UN
Guterres Paris Internet Speech
Mentions Censorship and DESA
Even As He Bans Press and
Ignores Cameroon Corruption
By Matthew
Russell Lee, CJR Q&A, NY
Post
UNITED NATIONS
GATE, NOVEMBER 12 -- Before UN
Secretary Guterres took off
for Paris (coverage by Inner
City Press here),
his deputy spokesman Farhan
Haq on November 9 declined to
provide information about who
Guterres would meet with but said "one
of our colleagues, Vannina
[Maestracci] will be
travelling with the
Secretary-General and we'll
try to provide details once we
have the schedule firmed up."
Well, two days later,
absolutely nothing from the
UN, even as Turkish state
media reports Guterres met for
45
minutes with Erdogan.
What did they talk about, how
to ban journalists? Later,
still with no Erdogan or any
other read out, Guterres
pedantic Paris Internet
Governance Speech said, among
other things, "We see the
Internet being used as a
platform for hate speech, for
repression, censorship" - this
from a man who has banned and
censored Inner City Press for
131 days and counting, and
whose spokesman Stephane
Dujarric blocks Inner City
Press on Twitter. Guterres
intoned, "Non-traditional,
multilateral and
multi-stakeholder cooperation
will be crucial, including
governments, private sector,
research centres and civil
society" - while Guterres
maintains a non-public "banned
from the UN" list which
according to his own guards
includes political activists
he doesn't like. Guterres
said, "You have support from
UN Department of Economic and
Social Affairs (DESA)" - a
department taking payments
from UN bribery imprisonee
Patrick Ho. This is Guterres
and his UN. The day
before in his ParisPeace Forum
speech Guterres said, among
other things, "We must never
accept the plight of the
victims of violence and
terrorist acts in Syria,
Yemen, Mali or Myanmar" - but
covering up the slaugher of
Anglophones by Cameroon's Paul
Biya is fine with him, either
for a golden statue or
bureaucratic favors from
Biya's Ambassador as chair of
the UN Budget Committee.
Guterres said, "Alongside
Jürgen Habermas, we must
recognize that the oxygen of a
modern democracy is a
continuous flow of
communication between civil
society and the political
authorities" - this as
Guterres has Inner City Press
banned for the 130th day
after having it roughed
up on June 22 and July
3; his spokesman Stephane
Dujarric blocks
Inner City Press on Twitter.
Some continuous flow of
information. Guterres
said, "horror must never
prevail over hope. The hope
with which I receive my guests
in the meeting room on the
38th floor of the Secretariat
Building at United Nations
Headquarters, adorned by the
Matisse tapestry Polynésie, le
Ciel, with its deep, peaceful
shades of blue." It was from
even photo ops on the UN's
38th floor that Dujarric
unilaterally banned
Inner City Press, just
before having it assaulted by
UN Security Lieutenant Ronald
E. Dobbins on June 22 and July
3 and now contacting and dissembling
to those who question that
online, at least if they are
from Europe. As Inner City
Press moved forward with its
inquiry into UN Secretary
General Antonio Guterres'
personal use
of public funds, silence on
slaughter in Cameroon
and elsewhere and failure to
disclose family members'
financial interests in Angola
and elsewhere, his spokesman
Stephane Dujarric on 20 June
2018 said that “things will
soon be getting worse” for
Inner City Press' reporter.
Inner City Press has now been
banned from the UN for 127
days and Dujarric is providing
his and his boss' pretext, as
purported background, to some
of those asking questions, at
least if they come from
Europe, see below. The
pretexts are lies - now that
they are becoming public, the
ban is more disgusting and
should be UNtenable.
Two days
after Dujarric's threat this
reporter was pushed
out of the General
Assembly lobby during a speech
by Guterres by UN Security
Lieutenant Ronald E. Dobbins,
who did it again more
violently on July
3. Since then Inner City
Press has been banned
from entering the UN, and
Guterres even tried
to get Inner City Press ousted
from Park East Synagogue
twenty blocks north of the UN
on October 31.
As
many online have questioned
this no due process ouster,
including from Cameroon,
Japan,
the UK,
Italy
and other places in Europe, we
can now report that Dujarric
while refusing to answer Inner
City Press' and a UN
Expert's written
questions about how to appeal
this lifetime ban has reached
out to try to quiet some
critics.
Tellingly, while
he has entirely ignored for
example Anglophone Cameroonian
critics regardless of how
polite or articulate they are,
or how many social media
followers they have, Dujarric
has reached out to European
critics. What does he tell
them?
To give
the UN its best chance, Inner
City Press on the morning of
November 8 emailed questions
to Guterres, his Deputy Amina
Mohammed, Alison Smale,
Dujarric and his Deputy Farhan
Haq including: "November 8-2:
I am informed that the SG's
spokesman has selectively
contacted those (from Europe)
raising questions about the UN
3 July 2018 Press ouster and
ban since, including stating
that unnamed UN staff members
or officials demand a lifetime
ban in order to feel “safe.”
Given the lack of due process,
please name which officials or
safe claim to feel unsafe in
order to justify censorship,
and the basis for your claims.
Also, again, answer UNSR David
Kaye's and others' question:
what is the appeals process
for a unilateral no due
process physical ouster and
banning by the UN of a
journalist?" But seven hour
later, no answer to any of the
questions.
So,
for now due to the UN's
constant threat of retaliation
even against those it has
unilaterally chosen to reach
out to with dirt that cannot
stand the light of day, this
is a composite:
Dujarric claims
that Inner City Press made
"diplomats" feel unsafe. But
he has yet to provide the name
of a single diplomat, other
than the false Morocco Mission
complaint in USG Alison
Smale's 17 August 2018 ban
letter.
Dujarric claims
that his staff didn't like
having the movement reported
on. This seems to refer to
Inner City Press, once it had
no office to use, working on a
bench in the Secretariat lobby
and noting when spokespeople
who refused to even
acknowledge formal questions
went out to lunch. Inner City
Press also noted, when a
favored wire service got an
advance copy of a UN report,
the open favoritism of Associate
Spokesperson
Vannina
Maestracci. This
is not behavior - it is
content, and critique. More t
the point, this is obviously
not a legitimate basis to ban
a journalist for life. But
today's UN is lawless.
Dujarric goes low
and says that unnamed female
reporters didn't want to see
Inner City Press doing
stand-up Periscope broadcasts.
But the purpose of these --
filming on the fourth floor
was permitted without an
escort, Inner City Press was
told by Media Accreditation --
was to show EMPTY offices, for
example Morocco state media,
while Inner City Press had
nowhere to work. In fact,
Inner City Press went out of
its way not to speak with or
engage in any way with
Dujarric's coterie of pro UN
correspondents - that why it
left the building after work
through the garage, which was
later used against it.
There is
more, and we will have more.
But it is clear these are
pretexts. And even if Antonio
"The Censor" Guterres, who
believes it is impermissible
for a journalist to do a
critical stand up on the
public sidewalk across two
lanes of traffic from the $15
million publicly funded
mansion he (sometimes) lives
in believes these pretexts, an
interim solution was and is
clear.
Simply
allow Inner City Press in to
go to the noon briefing and
asked question - unless that
is what they are afraid of -
and to cover UNSC stakeouts
and Budget Committee meetings.
It is pathetic that a UN and
Secretary General that be
focused on "conflict
prevention" can't find a
solution other than violent
ouster and banning for a
critical journalist. We'll
have more on this.
This
is how any dictatorship would
try to justifying physically
assaulting and banning a
reporter - say that the
journalist's reporting made
unnamed people feel unsafe in
unspecified ways.
Yes,
Inner City Press named UN
officials who took money from
now convicted briber Ng Lap
Seng, including to provide Ng
with falsified General
Assembly documents. Is it
legitimate for Guterres' UN to
oust and ban a media for
making briber-takers feel
unsafe? There are others: the
Patrick Ho trial starts this
month.
Even
in Dujarric's private outreach
to European critics, he has no
evidence. This is why he and
USG Alison Smale never offered
a hearing or opportunity to be
heard: there is no evidence,
the charges are Trump-ed up.
Smale's deputy claims an article
shouldn't have been written
about him using audio of what
he said at an official
stake-out position accepted
(at least for other media) by
Smale's own Department, which
called frivolous the Morocco
Mission complaint Smale also
used.
But today
we ask: why does Dujarric
refuse to response for example
to African critics while
reaching out to Europeans to
say that the banning of Inner
City Press should be accepted,
that asking the UN questions
in person is a privilege? It
is because Dujarric himself is
privileged. Publicly available
records -- don't be scared --
show that Dujarric bought an
apartment on Manhattan's Upper
East Side for $3,785,000.
Now
the UN is wasteful - but does
it pay its spokesman enough to
buy a $4,000,000 apartment?
The money, it seemed from
public records, came from
(where else) an art gallery,
the Odyssia Gallery in New
York, which among other things
produces vanity shows. The NY
Times had reported that
"Ilaria Skouras Quadrani, a
daughter of Mr. and Mrs.
Federico Quadrani of Rome and
New York, was married last
Monday to Stephane Dujarric de
la Riviere, a son of Anka M.
Begley of New York and
Francois Dujarric de la
Riviere of Paris. Msgr. Robert
Charlebois performed the
ceremony at the church of San
Pietro in Montorio in Rome.
Mrs. Dujarric, 24, is a
researcher at the Kate Gansz
Company, an art dealer in
London. She graduated from
Mount Holyoke College and
received a master's degree in
art history from New York
University. Her parents own
the Odyssia Gallery in New
York." This Odyssia
Gallery, which later published
a book (cover photo here) of
Ilaria's drawings, has or had
as address 305 East 61st
Street, Manhattan. But a
recent reporter's visit to the
site found an empty building.
So what IS the source of this
spokesman's $4 million
apartment?
It
is all very nice, a position
from which to target hard
working media and try to
destroy a shirt, a laptop, a
livelihood, all without due
process, only later
evidence-free excuses provided
in private to other European,
banning questions from Africa
and about the UN's corruption.
It is UNacceptable. We'll have
more on this.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office, past & future?: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now UNder
Guterres: UN Delegates
Entrance Gate
and mail: Dag H.
Center
Box 20047, NY NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in
the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-2018 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
for
|