After
UN Killed 8000
in Haiti with
Cholera, Suit
Due Today: NYT
Jumped First,
But Will They
Follow Thru?
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
October 8/9,
updated --
After the UN
brought
cholera to
Haiti which
has killed
over 8,000
people, and UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon
said the legal
claims of
those killed
were "not
receivable,"
now the UN is
slated to be
sued on the
morning of October
9, in a class
action, in the
US District
Court for the
Southern
District of
New York.
This news was
ostensibly
under embargo
until midnight
between
October 8 and
9. Inner City
Press drafted
the story
below and sat
on it for
hours, to
respect the
embargo. Then
the New York
Times
seemingly
violated the
embargo,
without
explanation. Droit
de seigneur,
apparently.
But the
question is:
does the New
York Times
follow through
and hold the
UN
accountable?
Inner City
Press'
experience is,
sadly, no.
Tellingly,
the New
York Times
recently
profiled USUN
Ambassador
Samantha Power
heavily relying
on her tweets
- - which as
Inner City
Press had
shown on this
site, in
GoogleNews and
BloggingHeads.tv,
Power does not
send. But hey,
they're the
New York
Times.
So why didn't
they get Power's
position on
cholera in
Haiti?
The
truth will
out, going
forward. And
we will cover
it. For now:
The
plaintiff's
attorneys told
Inner City
Press, during
the embargo
period, that
the causes of
action
include
negligence,
gross
negligence/recklessness,
wrongful
death,
negligent
supervision,
negligent
infliction of
emotional
distress,
intentional
infliction of
emotional
distress,
private
nuisance,
public
nuisance, and
breach of
contract.
The
contract
breached is
the UN's
Status of
Forces
Agreement or
SOFA,
online here.
Inner City
Press has
waiting until
midnight
October 8-9
to publish
this, to
respect the
plaintiffs'
embargo.
The
UN has
continued to
preach about
the rule of
law and about
accountability,
even as it has
refused to
even apologize
for bringing
cholera to
Haiti.
It has
demanded that
its other
reports, for
example
on chemical
weapons in
Syria, be
taken
seriously even
after it
issued
and defended a
bogus report
exonerating
itself for
having brought
cholera to
Haiti.
Inner
City Press has
repeatedly
asked the head
of UN
Peacekeeping,
Herve
Ladsous, if
any
improvements
have been made
to DPKO's
practices; he
has refused to
answer.
(Click here
for a story
from today's
UK New
Statements
about that.)
After
even Haitian
Prime Minister
Lamonthe said
the UN bears
"moral
responsibility
for cholera in
his country,
Inner City
Press asked
the
UN about it,
twice. On September
30, Inner
City Press asked,
referring
to "litigant
or potential
litigants"
--
Inner
City Press: On
Haiti, the
speech by the
Prime Minister
in the General
Assembly said
that the UN
has “moral
responsibility
for the
eruption of
the cholera
epidemic”, and
said that the
response is
far from being
sufficient. I
wondered,
given that he
is the Prime
Minister of
the country,
what the
response of
the
Secretariat is
to
that?
Spokesperson
Martin
Nesirky: Well,
the
Secretary-General
met with the
Prime
Minister of
Haiti, and
they discussed
the question
of cholera in
Haiti, and the
focus was very
much on
handling that
outbreak and
the
need,
specifically,
for additional
funding. There
is something
of a
shortfall in
funding for
that, and that
is precisely
what the focus
is on.
Inner
City Press:
But this
phrase “moral
responsibility,"
up until
now the
Government has
resisted
saying the
things that
the litigants
or
potential
litigants are
saying,
and so is,
does this
change
anything that
the Government
uses this
phrase?
Spokesperson:
The focus of
the United
Nations and,
as we
understand it,
of the
Haitian
authorities is
to help the
people of
Haiti to
overcome the
cholera
epidemic. And
a key
component of
that is
funding.
Then
after being
contacted from
multiple legal
and media
sources in
Haiti,
Inner City
Press on
October 1
asked:
Inner
City Press:
there’s been a
report in the
media in Haiti
that one of
the things
agreed to in
the meeting
between the
Prime Minister
and
the
Secretary-General
was something
called a joint
commission to
work
on cholera
that would
begin its work
on 10 October.
Is that the
case?
Spokesperson:
The case is
that the
Secretary-General
and the Prime
Minister, as
we
said in our
readout,
discussed
efforts, joint
efforts, to
eradicate
cholera,
amongst other
matters,
including
relocating
internally
displaced
people. And
there is a
senior
coordinator
within the UN
system for the
cholera
response in
Haiti, and he
will remain in
close
touch with the
Haitian
Government and
authorities,
particularly
with
the aim of
having joint
efforts to
eradicate
cholera.
Inner
City Press: Is
there anything
to this 10
October date
in Haiti,
[inaudible]
dot com?
They’ve made
it seem like
kind of a
formal
kicking off of
a new project?
Spokesperson:
As I say, the
senior
coordinator
from the
United Nations
is in close
contact with
the Haitian
authorities
and I don’t
have anything
beyond that at
this point.
And
now, the class
action
lawsuit. There
will be more.
Watch this
site.