Your support
means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you
access to exclusive bonus material on
our Patreon page. Click
here to become a patron. MRL
on Patreon
UNITED NATIONS,
April 27 – On Gaza, UN
Secretary General Antonio
Guterres on April 5 said in a
statement, "I reiterate my
call on all concerned to
refrain from any act that
could lead to further violence
or place civilians in harm's
way, especially children."
Then he prepared to leave for
six days in China, just as the
previous Friday he was an
another UNannounced trip to
his home in Lisbon. On April
20, after
Palestine's
Riyad Mansour,
flanked by the
Ambassadors of
Tunisia,
Kuwait and of
the Arab
League,
conducted his
Friday
stakeout,
Inner City
Press asked if
there has been
any progress
on requesting
an inquiry by
the UN Human
Rights
Council, and
if Mansour had
any comment on
Mike Pompeo's
upcoming trip
to Jerusalem.
Periscope video
here.
Mansour
said he was
not the right
person to ask
about Pence,
and that some
process is
underway in
Geneva. We'll
see. On
April 13, after Palestine's
Riyad Mansour, flanked by the
Ambassadors of Kuwait and of
the Arab League, responded to
Inner City Press' question
about why Guterres hadn't
followed his own advice and
set up an inquiry, Inner City
Press put the question to
Guterres himself. He dismissed
it with a wave of his hand.
Vine video here.
On April 20, after Guterres'
spokesman refused to answer
Inner City Press on who
Guterres was taking with him
to the UN Security Council
retreat in Sweden (other than
Izumi Nakamitsu, which Inner
City Press on its own
reported, on Syria and perhaps
North Korea), Inner City Press
asked Mansour if he knew if
Guterres took envoy Mladenov
to Sweden. Mansour replied
that Mladenov would brief the
open Council meeting on April
26 - and that Palestine is now
going forward in the UN Human
Rights Council in Geneva.
We'll have more on this. Inner
City Press Photos
on Alamy. On
Sunday, April
8, with
Guterres
issuing
statements praising
China but
little to nothing on
any other topic, the
International
Criminal Court
Prosecutor
Fatou Bensouda
issued this:
"It is with
grave concern
that I note
the violence
and
deteriorating
situation in
the Gaza Strip
in the context
of recent mass
demonstrations.
Since 30 March
2018, at least
27
Palestinians
have been
reportedly
killed by the
Israeli
Defence
Forces, with
over a
thousand more
injured, many,
as a result of
shootings
using live
ammunition and
rubber-bullets.
Violence
against
civilians - in
a situation
such as the
one prevailing
in Gaza –
could
constitute
crimes under
the Rome
Statute of the
International
Criminal Court
(“ICC” or “the
Court”), as
could the use
of civilian
presence for
the purpose of
shielding
military
activities. I
remind all
parties that
the situation
in Palestine
is under
preliminary
examination by
my Office.
While a
preliminary
examination is
not an
investigation,
any new
alleged crime
committed in
the context of
the situation
in Palestine
may be
subjected to
my Office’s
scrutiny. This
applies to the
events of the
past weeks and
to any future
incident. I
am aware that
the
demonstrations
in the Gaza
Strip are
planned to
continue
further. My
Office will
continue to
closely watch
the situation
and will
record any
instance of
incitement or
resort to
unlawful
force. I urge
all those
concerned to
refrain from
further
escalating
this tragic
situation. Any
person who
incites or
engages in
acts of
violence
including by
ordering,
requesting,
encouraging or
contributing
in any other
manner to the
commission of
crimes within
ICC's
jurisdiction
is liable to
prosecution
before the
Court, with
full respect
for the
principle of
complementarity.
The resort to
violence must
stop." At
6 pm on April 6 Mansour
returned with Tunisia's
Ambassador and said the US had
broken silence and blocked the
statement. 12 Minute Video here. Inner City Press asked
Mansour what he'd like
Guterres to do, now that he's
on a six day trip to China.
Mansour said Guterres said
let's stay in touch, or with
his office; there is an Arab
League meeting on April 12.
Watch this site.
While France 24 asked a
softball question to Kuwait -
what would you like to say to
Nikki Haley? - hanging over
the proceding was incoming US
National Security Adviser John
Bolton, set to begin on
Monday. Inner City Press
asked, since Mansour mentioned
the UN Human Rights Council,
if they were planning a
specific request there (last
Friday they told Inner City
Press, Security Council only).
Step by step, Mansour said on
April 6. We'll have more on
this - while the Arab League
Ambassador is Maged Abdelaziz,
formerly the Ambassador of
Egypt to whose state media
Akhbar al Yom Guterres and his
Global Communicator Alison
Smale have assigned Inner City
Press' long time work space
S-303, leaving Inner City
Press confined to minders.
Akhbar al Yom's Sanaa Youssef,
as is the norm, was not
present on April 6 and has not
asked the UN a question in ten
years. At the UN earlier on
April 6, while Haneen Zoabi,
Member of Israeli Knesset from
the Arab joint list, is set to
speak, it is not in the UN
Press Briefing Room or UN
Security Council stakeout or
any public place - she will
UNwisely appear in the private
club of the UN Censorship
Alliance a/k/a UN
Correspondents Association, a
group which had independent
Press thrown
out for covering its
event in the UN Press Briefing
Room, in pursuit of the UN
bribery story of convict Macau
based businessman Ng Lap Seng,
whose South South News paid
thousands of dollars to UNCA.
It is ironic that on a talking
tour ostensibly about free
speech, the UN venue would be
a private club of censors. But
that is today's UN. The UN
Security Council was set to
meet about Gaza at 6:30 pm on
Good Friday, a day the UN was
closed to the public and to
non-resident correspondents.
ICP photos here.
More than dozen Palestinians
had been killed; Israel spoke
of rocks and Molotov cocktails
being thrown. But nothing had
been heard from UN Secretary
General Antonio Guterres. In
fact, for more than 17 hours
his top three spokespeople had
refused to answer even where
Guterres was. In through
the metal detectors just after
Kuwait which called the
meeting, Inner City Press
filmed Sweden's Deputy Carl
Skau calling for an immediate
investigation, and France's
spokesperson indicating that
Permanent Representative
Francois Delattre would not be
coming. Nor did the French
deputy; for the US, it was not
immediately clear to many who
spoke. Crowd-sourced, it
emerged that he was and is Walter Miller,
Deputy Political Coordinator.
In fact, Equatorial Guinea had
not arrived at all by 6:30 pm,
according to UN sources inside
the Council, a Security
officer said, We'll just wait.
After 6:50 pm the Permanent
Representative of Equatorial
Guinea showed up, as
Palestine's Permanent Observer
Mansour was saying that UN
Secretary General Antonio
Guterres should issue a
statement. Inner City Press
asked him, have you tried to
reach out to the SG? Is he in
New York? Mansour said he
doesn't know. There was an
open meeting, ending with
Palestine's Mansour (Inner
City Press' photo on Alamy here).
At 8:45 pm Guterres' deputy
spokesman Farhan Haq emailed
out a statement, beginning
"The Secretary-General is
deeply concerned about the
clashes at the Gaza fence
today between Palestinians
participating in the 'Great
Return March' and Israeli
Security Forces, which
resulted in at least fifteen
deaths and a large number of
injured. His thoughts are with
the families of the victims.
The Secretary-General calls
for an independent and
transparent investigation into
these incidents. He also
appeals to those concerned to
refrain from any act that
could lead to further
casualties and in particular
any measures that could place
civilians in harm's way."
Inner City Press asked Mansour
about this last phrase - he
focused on the investigation
call - and if anything would
be sought at the Human Rights
Council. No, it is a threat to
international peace and
security and belongs in the
Security Council, he said.
Later it was reported
that "UN Secretary-General
Antonio Guterres had called
for an independent inquiry
into Friday's violence.
Guterres made his comments
late Friday before the
emergency UN Security Council
meeting to address the issue.
UN spokesman Farhan Haq
relayed his statement to the
media." But Guterres' comment
relayed by Haq was NOT
"before" the Security Council
meeting much less the closed
door consultations. And it is
telling that those reporting
on the meeting, and on the UN,
did not mention that Guterres
was in fact -- as confirmed
to Inner City Press after 17
hours, still without answers
on Kenya and Somaliland --
back in his home in Lisbon,
for four days. Why not just
announce it? Why not report
it?
Israel's
Ambassador Danny Danon issued
a statement in advance, and
after: “The State of Kuwait,
with full knowledge that our
Permanent Mission, Israel, and
Jews everywhere were observing
the first night of Passover,
hijacked the consultations,
forced an open session and
invited the Palestinian
delegation to present remarks
that they had been advised to
prepare well in advance.
Israel was not given the same
advance notice and was barred
from taking part in the
deliberations due to the
observance of our religious
holiday. Once again, Hamas has
exploited women and children
as human shields, including by
dressing young children in
military uniforms and arming
them with guns and
ammunition. Despite the
Palestinian leadership’s
insistence on the peaceful
nature of these
demonstrations, Hamas and its
affiliated factions have
interspersed armed terrorists
amongst civilians, a number of
whom were killed as a result
of their direct attacks on
Israeli positions. I would
like to remind the Council
that exploiting procedural
rules so that one side can
make its case while the other
cannot is antithetical to the
spirit of the United Nations
and is a direct affront to the
fundamental principles of
honest deliberation." The OIC
issued a statement after that,
beginning "The Organization of
Islamic Cooperation (OIC)
roundly condemned the brutal
aggression by the Israeli
occupation forces on unarmed
Palestinian civilians marching
peacefully in commemoration of
Palestinian Land Day, leaving
over 16 martyred and more than
1400 wounded. The OIC decried
the aggression as a serious
escalation and yet another act
of state terrorism and a crime
deserving investigation and
accountability. OIC
Secretary General Dr. Yousef
Al-Othaimeen said Israel, the
occupying force, bears full
responsibility for the scale
and gravity of its ongoing
aggression and war crimes
against the Palestinian
people." We'll have more
on this. Inner City Press,
which covered a protest
outside the UN earlier in the
day, has twice asked the UN,
Where is Secretary General
Antonio Guterres? At UNESCO
there have been attempts to
"soften" the draft resolution
on Israel, attempt involving
not only new Director General
Audrey Azoulay but also her
father, an adviser to the King
of Morocco. But Inner City
Press has obtained a copy of
Israel's response to the
draft, exclusive photos here.
While acknowledging that the
draft is short, Israel calls
it an "extreme" and deceptive
package, that cannot be the
basis of consensus or
negotiation. The letter, by
Israel's delete to UNESCO
Carmel Shama Hacohen, urges
the member states on UNESCO's
Executive Board to raise their
voices and vote against the
draft. The UNESCO Executive
Board session, which Inner
City Press will be covering as
part of its ongoing UNESCO
series, begins April 9 in
Paris. In New York, when
Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu came to the
UN on 7 March 2018 to open an
exhibition about Jerusalem, he
singled out a particular UN
Security officer, Matthew
Sullivan, and brought him in
front of the microphone. Link
to photo here.
He said, as he had
on 26 September 2016, see
below, that Sullivan seeks him
out after each year's General
Assembly speech and reviews
it. Sullivan then called
Netanyahu a great orator, and
said the cartoon chart of Iran
and the bomb with a burning
fuse was his favorite. Inner
City Press went and asked the
UN Spokesman Stephane
Dujarric, who had been
present. Dujarric acknowledged
it but said Sullivan
"was thrown
into a
limelight that
he did not
seek." Well,
no - Netanyahu has repeated
this same quote of Sullivan,
using Sullivan's name, in a
weekly cabinet meeting on
September 26, 2016, Facebook video
at -5:24, translated there
into English. On March 14,
Inner City Press asked the UN
again, UN transcript here:
Inner City Press: of Inspector
Sullivan and Net… and Prime
Minister [Benjamin] Netanyahu,
it wasn't just an incident… I
want to… I guess what I
wanted… and he didn't answer
this. In September 2016,
Prime Minister Netanyahu
quoted exactly what Inspector
Sullivan said later in 2018
about the Iran bomb fuse
speech being the best speech
ever. And so, it seems
like the question really
isn't… isn't whether he was
surprised in the basement last
week, but did anyone look into
when was the quote given that
Mr. Netanyahu quoted in
September 2016? And… and I
guess I'm asking because,
again, many UN staff have
wondered whether they can do
the same thing. Is it
appropriate to praise… to… to
offer that type of praise
twice, not once but twice, at
least? Deputy Spokesman:
First of all, we do not
control what the Prime
Minister of Israel says.
That's his business…
Inner City
Press:
He was quoting Mr. Sullivan.
Deputy Spokesman: …nor
do we police that.
Regarding private opinions
expressed by staff, they…
they're capable of talking to
people and expressing their
private opinions. This
is not a case where someone
was expressly trying to
express their opinion in
public. That was not
sought by Officer Sullivan, as
Stéphane made clear last week.
Inner City Press: But, when
somebody calls you over in
front of cameras and a
microphone, you still choose
what you say. Maybe you
didn't expect to be called
over but it's not… it's…?
Deputy Spokesman: As
Stéphane made clear, he was
doing his regular security
duties. He… there was no
speaking engagement sought on
behalf of the officer." A bit
later on March 14: "this is
not a case where someone
sought to express a public
opinion. That was put
upon him through circumstances
outside of his control.
Yes? Inner
City Press:I
just wanted to allow the
follow-up, but I just… I guess
is… your answer about that it
wasn't thrust on him, this
also covers the September 2016
statement quoted by… Deputy
Spokesman: He had not…
he was not making a public
statement. That was
something he had expressed to
a person who then disclosed
it. Inner City Press: Right,
but he did it twice, with… I
mean, in… given that the first
time was… I don't know.
Was it appropriate? Deputy
Spokesman: We've said
what we've said." On March 9,
after being told by another UN
Security officer that Sullivan
was now seeking to file some
sort of complaint against
Inner City Press, at the days
noon briefing Inner City Press
asked again, getting off off
in the process by Agence
France Presse. Video here.
From the UN's March 9 transcript:
Inner City Press: Yesterday, I
had asked you about what
happened during the visit of
Prime Minister [Benjamin]
Netanyahu and… and Officer
Matthew Sullivan. You
had said that he was cast into
a light that he hadn't
expected, and that was
fine. It… the… the…
since found that in a… in a
meeting with his Cabinet in
September 2016, Prime Minister
Netanyahu said, this is a
quote from his Facebook page,
translated into English from
Hebrew, "I met there with
Matthew Sullivan, an American
security man, a former New
York City policeman and he
waits for me every time at the
exit. He always gives me
his opinion about the speech
and he told me it was an
excellent speech, but I had
given him a better one.
I asked him which one was
better. He said the bomb
speech was better." So
it was exactly what was said
downstairs yesterday, like
almost verbatim, so I guess I
want to ask you, it doesn’t
seem like it was as
spontaneous as…
Spokesman: I don't speak
for the Prime Minister of
Israel, nor do I write his
remarks that he shares with
his Cabinet. As I said,
again, Inspector Sullivan is a
distinguished supervisor in
our security service, and I
think I answered your
question. Inner
City Press:
I guess my question is, and I
say this because many staff
members have reached out and
said they've been told not to
speak in exactly this way, so
I just want to be clear
whether they can or they
can't. If the UN was
aware of these comments…
Spokesman: I think he
was… Inspector Sullivan has
been put in a very difficult
position that he did not… that
was not of his own making. Inner
City Press:
Was he aware of the statement
in 2016, that he was being
quoted? Spokesman: I
don't know. Yes, Carole?
Question: Can I ask
about… You've asked five
questions..." And thus
Dujarric let / used AFP to cut
off the line of questioning.
Left to the end, Inner City
Press continued: maybe you
don't know, but you could find
out. Was either the
Department of Safety and
Security (DSS) or Inspector
Sullivan aware back in
September 2016, when the Prime
Minister made the comments and
put them online, saying that
this high inspector, as you've
called him, in the UN praised
my… my Iran bomb speech.
And if he had
been…Spokesman: I'm not
aware that anyone was aware of
those comments.
Inner City
Press:
Now that you are aware, does
what happened yesterday seem
as spontaneous as you
portrayed it yesterday?
Spokesman: It is not for
me to say whether or not the
things that were done or said
by a visiting Head of
Government in this
organization is spontaneous or
not spontaneous. What I
do know is that Mr. Sullivan,
Inspector Sullivan, was there
to supervise the security
arrangements of a high-level
guest. He was sought out
by the Prime Minister and in
no way sought to find himself
in front of the camera. Inner
City Press: But if… if the UN
were aware that a person at
his level of the UN had been
quoted in this way, as he was
in 2016… Spokesman: You
know, people… I'm not going to
go into hypotheticals.
I'm just stating what I know
as facts." It's not
hypothetical. Here's the
online English translation of
what Netanyahu told his
cabinet in September 2016: "I
met there with Matthew
Sullivan, an American security
man, a former New York City
policeman, and he waits for me
every time at the exit from
the United Nations General
Assembly. He always gives me
his opinion about the speech
and he told me that it was an
excellent speech, but that I
have given a better one. I
asked him which one was
better. He said the bomb
speech was better. He said, 'I
express the general sense that
United States citizens have in
their massive support for the
State of Israel.' They see us
as representing their values
and this continues and it is
the fundamental truth about
the special relationship
between the two countries."
But on 7 March 2018 UN
Spokesman Stephane Dujarric
told Inner City Press that
Sullivan had been caught up in
the moment. What, repeating
word for word what Netanyahu
has been recounting for a year
and a half? We'll have more on
this. From the March 7 UN
transcript: Inner City Press:
I saw you were down there, and
I mean this with all due
respect. Obviously,
Officer Sullivan, Matthew
Sullivan, maybe he was put in
a hard spot, brought up to the
microphone, but it seemed to
me that he was saying that…
that, each year at the GA, he
greets Prime Minister
Netanyahu, and reviews his
speech. And then he
said, "You're a great orator",
and then he said… he seemed to
say that the cartoon of the
bomb and the fuse was a
particularly good
speech. And I'm just
wondering… everyone is
definitely entitled to their
views, but I know that many UN
staff feel constrained from…
from praising one way or
another a speech viewed as
controversial, and I wanted to
know, what are the rules?
Spokesman: Indeed, I
was. I think Inspector
Sullivan was thrown into a
limelight that he did not
seek. The Prime Minister
seemed to have called for
him. And the inspector
has been here and has a had
very long and extremely
distinguished career here, is
known… he has known Heads of
States and Heads of
Governments for a long time,
including the current Prime
Minister of Israel, who, as
you know, also served as
Permanent Representative here
a few years ago. Inner City
Press: Right. I just
have one more… because you
were saying he didn't seek it
out, but I was… I was down
there, as well. And
again, I mean this will all
due respect. I saw him
taking selfies with… with…
with Benjamin Netanyahu before
he was brought to the
microphone, so, clearly…
Spokesman: Well, I think
in both cases, the Prime
Minister came… called out
Inspector Sullivan and went to
find him. Inspector
Sullivan was there to do his
work, to secure the area, to
supervise security. He
at no point sought out to have
his photo taken. Inner City
Press: This… this… this detail
that after each speech… I
mean, I know, for example,
there was a… Ralph was a
security guard here, but I
never heard him say one way or
another if he liked a
particular leader or liked a
particular speech. I'm
just wondering, for the
benefit of going forward,
because I've known people to
be disciplined for it.
I'm not… I'm asking you, what
is the rule? Spokesman:
I think… I feel I've answered
your question." Well, no. That
the exhibition, and statement,
were controversial is
exemplified by the event not
being listed in the day's
Media Alert as sent out. (An
addition, in red print, was
sent later.) The Under
Secretary General for Global
Communications, Alison Smale,
did not attend the exhibition
opening, when she goes to less
high profile ones. (She
refuses to explain this, or
any content neutral media
access rules the UN may or may
not have). Sullivan, Inner
City Press previously reported,
was on the board of an
organization holding
commercial events in UN
conference rooms, including
for GPS sneakers. When Inner
City Press asked about this,
Sullivan and the UN spokesman
said Inner City Press only
looked into it because
Sullivan had "thrown Inner
City Press out of the UN."
That did happen, for covering
UN corruption, and Haiti
cholera. And, as Inner City
Press was also first to report,
Sullivan was previously beaten
up by Turkey's Erdogan's
guards. We'll have more on
this. In today's UN, Holocaust
remembrance is politicized,
and the Department of Public
Information which makes
decisions is not transparent,
does not answer Press
questions. On January 25 Inner
City Press went to cover a
Serbia-sponsored event about
the Jasenovac extermination
camp, complete with a long
speech by Serbian Foreign
Minister Ivica Dacic,
Periscope here.
While there was a disclaimer
sign, a representative of
DPI's Holocaust Outreach unit
was there. The event was
listed (as "invitation only")
on DPI's list of events in the
UN Visitors Lobby - but an
Israeli-mission sponsored
event set for January 31
wasn't listed. Questions to
DPI chief Alison Smale, on access
and complaints by
whistleblowers of malfeasance
in DPI, have gone
unanswered. Inner City Press
was required unlike others to
get a UN DPI / Smale "minder"
to even cover the Holocaust
photo op (Inner City Press'
Alamy photos here);
later, US Ambassador Nikki
Haley issued this, on (retaliatory)
Prince Zeid's earlier
statement: "This whole issue
is outside the bounds of the
High Commissioner for Human
Rights office’s mandate and is
a waste of time and resources.
While we note that they wisely
refrained from listing
individual companies, the fact
that the report was issued at
all is yet another reminder of
the Council’s anti-Israel
obsession. The more the Human
Rights Council does this, the
less effective it becomes as
an advocate against the
world’s human rights abusers.
The United States will
continue to aggressively push
back against the anti-Israel
bias, and advance badly needed
reforms of the Council."
Earlier on January 31, even
before 10 am, two
developments: a commemoration
on the third floor balcony of
the General Assembly Hall at
9:20 am (Periscope including
Leningrad and translation here), and
this, from Danny Danon: “On
the day that the UN is marking
International Holocaust
Remembrance Day, the UNHRC has
chosen to publicize this
information about the number
of companies operating in
Israel. This is a
shameful act which will serve
as a stain on the UNHRC
forever. We will
continue to act with our
allies and use all the means
at our disposal to stop the
publication of this
disgraceful blacklist.” We'll
have more on this - and on
Secretary General Antonio
Guterres' meeting with Darfur
genocide
indictee Omar al Bashir,
UNdisclosed until Inner City
Press asked about it at the
January 29 noon briefing, and
still covered up. Watch this
site.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Past
(and future?) UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047,
Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2018 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for