Inner City Press
Global Inner Cities Report - April 11, 2006
Through the UN's One-Way Mirror, Sustainable
Development To Be Discussed by Corporations, Even Nuclear Areva
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee at the UN
UNITED NATIONS, April 11 -- Sustainable development,
a talismanic buzzword in both the corporate and the UN worlds, was the focus of
a report released Tuesday as a glossy pamphlet with accompanying Power-Point(TM)
on CD-ROM. It's in preparation for 12 days of meetings on the topic at the
beginning of May. JoAnne DiSano, director of the UN Division of Sustainable
Development, stated that the CEOs for various companies will be attending.
When asked by Inner City Press to name the companies
and how they were chosen, Ms. DiSano named three: Shell US, Alcan and Eskom.
Subsequently a staffer named more: Electricity de France along with an "Italian
utility," presumably Ente Nazionale per l'Elergia Eletrica
and, subject to
confirmation, the producer of nuclear reactors and fuels Areva <CEPFi.PA>. Areva,
it should be noted, is bidding on a contract to supply four nuclear reactors to
China, while fending off questions about its domination of legislative and other
processes, and its disposal of spent uranium and plutonium. Click
here
for Areva NC's recent 400-page disclosure on these
issues -- released in response to a ruling by the
Cherbourg county court to provide proof of
its claim that it is not illegally storing foreign waste at its La Hague
reprocessing complex.
At the UN briefing on Tuesday Inner City
Press asked: "Are all of the invited companies members of the UN Global
Compact?"
Some are and some aren't, Ms. DiSano in
essence answered. When asked if the CEOs will brief the press and take
questions, both Ms. DiSano and her staff said it would be a good idea. That's
what the head of the UN Global Compact, Georg Kell, told Inner City Press in an
impromptu interview before his pep talk at a Fashion and Development event in
the UN basement last week [see April 3 Report, below.]
UN
Under-Secretary Jose Antonio Ocampo responded that the Global Compact is about
more than the environment. The report that was the subject of the briefing,
"Trends in Sustainable Development," references the Global Compact and voluntary
"corporate social responsibility," another swirling buzzword. Whether the
Sustainable Development conference, slated for May 1-12, will including a
corporate stake-out remains to be seen.
After the quake in
Muzaffarabad
In other UN corporate news, an
inquiry to the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, about what they
called a financial "scheme" with
Société Générale and derilab s.a., resulted in the following answer:
From: Olivier
Pierre Delarue
To: Matthew.Lee
[at] innercitypress.com
Sent: Thu, 6
Apr 2006 14:18:54 +0200
Subject: Re:
Fwd: Press inquiry concerning how Societe Generale Corporate & Investment
Banking, and derilab s.a were selected for participation with UNHCR
I work in
UNHCR's Private Sector Fund Raising Service as Senior Corporate Relations
Officer and your query about this fund raising initiative was forwarded to me...
Based on the previous exchange of email you sent, your focus seems to be on the
procurement and bidding process done by the UN. This particular initiative,
however, is a fund raising project first proposed by corporate entities and
aimed at raising funds for UNHCR's humanitarian program. Therefore, as with any
fund raising project, we are not talking about the usual procurement procedure.
In my capacity
as Senior Corporate Relations Officer, my role is to work on creating new
partnerships with the corporate world in order to increase our donor base and
receive greater financial and expertise from the private sector. In this
particular case, Derilab s.a. approached us in the aftermath of the earthquake
in South Asia and proposed to assist us pro bono in finding new ways of raising
donations from the financial market for this emergency. As this was never done
in the past, a financial product which incorporated a charity/donation component
was not easy to build. Derilab presented the project to all the major banks
involved in structured and derivative products. Only Societe Generale showed a
serious interest in working on this new concept.
As matter of
principle, UNHCR screens all new partnerships with the private sector. Societe
Generale, the only bank to show an interest for this project, was screened. As a
result of our careful review, Societe Generale was screened positively for
various reasons, including their participation in the UN Global Compact. Please
note that in the case of this initiative, UNHCR is only a receiver of donations
through this financial product -- but is not endorsing the product itself.
Inner City Press responded with follow-up
questions, including regarding Societe General's long embroilment in a money
laundering scandal, and asked:
-is membership in the Global Compact the main
screen UNHCR applies to its corporate engagements, whether philanthropic or in
procurement? What are the other "various reasons"? Did your careful review of
Soc Gen -- just as an example -- include the issues raised by the money
laundering allegations sketched below, including those in Nigeria (we're aware
that Soc Gen has not been convicted of anything, but that wouldn't seem to be
the standards for a careful review).Again, these questions don't go to the
merits of how the funds are used by UNHCR -- as an aside, hats off for your work
in the Balkans and with Return, Afghanistan, etc.
- is derilab s.a a signatory to the Global
Compact? (I'm aware I could look it up, but the question also includes -- if a
company is not a signatory to the Compact, what else do you look at?)
Neither question
has yet been answered. A Web search for derilab reflects that nearly all of the
"hits" are about its recent "scheme" with UNHCR. It's own
web site says
only
"derilab(R) was recently founded by
experts in the field of financial derivative and structured products. derilab's
focus is to provide it's [sic] customers with key information on derivative and
structured products. derilab also advises on the structuring of financial
products."
It might well be on the level. But it's
not yet clear that if it weren't, the scheme would not proceed. It would help if
the follow-up questions were answered. Or, for purposes of the corporate
stake-out (idea) Soc Gen's CEO is Daniel Bouton.
Elsewhere at UN headquarters on Tuesday,
the main press interest was the freeze-out of Hamas. Political contacts, said
Kofi Annan's spokesman, will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Is this a
new policy? The policy is in evolution, it is fluid. It is, in a word,
developing. Sustainably or not, only time will tell.
One of the
(James)
bones of contention at the noon briefing
was how much UN special coordinator Alvaro de Soto confers with UN headquarters,
before engaging in "political contacts." Often, appeared to be the answer.
Which led into the following colloquy:
Did the UN resident
coordinator in Tashkent, Fikret Akcura, check in with UN HQ before on Tuesday
praising the Karimov regime's progress on the Millennium Development Goals? I
haven't seen his statement, the spokesman replied. (Fikret Akcura's statement,
put out on the IRIN service of the UN, was then and is as of this writing
online, click
here.)
The praise can be contrasted with Karimov ordering the exit of UNHCR by April
17, while continuing to demand the return of those who protested in Andijan.
(Click
here
for more. Another lesser contrast is that
the Uzbekistan Q&A did not make the cut for the briefing's online
highlights, what standard was applied is unclear.) Mid-afternoon, the OSSG
proffered an answer, that both agencies are part of a UN country team and as
such share information, including with Headquarters. Despite the prompt
response, we're still left with a question: at the UN, at least in Uzbekistan,
does the left hand know what the right hand is shaking?
Mine Your Own Business: Explosive Remnants of War and the Great Powers, Amid the
Paparazzi
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee, at the United Nations
UNITED NATIONS, April 3 -- On a day when
UN envoy Jan Egeland was barred from entering Sudan, Mine Action and Awareness
Day events were held in that country, with the involvement of the UN Mine Action
Service. The UN Mission in Sudan put out a statement that "Egeland’s flight into
Sudan was not given authorization to land yesterday" and "the Wali (governor) of
South Darfur stated that he strictly opposes Mr. Egeland’s visit. The Sudanese
Permanent Representation to the United Nations in New York further stated that
Mr. Egeland would be welcome neither in Darfur nor in Khartoum." Simultaneously,
the UN Mine Action Office in Sudan put out a press release entitled "The UN in
Sudan Celebrates the First International Day for Mine Awareness and Assistance
in Mine Action on 4 April 2006." The celebration apparently took place without
Mr. Egeland, the UN's Emergency Relief Coordinator.
A week
earlier, UNMAS led a trip to Damazin, Sudan, to which refugees currently in
Ethiopia are slated to return. The trip was led by Richard Kollodge, who in an
April 3 interview with Inner City Press stated that the government in Khartoum
has not blocked the work, at least in South Sudan, of the UN Mine Action
Service.
Back in
New York, a Mine Action fact sheet was distributed stating that in 2005, three
governments used landmines. The fact sheet didn't name them, but a question
during the press briefing yielded two of the names: Nepal and Myanmar. In the
hallway after the briefing, once the cameras were off, the third name emerged:
Russia. In fact, the 2005 report of the International Campaign to Ban Landmines
states unequivocally:
"Russia has used
mines on a regular basis since 1999, primarily in Chechnya, but also at times in
Dagestan, Tajikistan, and on the border with Georgia. Russia has generally
argued that its mine usage has been necessary to stop the flow of terrorists,
weapons and drugs... Russian forces have used mines extensively in Chechnya
since the renewal of armed conflict in September 1999. Federal troops have laid
mines around and leading up to bases, checkpoints, commanders’ offices,
government buildings, factories and power plants; on roads and mountain paths in
the rebel-dominated south; in fields running from Grozny to Alkhan-Kalu; in the
estuary of the River Sunzha; along various borders. Russian officials have
repeatedly claimed that all minefields are mapped, marked, and removed when
troops relocate. [Source: report of Deputy Chief of the Military Engineering
University, Maj. Gen. A. Nizhalovskii, during a virtual roundtable discussion of
engineer equipment in military operations in Chechnya. Armeyskiy sbornik (Army
collection), No. 6, June 2000, pp. 35-40.] These assertions have been
contradicted by statements from both civilians and military officers. In
addition to Chechnya, there appears to have been a considerable increase in
rebel mine attacks in Dagestan, especially in May-June 2005. According to the
Minister of Interior of Dagestan, Lieutenant-General Adilgerei Magomedtagirov,
58 terrorist acts (bombings) have been committed in Dagestan since the beginning
of 2005, 40 of them committed in Makhachkala, the capital of Dagestan. [Russian
source]
Some in the press
corps wondered not if naming Russia during the on-the-record press conference
was a coincidence, given that two smaller (and less powerful) state-users of
mines were named. During the briefing, Inner City Press inquired whether the
type of cluster munitions most recently in the news from use by the United
States in Afghanistan qualify as "mines." No, was the answer given at the
briefing by Max Gaylard, the director of the UN Mine Action Service, who added
that such cluster munitions are "just as dangerous" and constitute a "next
important issue." One wag noted how members of the Permanent Five can contort a
debate, leading to fact sheets missing basic facts, and definitions with glaring
loopholes.
[See 9 p.m. update
below: a cluster bomb answer came after deadline from UNDP: "Cluster munitions
are addressed by mine action when they are dropped and become unexploded." Hmm.]
Ela Bhatt speak on
micro-credit at the UN, 4/3/06
At an
earlier press briefing, Ela Bhatt of SEWA Bank in India spoke about microcredit,
in the run-up to a (late-starting) Fashion for Development event. Inner City
Press asked whether Ms. Bhatt would agree with Citigroup's characterization of
its own consumer finance lending in India as "micro-finance." In response, Ms.
Bhatt emphasized that it is the organizing of the poor that is important, and
not merely the provision of credit for interest. Those at the briefing nodded,
though much of the interest in the briefing had been the flier saying that the
Colombian-born singer Shakira would be there. Once it was clear that she would
not, the paparazzi left, and Ms. Bhatt spoke eloquently of the marginalization
of street vendors. This was slated to continue at 5 p.m. in Conference Room 3,
but as of press time at 5:25 p.m., the event had yet to start. Not appearing to
collect their awards were Hillary Clinton, Kerry Kennedy,
Nélida Piñón, and Angelina Jolie. The m.c. joked that
all present knew the reason for this last. Such is the news... Various
fashionistas were, however, assembled (as elsewhere in the basement preparations
to greet a cosmonaut were underway). And at 5:35 p.m., as Global Compact
executive head praised the fashion industry, Shakira swept into the room, and
the flashbulbs were blinding. Upon receiving her award, she spoke briefly.
Whether a question about the UN's ILO should open an office in Colombia in light
of the murders of trade union organizers there remained to be seen.
[9 p.m. 4/3/06
update: the answer is no, no questions were possible. At the Fashion for
Development shindig in the Delegate's Lounge, slinky dresses were paraded (one
falling one, by accident or design) to pumping Brazilian and flamenco music.
Outside a hard rain fell on Long Island City. The quasi-cosmonaut event had red
sturgeon eggs on pastry. And after deadline the Afghan cluster bomb answer
rolled in, from UNDP: "Cluster munitions are addressed by mine action when they
are dropped and become unexploded." It was too late to follow up, for now -- the
cleaning crew was closing the UN down.]
Footnote: earlier in
Conference Room 2, Nicaraguan Ambassador Eduardo J. Sevilla Somoza, nephew of
Anastasio Somoza Debayle, the country's president until 1979, was rubberstamped
to head a committee considering the UN Charter...
Human Rights Are Lost in the Mail: DR Congo Got the
Letter, But the Process is Still Murky
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee, Inner City Press UN
Correspondent
UNITED NATIONS, March 31 -- The "a dog ate my
homework" defense proffered to the UN Human Rights Committee by the Democratic
Republic of the Congo was discredited on Friday, in questions and follow-up at
the UN Headquarters in New York. At a March 16 open meeting, the Congolese
representative claimed that the question-letter of the Human Rights Committee
had never been received. But on March 31, UN associate spokesman Robert Sullivan
confirmed that the question-letter had been given directly to the DRC's
permanent representative in Geneva. If the homework was eaten, it was not by
the dog.
Human
Rights Committee Chairperson at 3/31/06
briefing
(stream)
At a March 31 press briefing,
the chairperson of the
Human Rights Committee Christine
Chanet was asked by Inner City Press how the Committee sends its
question-letters to state parties. "We use notes verbales," she said. "We
can send mail and email." Asked to assess the DRC's statement that it did not
receive the question-letter, she said, "We have to suppose that it is true." The
other two Committee members conducting the press briefing both weighed in.
Sweden's Elizabeth Palm opined that the issue arose in connection with an
"individual communication" -- that is, a complaint -- to which DRC never
responded, leaving the Commission to consider only one side of the complaint,
and in closed session at that.
Among the questions asked in the purloined letter was this overarching one,
still unanswered:
"Please comment on the growing number of reports of enforced disappearances and
summary executions throughout the territory of the State party, apparently
committed by all the parties to the armed conflict. What has the State party
done to stop these violations and afford remedies to the victims and their
families?"
The letter also referred
to these sample complaints:
Isidore Kanana Tshiongo a Miranga v. Zaire; No. 542/1993 (Agnès N’Goya v.
Zaire); No. 641/1995 (Nyekuma Kopita Toro Gedumbe v. Democratic Republic of the
Congo); No. 933/2000 (Adrien Mundyo Busyo, Thomas Osthudi Wongodi, René Sibu
Matubuka et al. v. Democratic Republic of the Congo); No. 962/2001 (Marcel
Mulezi v. Democratic Republic of the Congo).
Ivan Shearer of Australia
ascribed DRC's lack of response to "administrative disorganization" that he said
he hoped would soon end. Elections are scheduled for the DRC in June; as Ms.
Chanet noted, issues have arisen about the release prior to the election of
voter information.
Access or no-access to information also
came up at the briefing. The Committee panelists alluded to an unnamed country
which, since it declined to submit a report, was reviewed only in confidential
session -- presumably what this still-unnamed country wanted in the first place.
As previously reported on this site, at least one of the Human Rights
Committee's meeting that was listed as "open" was abruptly closed, by
means of a piece of paper taped to the door of Conference Room 2. Asked about
this, Ms. Chanet said that often the non-governmental organizations that make
presentations to the Committee need to be protected by keeping the meetings
closed. But the Committee earlier this month solicited and heard testimony from
NGOs about the United States' compliance with the International Convention on
Civil and Political Rights -- did the testifying NGOs ask to be confined to
closed sessions? They didn't ask that it be open session, Ms. Chanet replied.
Perhaps in the future this will change.
Friday footnote: following the UN Security Council's
vote, without hearing from the Republic of Georgia, to extend the UN
Peacekeeping mission there for six months, Inner City Press asked outgoing
Council president Cesar Mayoral why Georgia had not been permitted to speak (as
Georgian permanent representative Revaz Adamia has been complaining for
months). "One member blocked it," Amb. Mayoral said.
"That would be Russia?" asked Inner City Press.
"You're the one saying that," the
Argentine Ambassador
replied. With a smile.
An earlier Inner
City Press report, on Iraq, footnote on DR Congo
As Operation Swarmer Begins, UN's Qazi Denies It's
Civil War and Has No Answers if Iraq's Oil is Being Metered
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee, Inner City Press UN
Correspondent
UNITED NATIONS, March 16 -- Kofi Annan's
representative to Iraq, Ashraf Qazi, on Thursday described to the UN press corps
a country on the upswing, where people view each other in secular terms and
there is little to no danger of violence spreading over any of the country's
borders. Ashraf Qazi said, "I don't personally believe they are anywhere close to a
civil war" and "the situation has so far been under control." Ashraf
in Wonderland, said one wag at the briefing. Out in real world, 1500 troops and
50 helicopters were conducting assaults near Samarra, part of "Operation Swarmer."
In New York, Mr. Qazi arrived
more than half an hour late for the scheduled press briefing. He was
accompanied by a staffer from the Office of the Spokesman for the Secretary
General, who made a list of the reporters who raised their hands
to asked questions, but then went out of order for the final two allowed questions.
Inner City Press, which has sought since December to get an answer regarding oil
metering in Iraq, was passed over, for a question that elicited from Ashraf Qazi
statements that "on the streets, Iraqis don't deal with each other as Shia and
Sunni," but such fissures in governance "haven't allowed ministries to become
professional and competent." As the briefing ended and Mr. Qazi and his
entourage made for the side door, Inner City Press' reporter shouted out, "Is
oil in Iraq being metered?"
"I don’t know."
"That's too technical."
Ashraf Qazi on 3/16/06
"We'll try to get Mr. Halbwachs to
answer." This last was from the Spokesman's Office staffer, who acknowledged having gone out of the
order on his list. "I thought you were going to ask that question," he
said.
This was not mind-reading:
Inner City Press began asking this question about oil metering in December 2005. There's a new
context, including
reports
that Iraq's Oil Ministry is warning Western Oilsands of Canada against bypassing
the Ministry and seeking oil directly in the Kurd-dominated north of the
country, presumably unmetered.
At the December 2005
press briefing at the United Nations,
regarding oil metering, the UN's
Jean-Pierre Halbwachs
stated
that we “understand that a recent agreement has been reached between the
Government of Iraq and a U.S. company to undertake the task.” See,
http://www.iamb.info/trans/tr122805.htm
The minutes of the
Jan. 23 meeting (also online at www.iamb.info) vaguely state that “the IAMB was
informed that no progress had been made with regards to the metering contract.”
Midday on March 16, Inner City
Press sent an email to Mr. Halbwachs at the address he gave at the December press
briefing, and raised the matter -- and others -- at the regular noon press
briefing, including the
report
about Western Oilsands of Canada and oil in the Kurdish north. The spokesman had
no response about oil metering, stating that the oil belongs to the people of
Iraq. That's the point -- if the oil is continuing to flow unmetered, it makes
the use of the revenue to benefit Iraq's people ever less likely.
Finding no answers from the United
Nations, which chairs the International Advisory & Monitoring Board on the Development Fund
for Iraq, Inner City Press will also be pursuing these issues elsewhere,
including in Washington with the International Monetary Fund, whose Bert Keuppens sits on the Advisory & Monitoring Board. Watch this space.
IAMB, including Messrs. Halbwachs & Keuppens, 12/05
Elsewhere at the UN on March 16, the
Democratic Republic of the Congo was critiqued at length before the human rights
panel in Conference Room 2. DR Congo's representative claimed that some of the
question-letters had gotten lost. One wag thought, even on human rights, it's
like the dog-ate-my-homework defense...
Other Inner City Press
reports are archived on
www.InnerCityPress.org -
Cash Crop: In
Nepal, Bhutanese Refugees Prohibited from Income Generation Even in
their Camps
The Shorted and
Shorting in Humanitarian Aid: From Davos to Darfur, the Numbers Don't
Add Up
UN Reform:
Transparency Later, Not Now -- At Least Not for AXA - WFP Insurance
Contract
In Congolese
Chaos, Shots Fired at U.N. Helicopter Gunship
In the Sudanese
Crisis, Oil Revenue Goes Missing, UN Says
Empty Words on
Money Laundering and Narcotics, from the UN and Georgia
What is the Sound
of Eleven Uzbeks Disappearing? A Lack of Seats in Tashkent, a Turf War
at UN
Kosovo: Of
Collective Punishment and Electricity; Lights Out on Privatization of
Ferronikeli Mines
Abkhazia:
Cleansing and (Money) Laundering, Says Georgia, Even Terror’s Haven
Post-Tsunami
Human Rights Abuses, including by UNDP in the Maldives
Halliburton
Repays $9 Million, While Iraq’s Oil Remains Unmetered
Darfur on the
Margins: Slovenia’s President Drnovsek’s Quixotic Call for Action
Ignored
Who Pays for the
Global Bird Flu Fight? Not the Corporations, So Far - UN
Citigroup
Dissembles at United Nations Environmental Conference
Other Inner City Press
reports are archived on
www.InnerCityPress.org -
For reporting about banks, predatory
lending, consumer protection, money laundering, mergers or the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), click
here for Inner
City Press's
weekly CRA Report.
Inner City Press also reports weekly concerning the
Federal Reserve,
environmental justice,
global inner cities, and more recently
on the United
Nations, where Inner City Press
is accredited media. Follow those links
for more of Inner City Press's reporting, or, click
here
for five ways to
contact us,
with or for more information.
©opyright 2005-2006 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editors [at] innercitypress.com - phone: (718) 716-3540