IMF
Says Australia Banks
Vulnerable With Two Thirds of
Wholesale Funding From
External Sources
By Matthew
Russell Lee, CJR PFT NY
Post
NEW YORK CITY,
February 21 – When
the
International
Monetary Fund
held its
biweekly
embargoed
media briefing
on February
7,
Inner City
Press
submitted five
questions including
two on Zimbabwe
and Barbados which the
IMF answered, see
below.
Now on
February 21 from
the IMF on Australia:
"On
February 4,
2019, the
Executive
Board of the
International
Monetary Fund
(IMF)
concluded the
Article IV
consultation
[1] with
Australia.
Australia has
advanced
further in its
economic
rebalancing
after the end
of the mining
investment
boom of the
2000s.
Economic
growth picked
up to rates
above that of
potential
output in the
first half of
2018, with
solid private
and public
consumption
and
residential
investment
more than
offsetting the
drag from
delays in
public
investment
plans and
drought.
Growth slowed
down somewhat
in 2018Q3.
Labor market
conditions
also improved,
with strong
employment
growth and
declining
unemployment.
The housing
market has
been cooling
after a long
boom. The
cooling since
mid-2017
reflects a
number of
factors,
including the
bottoming out
of interest
rates
globally, the
weakening of
foreign and
domestic
investor
demand, and
the tightening
of lending
standards and
bank capital
requirements.
The housing
market
correction is
helping
housing
affordability,
but
accumulated
vulnerabilities
related to
house prices
and debt
levels remain
high. On the
supply side,
progress has
been made in
using City
Deals,
agreements
across all
levels of
government
that integrate
planning and
infrastructure
delivery for
new
developments
and
redevelopments.
The fiscal
policy stance
has been
supportive,
with increased
infrastructure
spending. The
Commonwealth
government
deficit has
narrowed to
0.3 percent of
GDP and should
move into
surplus in
FY2019/20. The
authorities
have
accelerated
the lowering
of the company
tax rate for
small
companies with
a turnover of
up to A$50
million to 25
percent by
FY2021/22 and
set up a
schedule for
cutting
personal
income taxes
and
rationalizing
the tax
brackets over
the next seven
years. This
should
maintain a
tax-to-GDP
ceiling at the
federal level
of 23.9
percent of GDP
while
protecting its
commitment to
a budget
surplus of 1
percent of GDP
over the
business cycle
as a
medium-term
fiscal
anchor.
The monetary
policy stance
remains
accommodative,
with the
current policy
rate being on
hold at 1.5
percent since
August 2016
and inflation
hovering just
below the
lower end of
the Reserve
Bank of
Australia’s
(RBA’s) target
range of 2-3
percent. The
cash rate
setting
implies a real
policy rate of
zero relative
to estimates
of the real
neutral
interest rate
in the range
of 1-2
percent.
Australian
banks are well
capitalized
and
profitable. In
2018Q3
compared with
end-2017,
banks’
regulatory
capital to
risk-weighted
assets ratio
remained
stable at 14.7
percent, and
the return on
assets
increased by
0.2 percentage
point to 1.4
percent. The
ratio of
liquid assets
to total
assets
remained
relatively
stable at 17.2
percent in
2018Q3. Stress
tests under
Financial
Sector
Assessment
Program
(FSAP),
conducted in
parallel with
the Article IV
consultation,
found banks to
be resilient
to solvency
and liquidity
stress but
also noted the
vulnerability
to external
funding
shocks, given
that banks’
wholesale
funding
accounts for
about
one-third of
total
liabilities,
of which
two-thirds are
from external
sources."
From
the IMF on
February 14
about Uganda,
where Sam and
Edith
Kutesa gave
inside
information on
Crane Bank
after taking
$500,000 from
CEFC China
Energy UNSG Antonio
Guterres is
linked to and
covers up for,
this: "An IMF
mission
visited Uganda
January 29 to
February 12,
2019 to hold
discussions
for the 2019
Article IV
consultations.
Economic
growth has
recovered,
while progress
on social
indicators is
mixed and
poverty
reduction has
stalled.
Fiscal and
external
vulnerabilities
have
increased,
reflecting
scaled-up
infrastructure
investment,
but also
weaknesses in
the budget
process. To
achieve more
inclusive
growth, the
trend towards
reduced budget
allocations
for social
sectors should
be reversed.
Monetary
policy has
maintained low
inflation and
can stay the
course.
Banking sector
health has
improved, and
credit to the
private sector
has
increased.
Recent
Economic
Developments
and
Outlook
1. Uganda’s
economy
maintains
momentum. The
economy grew
by 6.1 percent
in FY17/18,
supported by
improvements
in the
services
sector and a
rebound in
agriculture
from the
previous
year’s
drought.
Investor
surveys
indicate that
business
conditions and
sentiment are
strong. Credit
to the private
sector has
improved,
helped by a
supportive
monetary
policy stance.
Growth is
projected at
6.3 percent in
FY18/19, as
manufacturing,
construction,
and services
continue to
expand.
2. Social
indicators
show mixed
progress.
Literacy and
numeracy
improved until
2010 but have
stagnated
since...
In this
regard,
cabinet’s
recent
decision to
start the
accession
process to
become a
member of the
Extractive
Industries
Transparency
Initiative is
a welcome
step. Uganda
has achieved
important
progress in
addressing
technical
compliance
issues with
the Anti-Money
Laundering and
Countering
Financing of
Terrorism
(AML/CFT)
standards and
was removed
from the
Financial
Action Task
Force’s
(FATF’s) grey
list in
FY17/18. The
authorities
are encouraged
to continue
their work to
align their
AML/CFT regime
with
strengthened
international
standards to
ensure that
Uganda’s
regime is
fully
compliant with
FATF
requirements.
Uganda’s
application to
the Egmont
Group is one
step in this
direction.
The mission
met with
Minister Matia
Kasaija,
Governor
Emmanuel
Tumusiime-Mutebile,
Permanent
Secretary/Secretary
to the
Treasury Keith
Muhakanizi,
Deputy
Governor Louis
Kasekende,
Commissioner
General Doris
Akol, Acting
Director
Uganda Bureau
of Statistics
Imelda Atai
Musana, senior
government
officials,
civil society,
unions, and
the private
sector. The
IMF team
welcomes the
open and
constructive
discussions
with the
authorities
and expresses
its gratitude
for their
hospitality
and excellent
cooperation."
On
February 12
from IMF
spokesperson
Gerry Rice on
Ecuador,
this: "Gerry
Rice, the
International
Monetary
Fund’s chief
spokesperson,
made the
following
statement on
Ecuador
today:
“The IMF
together with
other partner
multilateral
financial
institutions
have been
engaged in a
close dialogue
with the
Ecuadorian
authorities
over policies
to strengthen
Ecuador’s
economy for
the benefit of
all
Ecuadorians.
“As part of
this
partnership,
the Ecuadorian
authorities
and the IMF
have agreed to
deepen this
dialogue with
the goal of
working toward
a possible
IMF-supported
financial
arrangement.
This potential
IMF supported
arrangement
would aim to
protect the
poor and most
vulnerable,
boost
competitiveness
and job
creation,
improve
transparency
and strengthen
the fight
against
corruption as
well as
fortify the
institutional
foundations
for
dollarization.
“In this
context, an
IMF team is
currently in
Quito to
continue this
dialogue and
identify how
the IMF can
best support
the
government’s
home-grown
policy plan." This is
the same
Ecuador whose
foreign
minister Maria
Fernanda Espinosa
Garcés is claiming
openness at
the UN while
inviting
bribees and
banning the
Press...
On
February 7
Inner City
Press asked, "On
Zimbabwe, what
is the IMF's
comment on
reports that "
Zimbabwe has
cleared its
arrears with
the IMF, but
the country
still owes
$687 million
to the AfDB,
$1.4 billion
to the World
Bank and $322
million to the
European
Investment
Bank" and on
recent
developments
including
crackdowns in
the country?"
Spokesperson
Gerry Rice
said that the
IMF's rules mean it
would not lend
while arrears
exist to other
multilateral
organizations;
on the
crackdown he
emphasized
that all
stakeholders
should proceed
"peacefully."
Inner
City Press also asked,
"On Barbados,
former
co-chair of
Jamaica’s EPOC
Richard Byles
has said the
circumstances
which forced
Jamaica to
turn to the
IMF were very
similar to
those
currently
faced by
Barbados with
very high debt
to GDP ratios
and low
foreign
reserves. Any
IMF comment?
Has Barbados
reached out to
the IMF?" Rice
responded
about the EFF
program
initiated last
October - here's
from the transcript:
"There is one
other -- a
couple of
other
questions on
line I'll
take. One is
on Barbados
where, again,
Matthew Lee is
asking the
former
co-chair of
Jamaica's
EPOC, Richard
Byles, has
said the
circumstances
which forced
Jamaica to
turn to the
IMF were very
similar to
those
currently
faced by
Barbados, very
high debt
levels, low
foreign
reserve. Any
IMF comment,
has Barbados
reached out to
the IMF, the
answer is
clearly yes
because last
October our
Board approved
a program, a
financial
program for
Barbados under
our extended
fund facility,
one of those
instruments
that we can
use when
countries are
in difficulty.
So just
confirming
that." And on
Zimbabwe: "Then
let me take a
few calls from
this -- there
is one on
Zimbabwe
asking about
-- what is our
comment on
reports that
Zimbabwe has
cleared its
arrears with
the IMF but
the country
still owes, he
says 687
million to the
African
Development
Bank, 1.4
billion to the
World Bank,
322 million to
the European
investment
bank and on
recent
developments
including the
crackdowns in
the
country.
We have talked
quite a bit
about Zimbabwe
here in the
past but just
to answer the
question, it’s
-- I can
confirm that
-- and I’ve
said it before
here, that
Zimbabwe has
cleared,
indeed, its
arrears to the
IMF but
arrears remain
outstanding to
other
multilateral
creditors,
including the
World Bank and
that severely
limits
Zimbabwe’s
access to
international
financial
support --
Zimbabwe has
no arrears to
the IMF. Our
rules preclude
lending given
the arrears to
other
financial
institutions.
And on the
crackdown he
asks about, I
don't have too
much to add
beyond what I
said here
before, which
is that we
encourage all
stakeholders
to collaborate
peacefully --
and I think
that's the
word I would
want to
stress, is the
"peacefully"
-- and, you
know, try to
develop
policies that
will stabilize
the economy
and promote
sustainable
and inclusive
growth. It's
clearly a very
difficult
situation
there in
Zimbabwe and
we recognize
that."
Inner City
Press also
asked, "On
Nigeria,
Minister of
Budget and
National
Planning,
Senator Udo
Udoma, has
said the
nation’s
economy will
grow by 3.01
per cent this
year, compared
to a forecast
of two per
cent by the
International
Monetary Fund.
What is the
IMF's
response?
What is
the IMF's
comment on the
making public
of US “Field
Manual (FM)
3-05.130, Army
Special
Operations
Forces
Unconventional
Warfare” and
its mentions
of the IMF? On
Cameroon, now
the US is
cutting
military aid
due to human
rights
violations
(and a
Cameroon
minister
threatening
opponents with
a Holocaust).
Do these
issues, and
the continued
crackdown in
the Southwest
and Northwest
of the
country, have
no impact the
IMF's
continued
programs with
the Biya
government?"
Somehow these
Cameroon
questions
don't get
answered.
We'll have
more on this.
On
Venezuela Rice
made it clear
that IMF has
not spoken
with Guaido,
saying the IMF
will take its
guidance from
the
international
community and
stating of the
IMF,
"we don't do
politics, we
do economics."
We'll have
more on
this. Back
from the IMF's
January 17
transcript
answering
Inner City Press'
Zimbabwe
question at
the time.
RICE: "I'll
take one more
online and
that's about
Zimbabwe and
asking for the
status of
where we are
with the
countries debt
and relation
with the IMF
and did we
have any
comment on the
unrest and the
government
crackdown
there is the
question.
So in answer
to that, I
would say that
of course
Zimbabwe is
facing major
challenges and
just in terms
of the unrest,
we encourage
all
stakeholders
to collaborate
peacefully in
developing and
implementing
policies that
will stabilize
the economy
and promote
sustainable
and inclusive
growth.
On the overall
economic
situation,
debt and the
IMF, there has
been no real
change in what
I have said
here recently
which is
Zimbabwe
continues to
be in a
difficult
situation
regarding debt
with
protracted
arrears to
official
creditors
including
multilateral
creditors such
as the World
Bank which
severely
limits
Zimbabwe's
access to
international
financial
support.
In terms of
the IMF,
Zimbabwe has
in fact
cleared its
arrears to us,
to the Fund,
but our rules
preclude
lending to a
country that
is still in or
under arrears
to other
international
financial
situations. So
until that
particular
situation is
resolved, we
would not be
moving forward
with a
financial
support for
Zimbabwe.
I said here
the last time
that the
authority's
economic
policies we
felt were
headed in the
right
direction
broadly in
terms of
addressing the
fiscal deficit
and monetary
policy and so
on. I won't
repeat what I
said the last
time but
that’s where
we are on
Zimbabwe."
More
here.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|