UN
Ignores Qs on
Nigeria, Free
Press, S.
Sudan,
Corruption: Dujarric
Day 4
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, March
13 -- New /
old UN
spokesperson
Stephane
Dujarric again
refused before
noon to
answer, or
this time even
respond
to, any
single one of
a set of four
simple
questions e-mailed
to him at
8 in the
morning on
March 13.
Nor at the
even-shorting
noon briefing,
ending at
12:16 pm, did
he answer any
of the
questions
submitted four
hours
previously.
These were the
questions
asked by Inner
City Press at
8 am on March
13:
-On
Nigeria, what
is the UN
Secretary
General's or
Secretariat's
response
to the the
Nigerian group
WON saying the
UN should
refund the $30
million given
it by the
Nigerian
government for
reconstruction
of its
building that
was bombed by
Boko Haram? To
help you
answer:
Emmanuel
Ogebe
of WON said:
“We are asking
that the UN
should refund
the N
4billion
because we
believe that
an
international
organization
of
that class
should have
the resources
to fix the
building. The
fact of
the matter is
that Nigeria
should not
foot the bill
of an
international
organization
funded by all
countries of
the world and
then, poor
people who
have nothing
will loose
their houses,
churches
and the
Nigerian
government
will not
provide for
them. It is
only
obligatory
that Nigeria
pays its dues,
and we have
even gone far
to
provide peace
keeping
troops. We
have paid our
dues even with
the
lives of some
officers, and
now we have an
atrocity like
this,
instead of the
UN to take
care of the
building and
allow us have
resources to
take care of
ourselves...
We ask the UN
Secretary
General to
refund the $30
million into a
Victim
Compensation
Fund
that would
assist victims
of the
insurgent.”
This
is not (yet?)
litigation:
what is the UN
Secretariat's
response?
Second:
-While
still
requesting
response with
regard to Mr.
Roed-Larsen,
Mr. Joseph
V. Reed et al,
here is a more
systematic
question:
Has
the SG yet
prepared the
guidelines
required by
Resolution
67/255?
Following the
GA's decision
on $1/year
contracts in
April 2013,
how
many
individuals
currently have
$1/year
contracts, and
who are they?
To
assist your
answer:
A/RES/67/255, 73rd
plenary
meeting 12
April 2013 e,
excerpt
...63.
Stresses that
one-dollar-a-year
contracts
should be
granted only
under
exceptional
circumstances
and be limited
to high-level
appointments,
and requests
the
Secretary-General
to prepare
guidelines
regarding the
use of these
contracts,
along the same
lines
of those
established
for
when-actually-employed
appointments,
and to
report
thereon, in
the context of
his next
overview
report, to the
General
Assembly at
the main part
of its
sixty-ninth
session;
Third:
What is the
UN's (or
UNMISS')
response to
South Sudan's
information
minister
Michael Makuei
saying “When
you go and
interview a
rebel
who ran away
from here and
you come and
play that
interview on
government
territory, and
you know that
man is not
friendly --
this
is not the
meaning of
journalism.
You interview
him outside
and
publish it,
whatever you
do, outside,
but when you
come and
disseminate
this poisonous
information
inside South
Sudan, it is
an
offense.”
What
is UNMISS' (or
the UN's)
response to
that, and to
Wau University
students
petition for
the UN to
leave Bahr al
Ghazal. To
assist your
answering:
“Winnie
Babihuga, the
world body’s
representative
in Western
Bahr el Ghazal
state welcomed
the student’s
petition and
promised to
forward it to
its
headquarters
in New York.”
Has
the petition
yet arrived?
This is an
ongoing
request to be
informed
if and when it
does.
4th
and for now
last:
-Now
that UN Global
Compact member
Telia Sonera
has been
linked to the
Uzbek bribery
and money
laundering
probe, what is
the UN or its
Global
Compact's
response?
To
assist you
answering:
http://yle.fi/uutiset/sonera_linked_to_uzbek_bribery_probe/7134014
News
12.3.2014
21:07
|
updated
12.3.2014
21:16
Sonera
linked to
Uzbek bribery
probe One of
Finland’s
largest
telecom
operators has
been
indirectly
tied to a
money
laundering
investigation
into the
flamboyant
daughter of
Uzbekistan's
president
and
http://www.teliasonera.com/en/newsroom/news/2013/teliasonera-becomes-a-member-of-the-un-global-compact/
TeliaSonera
becomes
a member of
the UN Global
Compact 21
February 2013
The UN
Global
Compact, with
over 10,000
corporate
members and
other
stakeholders
across 130
countries, is
the largest
voluntary
corporate
responsibility
initiative in
the world. It
is a
leadership
platform
for the
development,
implementation
and disclosure
of responsible
and
sustainable
corporate
policies and
practices. In
February,
TeliaSonera
became a
signatory and
a member of
the UN Global
Compact.
At the March
13 noon
briefing,
Dujarric told
the first
questioner on
Ukraine, that
is a legitimate
question. Does
this mean, to
Dujarric, that
corruption and
freedom of the
press
questions are
NOT legitimate?
On
March 12,
Inner City
Press asked
Dujarric:
-On
South Sudan,
what is the
UN's response
to NGO Rally
for Peace and
Democracy
critique of
worsening
conditions in
UNMISS camps,
specifically
that "most of
IDPs reported
that their
food
security
situation in
the camps is
deteriorating
further and
that
their repeated
complaints are
falling on
deaf ears...
Domestic
flies,
mosquitoes and
cockroaches
infest the
camp dwellings
as the rainy
season almost
approaching.
This has
driven fear
for reason of
high
morbidity and
fatality
caseloads of
bacterial
diseases –
bloody and
watery
diarrhea
(dysentery),
malaria,
typhoid,
pneumonia and
warm
infestations."
-As
requested in
person at the
March 10 noon
briefing,
please confirm
or
deny that
Haiti cholera
court papers
were taped to
the door of
the
Secretary
General's
residence on
or around
January 20;
please state
not only the
title
(inserted into
the
transcript)
but the
current
terms of
reference,
mandate and
pay scale of
Mr. Iqbal
Riza, and
confirm that
Augustine
Mahiga has
been paid as a
USG since June
2013.
What lessons
has he
conveyed to
Nicholas Kay?
Has Margaret
Vogt
conveyed
lessons to
Babacar Gaye?
Relatedly,
please
state the
current terms
of reference,
mandate and
pay scale of
Mr. Joseph V.
Reed, and
state how many
days Terje
Roed Larsen
has
worked on his
mandate, where
(Bahrain?) and
at what level
of
compensation.
-
on behalf of
the Free UN
Coalition for
Access, asking
why the
Secretary
General's
photo op with
NYC Mayor Bill
De Blasio, in
his
daily
scheduled, has
not been
listed in the
UN Media
Alert.
-Please
state
why the
Secretariat
has declined
to recognize
(or give
work-release
to) those who
garnered the
most votes in
the December
election, and
state who the
Secretariat
recognizes as
the Staff
Union
at this time.
Please
email answers
as soon as
they become
available, as
requested,
before
noon (several
of these
questions were
asked on March
10). Thank
you.
Tellingly,
even when
responses
came, they did
not MENTION
Mahiga or
Margaret Vogt,
much less Joseph
V. Reed or
Terje Roed
Larsen;
because Ban's
meeting was
canceled, why
it was not
listed in the
day's UN Media
Alert, a
longstanding
request to
Dujarric by
the Free
UN Coalition
for Access,
was not
answered.
Here's what
Dujarric's
office sent:
Subject:
Your
emailed
questions
From:
UN
Spokesperson -
Do Not Reply
un.org
Date:
Wed, Mar 12,
2014 at 3:42
PM
To:
Matthew.Lee
[at]
innercitypress.com
Cc:
Stephane
Dujarric [at]
un.org
Regarding
your
emailed
questions, the
Spokesperson
read the
following on
the
conditions at
an UNMISS camp
at today's
noon briefing:
"Moving
on
South to South
Sudan, as we
told you on
Monday, heavy
rains in
Juba have
damaged tents
at the Tomping
compound.
The
Office for the
Coordination
of
Humanitarian
Affairs (OCHA)
says that
it has
exacerbated
already
difficult
living
conditions.
Aid agencies
responded with
measures to
improve
drainage and
shelters in
the site,
and will
assist people
to move to
plots in the
UN House base
later
this week.
The
UN Mission
also says that
it is finding
ways to
improve
conditions by
trying to
extend current
sites and is
building new
ones. Our
humanitarian
colleagues
further says
that displaced
communities
and
the aid
agencies
supporting
them expect to
face similar
challenges in
several sites
once the rainy
season starts
in earnest in
April."
On
your question
on Haiti, the
Spokesperson
has repeatedly
said that we
would not be
able to
comment on
claims against
the
Organisation,
as
per standard
legal
practice.
On
your question
on different
special
advisers, the
Spokesperson
provided an
answer at the
noon briefing
two days ago.
In addition to
what was said
then, we can
add that Iqbal
Riza is a
Special
Adviser,
who has
advised the
Secretary-General
on the
Alliance of
Civilizations,
among other
topics.
The
meeting with
Mayor di
Blasio was
postponed,
following the
building
collapse in
Manhattan
today.
We
have no
comment on the
question on
staff
representation
in New York.
Confirming
that legal
papers were
taped to the
door of Ban
Ki-moon's
residence is
not commenting
on a legal
case. In fact,
refusing to
discuss the
service of
papers is
another way
for Ban's UN
to try to
dodge the
cases, and its
responsibility.
The answer on
March 10 on
Mahiga called
nine months of
pay a short
time; of the
written
questions,
Vogt, Reed and
Roed Larsen
are not
mentioned.
This is a
complete lack
of
transparency
about high UN
officials -
and about
money. This is
the UN.
Dujarric began
on March 10
with questions
raised two
weeks ago (and
before) about
censorship and
his
replacement
atop the News
& Media
Division and
UN
Accreditation
UNanswered.
Tellingly,
some in the
press briefing
room applauded
before
Dujarric even
said a word.
He read a
statement for
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon about
"The Ukraine."
In the
question and
answer
session, four
of the first
five
questioners
Dujarric
called on were
among the 15
executive
committee
members of the
United
Nations
Correspondents
Association,
with which Dujarric
has some
history.
Inner City
Press asked if
Ban
Ki-moon had
the Haiti
cholera court
papers taped
to his
residence door
on January 20
-- no answer
-- and for UN
response to
Channel 4's
new video
showing abuse
by the
military of
Sri Lanka,
from which the
UN accepts
peacekeepers
and even
Shavendra
Silva as an
adviser.
(Dujarric said
he hasn't seen
the video; it
is online here:
warning,
graphic).
On the case
against the UN
for bringing
cholera to
Haiti, Inner
City Press
asked Dujarric
to confirm
that the court
papers were
taped to the
door of Ban's
residence on
January.
Dujarric
declined to
confirm - or
deny - this. Video on Haiti (and Sri Lanka) here.
As it did days
ago, Inner
City Press
asked for the
status of
selecting
Dujarric's
replacement as
head of the
News and Media
Division, in
charge of UN
media
accreditation.
No answer has
been given
about this
status. This
is of concern.
A
flier the Free UN Coalition for Access posted on
this topic, on
the "non-UNCA"
bulletin board
it advocated
for, was torn
down on March
7. At a second
briefing, by
the CTBTO, on
March 10
Dujarric
called first
on UNCA, then
on others.
When Inner
City Press
thanked
CTBTO's Zerbo
on behalf of
FUNCA - the
point is,
there cannot
be only one
organization
given UNCA's
track record
of attempted
censorship and
even more now
with
Dujarric's
history with
them --
Dujarric tried
to move on
(back to UNCA)
before the
related
question on France's
nuclear tests
in the Pacific
was answered.
It is a new
era, requiring
a new
approach.
Two years ago
Dujarric was
re-introduced
to UN
journalist as
the chief of
the News &
Media
Division, in a
reception in
what the UN
called "UNCA
Square." And
then the
censorship
attempts
began.
A
journalist for
Iranian TV,
found to have
a rubber gun
which was a
prop in an
independent
film he was
working on, had his UN
accreditation
revoked,
permanently.
Dujarric was
in charge of
Media
Accreditation,
and Inner City
Press asked
him for a
justification
of this "one
strike and
you're out
policy." No
answer was
ever provided
by Dujarric.
Also
in his Media
Accreditation
role, Dujarric
chastised
Inner City
Press for
daring to go
stand outside
and try to
cover a
meeting of
Ban's Senior
Advisory Group
on
Peacekeeping
Operations,
which included
controversial
Sri Lankan
military
figure
Shavendra
Silva. After
the Sri Lankan
government
directed a
complaint
letter to the
aforementioned
UNCA, Inner
City Press was
told
it could not
cover the
meetings.
Inner
City Press,
then on the
board of UNCA,
was not
notified when
the
organization's
then president
agreed to
screen a Sri
Lankan
government
film denying
war crimes.
After it
published an
article noting
that the UNCA
president had
in the past
rented one of
his apartments
to Palitha
Kohona, Sri
Lanka's
Permanent
Representative
to the UN,
demands were
made that
Inner City
Press remove
the article
from the
Internet.
UNCA
took to
sending copies
of
correspondence
to Dujarric,
about articles
Inner City
Press had
written about
officials and
diplomats of
Dujarric's
native France.
Finally, UNCA
first vice
president
Louis
Charbonneau of
Reuters sent a
complaint
against Inner
City Press to
Dujarric,
calling it
"for the
record."
More
recently,
Charbonneau
has gotten one
of his
complaints to
Dujarric
banned from
Google's
Search, using
a filing
under the
Digital
Millennium
Copyright Act
-- straight up
censorship.
What does
Dujarric say?
In
fact, Dujarric
solicited
complaints
against Inner
City Press
from other big-media
UNCA
board
members,
through a
private,
including
through non-UN
email address.
Freedom
of Information
Act responses
show that UNCA
board members
met with "the
UN" to
request that
Inner City
Press be
thrown out.
Once Inner
City Press
published some
of these,
Dujarric on
June 29, 2012
asked to meet
Inner City
Press.
Dujarric
told
Inner City
Press not to
refer to Ban
Ki-moon as
"Wan Ki-moon"
and not to
refer to Herve
Ladsous,
the fourth
Frenchman in a
row atop UN
Peacekeeping,
as The Drone
despite
Ladsous
proposing the
UN's first use
of drones and
refusing to
answer Press
questions
about it.
This and a
specious
criticism for
having signed
Nobel Peace
Prize Winner
Tawakul Karman
of Yemen into
the UN,
where she
dared speak on
the UN
microphone
after a
Security
Council
meeting on
Yemen, were
linked by
Dujarric to
re-accreditation
he controlled.
Criticism of
stories,
coverage and
even tweets is
fine -- but
when done by
an official in
charge of
accreditation,
and even tied
to
accreditation,
we call it
what it is:
censorship.
Disgusted,
Inner
City Press and
another long
time
correspondent
from Brazil
founded the Free UN Coalition for Access as an
alternative to
the insider
UNCA, which
did not for
example offer
any defense to
the cameraman
thrown out for
the rubber
gun. (Reuters'
Charbonneau,
in fact, wrote
a story
playing up the
Iranian
angle.)
But
Dujarric
became the
interlocutor
for FUNCA. He
said only UNCA
was needed.
After
convening a
meeting
between FUNCA
and UNCA, at
which Inner
City Press openly said
"this is on
the record"
and UNCA
president
Pamela Falk of
CBS said,
"He's going to
write about
this,"
Dujarric sent
Inner City
Press a letter
which claimed the meeting was off the record and said
FUNCA was not
a DPI
interlocutor
for reform.
There
have been no
reforms since,
quite the
opposite.
Dujarric, who
earlier
refused a New
York Civil
Liberties
Union request
that the UN
provide due
process to
journalists,
continued the
Kafka-esque
atmosphere in
March 2013
when Reuters
and Agence
France-Presse
filed stealth
complaints
leading
with how Inner
City Press
asked a
question to Herve
Ladsous.
When
Dujarric's
Accreditation
Unit led a
raid on Inner
City Press'
office, photos
from which
quickly
appeared on
BuzzFeed,
Dujarric
denied any
role in giving
out the
photos. But
the published
photos are
identical to
the ones his
unit took that
day.
Since the
letter with
the false "off
the record"
claim, the
raid and
photos and
attempt to
censor tweets,
there has been
very little
contact
(though there
was an attempt
to essentially
ban FUNCA,
another
limitation on
freedom of
association,
speech and
press). FUNCA
has continued,
working with
UN-focused
journalists
not only in
New York but
as far afield
as Somaliland
and Colombia.
Now
Stephane "The
Censor"
Dujarric is
the
spokesperson.
Can he use
this position
to pursue the
censorship
he's sought
for the past
two years?
FUNCA opposes
it, and says
these
questions must
be answered.
Watch this
site.