UNITED
NATIONS, April
22 -- The UN
claims to have
a “zero
tolerance”
policy on
sexual abuse
or
exploitation
by its
personnel. But
does it?
On
April 22,
about Haiti,
Inner City
Press asked
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
spokesman:
Inner
City Press: it
goes back to
February,
where a
Canadian UN
police
officer from
Haiti was
accused of
sexual abuse
or
exploitation
and
left the
country. Now
it is being
pointed out
that,
particularly
under Canadian
law, he can’t
be charged in
Canada for
alleged
crimes
committed
outside of the
country, and
so human
rights lawyers
and others are
saying this is
a blind spot
in the UN’s
accountability
system. One,
what’s
happened to
the individual
that
was accused of
this, or was
said to be,
left the
country in the
face
of the charge
in February?
And two, is it
in fact the
case, how can
the UN say
that he could
be charged in
Canada if
Canadian law
seems
to prohibit
that?
Spokesperson
Martin
Nesirky: I’d
have to check
on that,
Matthew. I am
aware
that an
individual did
leave Haiti
earlier this
year, but I
need to
check on the
details.
Although
the existence
of an outright
loophole even
in the UN's
stated
policies seems
evident,
Inner City
Press waited
to write the
story.
After 5 pm,
Ban's
spokesperson's
office told
Inner City
Press:
Subject:
On
your MINUSTAH
question.
From: UN
Spokesperson -
Do Not Reply
[at] un.org
Date: Mon, Apr
22, 2013 at
5:29 PM
To:
Matthew.Lee
[at]
innercitypress.com
DPKO
says that the
case is still
under
investigation
by the
Canadian
authorities.
Typical
for DPKO under
Herve
Ladsous, this
doesn't
answer the
loophole or
blind-spot
question
actually
asked,
“how can the
UN say that he
could be
charged in
Canada if
Canadian
law seems to
prohibit
that?”
See,
for example,
this CBC
report:
“The
case is
complicated by
the fact a
police officer
was involved —
and
not a member
of the
military.
Soldiers can
be tried in a
military
court, but
under U.N.
rules,
civilian staff
– including
police
officers –
cannot be
charged in
Canada if a
crime is
committed
abroad. Once
back in
Canada, they
cannot be
charged for a
crime
committed
abroad. Once
back in
Canada, they
cannot be
charged for a
crime
committed
abroad.”
That's what
Canadian media
say. So
the UN is just
putting off
acknowledging
or addressing
this loophole
in criminal
prosecution,
perhaps hoping
that people
just forget
about
it. Watch this
site.