US
Says Will Help
Syria Coalition
With Banks,
G77 Seethes,
Resolution
Pends
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, May 6
-- The US as
Host Country
to the United
Nations has
told the
member states
in the Group
of 77 that it
can do little
to live up to
the provision
in the Host
Country
Agreement that
countries'
missions
should have
access to
banking
services.
This has given
rise to G77
outrage, on
which Inner
City Press
first reported
on March 18,
and to a draft
General
Assembly
resolution,
below.
Significantly,
when the US
State
Department was
asked on May 5
what the
effect of granting
foreign
mission status
to the Syrian
Opposition Coalition
would be, the
response was,
"It will allow
us to formally
facilitate
banking and
security
services for
the coalition
offices in the
United
States."
Several G77
members have
expressed
surprise or
anger at this
statement, one
telling Inner
City Press,
The US can't
do anything
for countries,
some
supposedly
allies, but
will
facilitate
banking for
these
Gulf-sponsored
rebels?
The Syrian
Coalition
under Ahmad
Jarba is based
in Turkey, and
has been
subject to a power
struggle between
Qatar and Saudi
Arabia, with
the latter
mostly
winning. As
one G77 member
put it, Money
talks.
Back on March
18 JPMorgan
Chase came up
as a topic,
and target, in
a closed door
meeting at the
UN of the
Group of 77
and China on
March 18,
several Permanent
Representative
then
exclusively
told Inner
City Press.
They marveled
that the UN
does business
with JPM Chase
while the bank
cuts off many
of the member
states of the
UN.
Now a
G77-agreed
draft
resolution has
emerged,
including a
review of the
UN's relations
with JPM
Chase, and has
the votes to
be adopted in
the General
Assembly, as
reported by IPS.
Inner City
Press is
publishing the
full text,
below.
In the
half-light of
the UN
Conference
Building's
second floor
on March 18,
ambassadors
complained
that while JPMorgan
Chase is
moving to deny
many of their
missions bank
accounts, the
bank also
overcharges
them when for
example they
pay or get
paid by UN
Peacekeeping.
The
idea discussed
was to draft
and vote on a
General
Assembly
resolution on
the topic. The
US government
is required,
under the UN
Host Country
Agreement, to
try to ensure
banking
services for
countries'
diplomatic
missions. Here
is the
G77-agreed
language, on
which for now
the UN
Secretariat
has declined
comment:
7
April 2014
Group of 77
and China
DRAFT
RESOLUTION
General
Assembly
Sixty-eighth
session
Agenda
item 124
Strengthening
of the United
Nations system
Agenda
item 125
United Nations
reform:
measures and
proposals
Enhancement
of
the
administration
and financial
functioning of
the United
Nations
The
General
Assembly,
PP1
Guided by the
purposes and
principles of
the Charter of
the United
Nations and
its relevant
provisions,
PP2
Considering
the agreement
established by
the United
Nations, the
host country,
and the City
of New York,
in order to
guarantee the
rights,
obligations
and the
fulfillment of
responsibilities
by Member
States towards
the United
Nations, under
the United
Nations
Charter and
international
law,
PP3
Taking into
consideration
also that the
Vienna
Convention on
Diplomatic
Relations of
1961 and the
host country
agreement of
26 June 1947
approved by
General
Assembly
resolution
A/RES/169(II),
are the
regulatory
framework for
States and
international
organizations,
in particular
the relations
for the United
Nations
headquarters
in the City of
New York and
the Member and
Observer
States,
PP4
Expressing its
deep concern
over the
decisions made
on a number of
occasions by
several
banking
institutions,
including JP
Morgan Chase
Bank (the
United States
consumer and
commercial
banking
business of
JPMorgan Chase
& Co.) in
relation to
the closing of
the Permanent
Missions’
accounts and
the accounts
of their staff
accredited to
the United
Nations and
their
relatives,
PP5
Regretting the
notifications
made by the
host country
to the
Permanent
Missions,
indicating
that the
relations
between the
Permanent
Missions of
Member and
Observer
States and
their staff
with the
banking
institutions
in the City of
New York, as
well as the
financial
relations
between the
United Nations
Secretariat
and the
banking
institutions,
are both of a
private nature
and are not
regulated,
directed, or
oriented in
any way by the
host country
or any of its
agencies,
PP6
Stressing that
Governments of
Members and
Observers of
the United
Nations, the
Permanent
Missions and
their staff,
as well as the
United Nations
headquarters,
UN Agencies,
Funds and
Programmes,
ought to be
guaranteed the
normal
functioning of
their
facilities in
order to
discharge
their duties,
and recalling
the
obligations of
the Host
Country under
international
law to accord
full
facilities for
the
performances
of the
functions of
the Permanent
Missions
accredited to
the United
Nations;
PP7
Keeping in
mind the need
for Permanent
Missions and
the United
Nations
organization
as a whole, to
establish
long-term
business
relations
based on
mutual trust
and respect,
especially in
light of the
latest actions
taken by some
banking
institutions,
including the
JP Morgan
Chase Bank in
this regard,
OP1
Requests the
Secretary
General to
review and
report to the
General
Assembly,
within the
next 120 days
following the
adoption of
the present
resolution, of
any obstacles
or impediments
observed in
the accounts
opened by the
Permanent
Missions of
Member and
Observer
States or
their staff at
the JP Morgan
Chase Bank in
the City of
New York, and
the impact
that these
impediments
have on the
adequate
functioning of
their offices,
and, to this
end, invites
Member and
Observer
States to
provide the
Secretary
General with
relevant
information
that will
facilitate the
elaboration of
such report;
OP2
Also requests
the Secretary
General to
submit to the
General
Assembly a set
of
recommendations
and a proposal
oriented to
reviewing the
U.N.
Secretariat’s
financial
relations with
the JP Morgan
Chase Bank and
considering
alternatives
to such
financial
institutions
and to report
thereon along
with the
information
requested in
OP1 above;
OP3
Further
requests the
Secretary
General, as
soon as
possible but
not later than
30 days from
the adoption
of the present
resolution, to
provide Member
and Observer
States with
alternative
options
regarding
banking
services in
the City of
New York, to
allow them to
adequately
manage and
maintain their
accounts,
assessed
budgetary
contributions,
voluntary
contributions,
transfers and
other
financial
activities
directly
related to
their
membership to
the United
Nations, and
their
Permanent
Missions,
while
reassuring, by
holding proper
negotiations
on this matter
in his
capacity as UN
chief
administrative
officer,
including with
the host
country, that
all Permanent
and Observer
Missions and
their staff
and their
family members
will be
granted equal,
fair, and
non-discriminatory
treatment from
the referred
institutions
when
conducting
their
respective
accounts;
OP4
Requests the
host country,
in light of
its
obligations
under
international
law including
the host
country
agreement, in
particular
sections 1,
2(b) and 27
and especially
stressing the
provisions as
outlined in
section 25,
and the Vienna
Convention, to
take, as soon
as possible,
all the
necessary
measures to
ensure
Permanent
Missions
accredited to
the United
Nations and
their staff
are granted
equal, fair
and
non-discriminatory
treatment by
the banking
system;
OP5
Underscores
the importance
of the host
country taking
the necessary
measures to
ensure that
personal data
and
information of
persons
affected by
the closure of
accounts is
kept
confidential
by banking
institutions,
including the
JP Morgan
Chase Bank and
the possible
successors of
those
institutions,
and requests
the
Secretary-General
to work with
the host
country in
that regard
and to report
to the General
Assembly
within 90
days;
OP6.
Decides to
keep this
matter under
review during
the 68th
session of the
General
Assembly as
well as the
following
sessions.
JPMorgan
Chase
was centrally
involved in
the 2008
predatory
lending
meltdown that
hurt the
economies of
countries
around the
world, as
Inner City
Press has
covered in
depth. Now,
belatedly,
there is fight
back in the UN
General
Assembly, on
the issue of
bank accounts
and fees.
Watch this
site.