UN GATE, Oct 30
– The
UN
of Antonio
Guterres has gotten
so selective
and sleazy,
so censorious, that
they refuse to
answer actual
questions from
the Press they
ban, then
issue canned
statements
when the
zombie state
media they let
it doesn't
even ask
questions.
Banned Inner
City Press on
October 29 in writing
asked Guterres,
his deputy Amina J.
Mohammed, colonial
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric and
his well-pronouncing
deputy Farhan
questions
questions
including
about Guinea
Bissau:.
October
29-2: On
Guinea-Bissau,
what is SG
Guterres'
comment and
action if any
on that
President José
Mário Vaz
sacked his
government on
Monday "with
immediate
effect"? Vaz
said the
decision,
which was read
out on
national
radio, was
based on what
he called a
"serious
political
crisis" in the
country, which
had "prevented
the normal
operation of
some
institutions".
The move comes
days after
Prime Minister
Aristide Gomes
denounced a
coup attempt
and police
violently
repressed an
opposition
protest.
One protester
was killed on
Saturday and
several others
were injured
during a
demonstration
calling for a
delay to the
24 November
election.
The opposition
wants the
election
delayed to
give it time
to clean up
the election
register to
prevent voter
fraud
Guterres,
Dujarric, Melissa
Fleming - none
of these responded.
Haq held
a pathetic
noon briefing
in an empty
room, thanking
Honduran
president JOH
for given Guterres
$50,000
of the $1
million JOH
took from drug
trafficking El
Chapo. Then
after none of
Guterres'
scribes even
asked about
Lusophone
Guinea
Bissau,
Dujarric put
this out:
"Statement
attributable
to the
Spokesman for
the
Secretary-General
- on
Guinea-Bissau
The
Secretary-General
is following
with serious
concern the
unfolding
developments
in
Guinea-Bissau
following the
decrees issued
on 28 and 29
October by
President José
Mario Vaz
dismissing the
Government and
appointing a
new Prime
Minister. He
calls on all
political
stakeholders
to abide by
the decisions
taken by
ECOWAS
regarding the
governance
arrangements
in
Guinea-Bissau
until the
presidential
election on 24
November and
reiterated in
the ECOWAS
communiqué of
29
October.
The
Secretary-General
looks forward
to the holding
of a peaceful,
credible and
transparent
presidential
election on 24
November and
urges all
stakeholders
to exercise
their civic
duty.
The
Secretary-General
was also
saddened to
learn of the
death of one
person
reportedly
following a
demonstration
on 26 October.
He looks
forward to the
prompt
conclusion of
the
independent
inquiry
announced by
the Ministry
of Interior
into the
circumstances
and
consequences
of the
demonstration.
New York, 30
October 2019."
Total B.S.. And
not a word of
disclosure on
Guterres' son
Pedro
Guimarães e
Melo De
Oliveira
Guterres' business
in Lusophone
Africa.
Our questions
are not being
answered. We'll
have more on
this.
September
4-8:
Immediately
explain the
single lawless
line from MALU
on 30 August
2019:
"Greetings
Matthew Lee
from Inner
City Press,
Your media
accreditation
request, with
reference no:
M5413398, has
been declined
for the
following
reason: Media
accreditation
was withdrawn
on 17 August
2018." This is
a formal
request for
the UN's
explanation of
grounds for
this denial.
And a demand
for answer to
these
questions,
which MALU has
declined to
answer:
Who made the
decision?
Where is the
list of those
accredited by
[MALU]?
What and to
whom is the
process of
appeal?
May
15-3: On the
Public
Financial
Disclosures
for 2017
belatedly
published over
the weekend of
April 27-28,
please state
why Mohammed
Ibn Chambas,
like the
Executive
Secretary of
the UN
Biodiversity
Convention,
Cristiana
Paşca-Palmer,
UNICEF's
Henriette
Fore, with
documented
links to
ExxonMobil and
others, USG
Mark Lowcock
(undisclosed
while the
Secretariat's
speaker at the
UNSC Arria on
Cameroon),
UNCTAD's
Mukhisa
Kituyi, UN
Women's
Phumzile
Mlambo-Ngcuka,
UNOG chief
Michael
Moller, UNDP
chief Achim
Steiner,
Heidi Mendoza,
Adama Dieng,
UN Security
chief Peter
Drennan,
Rosemary
DiCarlo and
Nicholas
Haysum, is not
even on the
list. OIOS
chief
Inga-Britt
Ahlenius
reported - why
not Mendoza?
Where IS
Mendoza? Isn't
it a bad
practice for
the UN's head
(anti)
genocide
definition
official to
conceal from
the public
even cursory
financial
disclosure?
Did DiCarlo
decline to
make any
public
disclosure
despite being
the UN's top
political
officer? What
is the even
plausible
applicability
of this line
from SG
Guterres' web
page: "Please
note that
given the
multi-cultural
environment of
the UN and the
often security
sensitive
locations
where UN staff
are either
working or
come from,
full public
disclosure may
not always be
a viable or
sensible
option for
certain staff
members"? Why
has Guterres
changed the
previous
system in a
which a
"choosing not
to disclose"
statement was
upload and
listed, to one
which helps
conceal who
reports and
who does
not?
Again, state
why
considering
the UN bribery
conviction of
Patrick Ho of
CEFC, and
CEFC's attempt
to purchase
the oil
company of
Gulbenkian
Foundation
which paid Mr.
Guterres in
2016 was
omitted from
his online
public
financial
disclosure
covering 2016,
and why
Guterres has
not even
started an
audit of CEFC
in the
UN.
,
