokesperson's
office is
promoting a
for-pay event
for UNCA, by
taping a flier
for it on its
counter. This
is the UN's
Censorship
Alliance.
The Free UN
Coalition for
Access has
told the UN,
again on
October 16,
that it must
address and
reverse its
blocking of
press access,
and that if it
needs input it
must hold a
meeting open
to all
journalists
who cover the
UN, not just
its chosen
UNCA -- the
UN's
Censorship
Alliance --
which has
become akin to
a
company-created
and supported
union.
Ban's
spokesperson's
office
declined to
criticize the
September 27
censorship,
nor Ladsous'
spokesman
subsequently
asking another
media to
confirm that
it would not
air an on the
record
interview with
Ladsous'
deputy Edmond
Mulet about
the UN
bringing
cholera to
Haiti. Video
here.
In fact Ban's
Spokesman
played a part
in, at least
defending, a
French-only
briefing in
the UN Press
Briefing Room.
On
September 23,
the entourage
of French
President
Francois
Hollande
repeatedly but
unsuccessfully
ordered
the UN
accredited
Press to leave
the UN's
Press Briefing
Room.
Video
here.
On September
25 when the Free UN Coalition for Access asked UN
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric, who
peaked out
from the VIP /
Green Room
behind the
Press Briefing
Room, about
the incident,
he said
sometimes
countries try
to reserve the
Room.
Asked if other
countries had
done so during
this General
Assembly,
Dujarric said
yes.
Inner City
Press then
asked Dujarric
which other
countries,
beyond his
native France: