After
Lubanga,
Questions at
UN on Ntaganda
and Peter
Kerim Go
Unanswered
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
March 16 --
The conviction
of Thomas
Lubanga this
week
triggered a UN
Security
Council press
statement,
read out
before two
journalists on
Friday
afternoon by
this month's
Council's
President,
UK Ambassador
Mark Lyall
Grant.
Inner
City Press
asked him
about the
narrow scope
of the
indictment,
about the
failure
to arrest
Bosco Ntaganda
and the failure
to even indict
fellow
warlord Peter
Kerim, who not
only recruited
child soldiers
but also
kidnapped and
killed UN
Peacekeepers,
before being
made a Colonel
in
the Congolese
Army, the
FARDC.
UNICEF had
previously
acknowledged
to Inner City
Press having
counted up
child
soldiers
recruited by
Kerim, but has
still not
provided any
information
about where
they now
believe that
Kerim is or
what follow
up they did.
The
spokesman for
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon said
he would look
into it, and
returned with
a statement
about how
concerned the
UN in the
Congo is:
but no more
information.
Peter Karim's
impunity for
killing UN
peacekeepers
was arranged under then
Congo envoy
Alan Doss and
UN
Peacekeeping
chief
Jean-Marie
Guehenno, both
now "back in
the
game" as part
of Kofi
Annan's Syria
team. Ah,
accountability.
So
Inner City
Press asked
Council
president
Lyall Grant:
Inner
City
Press: There’s
been some
criticism to
only indict Mr
Lubanga
on child
soldier
recruitment
when he was
actually
thought to be
responsible
for the death
of UN
Peacekeepers
in 2005.
There’s also
the issue of
Bosco Ntaganda
who was
indicted at
the same time,
who is
now in the
Congolese army
and who
another ex
warlord Peter
Karim, who
killed UN
Peacekeepers
also in the
army. I
understand you
have to
take victories
where you can
get them. What
do you make of
this idea
that they
should have
gone further
on Lunbanga
and that it is
something of
an outrage
that Bosco
Ntaganda
continues to
be in an
army that the
UN works with
in the DRC?”
Amb.
Lyall
Grant: Let me
answer first
as president
of the
security
Council. I
think that as
this is the
first verdict
of the
International
Criminal Court
is important.
I think that
the fact that
the Security
Council,
although in
fact only six
members of the
current
Security
Council are
state parties
to the Rome
Statute, the
fact that they
have
unanimously
welcomed this
verdict, I
think is
also
important. So,
let’s look at
it as a sign
that the
International
Criminal Court
is coming of
age, that
international
justice is
seen as
important,
that it is
making
progress and
that it
is fully
supported by
the Security
Council even
by those
members that
themselves
have not
become state
parties to the
Rome Statute.
I think
it sends an
important
signal of the
absence of
impunity, the
fact
that the
Security
Council does
not accept
impunity for
some of these
most serious
crimes.
On
your
other point
about other,
I’m now
speaking in my
national
capacity,
obviously the
British
government
would like to
see all
those who are
responsible
for these most
heinous crimes
brought to
justice.
Obviously the
decisions on
who is
brought, how
long the
cases take,
which crimes
they are
indicted for,
and are
convicted of,
is a matter
for the court,
not the matter
for the
British
government.
We would like
to see more
cases come to
trial. We
would like to
see
more cases
come to
conclusion
with
appropriate
verdicts, so
we’re
not saying
that the fact
that Mr
Lubanga has
now been
convicted,
means that
others have
not been, or
others should
have been. We
would
like to see
this as the
first step in
what I hope
will be a
number of
convictions of
people who are
responsible
for these
crimes.
While
the
statement is
appreciated,
sometimes
naming names
is a required
element in
accountability.
Earlier in the
week Lyall
Grant
commented
on
accountability
in Sri Lanka,
but declined
to comment on
General
Shavendra
Silva, whose
58th Division
is depicted in
Ban Ki-moon's
own
Panel of
Experts report
as engaged in
war crimes,
being a Senior
Advisor on
Peacekeeping
Operations to
Ban and the
UN.
Bosco
Ntaganda is
a known
quantity,
whose presence
in Goma "at
the finest
restaurants
and playing
tennis" has
been commented
on even in
the UN, by
Patrick
Cammaert and
more recently.
Ntaganda
should be
named, as
should Peter
Kerim. Watch
this site.