On
Cholera in
Hispanola, UN's
Ban Took A Single
Question,
Still No
Apology
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, July
16 -- Six days
after Inner
City Press
asked the UN
about cholera
and if
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon was
traveling to
Haiti mid-July
(and the UN
dodged),
Ban traveled
there and
spoke publicly
six times --
including two
"press
conferences"
only one with
a Q&A
session (ther,
with only two
questions).
In the Dominican
Republic,
Ban's press
encounter send
out by his
Spokesperson's
Office contained
no questions
at all.
On July 15 after
Ban's
spokesperson's
office said it
had closed, it
released the
promised
transcript of
Ban's
"question and
answer" press
conference in
Haiti. To the
lone cholera
question, Ban
said
“I
and the United
Nations feel
very sad for
the tragic
death of more
than 8,000
people and
more than
700,000 people
who have been
affected
by cholera.
One of the
main purposes
of my coming
to Haiti this
time
is to
demonstrate
our strong
solidarity
with the
Government and
people,
particularly
those affected
people, the
United
Nations’
continuing
commitment to
eliminate this
cholera. I
will do my
best
as the
Secretary-General
to work with
the partners
and donors and
with the World
Bank to
mobilize all
the necessary
resources to
provide
assistance to
those affected
people and to
improve water
and
sanitation
systems. This
is exactly
what I did
yesterday with
Prime
Minister
Lamothe in Los
Palmas. Thank
you.”
That's it. At
the July 15 UN
noon briefing
Inner City
Press asked
Ban's deputy
spokesperson
to respond to
protest signs
in Haiti:
"Dead: 8563,
Sick 704,000;
Justice 0."
Haq said Ban
assures
Haitians of
his personal
commitment,
wants to be
the advocate
of the Haitian
people.
Inner City
Press asked,
will the UN
apologize? (Video here and embedded
below. Here's an
Inner City
Press song on
topic.)
Haq replied
that Ban is
"anguished"
about the
situation.
But is that an
apology?
Haq said he
had nothing to
add. Where he
gave the next
question, he
got back a
softball which
invited him to
talk about
money Ban's UN
gave, or
raied, or
merely tried
to raise.
Each time Ban
mentioned
cholera,
without once
addressing who
brought it to
Hispanola.
While an Inner
City Press
reader points
out the troop
contributing
country,
Nepal, the
question is:
wasn't the UN
in charge of
sanitation?
Doesn't UN
Peacekeeping
under Herve
Ladsous still
refuse to
screen
peacekeepers
before
deployment
from cholera
hot-spots?
Didn't the UN
dissemble
about the
failure to
take this
safeguard?
Ban ended
his first speech
saying "you
can count on
me and the UN
to do our
part." Really?
After meeting
a family
impacted by
(the UN's)
cholera, Ban
said "the
whole
international
community,
including the
United
Nations, has a
moral duty to
help those
people to stem
the further
spread of
cholera." Just
"including"
the UN. Just
because.
In what the UN
called a
"press
encounter,"
without
providing any
Q&A, Ban
said "Lastly,
in addressing
all
socio-economic
issues as well
as cholera
issues, let me
also underline
that this is
not a time for
donor
fatigue."
Is that it?
A question is
whether Ban
while there be
served with
legal papers
about the UN
bringing
cholera to
Hispanola,
another topic
on which Ban's
spokespeople
dodged and
worse.
The Free
UN Coalition
for Access
will have more
on this.
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2014 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|