Back on March
17 when Inner
City Press
asked UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's new
spokesperson
Stephane
Dujarric about
the arrest, he
said the UN
had seen the
reports but
had no
comment. He
noted Ban's
statement in
[May] 2009
with President
Mahinda
Rajapaksa. But
when Inner
City Press
asked how that
relates or is
applied to
these arrests,
Dujarric said
that was the
entirety of
the response.
Video
here.
Inner City
Press asked
who in the UN
Secretariat is
now monitoring
Sri Lanka.
Before, it was
Vijay Nambiar
and others.
Now what?
Dujarric
replied that
"like any
country," Sri
Lanka is
monitored by
the UN. Not
too closely,
it seems...
Meanwhile in
the Human
Rights Council
on March 17, Sri
Lanka
cynically
praised a
country for
inviting UN
High
Commissioner
for Human
Rights Navi
Pillay --
even as the
Sri Lankan
government
trashes her
for proposing
an
international
accountability
mechanism.
Only days ago
near
Kilinochchi an
outspoken
mother of the
disappeared,
Belendran
Jeyakumari, was
arrested
by the
government.
She protested
when UK prime
minister David
Cameron
traveled to
the North last
November. Now
what?
Sri Lankan
state
television has
run the
photographs of
leaders of
non-governmental
organizations
which dared
speak up about
conditions in
the country. Video
here, from
Minute 11:15.
(The state TV
mistakenly
says the
concurrent
debate about
Ukraine is
about
"Slovenia,"
too.)
Dead
seriously, on
Channel 4 a
week ago a damning
new video of Sri Lankan Army war crimes was released.
Click here;
warning:
graphic.
But when Inner
City Press
asked UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's new
spokesperson
Stephane
Dujarric about
it back on
March 10, he
replied, "I
haven't seen
the video." He
said that his
predecessor
had spoken
clearly on Sri
Lanka in the
last few days.
See Inner City
Press YouTube
of the
exchange, here.
Five days
later, Ban
Ki-moon's
spokesperson
Dujarric has
still not
provided any
UN comment on
the video, nor
on the
crackdown in
Sri Lanka. On
a parallel
track, Ban's
senior advisor
Vijay Nambiar
has invited
Myanmar to
contribute
"peacekeepers"
to the UN.
Under
Dujarric's
previously
boss, a
country was
blocked from
getting paid
for any new
peacekeepers
after a coup
d'etat. But
this is what
the UN has
become.
Most recently
Ban's office
was UNclear
about whether
the Rajapaksa
government has
invited him to
Colombo in May
for a youth
conference.
When asked
about
accountability,
the answer was
it is up to
member states,
just as Ban
said about
accepting
military
figure
Shavendra
Silva as an
advisor on
peacekeeping.
On the revised
draft
resolution, a
negotiating
session is
slated in
Geneva for
March 18 in
Room XXII; the
vote seems set
for March
26...
When the UN
Human Rights
Council
speeches
resumed on the
morning of
March 5, Sri
Lanka's
foreign
minister G.L.
Peiris
denounced the
report
of outgoing
High
Commissioner
for Human
Rights Navi
Pillay,
the pending
draft and any
international
inquiry.
Peiris cited
two reports
that he said
are to be
released
within weeks;
he cited a
railroad plan
announced only
yesterday.
This comes
after nearly
five years of
stonewalling
and
intimidation.
At the UN,
where blame
for inaction
in 2009 and
even
participation
in events
leading to the
execution of
surrenderees
go to the
highest
levels, Sri
Lanka sent
military
figure
Shavendra
Silva as its
Deputy
Permanent
Representative.
Under Ban
Ki-moon as
Secretary
General,
Shavendra
Silva became a
senior adviser
to UN
Peacekeeping
under Herve
Ladsous, the
fourth
Frenchman in a
row to hold
that post.
When Inner
City Press
asked, Ban
said this was
entirely up to
member states.
After Inner
City Press
wrote about
the United
Nations
Correspondents
Association
screening
the
government's
"Lies Agreed
To" inside the
UN, when
"Killing
Fields" which
it purported
to rebut was
not shown in
the UN, and
noted that Sri
Lanka's
Permanent
Representative
Palitha Kohona
had a prior
financial
relationship
with the
president of
UNCA, a demand
was made to
remove the
article from
the Internet.
When Inner
City Press
refused this
censorship
bid, attempts
began to
get Inner City
Press thrown
out of the UN,
directed
to the UN
official set to
become Ban's
new
spokesperson
on March 10.
One such
complaint,
upon the dubious
request by
Reuters
UN bureau
chief
Louis
Charbonneau under the
Digital
Millennium
Copyright Act,
has been
banned from
Google's
search.
(The new Free
UN Coalition
for Access
is now
combating
censorship at
the UN and
beyond.)
Ban Ki-moon
ended up
giving Pillay
only half of a
second term;
the "Rights Up
Front" plan he
belatedly
announced,
specifically
as a response
to what was
found to be
the UN's
"systemic
failure" on
Sri Lanka, he now
presents
without any
reference to
Sri
Lanka.
Despite
denials, Sri
Lankan
official tell
Inner City
Press when
they met
recently with
Ban, they
invited him to
Colombo in May.
Before then,
it appears, a
vote will be
held at the
25th session
of the Human
Rights
Council.
When HRC25
began its
speeches on
Monday morning
the 3rd of
March, Hugo
Swire of the
UK, Canada and
others cited
Sri Lanka and
the need for
accountability.
US Ambassador
Samantha
Power,
according to
the UN's list
of speakers,
was to appear
late Tuesday.
But at 4 pm on
Monday when
the marked up
Sri Lanka
resolution was
tabled, its
eight
operative
paragraph
appeared to
some to simply
kick the can
down the road
again, asking
for another
update from
the High
Commissioner
for Human
Rights -- who
soon won't be
Navi Pillay
anymore. Click
here for draft
as provided to
Inner City
Press.
Later on
Monday, the US
State
Department
announced that
the US' speech
would be given
by another
official,
Under
Secretary of
State for
Civilian
Security,
Democracy, and
Human Rights
Sarah Sewall:
not Power.
During the
speeches on
Monday, Syria
and North
Korea remained
in nearly
every speech
but Ukraine
and the
Central
African
Republic
worked their
way in, along
with a
smattering of
references to
Sri Lanka,
where the
killing of
tens of
thousands of
civilians
remains
unaddressed.
It was
noted that the
term of High
Commissioner
for Human
Rights Navi
Pillay is
almost up. But
it was
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon who
said she'd
only have one
half of a
second term.
Pillay
on January 20
said the
France put
Muslim
communities at
risk in CAR.
How will that
be acted on?
She's called
for a
international
accountability
mechanism for
Sri Lanka; Ban
says its
entirely up to
member states,
as he told
Inner City
Press regarding
having
controversial
military
figure
Shavendra
Silva as an
adviser to UN
Peacekeeping
under Herve
Ladsous.
Qatar,
which sent
only a
"Minister's
Assistant,"
predictable
denounced
Syria and also
spoke for
freedom of the
press if not
of speech.
#FreeAJstaff,
we and the Free UN Coalition for Access absolutely
agree with.
But what about
Qatar
having locked
up the poet
Ajami?
Greece
spoke on
Ukraine,
taking the EU
line, which
implies that
the
International
Monetary Fund
will save
Ukraine. Has
they happened
in Greece?
What about the
protesters in
Greece's
squares?
Ban
Ki-moon gave a
press
conference,
pitching for
relevance and
a role in
Ukraine, where
instead of
Robert Serry
he has now
sent his
deputy Jan
Eliasson. But
once it was
leaked that
former US now
UN official
Jeff Feltman
"got" Ban to
send Serry to
Ukraine, Ban's
UN being
viewed as
impartial is
more
difficult.
It was
World Wildlife
Day, so Ban
gave a speech
on that as
well. But
unaddressed
since Inner
City Press reported
and asked
about it on
February 28
are what UN
whistleblowers
say are more
than 50 rapes
in Eastern
Congo by
poacher Mai
Mai Morgan.
Ban will meet
his Special
Representatives
including
Martin Kobler
from the
Congo. What
will the UN's
answer be?
UK
Hugo Swire
took on the
Sri Lanka
issue; here's
his response
to Pillay's
report. He
said it's time
for
international
action.
US
Samantha Power
won't speak
until March 4,
in the
afternoon in
Geneva so work
hours in the
US. Sri
Lanka's G.L.
Peiris on the
other hand
appears March
5 but 3:40 am
Eastern Times.
Watch this
site.