In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYT,  Azerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .

By Matthew Russell Lee, New Platform

UNITED NATIONS, April 17 – With the large social media platforms like Google and Facebook vowing to use algorithms to prevent terrorist recruitment and for other purposes, the crudeness of results, intended or not, has come to the fore. Now Google's YouTube is engaged in implicit financial censoring of independent videos about censorship. Like many independent media, Inner City Press publishes its coverage and associated commentary not only on its website but on a number of third party platforms like YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, Scribd and SoundCloud. YouTube is owned by Google, and like its parent allows publishes to monetize their material with advertisements.

But do YouTube and Google behind it engage in censorship? As Inner City Press ramps up its fight against the eviction of its shared office in the United Nations while asking questions about UN corruption, it has received a series of e-mails from YouTube that its videos on these topics "cannot be monetized" with advertisements. On April 17 this list grew to include a simple Q&A with the UN about censorship in Mali, Paul Biya's cut off of the Internet in Cameroon, and refugees in Lebanon, from Syria. Inner City Press uploaded a video and nearly immediately received this: "Thanks for submitting your video(s) for monetization. We didn't approve your video(s) for monetization because the content in your video(s) or video details may not be advertiser-friendly. 'ICP Asks UN of Mali closing 47 radio stations, Cameroon Net Cut, Syria refugees at risk in Lebanon.'" How can Google and YouTube justify this? It is driving content away from them and to, for example, Patreon (here).

 Google has, on appeal, said "After reviewing your video, we’ve confirmed that the content in your video or video details aren’t advertiser-friendly. As a result, your video can’t be monetized. YouTube reserves the right to make the final decision about video monetization." This final Ban of monetization applies for example to:

• "On Syria, Samantha Power Tells ICP No One "Decent" Supports Qaeda-Linked Groups, Urges Aid Access"

• "On CAR Rapes, ICP Asks UN of #CodeBlue on Commission, Subpoenas, Ladsous, Spox Says “At Some Point""

• "On UNSCParis Attacks Resolution, ICP Asks UK Rycroft of Vienna I, French Delattre of UN Charter"
• 
  
• "ICP Asked HRW Why Its Yemen Event Is Behind Closed Doors with UN Censorship Alliance, Periscope Here"

• "ICP Asks UN About 2nd Delay of CAR Rapes Report by Ban Ki-moon's Panel, Kicking Can Down Road"

• "ICP Asks Amnesty of Death Sentences in Nigeria & Egypt, Obama's Release of Jets, Rockets & Tanks"

• "Libya's PR Dabbashi Says He Was Criticizing the UK, For Saying Only Ansar al Sharia Fighting ISIL"
• 
  
• "Boko Haram Is on UN Al Qaeda Sanctions List, Chair Quinlan Say: But Do They Have a Bank Account?"
• 
  
• "Why Were Ban Ki-moon's Remarks on Charlie Hebdo Attack Not In UN Media Alert? FUNCA Asks"

• "ICP Asks UN Why It Says Yarmouk in Syria Is No Longer Besieged, Is Told That's Semantics, UNclear,"

• "On Yemen, ICP Asked Jordan FM Judeh of Casualties, AQAP Benefiting, He Said That's Not the Goal"

• "UNSC Stakeout on Libya, Press Elements on Extremisms, ICP on Dabbashi, Qs on South Sudan"
• 
  
• "After US Drops Arms in Kobane, ICP Asks, UN's Ban “Notes” It, Wants in “Broad Context” of Int'l Law,"
• 
  
• "ICP asks UN Women about ISIS, UN Cover Up of Tabit Rapes in Darfur, Kim-for-Kane Post Loss"

• "In Golan After UN Peacekeepers Hand Over Guns to Nusra, UN Won't Say If Ladsous Ordered It"

• "On Yemen, ICP Asks UK Rycroft About Vince Cable & Arms Sales to Saudi; Syria Q&A Too"

• "On Syria, Churkin Says No Russian Green Light For Turkey, UK Sounds Green, US Power"
• 
  
• "ICP Asks Ladsous Why Left Chad Troops Die in Mali, Sex Abuse in CAR, Terrain in S Sudan, No Answer"

• "ICP Asks Venezuela FM Delcy Rodriguez About Syria and Yemen, Who Dominates UN DPKO & DPA Posts"
• 
  
• "ICP Asked Saudi PR of US Criticism of Executions, al Nimr, Here's UK Matthew Rycroft on UNSC Process"
• 
  
• "On Yemen, ICP Asks UN of US-Made Cluster Bombs Dropped by Saudi on Sana'a, Envoy's One-Sided Visits"
• 
  
• "On Yemen, ICP Asked Uruguay VM Cancela of Civilians Hit by Saudi Strikes in Yemen, He on Hospitals"
• 
  
•  "ICP Asks UN Spox of Burundi Rapes & Deployments to CAR, No Updates, Peacekeeping & Sri Lanka"

"ICP Asks UN Counter-Terrorism Center of Boko Haram Victims, Who Are UNCTC's Non-Saudi Donors?"

"On UN Rapes, ICP Asks Khare of Light Penalties for Statutory Rape, Where is #Ladsous?"

  This is the opposite of what Google and similar mega-platforms claim to be doing. Facebook, as another example, talks about flying Internet-distributing drones over Africa. So why haven't they done so over Southern Cameroons in the past 55 days? These platforms should be urged on these issues. On this censorship of the Press by denying or delaying monetization, it seems clear that someone or something has gotten Google's YouTube to do it. We'll have more on this.

   Last week, monetization was similar denied for an Inner City Press video about being ordered out of the UN Press Briefing Room for a "French only" briefing by outgoing French president Francois Hollande, murkily arranged by the UN's still holding-over spokesman Stephane Dujarric.

 On March 4, monetization not only of Q&As involving Sri Lanka and Ukraine and Yemen has been blocked - now, even a video from inside the UN Press Briefing Room, an exposé of UN censorship. Google's YouTube  wrote:

"We didn't approve your video(s) for monetization because the content in your video(s) or video details may not be advertiser-friendly.

"French Delegation Tells Press To Leave UN Briefing Room for Hollande, FUNCA Says No"

  Even after appeal, videos whose titles including the word "Nusra" for example are deemed ineligible for monetization.

This is no longer a mis-application of a terrorism screen. This is a pattern at Google, see here.
 
   These are video of questions and answers (sometimes) at the UN, of protests in the streets of New York, etc. Inner City Press has written,  to Monetization then to Press [at] YouTube.com:

“The videos you are saying are “not advertiser-friendly” are videos of media questions and answers with United Nations spokespeople and diplomats. They are news. The message sent yesterday and today said “you can request an additional review below” - this is a request for review. Look at the videos: they are Q&As in the UN Press Briefing Room.

This is also a request to be informed if it was any complaint to YouTube / Google which triggered this denial of monetization, and if so if it came from the UN or any[one else.]
I note that Reuters, got one of its anti-Press emails to the UN banned from Google Search with a frivolous DMCA filing: https://www.chillingeffects.org/notices/1457339# now [HRW] https://lumendatabase.org/notices/1457339#

Please confirm receipt and review the above and restore monetization, answering the question. Google and YouTube should not be involved in any form of censorship, including the denial of monetization of news footage."

   Now on February 26, YouTube has sent this:

"Hi Inner City Press, After reviewing your video, we’ve confirmed that the content in your video or video details aren’t advertiser-friendly. As a result, your video can’t be monetized.

"In Golan After UN Peacekeepers Hand Over Guns to Nusra, UN Won't Say If Ladsous Ordered It"

YouTube reserves the right to make the final decision about video monetization."

  So, like at the UN on unilateral decisions to target, evict and restrict particular media, and like some decisions by Twitter to which we will next turn, there is no appeal. (UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric, who has bragged about the UN's "use" of YouTube, ran out when Inner City Press asked about this, here.) This is UNacceptable. We'll have more on this.

***

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

Past (and future?) UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540

Search innercitypress.com  Search WWW (censored?)

Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2017 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com for