Your support
means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you
access to exclusive bonus material on
our Patreon page. Click
here to become a patron. MRL
on Patreon
After
UNSG Guterres Visited
CAR, News UN Released
Rebels Who Injured Peacekeepers, US Statement, Here
By Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS,
December 6 – Before UN
Secretary General Antonio
Guterres' trip
to the Central African
Republic, Inner City Press
asked him about UN sexual
abuse there, and about the
UN's inaction on mass killings
in neighboring Cameroon.
Guterres purported to answer
on the former, and "didn't
hear" the 15-second question
on Cameroon.
(Then Guterres' Department of
Public Information two days
later threatened Inner City
Press' accreditation, see
below.) On December 6, the US
State Department through its
spokesperson Heather Nauert
said, "The United States
remains concerned about
ongoing violence in the
Central African Republic
(CAR), and condemns in the
strongest terms the continued
targeted attacks against
civilians, peacekeepers, and
humanitarian actors. We
further emphasize our strong
support to the United Nations
Multidimensional Integrated
Stabilization Mission in the
Central African Republic
(MINUSCA), in its efforts to
protect civilians from
violence, prevent atrocities,
and help stabilize the
country. Fourteen UN
peacekeepers have been killed
in CAR since 2017 while
providing support and
protecting the CAR population
from predatory armed groups
that target, exploit, and kill
civilians. These deaths
are a tragic reminder of the
high cost of violence and the
price that peacekeepers,
civilians, and humanitarian
actors continue to pay. We
call on armed groups to put
down their weapons and engage,
without preconditions and in
good faith, with the CAR
government. We firmly
oppose impunity for human
rights violations, and support
the Special Criminal Court to
promote justice for victims
and accountability for those
responsible for atrocities.
The United States stands with
the CAR Government, MINUSCA,
and all Central Africans, as
they strive for peace,
justice, accountability, and
the prevention of future
atrocities in CAR." On
November 9, Inner City Press
asked Guterres' spokesman
Stephane Dujarric about the
UN's mission there, from the
UN transcript:
Inner City Press: In the
Central African Republic, it
seems that, in 2015, there
were some… some UPC rebels
that actually attacked and
injured a UN peacekeeper,
which is often said to be a
war crime, that were released
without any punishment at all
back to the rebel group.
And… and how does this… does
the Secretary-General believe
that such a move would, in
fact, put other peacekeepers
at risk because it's no
longer…Spokesman: We are
looking into the basis of the
story." A full day later,
nothing, and Dujarric canceled
the November 10 noon briefing,
after a mere three questions
stakeout by Guterres, nothing
on Yemen much less Cameroon.
On October 24 once Guterres
was in CAR, with a personal
photographer deployed in
advance and his spokesman
Stephane Dujarric, Inner City
Press asked deputy spokesman
Farhan Haq if Guterres in CAR
will meet with Mr. Renner
Onana, named as a bad actor in
the UN's own report on its
sexual abuse in CAR. Video here. A full day later, during a
trip that DPI's Alison Smale
said will be a litmus
test of UN story-telling, the
UN hadn't even answered this
basic question. So on October
25, Inner City Press asked Haq
again, noting it had found
online a photo
of Renner Onana, with a
promotion, greeting Fabrizio
Hochschild, a main adviser to
Guterres. Haq said he was
still checking - this just
after he'd said Guterres is
working on freedom of
information - and that Onana
might still be employed by the
UN but on leave. How hard is
it to find out? Either the UN
for some reason can't find
out, or doesn't want to say.
Because when Inner City Press
asked again on October 26,
still no answer. Video here.
From the October 26 transcript:
Inner City Press: On the trip,
you'd used this phrase, you
know, that he met with the
victims, all to the good, and
that he plans to end
impunity. I wanted to
ask now… this is the third
time, and it seems like it
should be pretty
straightforward. Mr.
Renner Onana was named in the
UN's own report and in
multiple press reports about
it as having… being he was
criticized in the report for
the cover-up, what was called…
viewed as the cover-up of
sexual abuse. So, I
wanted to know, given that
there's a photograph that he
got a promotion, is he still
at the mission? And how
do you explain it with the
idea of… this is not about a
Member State disciplining or
not disciplining a
peacekeeper. Was there
some other finding outside of
the UN's own report about what
happened that exonerated him?
What… what was done in terms
of accountability? Deputy
Spokesman: Well, we're…
like I said before, we're
checking up on this. I
don't have the details for you
yet, but we've asked our
colleagues for details about
this particular
situation. As you know,
when we pursue accountability
in cases involving staff, we
do that also in line with
following due process, which
is also one of our standards.
Inner City Press: But,
how can… you'd said yesterday
that maybe he was still, I
guess, on the payroll, but not
in the country. Do they
not know where he is?
Was he given a promotion?
Deputy Spokesman: I'm
trying to get details about
what his precise status
is. I don't have that
yet." And what he "had" on
October 27 was even more
outrageous. From the UN's
October 27 transcript:
Inner City Press: I've been
asking you, I guess for three
days as well, about Renner
Onana. Deputy Spokesman:
Oh, yes. And it's a good
thing that you're asking about
that because I have something
for you. What I can say
is that the individual is
currently head of a regional
office in the UN Mission,
MINUSCA. All matters
relating to the individual
accountability of those
concerned were reviewed and
addressed according to
internal processes by the
Office of Human Resources
Management and Department of
Field Support and the
appropriate application of
rules and policies.
Appropriate decisions were
taken, the specifics of which
remain confidential per
standard practice in order to
respect due process for all.
Inner City Press: Can you
understand why people… the
removal of Mr. [Andres]
Kompass who actually made
public the sexual abuse of
children in CAR and the
apparent promotion of an
individual that withheld the
information, at least
according to the UN's own
report on the matter, would
seem contradictory? Deputy
Spokesman: To correct
the record of what you're
saying, Mr. Kompass was
reinstated, and there was, as
you know, an inquiry that
dealt specifically with his
case, which we
respected. Inner City
Press: And he came back and
said he was totally disgusted
with the system, given what it
had done. I think the
disparate treatment between
Mr. Kompass and Mr… I wanted
to know, did Mr. Renner work
for Fabrizio Hochschild?
I've been waiting four days
for your answer. I was
doing… It seems that he
was promoted to become
MINUSCA's Director of
Political Affairs during the
same time period that Mr.
Hochschild was the DSRSG
[Deputy Special Representative
of the Secretary-General] in
MINUSCA. So I wanted to
know, this now is obviously…
this is why I'm
wondering. I was asking
what was the connection?
Did the Secretary-General
interact with him? Does
he believe, given what he said
about zero tolerance and
transparency recently as to
Mr. [David] Kaye's report,
that… that… that the questions
raised by just comparing the
UN's report on sexual abuse
and the promotion of this
individual and his apparently
close connection to a main
advisor of the
Secretary-General would give
rise to concern? Deputy
Spokesman: Well,
regarding that, like I said,
there were measures taken in
place. I… as I just
mentioned, in respect with due
process, the steps remain
confidential. As for who
Mr. Onana works for, he works
for the mission, MINUSCA, and
that's his job." This job is
to conceal UN rapes. Story-telling
indeed. Unless the UN intends
to try to replace the
independent press, isn't
answering factal questions
part of the litmus test? Or is
attacking and censoring
critics the goal? Smale and
her deputy who brought about
the threat
to Inner City Press'
accreditation after calling it
too negative then blocking it
on Twitter, were both on
October 24 at the New York UN
Day event, which UNlike other
correspondents Inner City
Press could only reach, later,
with their minder. Alamy
photos here.
Deputy SG Amina Mohammed was
informed - but Cameroonian
diplomats quote her as saying
Anglophone Cameroonian
aspirations will never be
supported because... Biafra.
Maybe she said it; we know
what the Cameroonian said but
after DPIs threat are it seems
not supposed to run audio.
Today's UN seems corrupt, in
CAR and at Headquarters. This
is UN Day. The UN delivered a
threat
to Inner City Press to
“review” it accreditation on
Friday afternoon at 5 pm. The
UN official who signed the letter,
when Inner City Press went to
ask about the undefined
violation of live-streaming
Periscope video at a photo op
by UN Secretary General
Antonio Guterres, had already
left, minutes after sending
the threat. What to make of
the letter's vague statement,
"filming and recording on the
38th floor are limited to
official photo opportunities,
and recording conversations of
others in the room is not
permitted. It has been brought
to our attention that you
breached that rule recently"?
It's not only vague as to
when, but absurd: once a
Periscope is authorized to
start streaming, it is
impossible to not record
someone who speaks loudly at
the photo op. This comes two
days after Inner City Press asked Guterres about the
UN inaction on threatened
genocide in Cameroon, and the
UN claimed
Guterres hadn't heard the
15-second long question.
Recently at a photo op,
Guterres' adviser on Cameroon
Khassim Diagne spoke loudly.
Inner City Press later reported,
based on sourcing, that Diagne
who was previously the
representative to Cameroon for
UNHCR,
the UN refugee agency Guterres
ran, speaks in favor of
Cameroon's government. Is this
letter a response to the
reporting? Is it retaliation?
Is it intimidation to stop
reporting on this threatened
genocide? We can't ask the
complainant, Maher Nasser:
after the threat was
delivered, he blocked Inner
City Pres on Twitter, here.
It also
comes after Alison Smale the
head of the Department of
Public Information which would
“review” Inner City Press'
accreditation has ignored threeseparatepetitions
from Inner City Press in the
six weeks she has been in the
job, urging her to remove
restrictions on Inner City
Press' reporting which hinder
its coverage of the UN's
performance in such crises as
Yemen,
Kenya,
Myanmar,
and the Central African
Republic where Guterres
travels next week, with
Smale's DPI saying its
coverage of the trip will be a
test of its public relations
ability. But the UN official
who triggered the complaint is
Maher Nasser, who filled in
for Smale before she arrived.
His complaint is that audio of
what he said to Inner City
Press as it staked out the
elevators in the UN lobby
openly recording, as it has
for example
with Cameroon's Ambassador
Tommo Monthe, here,
was similarly published.
A UN “Public Information”
official is complaining about
an article, and abusing his
position to threaten to review
Inner City Press'
accreditation. The UN has
previously been called
out for targeting Inner
City Press, and for having no
rules or due process.
But the UN is entirely
UNaccountable, impunity on
censorship as, bigger picture,
on the cholera it brought to
Haiti. And, it seems, Antonio
Guterres has not reformed or
reversed anything. This threat
is from an official involved
in the last round of
retaliation who told Inner
City Press on Twitter to be
less "negative" about the UN -
amid inaction on the mass
killing in Cameroon - and who
allowed pro-UN hecking of
Inner City Press' questions
about the cholera the UN
brought to Haiti and the Ng
Lap Seng /John Ashe UN bribery
scandal which resulted in six
guilty verdicts. We'll have
more on this.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Past
(and future?) UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047,
Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2017 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for