In
Haiti, UN Shot
at Civilians,
Didn't Tell UN
Spox, Who
Calls ICP Rude
for Qs
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, May 2
-- When UN
Peacekeepers
are
determined, by
the UN itself,
to have shot
at civilians
by using
inappropriate
force, what
accountability
is there?
None, with
Herve Ladsous
atop UN
Peacekeeping.
Even the
supposed
reporting in
the incidents
is
inconsistent.
Now,
at least as to
Haiti,
possible
killings by UN
Peacekeepers
are not even
reported to UN
headquarters
in New York.
This is a new
low.
Inner
City Press: On
Haiti, you may
have a
statement on
this.
There's some
footage that
has come out
of UN
peacekeepers,
they're
described as
the Brazilian,
but in any
case Blue
Helmets,
shooting at
people in Cite
de Soleil, and
there's a
gentleman on
the ground
dead; that
supposedly
took place
Tuesday, or
the publisher
of the video
says it was on
Tuesday, and
there are
people with…
against
MINUSTAH
[United
Nations
Stabilization
Mission in
Haiti]
signs.
So I wanted to
know, do you
have anything
on the death
or the kill…
of a civilian
by MINUSTAH in
Haiti on
Tuesday?
Deputy
Spokesman
Haq: No,
in fact we
have not
received any
report from
the UN
Stabilization
Mission in
Haiti
concerning any
sort of
violent
incidents in
recent
days. We
will check
with them on
this, but… but
as far as I'm
aware, they
have not
reported any
such incident.
The next day
on May 1,
making it
clear that
MINUSTAH never
even told the
UN
Headquarters
about its
shooting(s),
Haq came back
with this
answer -- then
called Inner
City Press
rude and an
"obnoxious
child" for
asked follow
up questions.
Call it the
Ladsousification
of the UN, or
at least this
part of it. On
Haiti
Haq said on
May 1:
"In
response to a
question asked
yesterday
about Haiti,
we can say
that on April
28th around 6
p.m. in Cité
Soleil,
MINUSTAH
troops, while
carrying out a
routine
patrol, came
under fire by
unidentified
individuals
and responded
in
self-defence.
Subsequently
the Haitian
National
Police’s
Public Order
Unit arrived
on the scene
and took the
lead in the
response.
"It was later
reported that
a Haitian
citizen, who
died from
gunfire, was
found in the
area where the
exchange of
fire involving
all the
parties took
place.
The Haitian
National
Police has
recovered the
body and has
launched an
investigation
into the
circumstances
of the death
of the
individual.
MINUSTAH for
its part has
launched a
preliminary
investigation
to ascertain
the
circumstances
of the
events."
But as seen in
Haiti and Mali,
UN Peacekeeping
refuses to
release
reports of its
shooting at
civilians,
even when the
civilians are
killed.
Inner
City Press:
While you were
away or last
week, the
summary was
released of
the incidents
in Gao.
And I wanted
to know, since
Mr. Ladsous
did not answer
this question,
does the
report contain
a review of
the deal that
was struck
between the UN
mission and
the MNLA in
Tabancourt
that gave rise
to the protest
in which three
civilians were
killed?
And I also
wanted to
bring to your
attention that
during the
stakeout by
Mr. Ladsous on
Thursday, the
microphone was
grabbed by Mr.
Ladsous'
spokesman to
avoid just
this
question.
Since you
previously
said it
wouldn't
happen, I
wanted to know
what you think
of it.
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric:
I think on the
issue of the
summary, what
was released
is
released.
I have nothing
to add to the
summary.
My
understanding
is that Mr.
Ladsous'
spokesman
pointed to
another
journalist to
answer the
question, and
that's the way
it happened.
Inner City
Press:
He grabbed the
microphone.
Spokesman
Dujarric:
Go ahead.
Inner
City Press: I
just wanted to
make you aware
of that.
But I'm saying
is that the
summary of the
report was
released, but
it seems like
the underlying
incident that
gave rise to
the protest
wasn't
answered about
in any
way.
What does the
UN
understand…?
Spokesman:
The report
looked at, at
the incident,
which is a
very violent
confrontation.
And I think
we've made our
recommendations
clear, and I
think the
investigation
was done
rather
swiftly.
Inner City
Press:
And is the
Haiti report
about shooting
at civilians
going to be
similarly
summarized?
And if not,
why not?
Spokesman:
The Haiti
report is
currently… has
now been
finalized.
[The
Department of
Peacekeeping
Operations]
and [the
Department of
Field Support]
have been in
contact with
the relevant
police-contributing
country
concerned,
which has
decided to
repatriate the
unit
commander.
In addition,
three officers
have been
placed on
modified,
nonoperational
duty pending
the final
result of the
inquiry.
So I will… I
hope to have
more on that
for you.
But Dujarric
only referred
to
repatriation,
not to any
disclosure, as
in Mali, of
"excessive or
unauthorized
force" under
Ladsous. Why
not?
On Mali, after
Ladsous'
MINUSMA like
France, for
which Ladsous
was a diplomat
including
during the
1994 Rwanda
genocide,
urging the
escape of Hutu
genocidaires
into Eastern
Congo, reached
side deals
with the MNLA
rebels about
Tabankort,
there was a
protest in
Gao.
UN Police
ultimately
under Ladsous'
command shot
and killed
three
civilians. In
this case,
because the
Malian
government
wanted an
investigation
of the killing
of protesters
which
supported its
positition,
the UN did an
investigation
and at least
released a
summary.
(Ladsous
refused to
answer Inner
City Press'
questions
including
about the
roots of the
protest, his
mission's deal
with the MNLA
in Tabankort.)
But in Haiti,
where Ladsous'
peacekeeping
mission was
filmed
shooting at
protesters who
oppose Michel
Martelly, the
report has not
even been
summarized.
MINUSTAH chief
Sandra Honore
told Inner
City Press the
report is
finished and
"with DPKO" -
that is
Ladsous. But
no summary is
being
released.
Ladsous
refused Inner
City Press'
question about
this, and
scribes
ignored that
these are two
incidents of
shooting
unarmed
civilians, in
two countries,
under Ladsous.
Who is
responsible?
Vine
here.
These
questions took
place at the
UN Security
Council
stakeout, but
Reuters
and Agence
France Presse
did not
mention it,
only blaming
Rwanda. Both
previously
tried to
censor Inner
City Press
coverage of
Ladsous and
French
colonialism,
to the extent
of moving to
ask the UN to
throw Inner
City Press
out.
Which
approach is
journalism?
AFP
wasn't even AT
this stakeout
- Ladous
sought to
avoid
questions by
repeating his
talking points
in French, but
no AFP. Then
Reuters told
UNTV to give
it the
microphone, to
ask about
Rwanda.
Ladsous
leered. Then a
retired
Reuters
reporter was
pointed at by
Ladsous'
spokesman Nick
Birnback, who
then grabbed
the UNTV
microphone to
take it away
from Inner
City Press.