IMF
Criticizes
Bolivia As
Undercutting
Profitability,
Defers
to US, Ignores
Africa?
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
February 10 --
The
International
Monetary Fund
has just
released its
Article IV
review of
Bolivia, in
which it
criticizes the
country's new
Financial
Services Law,
specifically
that
"the
law’s general
thrust is to
subordinate
financial
sector
activities
to social
objectives
with
instruments
that could
create risks
to
financial
stability.
Main features
of the law
include: (i)
provisions
to regulate
lending rates
and set
minimum
lending quotas
for the
productive
sector and
social
housing; (ii)
discretion to
set floors
on deposit
rates; and
(iii)
mechanisms to
enhance
consumer
protection
and financial
access in
rural areas."
Inner
City Press
asked the
IMF's Mission
Chief for
Bolivia Ana
Corbacho to
explain this
criticism, and
more generally
to reconcile
Bolivia's and
President
Evo Morales'
public
critique of
the IMF
with this
visit.
In response to
a question
from Inner
City Press at
UN
headquarters
last month,
Morales recounted
how the IMF
dominated
Bolivia in the
past, but now
decision
making
had passed
from the "Chicago
to the Bolivia
boys."
The IMF staff
report says
they met with
"Minister of
Economy and
Public
Finances Arce,
Central Bank
President
Zabalaga,
Minister of
Planning Caro,
other senior
public
officials, and
representatives
of
the private
sector. Mr.
Tamez and Ms.
Kroytor (LEG)
provided
inputs
on the new
Financial
Services Law
at
headquarters."
The IMF staff
report also
says that "the
instruments
chosen
(interest rate
caps and
minimum credit
quotas) could
reduce the
profitability
and lending
funds of
financial
institutions,
over-leverage
target
beneficiaries,
and complicate
the conduct of
monetary
policy."
Ms.
Corbacho, on
an embargoed
press
conference
call largely
in Spanish on
which only
three media
asked
questions,
replied that
Bolivia for
example
capping
interest rates
might impact
financial
institution's
profitability
and thus
"financial
stability."
She
said the
government
responded that
financial
inclusion has
not
progressed
fast enough
and so they
are taking
these steps.
She the
Article IV
discussion,
which are held
with each IMF
member, were
"very open and
frank" with
Bolivia, and
thus positive.
To
Inner City
Press, the
IMF's
willingness to
question
consumer
protection in
Bolivia stands
in contrast to
the IMF's
deference to
the US on the
how to manage
and
communicate
the Federal
Reserve's
tapering, the
debt ceiling
-- anything,
essentially.
This
IMF position
was propounded
at last
Thursday's IMF
media
briefing, at
which
questions on
Africa -- the
Sudans, Areva
in Niger
-- submitted
over the
Online
Briefing
Center by
Inner City
Press were not
taken by
IMF
Spokesperson
Gerry Rice,
nor answered
afterward by
IMF staff.
This is how
the IMF is
operating; we
will have more
on this. Watch
this site.