ICC's
Ocampo On Darfur but not Uganda, Asserts Jurisdiction over U.S. But For Its Veto
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
UNITED NATIONS,
September 20 -- Sudan should arrest its two citizens who have been indicted by
the International Criminal Court, even though Sudan has not signed on to the
Court's Statute of Rome and is not a member of the ICC, prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo
told reporters on Thursday at the UN. While most questions concerned how Mr.
Ocampo's call for Sudanese arrests jibes with Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon's
"quiet diplomacy" of one-on-one meetings with president al-Bashir, Inner City
Press raised two incongruities: the ICC's recent silence as UN agencies have
engaged with the ICC's first set of indictees, the leaders of Uganda's
Lord's Resistance Army
(video
here,
from Minute 12:19), and the specifics of Sudan's -- and the United States' --
legal duty to execute warrants issued against their own citizens by the ICC. On
the latter, Mr. Ocampo set forth a theory under which the U.S. could be
responsible to arrest and turn over an American soldier, but only if the case
was referred to the ICC by the UN Security Council. Since the U.S. is a member
of the Security Council, Ocampo told Inner City Press, this is not a problem for
the U.S..
Inner
City Press asked Ocampo about his repeated statement that Sudan is obligated to
turn over its humanitarian affairs minister, Ahmed Muhammed Harun, and Ali
Kushayb, a Janjaweed leader, given that Sudan never joined the International
Criminal Court. Sudan is "part of the United Nations," Ocampo answered, and
Sudan has a duty identical to the duty of Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia to
turn suspects over to the country-specific Tribunals the Security Council
established.
This
logic would apply to any non-ICC member country, like the United States. Inner
City Press asked if, in Mr. Ocampo's statement of the law, the U.S. would be
legally required even now to turn over any American, including a soldier (or,
say, a Blackwater USA military contractor) indicted by the ICC.
But the
United States is a member of the Security Council, Mr. Ocampo answered. He used
the example of Iraq, saying that neither the U.S. nor Iraq are members of the
ICC, so he and the ICC could only open an investigation if the Security Council
made a referral of the case. There is the solution, Ocampo said.
The
U.S. having a veto on the Security Council is the ultimate -- and in some's
view, only -- protection.
Mr. Ocampo, U.S. flag at edge,
Uganda's LRA not shown
Since Mr.
Ocampo spoke of the al-Bashir government sensing a "weakening of resolve," Inner
City Press asked if this might not also flow from the failure to executive the
arrest warrants for Joseph Kony, Vincent Otti and several other leaders of the
Lord's Resistance Army, now known to be in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
That's different, Ocampo said. The president of Congo is in favor of executing
the warrants, but does "not fully control Northern Congo."
Inner
City Press pointed out that the UN has processed funds to build an airstrip for
the LRA, and that the UN's envoy Joaquim Chissano has met with the LRA
leadership. Has Ocampo said anything to Chissano, or anywhere near as much about
the LRA as about Sudan in recent months?
Ocampo's
answer was oblique, that "comprehensive solutions" are needed in Uganda as in
Sudan, but that he is in part of justice, and enforcing the law. But what's the
difference between Harun and Joseph Kony? When Inner City Press asked if, to
make international criminal law look more credible, Ocampo might support the
Security Council putting indictments into suspension for a year to allow for
peace talks, Ocampo said, "I cannot speculate on others' responsibility. I'm a
prosecutor. I respond to the law always."
But what
about the LRA? And the apparent misunderstanding by some in the U.S. that they
are legally exempt from the ICC? These questions will continue to be asked.
* * *
Click
here for a
Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army
(which had to be finalized without the UN's DPA having responded.)
Click
here
for an earlier
Reuters AlertNet
piece by this correspondent about the Somali National Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's
$200,000 contribution from an undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-453A,
UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile
(and weekends): 718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner
City Press are listed here, and
some are available in the ProQuest service.
Copyright 2006-07 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com -
UN Office: S-453A,
UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile
(and weekends): 718-716-3540