UN
& US, Transparency for Finance But Not Foreign Affairs: Somalia, Sovereignty and
Senator Tom Coburn
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee at the U.N.
UNITED NATIONS, June
12 -- In the real world, Congo equals six Rwandas: that is how the UN's Jan
Egeland put it in response to question about the death of seven humanitarian
workers in Ituri in the DRC. "By far the worst humanitarian disaster of our
time," he also said, urging that whatever happens at the end of July, when
elections are slated, the UN not mostly leave the country as it did, in essence,
in East Timor.
UNHCR
aid reaches Dili
In
issuing $18 million flash appeal for Timor Leste, to supplement $4 million from
the UN's Central Emergency Revolving Fund, Mr. Egeland characterized as "great"
the United States' $10 million. The
CERF web site shows
that this $10 million is an "uncommitted pledge." Time did not permit this
follow-up question:
how does this U.S. un-commitment relate to
the issues raised in Deputy Secretary-General Mark Malloch Brown's speech last
week?
On that, at 11
a.m. U.S. Senator Tom Coburn, Republican of Oklahoma, came down from a meeting
with Mr. Malloch Brown, and after three times referring to waste-fraud-and-abuse
as if a single word, took questions from the media. Responding to Sen. Coburn's
demand for transparency, Inner City Press asked if he would support at the UN
something like the U.S. Freedom of Information Act. The Senator said yes. Inner
City Press later asked him if he had any insight into the controversy
surrounding the U.S.'s alleged funding of warlords in Somalia. "I have no
comment on that," Senator Coburn replied. It did not feel transparent.
Sen. Coburn -- 
versus
[=] ???
As it
turns out, during his 2004 campaign
Tom Coburn bragged that
"As a U.S. Senator, I will oppose any
legislation or treaty that compromises the sovereignty of the United States... I
will vote against approving the United Nation sponsored Law of the Sea treaty
which seeks to impose a regime to rule over the use of the oceans and their
resources... No treaty or international organization, including the U.N., shall
ever supercede [sic] the sovereignty of the United States."
(www.coburnforsenate.com/americanatsov.shtml,
as of June 12, 2006.)
One
wonders if this particular campaign promise came up at the meeting with the
Deputy Secretary General. At the stake-out, Senator Coburn said this meeting had
been scheduled well before "the speech," to discuss on what terms the U.S. would
participate in renovating the UN Headquarters. Deputy Secretary-General Malloch
Brown's daily schedule include a Republican Rep. from Arizona as well. At the
noon briefing, Inner City Press asked if this meeting, too, pre-dated last
week's speech. No answer came, as of press time five hours later.
There was
however some candor.
Inner City Press asked Jan Egeland,
as last week it asked Kofi Annan's spokesman, if the Lord's Resistance Army's
Joseph Kony, Vincent Otti and three other ICC indictees should be arrested. Mr.
Egeland responded that all five should be arrested. He added that he is working
on a plan to reach out to the Lord's Resistance Army personnel below the five
top indictees, to "remind" them that that there is a future, even to get them
back in school. This has not been elsewhere reported. Nor has the second of
these two responses to Inner City Press, from the ICC Prosecutor's spokesman in
The Hague:
From: Christian.Palme [at] icc-cpi.int
To: Matthew.Lee [at] innercitypress.com
Sent: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 13:58:24 +0200
Dear Matthew, My only comment is the
following official statement from the Office of the Prosecutor of the ICC:
"The governments of Uganda, Sudan and
Democratic Republic of Congo are obligated to give effect to the arrest
warrants, and we are confident that they will honor their joint commitment to do
so. The ICC warrants name Joseph Kony, Vincent Otti, Okot Odhiambo, Dominic
Ongwen and Raska Lukwiya. Each is charged with crimes against humanity and war
crimes, committed in Uganda since July 2002, in the context of a 20-year
campaign of brutality against civilians."
Then, after Inner
City Press' follow-up question, does Sudan have any agreement or arrangement
with the ICC in this regard, this:
From: Christian.Palme [at] icc-cpi.int To:
Matthew.Lee [at] innercitypress.com Sent: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 19:20:17 +0200
Dear Matthew, No, the Sudan is not a
State Party to the ICC. Yes, there is an agreement between the ICC and Sudan to
arrest the five leaders of the Lord's Resistance Army for whom arrest warrants
have been issued by the Court.
Subsequently, there were
reports quoting
that ICC Prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo that "the
Sudan, a non-state party who had harbored the LRA in the past, has voluntarily
agreed to execute the (ICC) warrants" and that Kony "has used negotiations to
buy time and regroup. To do justice and re-establish security in the region, the
justice network has to arrest the LRA commanders." And then there were
reports of the
LRA killing nine more people
near Juba. Presumably, the triggers weren't pulled the five indictees.
Of the
S-G's spokesman's office in New York, speaking of waste-fraud-and-abuse, Inner
City Press asked for an update and briefing from the UN's Jean-Pierre Halbwachs
on the International Advisory and Monitoring Board for Iraq, whose
June 2 release implies
that oil is still not being metered in Iraq, by "continu[ing]
to reiterate its concern that key actions, especially the installation of an oil
metering system, needed to be comprehensive and were taking a long time to
implement." Speaking of waste-fraud-and-abuse, the
release also
discloses delay in the auditing of contracts of Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg,
Brown & Root:
"the
IAMB requested an independent verification of the global settlement of all six
DFI funded task orders under the Kellogg, Brown and Root (KBR) contract reached
between the U.S. Government and KBR on December 22, 2005 as well as a review of
the remaining sole-sourced contracts to determine whether excess costs were
incurred that would be the subject of renegotiation. However, progress has been
slow in executing these special audits."
On the peacekeepers
in Ituri there was no update, after two weeks of captivity. On a
report of UNHCR's dealings in Cairo with
Sudanese refugees, culminating
in the death of 27 refugees on December 30, 2005, Inner City Press was directed
to UNHCR, which has denounced the report. Let the sunshine in!
Endnotes: First, on
the topic of child labor, BBC today broadcast an
in-depth report
about 10-year old miners in Katanga in DRC, in a mine owned by
Metorex Group.
Cobalt dug and cleaned by foot by ten year olds... Next, some less enterprising
gloating. Last week Inner City Press asked the spokesman about rumblings heard
that the SRSG for Kosovo Soren Jessen-Petersen would leave at the end of the
month. "I have nothing on that," was the response. Monday it was announced:
Jessen-Petersen is leaving, at the end of the month. Finally, upstairs
downstairs: in the basement in Conference Room 2, speakers inveighed for
independence for Puerto Rico, pointing out the corporate interests which want to
keep their Caribbean tax breaks. Upstairs in the lobby, a throng watched the
Czech Republic beat Team USA 3-0. One wag in the crowd said, "If they still had
Slovakia, would the score have been six - zero?" Let the games continue.
In
Bolton's Wake, Silence and Speech at the UN, Congo and Kony, Let the Games Begin
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee at the U.N.
UNITED NATIONS, June
9 -- What is the U.N.'s role, what is it's jurisdiction? U.S. Ambassador John
Bolton on Friday said, "The member states tell the Secretariat what to do, not
the other way around." Meanwhile in the Democratic Republic of Congo, where the
U.N. has 17,000 peacekeeping troops, prisoners in Beni, North Kivu are rioting
to protest conditions and their lock-out without charges or trial. Less than a
week after 192 prisoners broke out of jail in Bukavu, in Beni ten escaped and
three were shot, including one prisoner who hadn't even tried to escape. In a
post-shooting written statement, the
UN stated that
it will "remind the authorities once again of their
responsibilities concerning prison conditions and the security of the
population." So the UN does sometimes speak to, or at least remind, member
states of their responsibilities.
But when does the UN speak,
and when does it stay silent? Friday at the noon briefing at UN Headquarters,
Inner City Press asked the spokesman to take a position, primarily directed at
South Sudan, on whether Lord's Resistance Army officials including not only
Joseph Kony but also Vincent Otti, who have both been
indicted for war crimes
and crimes against humanity in Northern Uganda by the
International Criminal Court,
should be arrested. On Thursday, the new staffer in the Spokesman's office,
previously speaking for the ICC, stated at five p.m. that he'd been unable to
confirm reports that Otti is in South Sudan. The effort was appreciated and
acknowledged. Friday after the briefing and Inner City Press'
question
about increasingly
detailed reports,
he appeared to say that it is not the UN's problem. (In fairness, Inner City
Press later in the day sought clarification, see below.) In the briefing as
before, the spokesman had inveighed generally against impunity.
But what about this particular individual, Otti, as
a test: will the UN "remind the authorities" in South Sudan that they have a
responsibility, in light of the ICC indictment?
World
Cup fans in Congo
So far, for two days the UN has
declined to answer the question. So too when asked about a
detailed report in the New Vision
newspaper, carried on the UN's own MONUC website,
that the Lord's Resistance Army is entrenched in Garanga National Park in the
DRC. Inner City Press raised this article at the noon briefing, and afterwards
showed the new staffer that article, as well as a more recent article, "Sudan VP
Meets Kony Rebels in Juba," in which the Ugandan state minister for foreign
affairs Henry Okello Oryem is quoted that "We are consulting the International
Criminal Court because they have issued arrest warrants, implying the government
of southern Sudan is under obligation to arrest the rebels on sight. This issue
has to be sorted out."
Inner City Press asked again: why isn't the
Secretary General or wider UN providing guidance at this point? (In fairness,
the Secretary General spoke out at the time of the ICC indictments, and since
then generally about not tolerating impunity.) The reasons offered for not
speaking at this time include that the International Criminal Court is not a UN
body, that the UN and ICC have a partnership agreement; that Sudan is not a
party to the ICC (the spokesman for the ICC Christian Palme will be asked to
confirm this); and that the reported talks between the LRA, South Sudan and
prospectively Uganda have no UN involvement. Inner City Press said, and says
here, that there are some who question if the UN would be so restrained if
Mladic for example were spotted negotiation in Pristina or Montenegro, and who
question if the proffered differences are much more than hair-splitting. So far
not many seem to care or question, was the interim response. What is the
standard for speaking? It becomes increasingly hard to tell.
In Kampala, Uganda's president
Yoweri Museveni said,
"the DRC government and the UN are not serious" about acting on the Lord's
Resistance Army. Often in reference to Un inaction it is said, "the UN and what
army?" But in this case, the UN actually has an army, near the refuge of the
long-denounced Lord's Resistance Army, reportedly down to fewer the 500 members.
While 17,000 troops may be spread out, the rhetorical question about "what army"
can, in this case, be answered. MONUC in the field will speak to government
officials about their human rights duties, in jails and elsewhere. Why at UN
headquarters has speech become so selective?
Again no new update was given regarding
the seven UN peacekeepers held captive in Ituri. Before he left for Khartoum,
what we'll call a senior UN official told Inner City Press that the UN has seen
the Nepali kidnappers, but that their captor is lucid one day and not so the
next. More was said but for now not reported. As the Spokesman says, things are
delicate.
In lighter news, the first day of the
2006 World Cup saw dozens of people milling in front of the television in the UN
Headquarters lobby, watching Germany beat Costa Rica 4-2 in French-language TV
5. Such crowds in the lobby usually connote an act of terrorism, or perhaps a
John Bolton speech. But this time, and for this month, it is sport. On the
second floor, a smaller crowd gathered by the TV set to the side of the Security
Council. What will happen when a match overlaps with a Security Council stakeout
is not yet known. Then again, as of Friday there's no ESPN, ABC or ESPN-2
available on UN TV. At 2:50 p.m., DSG Mark Malloch Brown floated through the
lobby. Let the games begin!
3:25 p.m. postscript -- the light mood can't last
long. An impromptu press conference was called at the stake-out regarding the
alleged targeting of civilians on a beach by the Israeli Defense Forces.
Questions were shouted about the impact on the referendum. Games, not funny, of
an entirely different sort.
7:15 footnote: in the UN's Delegate's Lounge,
prospective spokespersons for Lebanese inquiries hold forth with martinis and
thick cigars, at the bar there's rare talk of Turkmenistan and Ruhnama, and even
those who joist back and forth throughout the week are all at ease. If only
world peace were this easy.
Pro-Poor Talk and a Critique of the World Trade Organization from a WTO Founder:
In UN Lull, Ugandan Fog and Montenegrin Mufti
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee at the U.N.
UNITED NATIONS, June
8 -- The chairman of BP / British Petroleum on Thursday
denounced the
high cost of remitting money from poor people to their relatives as "a horrific
indictment of the financial system."
Peter Sutherland,
Kofi Annan's point-man on migration and founding director general of the World
Trade Organization, also conceded that the poor are ill-served by the WTO's
dissonant treatment of goods and people. Nations accede to the free movement of
goods and increasing services, but restrict those who must travel in search of
work or other improvement.
Asked what
might make member states be as open to people as goods and services, Mr.
Sutherland responded both that there are economic benefits and that it is
inexorable, given most of the developed world's declining birthrate. Thus
the briefing ended,
but there were ever yet more question some quite concrete. In Russia for
example, with its dwindling population, much of the construction work is done by
migrants from Central Asia. Uzbek immigrants live in sheds, subjected to
shakedowns under threats of deportation. The use of migrant labor may well be
inexorable, but the fair and humane treatment of migrants is not.
BP's
Mr. Sutherland & S-G
The
recent UN migration report's author, Hania Zlotnik, was asked about this outside
the briefing room. She recounted recently watching an old Public Broadcasting
Corporation documentary about Chicago, in which Eastern European immigrants were
exploited but now have even power. She reported that on the substance of
migration, the United States is not being a problem -- only on the issue of the
upcoming forum and its timing. In the wake of Wednesday's John Bolton - Mark
Malloch Brown dust-up, the U.S. position on migration was not mentioned in the
briefing.
The U.S. was the
elephant in the (briefing) room, as it is on the issue of the funding of the
warlords in Somalia. On that, Ambassador Loj in the morning predicted a Security
Council briefing, which occurred, leading to a more formal presentation from
Francois Lonseny Fall, now slated for June 19. Whether he will take questions is
not yet known. On Thursday, incoming General Assembly president Haya Rashed Al
Khalifa was slated to speak with the press, and then decided not to at the late
minute. Speaking in depth, not in Room 226 but rather in the UN Correspondents
Association, was the Grand Mufti of Bosniak and Albanian Muslims in Montenegro,
Rifat Fejzic, who painted a positive picture of the treatment of the Islamic
community in what's slated to be the 192nd member state. He estimated that there
are 150,000 Muslims in Serbia itself, not including Kosovo.
A long-time
Balkans observer was surprised at the Grand Mufti's upbeat take, contrasting it
to the Bosnians. He referenced a Balkan proverb, that one who is bitten by a
snake becomes afraid of a lizard. Independence via referendum and not bloodshed
means that lizards can be addressed without fear. The Grand Mufti said that
French officials have approached him, for information on how to bring about a
more hierarchical organization of Muslims in France. How this will work out is
anybody's guess.
There was
something of a lull at the UN on Thursday. The Secretary General urged reporters
to put the speech story behind them, advice echoed by the forthcoming lame duck
General Assembly president at a four-minute
East Foyer stakeout.
John Bolton was in London; his Security Council colleagues were in Sudan, from
which
Reuters reported
that Joseph Kony's deputy Vincent Otti will be participating in talks with South
Sudan and even Uganda. Since Mr. Otti has been indicted by the International
Criminal Court, at noon the
question was raised,
should Mr. Otti be arrested? Near press time the new member of the Spokesman's
Office team courteously disclosed that the Otti report could not be confirmed,
and thus there'd be no comment. The question remains: should South Sudan arrest
Mr. Otti? Time will tell the answer.
Human Rights Forgotten in UN's War of Words, Bolton versus Mark Malloch Brown:
News Analysis
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee at the U.N.
UNITED NATIONS, June
7 -- The dueling speech and sound-bytes from UN Deputy Secretary-General Mark
Malloch Brown and John Bolton, the U.S. Ambassador, consumed the press corps and
debate on Wednesday. At a three-minute stake-out in the morning, Amb. Bolton
declared that "this is the worst mistake by a senior U.N. official" since 1989.
(Video
here,
quote is at minute 2:13). At the noon briefing, after the spokesman said that
the Secretary-General stands behind his Deputy's speech, he was
asked if
any graver mistakes by UN officials since 1989 came to mind. A topic just then
being discussed in the depopulated Security Council,
Rwanda, came to mind but was not
mentioned.
The spokesman was also asked, since the speech named names, if there'd be any
comment on the Council of Europe's just-released
report calling "reprehensible" the U.S.
policy of extraordinary
rendition of terrorism suspects to secret camps -- including it seems in Poland
and Romania -- and from there for torture with nary a court. The spokesman said
he hadn't yet seen the report and had not comment. So much for naming names.
Asked,
in advance, about the Dutch judicial system's conviction earlier in the day of
Oriental Timber Co.'s
Guus Kouwenhove for
violation the UN arms embargo on Liberia, the spokesman said that it is up the
member states to bring enforcement actions. On Ambassador Bolton's call for now
lifting the arms embargo on Liberia, the spokesman had no comment.
Later at
the very Security Council stake-out, Mark Malloch Brown
appeared.
He selectively took questions from reporters by name, praising the very Fox news
he'd in the speech called a detractor, and dismissing the notions of
polarization, either that he is too closely aligned with the Democratic Party in
the U.S. or that his remarks might make matters worse by enlarging the UN as a
target of Republican rhetoric. When he strode off, there were still hands in the
air and questions to be asked. These include, from the text of his speech, the
identities of the G-77 member "few spoilers... opposed to reform for its own
sake" and his views of the major candidates for the 2008 U.S. presidential
election, referred to in the final substantive line of his speech. While he'd
probably "no comment" an inquiry about Senator Bill Frist, for example, one
might wonder why, given the other specifics in his speech.
versus
= ???
One mostly
wonders why what he calls his friendly critique of the U.S. did not include any
reference to such controversies as
extraordinary rendition or, even more unreported, the essentially confirmed
U.S. funding of warlords in Somalia. The references in the speech to human
rights are to the Unites States' vote against the new Human Rights Council and
decision not to run for a seat, and to the Security Council's attempt to expand
its mandate to include human rights. The speech mentions Rush Limbaugh and not
Guantanamo Bay, and one wonders why.
One might
also wonder why Mr. Malloch Brown gave his speech at such a Democratic
Party-identified venue. Why not the Council on Foreign Relations? Or the
American Enterprise Institute, which he mentioned by acronym at the stake-out?
Why not in the UN Headquarters building, described in the speech as "in most
respects the most hazardous workplace in town"?
In fact,
the previous week Richard Holbrooke said much the same thing, in an impromptu
stake-out after his
remarks
on the Global Business Coalition on HIV/AIDS. Holbrooke said, as taped by this
reporter (see,
Corporate Spin on
AIDS, Holbrooke's Kudos to Montenegro and its Independence,
May 31, 2006),
and the unnamed CNN, which never played
it:
"This administration has shown a
schizophrenic attitude towards the UN. We use it when it suits our purposes,
like Iran, and we bypass it in a way that undermines it. It needs to be funded,
and at the same time we need to push for more reforms."
Some
might call this a Cliff Notes version of Malloch Brown's later speech. While all
day reporters were urged to "read the speech," as of 5 p.m. a Google search for
"you will lose the UN" did not find the speech. [5:30 update: on un.org clicking
Dep. Sect-Gen and speeches and latest, one
finds the
speech.] In further punditry, the first lesson and question of public
relations is "who are you trying to persuade"? This question was posed to a
right-leaning pundit who was, in fact, called on by Mr. Malloch Brown. "The
people where he gave the speech," was the answer. "It was a job application." If
so, consider the owners of Progressive Insurance in Ohio, Middle America, and
the cashing-out duo of Golden West Financial, selling to Wachovia. But if the
message was directed beyond that room, again the question is, to whom? If
overseas, to omit a substantive critique of U.S. human rights seems strange. And
if it was directed to Middle America, the phrase in the speech, it is not clear
that the speech's venue, its gleeful dissection on Fox News or the subsequent
stake-out are enough.
In other
fruitless stake-out news, while at the noon briefing it was announced that Carla
Del Ponte and her replacement on the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda,
Hassan B. Jallow, would take questions after their time in the Security Council,
Ms. Del Ponte walked right by the microphone and brushed off those reporters who
trailed her.
Security
Council president Loj did stop and take questions. On Somalia, she said she
anticipates a briefing on Thursday and next week. Asked again to comment on
Denmark's failure to response to the UNAIDS survey, she deferred to a staffer,
who reiterated this written response:
"From: Michael Starbaek Christensen [at]
um.dk
To: Matthew.Lee [at] innercitypress.com
Sent: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 15:42:42 -0400
Subject: Un AIDS survey
"Dear Matthew, I checked with the Danish
delegation to the HIV/AIDS high level event. In Denmark, the Ministry of Health
is in charge of the Danish efforts to prevent and inform about HIV/AIDS. The
efforts are concentrated on the substantive work in this field, and resources
have not been earmarked to produce a report to the UN."
In
refusing to even respond to a UN project on AIDS, is Denmark a "spoiler," as
phrased in the Malloch Brown speech? On Denmark's (non-) response, UNAIDS has
yet to respond to a request for comment. Selective naming of names, selective
allowing of questions. How it will turn out remains to be seen
Other Inner City Press
reports are archived on
www.InnerCityPress.org -
AIDS Ends at the
UN? Side Deals on Patents, Side Notes on Japanese Corporations,
Salvadoran and Violence in Burundi
On AIDS at the
UN, Who Speaks and Who Remains Unseen
Corporate Spin on
AIDS, Holbrooke's Kudos to Montenegro and its Independence
(May 31, 2006)
Kinshasa Election
Nightmares, from Ituri to Kasai. Au Revoir Allan Rock; the UN's
Belly-Dancing
Working with
Warlords, Insulated by Latrines: Somalia and Pakistan Addressed at the
UN
The Silence of
the Congo and Naomi Watts; Between Bolivia and the World Bank
Human Rights
Council Has Its Own Hanging Chads; Cocky U.S. State Department Spins
from SUVs
Child Labor and
Cargill and Nestle; Iran, Darfur and WHO's on First with Bird Flu
Press Freedom?
Editor Arrested by Congo-Brazzaville, As It Presides Over Security
Council
The
Place of the Cost-Cut UN in Europe's Torn-Up Heart;
Deafness to Consumers, Even by the Greens
Background Checks
at the UN, But Not the Global Compact; Teaching Statistics from
Turkmenbashi's Single Book
Ripped Off Worse
in the Big Apple, by Citigroup and Chase: High Cost Mortgages Spread in
Outer Boroughs in 2005, Study Finds
Burundi: Chaos at
Camp for Congolese Refugees, Silence from UNHCR, While Reform's Debated
by Forty Until 4 AM
In Liberia, From
Nightmare to Challenge; Lack of Generosity to Egeland's CERF, Which
China's Asked About
The Chadian
Mirage: Beyond French Bombs, Is Exxon In the Cast? Asylum and the
Uzbeks, Shadows of Stories to Come
Through the UN's
One-Way Mirror, Sustainable Development To Be Discussed by Corporations,
Even Nuclear Areva
Racial
Disparities Grew Worse in 2005 at Citigroup, HSBC and Other Large Banks
Mine Your Own
Business: Explosive Remnants of War and the Great Powers, Amid the
Paparazzi
Human Rights Are
Lost in the Mail: DR Congo Got the Letter, But the Process is Still
Murky
Iraq's Oil to be
Metered by Shell, While Basrah Project Remains Less than Clear
At the UN, Dues
Threats and Presidents-Elect, Unanswered Greek Mission Questions
Kofi, Kony,
Kagame and Coltan: This Moment in the Congo and Kampala
As Operation
Swarmer Begins, UN's Qazi Denies It's Civil War and Has No Answers if
Iraq's Oil is Being Metered
Cash Crop: In
Nepal, Bhutanese Refugees Prohibited from Income Generation Even in
their Camps
The Shorted and
Shorting in Humanitarian Aid: From Davos to Darfur, the Numbers Don't
Add Up
UN Reform:
Transparency Later, Not Now -- At Least Not for AXA - WFP Insurance
Contract
In Congolese
Chaos, Shots Fired at U.N. Helicopter Gunship
In the Sudanese
Crisis, Oil Revenue Goes Missing, UN Says
Empty Words on
Money Laundering and Narcotics, from the UN and Georgia
What is the Sound
of Eleven Uzbeks Disappearing? A Lack of Seats in Tashkent, a Turf War
at UN
Kosovo: Of
Collective Punishment and Electricity; Lights Out on Privatization of
Ferronikeli Mines
Abkhazia:
Cleansing and (Money) Laundering, Says Georgia
Post-Tsunami
Human Rights Abuses, including by UNDP in the Maldives
Who Pays for the
Global Bird Flu Fight? Not the Corporations, So Far - UN
Citigroup
Dissembles at United Nations Environmental Conference
Other Inner City Press
reports are archived on
www.InnerCityPress.org -
For reporting about banks, predatory
lending, consumer protection, money laundering, mergers or the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), click
here for Inner
City Press's
weekly CRA Report.
Inner City Press also reports weekly concerning the
Federal Reserve,
environmental justice,
global inner cities, and more recently
on the United
Nations, where Inner City Press
is accredited media. Follow those links
for more of Inner City Press's reporting, or, click
here
for five ways to
contact us,
with or for more information.
Copyright 2005-2006 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editors [at] innercitypress.com - phone: (718) 716-3540
