On
Haiti Cholera,
UN Still Won't
Say If Got
Papers, No
Briefing by
Serpa, Song
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
February 25,
with a song
-- Now the
Haitian Lawyers
Association
and Haitian
Women of Miami
have filed an
amicus brief
about the UN's
refusal to
confirm even
service of
legal papers
in the Haiti
cholera case.
So Inner City
Press at the
February 25 UN
noon briefing
asked the UN
spokesperson,
for the third
time, to
confirm or
deny that
papers have
been received,
by Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon and
his UN
Peackeeping
deputy Edmond
Mulet.
Spokesperson
Martin Nesirky
said, again,
that he would
check -- and
then quickly
said no to
Inner City
Press'
February 20
request for a
briefing by
the head of
the UN Office
of Legal
Affairs Miguel
de
Serpa.
Inner City
Press keyed
this request
to the
UN's envoy on
cholera in
Haiti Pedro
Medrano having
told Jonathan
Katz in
Beacon Reader
that "It’s the
under-secretary
[general] for
legal affairs,
Miguel de
Serpa. They
are now
dealing with
the issue
before the
federal court
in Manhattan."
[Full
disclosure:
Beacon Reader
is a
cooperative-like
subscription
site to
which this
reporter,
like Katz, contributes,
for example last Thursday here.]
Nesirky, who
leaves March 7
for the UN
Information
Center in
Vienna, on
February 20
said he doubted
any briefing
on the topic
by Miguel de
Serpa will
take place, or
it will be
"very
short."
On
February 25
Nesirky said
there will be
NO briefing by
Miguel de
Serpa. The Free UN Coalition for Access, which has
pursued such
briefing since
its inception,
notes that
under Kofi
Annan the head
of Legal Affairs
Nicolas Michel
held press
conferences.
There are
other legal
questions de
Serpa should
answer, for
example
question
concerning if
traditional
peacekeepers
in MONUSCO in
the Congo are
now combatants
or parties to
an armed
conflict, with
the Force
Intervention
Brigade in the
same UN
mission. Inner
City Press wrote about
and asked this
as well on
February 25; we'll
see if there's
an answer to
member states,
since the
press and the
public
apparently
don't get any.
Inner City
Press on
February 13
has asked
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
spokesperson
Martin
Nesirky:
Inner
City Press: on
Haiti, I
understand the
position of
not commenting
on the cholera
litigation,
but maybe you
can ask the
Office for
Legal Affairs
whether the UN
has actually
accepted
service or
process of the
papers. There
were some
earlier
problems, and
I’ve heard
from them that
they actually
managed to
serve two
individuals so
I’m asking
you, just a
yes or no
answer whether
papers were
received.
Spokesperson
Nesirky:
Well, I can’t
give either
because I will
need to check.
But now twelve
days have
passed and no
answer has
been received.
The "two
individuals"
namelessly
referred to by
Inner City
Press in its
question were
Ban Ki-moon
and Edmond
Mulet, who
spoke on the
issue last
Fall as shown
in the Inner
City Press
YouTube video
here and
embedded
below.
In the face of
such
stonewalling,
of such a blue
wall of
silence, Inner
City Press has
uploaded the
first, raw
version of its
new song on
the topic,
here.
Last
month the UN's
envoy on
cholera in
Haiti Pedro
Medrano was quoted
by Agence
France Presse
that legal
wrangling over
the epidemic
had to be put
aside in order
to tackle the
sweeping
advance of the
disease.
Since when
Inner City
Press has
asked, the UN
has repeatedly
refused to
comment on, or
access legal
papers in, the
class action
lawsuit
against it for
bringing
cholera to
Haiti, this
seemed
strange.
At the UN's
January 23
noon briefing
Inner City
Press asked
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
acting deputy
spokesperson
Farhan Haq how
much if
anything --
beyond its
credibility --
the lawsuit
has cost the
UN, and if the
UN has
accepted
service of
legal papers.
Haq said the
UN will not
comment on the
lawsuit.
But, Inner
City Press
pointed out,
the UN's
Medrano DID
comment on the
lawsuit,
saying it
should be put
aside.
Then Haq said
that is not
the quote,
pulling out
the AFP
article. It
appears the UN
chose AFP
or even this
AFP
correspondent
Tim Witcher to
make its pitch
for money
while avoiding
dealing with
its
responsibility
for the
cholera. (The
correspondent
Witcher was
called on
first at the
January 23
noon briefing,
and said to
Haq, "On
behalf of Pam,
I welcome
you,"
referring to
Pamela Falk of
CBS, the
president of
the United
Nations
Correspondents
Association
now known as
the UN's
Censorship
Alliance.)
How could that
AFP article
not have
pursued the
lawsuit angle?
This is how
the UN -- and
its chosen
scribes --
work, or don't
work. And
it is being
challenged and
protested by
the new Free
UN Coalition
for Access.
On the fourth
anniversary of
the earthquake
in Haiti, UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon issued
a 312-word
statement to
UN staff
there. He
began,
appropriately,
with "grief" -
but nowhere in
the statement
did he mention
the word
"cholera,"
much less that
the UN is
nearly
universally
viewed as
having brought
cholera to
Haiti, through
a deployment
of
peacekeepers
from Nepal
coupled with
lax UN
sanitation
practices.
In New
York, the UN
dodged the
claims and
questions from
Inner City
Press about if
it has
standing
claims
commissions
anywhere --
the answer is
no -- and if
it even now
screens for
cholera before
deployment --
the answer is
still no. Most
recently, the
UN has refused
to accept
service of
legal papers
in the class
action lawsuit
filed against
it. And see
below:
When asked
inside the UN
about bringing
cholera to
Haiti,
spokespeople
for UN
Peacekeeper
have for
months been
telling the
Press "we have
nothing more
to say," or
more recently,
"that is not a
yet or no
question."
In
November 2013
Inner City
Press went two
blocks from
the UN to a
panel
discussion
with UN
Peacekeeping
and the US
State
Department, to
see if there
might be a
more candid
answer.
The
guest was
supposed to be
UN
Peacekeeping
chief Herve
Ladsous, who
inside the UN
refuses to
answer Press
questions. (Video here, UK
coverage
here.) But
he was
replaced,
apparently at
the last
minute, by his
deputy Edmond
Mulet, once
the head of
the UN's
mission in
Haiti,
MINUSTAH.
When
Mulet and the
US State
Department's
Victoria Holt
were asked
about cholera
in Haiti, only
Mulet
answered.
(Holt answered
another
question about
zero tolerance
for sexual
abuse, but
said nothing
about the
US-trained
391st
Battalion of
the Congolese
Army being
implicated in
135 rapes in
Minova.)
Mulet
essentially
blamed the
cholera death
on Haiti
itself, noting
the "same
strain" --
that would be,
from Nepal,
brought along
with the
peacekeepers
from there by
the UN --
spread to the
Dominican
Republic but
didn't kill
anyone.
Mulet
said it spread
to Cuba too,
but the
government
there was more
organized. But
no follow-up
was allowed on
the main
point: it was
the UN
peacekeepers'
negligent
santitation
practices that
put their
fecal material
in the river
and introduced
cholera to
Haiti. Have
any
improvements
been made
since?
The
venue was the
Museum of
Tolerance; the
host was
UNA-USA. The
mood was how
to make the UN
attractive to
Americans, or
really, how to
best present
the UN to
Americans.
That's why
Mulet's
blame-the-Haitians
line doesn't
work: nearly
anyone who
hears what
happens thinks
the UN should
apologize, and
try to help
the families
of those
killed. This
song will
continue to be
developed.
Watch this
site.
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2013 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|