By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, March
16 -- When the
UN under
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon and UN
Peacekeeping
under Herve
Ladsous
claimed total
immunity - or
impunity - for
cholera in
Haiti, "the
episode and
the arguments
advanced by
the UN have
damaged the
organization’s
legitimacy and
moral
standing."
That
verdict is
from a
just-released
study
of UN
Peacekeeping,
Sara E. Davies
and Simon
Rushton,
“Healing or
Harming? UN
Peacekeeping
and Health,”
New York:
International
Peace
Institute,
March 2015.
Ladsous
has appeared
at IPI,
purportedly to
answer
questions on
his tenure as
the fourth
Frenchman in a
row atop UN
Peacekeeping.
But as
elsewhere,
Ladsous at IPI
refused Inner
City Press'
questions, here; here
on DR Congo;
here
on covering up
rapes.
What was that
again, about
lost
legitimacy and
moral
standing?
More than
three months
after the UN
promised an
investigation
of its
peacekeepers
in Haiti
having fired
pistols and
tear gas at
protesters,
the report has
yet to be
released. This
is called a
cover up, and
has become a
pattern in UN
Peacekeeping
under Ladsous.
On
February 19,
Inner City
Press asked
UN Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric:
Inner City
Press: often
these
investigations
are never
released.
So I wanted to
ask you about
the Haiti
investigation
of the
shooting by
peacekeepers
at unarmed
demonstrators
that took
place last
year and has
been said
repeatedly
that it would
be almost
finished, that
it is
finished.
Where is it?
Spokesman
Dujarric: I
think — my
understanding
is it's close
to
finished.
My
understanding
too is that
the
peacekeeper,
the Jordanian
peacekeeper
that was shown
in the video,
has been
suspended.
But I will try
to get you
more details.
"Close
to finished"
four weeks
after the UN
said the same
thing? Inner
City Press also asked on
February 19:
Inner City
Press: I
wanted to ask
you about
cholera,
because I saw
that the
Deputy
Secretary-General
met with Mr.
Medrano
yesterday at
4:30.
Obviously,
some kind of a
readout, but
what I've seen
is that Mr.
Medrano has
done
interviews
saying that he
wishes that
the issue of
Haitians with
cholera —
23,000 or
something new
cases last
year — were
higher profile
and there's a
danger of
forgetting
it. So I
want to I
guess ask you
if he's in New
York, why
doesn't he do
a press
conference or
a stakeout or
— I mean, Mr.
Nabarro did a
stakeout, he's
doing a press
conference.
Can you ask?
Spokesman:
I'll find out
where he is.
The
question and
scheduled made
clear - he is
in New York.
But why will
he not answer
questions?
It's being
called
Ladsousification.
Here's
on Inner City
Press' exclusive
uncovering of
the sale of
posts in the
Ladsous-run
Haiti mission
MINUSTAH,
on which we
continue to
report.
All
this is four
weeks after
Inner City
Press on
January 20
asked Dujarric
about the
Haiti report,
and a
similarly
promised probe
of the deadly
downing of a
UN helicopter
in South
Sudan, video
here.
While Dujarric
had no answer
on January 20,
and provided
nothing in
writing in the
24 hours that
followed, at
the noon
briefing on
January 21 his
deputy Farhan
Haq read out
this answer:
"Yesterday,
Stéphane
[Dujarric] was
asked about
the status of
an
investigation
by the UN
Mission in
Haiti
(MINUSTAH).
I can tell you
that MINUSTAH
confirms that
the
investigation
has been
completed and
the report is
now being
reviewed by
the Mission’s
leadership.
Appropriate
actions have
been taken on
the initial
recommendations
for
improvements
in compliance
with
established
operational
procedures.
At the same
time, the
concerned
individuals
have been
suspended from
operational
duty and the
Member State
concerned has
been informed
about the
investigation.
"We were also
asked about a
Board of
Inquiry report
into a
helicopter
crash last
year in South
Sudan.
We were
informed that
the draft
report is
currently in
the last
stages of
being
finalized."
Regarding
Haiti, Inner
City Press
asked this
follow up: "on
the answer you
gave on Haiti,
I want to know
what has
MINUSTAH done
to track down
or to look
into people
actually
injured by the
videotaped
firing into
the crowd of
demonstrators?"
Haq
replied,
"Well, that
update we gave
you was what
we have at
this
stage.
Like I said,
that report is
still being
reviewed for
follow-up
activity.
We’ll provide
any further
details on the
question of
that incident
in Haiti as we
get them. "
The
nothing for
four weeks.
Nor what
the UN is
caught doing
on film: in
Haiti,
shooting into
crowds of
people
protesting the
failure to
hold
elections, and
blocked the
camera of
media trying
to cover it. Video here, from 0:18; a
second video
is here.
On
Haiti more
than a month
ago on
December
16 Inner
City Press
asked
Dujarric,
whether the
peacekeeper
filmed
shooting a
pistol and
pushing back a
cameraman --
like his boss Ladsous -- had
been
interviewed
yet.
Dujarric
would not
answer even
this, saying
he will only
speak when he
hears from
MINUSTAH.
Video here.
This might be
called a cover
up, or a hope
it goes away
-- even as Ban
Ki-moon, in
tuxedo, goes
to the
ball of his UN
Censorship
Alliance
where an award
about Haiti
will be given
out, with no
answers on
shooting
protesters
there.
Back on
December 15,
Inner City
Press also
asked UN
Spokesman
Dujarric about
the incident,
which the UN
mission
MINUSTAH has
said it is
investigating
itself.
Dujarric
repeated this,
adding that he
didn't want to
"pre-judge."
Video here. But MINUSTAH's short
press
statement
already
characterized
as "violent"
the
demonstrators
that were shot
at.
Dujarric
said they'd
have to see if
the
peacekeeper
felt
threatened.
Video here. After the web-cast
UN noon
briefing,
Inner City
Press was
contacted by
viewers who
noted this
subjective
idea of an
armed
authority
feeling
threatened is
that invoked
in the cases
of Michael
Brown in
Ferguson,
Missouri and
Eric Garner on
Staten Island
in New York.
As on
its impunity
for bringing
cholera to
Haiti, the UN
is on strange
and untenable
ground in
seeking to
justify
shooting at
unarmed
people. And
the head of UN
Peacekeeping
Herve Ladsous
is
conveniently
in former
French colony
Senegal during
all this.
UN
Peacekeeping's
chief is Herve
Ladous, and
tellingly he
himself tried
to block the
camera of the
Press, right
inside the UN,
in September
2014.
Vine
here.
When a
subordinate
carries out
the same act
as his or her
ultimate
supervisor
publicly did,
it is
case of
command
responsibility.
So
who
should be held
accountable is
known - but
will it
happen?
Back on
December
2, Inner
City Press
asked UN
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric about
MINUSTAH and
protests:
Inner City
Press: I
wanted to ask
you about
Haiti, since
there's the
Mission
there.
There have
been protests
about the
failure to
hold elections
and they've
been put down
by
police.
I wanted to
know, first,
whether
there's been
any MINUSTAH
[United
Nations
Stabilization
Mission in
Haiti]
involvement;
and also what
the Mission's
thinking is as
the 12 January
deadline
imposes when
the Government
will be
dissolved and
Mr. [Michel]
Martelly will
rule by
decree.
Is that the
fact?
And what’s the
UN doing?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
I don't
believe
there's been…
I don't
believe
there's been
any
involvement of
MINUSTAH in
the
demonstrations.
Obviously,
it's important
that people
have the right
to demonstrate
peacefully and
it's up to the
authorities to
ensure that
right is
respected.
The political
situation in
Haiti
obviously
remains a
concern.
It is one that
we're
following
closely.
So what
happened
December 2
("no
involvement of
MINUSTAH") and
December 12 -
MINUSTAH
shooting into
the crowd?
Inner City
Press has
asked Dujarric
about the UN's
rules of
engagement, so
far without
answer.
With questions
unanswered, UN
Peacekeeping
under Herve
Ladsous had
the gall on
the afternoon
of December 13
to rebroadcast
MINUSTAH
self-congratulations
that ignored
its filmed
shooting at
protesters and
threatening
media. Inner
City Press
initially
asked the UN
Spokesman:
"What were the
rules of
engagement?
Who gave the
order to use
pistol(s) and,
separately,
tear gas? What
is the UN's
understanding
of injuries
caused? What
was the role,
and is the
comment, of
the Under
Secretary
General for
Peacekeeping
Operations
Herve
Ladsous?"
Inner
City Press
twice,
in two media,
asked for an
explanation or
comment from
the UN
Spokesman, and
Saturday
afternoon
received this:
"The United
Nations
Stabilization
Mission in
Haiti,
(MINUSTAH),
has been
informed of an
alleged
excessive use
of force,
while
responding to
violent
demonstrators
targeting law
enforcement
personnel
supporting the
Haitian
National
Police (HNP)
and causing
injuries and
destruction of
property,
during the
demonstration
in
Port-au-Prince
today. The
Mission takes
this
allegation
very seriously
and
immediately
opened an
investigation
to establish
the facts."
Artfully, or
inartfully,
the MINUSTAH
statement does
not state that
it is the UN's
own alleged
(filmed)
excessive use
of force - so
is the UN
investigating
itself? We've
asked the UN
Spokesperson
and weekend
duty officer
this:
Because
the MINUSTAH
statement
leaves it
unclear, can
you confirm
that it is the
UN's own
“alleged
excessive use
of force” that
the UN is now
investigating?
What
is the time
frame for the
investigation?
Who
is doing the
investigation?
MINUSTAH's
human rights
unit?
Can
to state now
that the
results of the
investigation
will be made
public?
Since
the MINUSTAH
statement
expresses
conclusions
about the
demonstrators
(“violent,”
“and causing
injuries and
destruction of
property”)
please provide
similar
preliminary
findings as to
UN
Peacekeepers'
action shown
on this video:http://youtu.be/38owUZrNHzA
Hours later,
no answer,
even as the
second video
emerged.
Others in the
UN system have
been asked;
we'll have
more on that.
Inner City
Press has also
sought comment
from
prospective UN-related
awardee Andrea
Bocelli,
slated to
accept without
reference to
the UN
bringing
cholera or now
shooting into
crowds there
an award from
the UN's
Censorship
Alliance next
week -- and
continues to
await
response.
The
MINUSTAH
mission has
just published
this:
"MINUSTAH has
been informed
of an alleged
excessive use
of force,
while
responding to
violent
demonstrators
targeting law
enforcement
personnel
supporting the
Haitian
National
Police (HNP)
and causing
injuries and
destruction of
property,
during the
demonstration
in
Port-au-Prince
today. The
Mission takes
this
allegation
very seriously
and
immediately
opened an
investigation
to establish
the facts."
But UN
Peacekeeping
under Herve
Ladsous is
already
accused of
cover-ups.
This MINUSTAH
statement
doesn't even
say against
whom the
allegations
are.
Inner
City Press,
before the
December 12
protests and
footage of the
UN firing into
them, asked
the UN Office
of the
Spokesperson
about the
failure to
hold
elections, and
if the
MINUSTAH
mission was
involved in
cracking down
on
demonstrations.
On the latter,
the answer
given then was
no.
Now, this video, by Le Nouvelliste.
Who will be
held
accountable?
UN
Peacekeeping
is run by
Herve Ladsous,
a former
French
diplomat and
spokesman
during the
ouster of
Aristide. We
will have more
on this.