UN
Moscow Call
Limits
Questions All
1-Way, No
Sanctions,
Just Scribes
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, March
20 -- When new
/ old UN
spokesperson
Stephane
Dujarric
phoned in a briefing
from Moscow on
his eleventh
day on the
job, the
questions he
took all
pointed in one
direction, the
type of
favoritism
growing ever
worse at the
UN.
Dujarric's
deputy Farhan
Haq, who ended
his truncated
eight minutes
of Q&A on
the "rest of
the world" by
chiding Inner
City Press for
asking too many
questions --
actually, only
South
Sudan and
a UN
Staff Union
protest
against Ban
Ki-moon's
mobility plan
-- selected
for Dujarric
only one type
of question.
In fact, the
questions were
repetitive,
trying to get
a statement
from Ban even
if only spokesperson-mediated
that the
Crimea
referendum was
illegal. Haq
called on a
series of
executive
committee
members of the
old UN Correspondents
Association,
which
previously
lobbied
Dujarric to
try to get
Inner City
Press thrown
out of the UN.
Several of
these, it has
been noted there
is no record
of them
writing or
reporting
about Ukraine.
But this is
how the UN
works, or
doesn't work,
now.
Earlier on
March 20, the
US announced a
series of new
sanctions
including
against Bank
Rossiya. Inner
City Press
thought this
should be
asked to
Dujarric in
Moscow, if Ban
or Putin or Lavrov
had raised it.
But none of
those called
on by Haq even
asked the
question.
We'll have
more on this.
Last week,
Dujarric did
not provide a
Press
requested
read-out of
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
meeting
earlier in the
week with
Estonia's
foreign
minister, who
was captured
on leaked
audio
recounting
that the same
snipers may
well have shot
both police
and protesters
in Ukraine. No
read-out?
Adding to
unanswered
questions
still not
answered on
March 20
ranging from
Nigeria to
Terje
Roed-Larsen,
before 8 am on
March 14 Inner
City Press
asked
Dujarric:
These
are Inner City
Press
questions to
which
responses are
requested
before noon
today (they
are being sent
before 8 am,
and there are
only four of
them)
1)
Please provide
a read-out of
the Secretary
General's
meeting with
the foreign
minister of
Estonia this
week,
including
whether the
issue of who
called the
snipers' shots
in Kyiv was
discussed,
particularly
since a read
out of the
SG's meeting
with the
foreign
minister of
Turkey was
given -- or
explain why no
Estonia FM
read out is
being given.
2)
What is the
UN's / UN
Peacekeeping's
response to an
Indian police
officer now
facing
punishment for
having served
in the UNAMID
mission in
Darfur? See, http://www.ndtv.com/article/south/tamil-nadu-suspends-woman-ips-officer-who-served-in-un-mission-in-sudan-495423
3)
Please state
if the
Secretary
General /
Secretariat
views the
"invitation"
from Thailand
for the SG to
become
involved as
valid, given
questions
raised about
it in
Thailand, see,
http://www.bangkokpost.com/news/local/399785/surapong-seeks-to-quell-un-plan-revolt
4) In
the most
recent
Situation
Report on CAR
(as of March
12) it is said
"Targeted
violence
against
minority
groups
continues
countrywide,
including in
Bangui. Over
20,000 people
are besieged
and threatened
by armed
militias in 18
different
locations. The
majority of
them are
calling for
humanitarian
assistance
leaving these
enclaves for
safer areas in
or outside the
country."
Please
confirm that
the
referred-to
"minority
groups" are
Muslims, and
if so please
explain why
the UN would
not identify
them as such.
Please
state what if
anything the
UN system has
done on Navi
Pillay's
January 20
statement that
France's
actions in CAR
left Muslim
communities
vulnerable to
attack.
The
questions
about dollar a
year envoys,
Nigeria, UN
Global Compact
member and
money
laundering /
corruption
probe, service
of Haiti
cholera case
papers and UN
Media Alert
and others
have not been
responded to
in any way -
please
explain.
Here is the
totality of
Dujarric's
office answers
to the four
questions
above,
provided after
the noon
briefing that
never
happened:
we
have been
informed that
there will be
no readout of
the meeting
with the
Estonian
foreign
minister. We
have no
comment
concerning
Thailand for
today.
On the
Central
African
Republic,
officials
throughout the
UN system have
identified
specific
minorities who
have been
targeted in
specific
incidents, and
you will have
seen the many
statements and
press releases
concerning
violence
against
Muslims.
Tellingly, the
question about
UN
Peacekeeping
run by Herve
Ladsous was
not even
mentioned in
this cursory
response, nor
does the
paragraph on
CAR show any
actual follow
up to Navi
Pillay's
statement
about France
putting
Muslims at
risk. (An
answer to the
previously
day's question
about the
Global Compact
as provided
and will be
separately
reported.)
These were the
other
questions
asked by Inner
City Press at
8 am on March
13:
-On
Nigeria, what
is the UN
Secretary
General's or
Secretariat's
response to
the the
Nigerian group
WON saying the
UN should
refund the $30
million given
it by the
Nigerian
government for
reconstruction
of its
building that
was bombed by
Boko Haram? To
help you
answer:
Emmanuel
Ogebe
of WON said:
“We are asking
that the UN
should refund
the N 4billion
because we
believe that
an
international
organization
of that class
should have
the resources
to fix the
building. The
fact of the
matter is that
Nigeria should
not foot the
bill of an
international
organization
funded by all
countries of
the world and
then, poor
people who
have nothing
will loose
their houses,
churches and
the Nigerian
government
will not
provide for
them. It is
only
obligatory
that Nigeria
pays its dues,
and we have
even gone far
to provide
peace keeping
troops. We
have paid our
dues even with
the lives of
some officers,
and now we
have an
atrocity like
this, instead
of the UN to
take care of
the building
and allow us
have resources
to take care
of
ourselves...
We ask the UN
Secretary
General to
refund the $30
million into a
Victim
Compensation
Fund that
would assist
victims of the
insurgent.”
This
is not (yet?)
litigation:
what is the UN
Secretariat's
response?
Second:
-While
still
requesting
response with
regard to Mr.
Roed-Larsen,
Mr. Joseph V.
Reed et al,
here is a more
systematic
question:
Has
the SG yet
prepared the
guidelines
required by
Resolution
67/255?
Following the
GA's decision
on $1/year
contracts in
April 2013,
how many
individuals
currently have
$1/year
contracts, and
who are they?
To
assist your
answer:
A/RES/67/255, 73rd
plenary
meeting 12
April 2013 e,
excerpt
...63.
Stresses that
one-dollar-a-year
contracts
should be
granted only
under
exceptional
circumstances
and be limited
to high-level
appointments,
and requests
the
Secretary-General
to prepare
guidelines
regarding the
use of these
contracts,
along the same
lines of those
established
for
when-actually-employed
appointments,
and to report
thereon, in
the context of
his next
overview
report, to the
General
Assembly at
the main part
of its
sixty-ninth
session;
Third:
What is the
UN's (or
UNMISS')
response to
South Sudan's
information
minister
Michael Makuei
saying “When
you go and
interview a
rebel who ran
away from here
and you come
and play that
interview on
government
territory, and
you know that
man is not
friendly --
this is not
the meaning of
journalism.
You interview
him outside
and publish
it, whatever
you do,
outside, but
when you come
and
disseminate
this poisonous
information
inside South
Sudan, it is
an offense.”
What
is UNMISS' (or
the UN's)
response to
that, and to
Wau University
students
petition for
the UN to
leave Bahr al
Ghazal. To
assist your
answering:
“Winnie
Babihuga, the
world body’s
representative
in Western
Bahr el Ghazal
state welcomed
the student’s
petition and
promised to
forward it to
its
headquarters
in New York.”
Has
the petition
yet arrived?
This is an
ongoing
request to be
informed if
and when it
does.
At the March
13 noon
briefing,
Dujarric told
the first
questioner on
Ukraine, that
is a
legitimate
question. Does
this mean, to
Dujarric, that
corruption and
freedom of the
press
questions are
NOT
legitimate?
Apparently
this is the
case.
Dujarric began
on March 10
with questions
raised two
weeks ago (and
before) about
censorship and
his
replacement
atop the News
& Media
Division and
UN
Accreditation
UNanswered.
Tellingly,
some in the
press briefing
room applauded
before
Dujarric even
said a word.
He read a
statement for
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon about
"The Ukraine."
In the
question and
answer
session, four
of the first
five
questioners
Dujarric
called on were
among the 15
executive
committee
members of the
United
Nations
Correspondents
Association,
with which Dujarric
has some
history.
Inner City
Press asked if
Ban
Ki-moon had
the Haiti
cholera court
papers taped
to his
residence door
on January 20
-- no answer
-- and for UN
response to
Channel 4's
new video
showing abuse
by the
military of
Sri Lanka,
from which the
UN accepts
peacekeepers
and even
Shavendra
Silva as an
adviser.
(Dujarric said
he hasn't seen
the video; it
is online here:
warning,
graphic).
On the case
against the UN
for bringing
cholera to
Haiti, Inner
City Press
asked Dujarric
to confirm
that the court
papers were
taped to the
door of Ban's
residence on
January.
Dujarric
declined to
confirm - or
deny - this. Video on Haiti (and Sri Lanka) here.
As it did days
ago, Inner
City Press
asked for the
status of
selecting
Dujarric's
replacement as
head of the
News and Media
Division, in
charge of UN
media
accreditation.
No answer has
been given
about this
status. This
is of concern.
A
flier the Free UN Coalition for Access posted on
this topic, on
the "non-UNCA"
bulletin board
it advocated
for, was torn
down on March
7. At a second
briefing, by
the CTBTO, on
March 10
Dujarric
called first
on UNCA, then
on others.
When Inner
City Press
thanked
CTBTO's Zerbo
on behalf of
FUNCA - the
point is,
there cannot
be only one
organization
given UNCA's
track record
of attempted
censorship and
even more now
with
Dujarric's
history with
them --
Dujarric tried
to move on
(back to UNCA)
before the
related
question on France's
nuclear tests
in the Pacific
was answered.
It is a new
era, requiring
a new
approach.
Two years ago
Dujarric was
re-introduced
to UN
journalist as
the chief of
the News &
Media
Division, in a
reception in
what the UN
called "UNCA
Square." And
then the
censorship
attempts
began.
A
journalist for
Iranian TV,
found to have
a rubber gun
which was a
prop in an
independent
film he was
working on, had his UN
accreditation
revoked,
permanently.
Dujarric was
in charge of
Media
Accreditation,
and Inner City
Press asked
him for a
justification
of this "one
strike and
you're out
policy." No
answer was
ever provided
by Dujarric.
Also
in his Media
Accreditation
role, Dujarric
chastised
Inner City
Press for
daring to go
stand outside
and try to
cover a
meeting of
Ban's Senior
Advisory Group
on
Peacekeeping
Operations,
which included
controversial
Sri Lankan
military
figure
Shavendra
Silva. After
the Sri Lankan
government
directed a
complaint
letter to the
aforementioned
UNCA, Inner
City Press was
told
it could not
cover the
meetings.
Inner
City Press,
then on the
board of UNCA,
was not
notified when
the
organization's
then president
agreed to
screen a Sri
Lankan
government
film denying
war crimes.
After it
published an
article noting
that the UNCA
president had
in the past
rented one of
his apartments
to Palitha
Kohona, Sri
Lanka's
Permanent
Representative
to the UN,
demands were
made that
Inner City
Press remove
the article
from the
Internet.
UNCA
took to
sending copies
of
correspondence
to Dujarric,
about articles
Inner City
Press had
written about
officials and
diplomats of
Dujarric's
native France.
Finally, UNCA
first vice
president
Louis
Charbonneau of
Reuters sent a
complaint
against Inner
City Press to
Dujarric,
calling it
"for the
record."
More
recently,
Charbonneau
has gotten one
of his
complaints to
Dujarric
banned from
Google's
Search, using
a filing
under the
Digital
Millennium
Copyright Act
-- straight up
censorship.
What does
Dujarric say?
In
fact, Dujarric
solicited
complaints
against Inner
City Press
from other big-media
UNCA
board
members,
through a
private,
including
through non-UN
email address.
Freedom
of Information
Act responses
show that UNCA
board members
met with "the
UN" to
request that
Inner City
Press be
thrown out.
Once Inner
City Press
published some
of these,
Dujarric on
June 29, 2012
asked to meet
Inner City
Press.
Dujarric
told
Inner City
Press not to
refer to Ban
Ki-moon as
"Wan Ki-moon"
and not to
refer to Herve
Ladsous,
the fourth
Frenchman in a
row atop UN
Peacekeeping,
as The Drone
despite
Ladsous
proposing the
UN's first use
of drones and
refusing to
answer Press
questions
about it.
This and a
specious
criticism for
having signed
Nobel Peace
Prize Winner
Tawakul Karman
of Yemen into
the UN,
where she
dared speak on
the UN
microphone
after a
Security
Council
meeting on
Yemen, were
linked by
Dujarric to
re-accreditation
he controlled.
Criticism of
stories,
coverage and
even tweets is
fine -- but
when done by
an official in
charge of
accreditation,
and even tied
to
accreditation,
we call it
what it is:
censorship.
Disgusted,
Inner
City Press and
another long
time
correspondent
from Brazil
founded the Free UN Coalition for Access as an
alternative to
the insider
UNCA, which
did not for
example offer
any defense to
the cameraman
thrown out for
the rubber
gun. (Reuters'
Charbonneau,
in fact, wrote
a story
playing up the
Iranian
angle.)
But
Dujarric
became the
interlocutor
for FUNCA. He
said only UNCA
was needed.
After
convening a
meeting
between FUNCA
and UNCA, at
which Inner
City Press openly said
"this is on
the record"
and UNCA
president
Pamela Falk of
CBS said,
"He's going to
write about
this,"
Dujarric sent
Inner City
Press a letter
which claimed the meeting was off the record and said
FUNCA was not
a DPI
interlocutor
for reform.
So on March
20, it was a
UNCA executive
committee top
heavy circus,
here were their
election results,
compared to
votes for that
position in
December 2011,
those called
on in the
short March 20
Q&A in
bold:
Dec
'13 Dec '11
Prez:
* 78 [85]
Pamela Falk,
CBS News TV
and Radio
1st VP
* 74 [79]
Kahraman
Haliscelik,
TRT Turkish
Radio & TV
2d VP
* 48 71 Masood
Haider, Dawn,
Pakistan
* 48
[71] Sylviane
Zehil,
L’Orient Le
Jour
3d VP
* 55 [62] Erol
Avdovic,
Webpublicapress
38 Ali
Barada,
An-Nahar/France
24
Trez *
81 [71]
Bouchra
Benyoussef,
Maghreb Arab
Press
Sect *
79 [81] Seana
Magee, Kyodo
News
Members
at
Large:
* 57
1. Nabil Abi
Saab , Alhurra
TV (US BBG)
* 57
2. Talal
Al-Haj
,Al-Arabiya
News channel
22 3.
George
Baumgarten ,
Jewish
Newspapers,
Nation Media
* 50
4. Sherwin
Bryce-Pease,
South African
Broadcasting
(SABC)
* 51
5. Zhenqiu Gu,
Xinhua News
Agency
* 69
6. Melissa
Kent,
CBC/Radio
Canada
* 56
7. Evelyn
Leopold,
Huffington
Post
Contributor
49 8.
J. Tuyet
Nguyen, German
Press Agency
DPA
* 67
9. Michelle
Nichols,
Reuters
41 10.
Edwin
Nwanchukwu,
News Agency of
Nigeria
27 11.
Cia Pak,
Scannews
*54
12. Valeria
Robecco, ANSA
* 54
13. Sangwon
Yoon ,
Bloomberg
Some
of the elected
are new and
their
positions on
UNCA Executive
Committee
members trying
to get other
(investigative)
media thrown
out of the UN,
and the need
to preclude
this and UNCA
leaders'
anonymous
social media
trolling, are
not yet known.
(Some not
elected were
among the
better / more
diverse
candidates.)
There
have been no
reforms since,
quite the
opposite.
Dujarric, who
earlier
refused a New
York Civil
Liberties
Union request
that the UN
provide due
process to
journalists,
continued the
Kafka-esque
atmosphere in
March 2013
when Reuters
and Agence
France-Presse
filed stealth
complaints
leading
with how Inner
City Press
asked a
question to Herve
Ladsous.
When
Dujarric's
Accreditation
Unit led a
raid on Inner
City Press'
office, photos
from which
quickly
appeared on
BuzzFeed,
Dujarric
denied any
role in giving
out the
photos. But
the published
photos are
identical to
the ones his
unit took that
day.
Since the
letter with
the false "off
the record"
claim, the
raid and
photos and
attempt to
censor tweets,
there has been
very little
contact
(though there
was an attempt
to essentially
ban FUNCA,
another
limitation on
freedom of
association,
speech and
press). FUNCA
has continued,
working with
UN-focused
journalists
not only in
New York but
as far afield
as Somaliland
and Colombia.
Now
Stephane "The
Censor"
Dujarric is
the
spokesperson.
Can he use
this position
to pursue the
censorship
he's sought
for the past
two years?
FUNCA opposes
it, and says
these
questions must
be answered.
Watch this
site.