To
Central
African
Republic IMF
Approves $32
Million Citing
Sale of
Stockpiled
Diamonds
By Matthew
Russell Lee, CJR PFT NY
Post
NEW YORK CITY,
December 19 – When the
International
Monetary Fund
on the
Central
African
Republic
issued a
statement on December
19,
it was
to announce
the
approval and
immediate disbursement
of $32
million,
citing the
sale of
stockpiled
diamonds. Downplayed
were the
issues like
the UN
standing by as
100 civilians
were
killed, Inner
City Press
coverage here.
The IMF
statement
went like
this: "On
December 19,
2018, the
Executive
Board of the
International
Monetary Fund
(IMF)
completed the
fifth review
under the
Extended
Credit
Facility (ECF)
arrangement
for the
Central
African
Republic.
Completion of
this review
enables the
disbursement
of SDR 22.84
million (about
US$31.6
million).
The three-year
ECF
arrangement
was approved
by the IMF
Executive
Board on July
20, 2016 and
access has
been augmented
twice to a
total of SDR
133.68 million
(about
US$185.2
million or 120
percent of the
Central
African
Republic’s
quota).
Following the
Executive
Board’s
discussion on
the Central
African
Republic, Mr.
Mitsuhiro
Furusawa,
Deputy
Managing
Director and
Acting Chair,
made the
following
statement:
“Central
African
Republic’s
performance
under the
ECF-supported
program has
been
satisfactory
despite a
challenging
security
environment
and difficult
humanitarian
conditions.
“The
authorities
remain
committed to
maintain
fiscal policy
consistent
with
macroeconomic
stability,
which is
critical for
economic
growth and
poverty
reduction. The
2019 budget is
anchored to
the domestic
primary
balance
objective
while allowing
a scale-up of
social and
capital
spending. The
integration in
the budget of
previously
excluded
revenues and
expenses of
government
agencies and
funds is an
important step
to enhance
fiscal
transparency.
“Strong
efforts to
mobilize
domestic
revenues,
which remain
weak, will be
critical to
sustainably
finance an
increase of
public
services. To
that end, the
authorities
will step up
the use of IT
tools and
modernize the
customs and
revenue
administration.
Given the
country’s high
risk of debt
distress,
continued
reliance on
grant
financing is
essential to
support debt
sustainability.
The
implementation
of the
investment
program for
the National
Recovery and
Peacebuilding
Plan will
boost economic
prospects,
create jobs,
and reduce
poverty.
“Structural
reforms have
progressed,
contributing
to the
strengthening
of the
treasury
single
account,
streamlining
of
quasi-fiscal
taxes,
improved
budget
transparency
and
traceability
of domestic
revenues.
Quarterly
publication of
budget
execution
reports allows
for better
tracking and
monitoring of
government
expenditures.
More
consideration
should be
given to
strengthening
financial
oversight of
public
institutions
and
state-owned
enterprises,
reducing
exceptional
payment
procedures,
improving the
business
climate, and
strengthening
the asset
declaration
regime. It
will also be
important to
follow through
on commitments
to strengthen
governance and
transparency
in the
management of
natural
resources.
“Central
African
Republic’s
program
continues to
be supported
by the
implementation
of supportive
policies and
reforms by the
regional
institutions
in the areas
of foreign
exchange
regulations
and monetary
policy
framework and
to support an
increase in
regional net
foreign
assets, which
are critical
to the
program’s
success.”
The Executive
Board of the
IMF also
concluded the
2018 Article
IV
consultation
with the
Central
African
Republic.
Growth is
estimated at
4.3 percent in
2017 and is
expected to
remain broadly
unchanged
driven by a
dynamic
forestry
sector,
construction
and externally
financed
investment
projects.
Inflation fell
on the back of
price declines
for food and
manufacturing
products.
Growth could
increase to 5
percent in the
medium term.
However, risks
are on the
downside,
mainly due to
the volatile
security
situation. The
projections
are predicated
on progress in
peace and
reconciliation
efforts under
the African
Union
Initiative,
the gradual
extension of
security
forces and
public
services in
provinces, and
steadfast
implementation
of reforms.
In July 2018,
the Parliament
passed a
revised budget
to reflect the
fiscal
performance in
the first half
of the year.
Data through
end-September
confirms that
the fiscal
deficit
remains
contained and
that the
fiscal program
is on track.
The current
account
deficit is
estimated at
8.3 percent of
GDP in 2017.
Currently
available
information
suggests it
will remain at
a similar
level in 2018.
While the oil
import bill is
set to
increase,
higher timber
exports and
the sale of
stockpiled
diamonds will
offset the
effect on the
trade balance.
The banking
sector
remained
stable and
credit growth
to the economy
has picked up
to 5.2 percent
(y-o-y) at
end-September
2018.
The Central
African
Republic
authorities
have
implemented a
comprehensive
economic
reform program
to entrench
macroeconomic
stability,
buttress
inclusive
growth, and
reduce
poverty. The
parliament
adopted a 2019
budget
consistent
with
macroeconomic
stability. The
2019 budget
enhances
fiscal
transparency
by integrating
previously
excluded
fiscal
revenues and
expenditure.
The
authorities
also envisage
to increase
social
spending. To
bolster growth
prospects,
resilience,
and poverty
reduction, the
authorities
have committed
to strengthen
fiscal revenue
mobilization,
enhance good
governance,
promote gender
equality and
improve the
business
climate."
In an earlier
disbursement
statement there
was no mention
of Argentina
preparing to
hos and spend
on the UN's
dubious South
South
operation
which has been
used to pay
bribes in the
UN. The
IMF statement went
like this:
"The Executive
Board of the
International
Monetary Fund
(IMF)
completed
today the
second review
of Argentina’s
economic
performance
under the
36-month
Stand-By
Arrangement
(SBA) that was
approved on
June 20, 2018.
The completion
of the review
allows the
authorities to
draw the
equivalent of
SDR 5.50
billion (about
US$ 7.6
billion),
bringing total
purchases
since June to
SDR 20.21
billion (about
US$ 28.09
billion). In
completing the
review, the
Executive
Board also
approved the
authorities’
request for
modification
of performance
criterion.
Following the
Executive
Board
discussion of
Argentina’s
economic plan,
Mr. David
Lipton, the
IMF’s First
Deputy
Managing
Director
stated:
“There are
early signs
that the
redesigned
economic
reform
program,
including a
new monetary
policy
framework, is
yielding
results. The
peso has
stabilized and
inflation,
though still
high, has
started to
decline, as
the
pass-through
from past peso
depreciation
is waning.
Nevertheless,
the Argentine
economy is
still
contracting
and remains
vulnerable to
shifts in
market
sentiment.
Economic
activity is
expected to
start
recovering in
the second
quarter of
2019
“The passage
of the 2019
budget with
broad
political
support has
helped to
solidify
confidence in
the
authorities’
economic
reform plan
and policy
continuity.
Fiscal
discipline
created space
for one-off
payments that
helped shield
the most
vulnerable
from the
burden of
adjustment.
Going forward,
it will be
critical to
continue
safeguarding
fiscal targets
against
implementation
challenges and
weaker-than-expected
revenue
collection.
Maintaining
social
spending
should remain
a key
priority.
Further
progress is
needed to
improve the
medium-term
fiscal
framework and
debt
management.
“Continued
commitment to
the zero
growth in base
money and to
the
market-determined
exchange rate
will further
strengthen the
credibility of
the monetary
policy
framework,
re-anchor
inflation
expectations,
and enhance
the economy’s
resilience to
external
shocks.
Preparations
are ongoing to
recapitalize
the central
bank and
enhance its
operational
independence.
“As the
economy
stabilizes, it
would be key
to pivot the
reform agenda
toward
boosting
medium-term
growth. In
this context,
structural
reforms would
help boost
investment and
productivity;
increase the
employability
of women,
youth, and
lower-income
workers; and
provide
greater
support to
those in
poverty.
Efforts could
also be
directed
toward
improving the
efficiency of
social
spending while
expanding the
coverage of
the social
safety net. It
would also be
important to
continue
removing
distortions in
the tax
system,
improving
labor market
regulations,
putting the
pension system
on a
sustainable
financial
footing, and
strengthening
governance.
“Continued
steadfast
implementation
of the
stabilization
plan will be
essential to
reassure
domestic and
international
investors,
solidify
Argentina’s
return to
macroeconomic
stability, and
durably
improve the
living
standards for
all
Argentines." Nine
days earlier
on Niger: On
December 10,
2018, the
Executive
Board of the
International
Monetary Fund
(IMF)
completed the
third review
of Niger’s
economic and
financial
program
supported
under the
Extended
Credit
Facility (ECF)
framework. The
completion of
the review
enables the
disbursement
of SDR14.1
million (about
US$19.5
million),
bringing total
disbursements
under the
arrangement to
SDR56.4
million (about
US$78.1
million).
The Executive
Board also
approved the
authorities’
request for a
waiver of the
nonobservance
of the
performance
criterion on
domestic
payments
arrears
clearance.
Niger’s
three-year
arrangement
was approved
on January 23,
2017 for SDR
98.7 million
(about
US$134.04
million) in
support of the
authorities’
national plan
for economic
development.
It aims to
enhance
macroeconomic
stability and
foster high
and equitable
growth, boost
incomes and
create jobs,
while
strengthening
the
foundations
for
sustainable
development.
Due to
unforeseen
financing gaps
that arise
from security
situation,
struggling
uranium sector
and food
security needs
IMF Executive
Board agreed
to increase
the overall
amount of the
ECF to SDR
118.44 million
(about
US$164.1
million, or 90
percent of
Niger quota).
Following the
Executive
Board’s
discussion on
Niger, Mr.
Mitsuhiro
Furusawa,
Deputy
Managing
Director and
Acting Chair,
issued the
following
statement:
“Niger’s
overall
performance in
the first half
of 2018 under
the
ECF-supported
program was
satisfactory,
with strong
revenues and a
lower than
projected
fiscal
deficit. The
implementation
of the
structural
reform agenda
also
progressed
well.
“The program
for 2019 is
based on a
realistic
draft budget
and
macroeconomic
framework.
Measures to
mobilize
domestic
revenue and
improve the
quality of
expenditure
while
emphasizing
social
spending will
support the
move toward
achieving the
WAEMU
convergence
criterion for
the budget
deficit in
2020. The
authorities
are committed
to eliminating
all arrears by
the end of the
year and
avoiding new
ones in 2019.
“Niger’s
medium-term
prospects are
encouraging,
as several
large-scale
projects
should help
raise economic
growth over
the medium
term. It will
be important
to secure
adequate local
content and a
fair fiscal
contribution
from these
projects. The
program of
structural
reforms aimed
at building a
more robust
private sector
and promoting
financial
inclusion has
a pivotal role
to play in
this regard.
State-owned
enterprise
reform and
efforts to
strengthen
governance and
anti-corruption
measures will
also be
crucial.
Sustained
attention to
gender issues
and to
addressing
demographic
objectives
will be
important for
longer-term
development.
“The continued
vigilance on
debt
accumulation
and the
priority put
on
concessional
borrowing has
helped Niger
maintain a
“moderate”
rating for
risk of public
debt distress.
Strengthening
and
diversifying
exports will
help reduce
vulnerability
to commodity
price shocks.” When
the IMF
held its biweekly
embargoed media
briefing on
November
15, Inner City
Press
asked four
questions
including,
"The Pakistan
People’s
Party’s leader
in Senate,
Sherry Rehman,
as asked 'What
is going on
with the IMF
meetings?
Neither the
prime minister
nor the
finance
minister
briefed the
parliament on
the terms of
the
negotiations.
Before
briefing the
IMF with the
terms of
agreement
regarding the
country’s
foreign debts,
the government
should have
discussed it
in parliament.
What is with
this secrecy?'
What is the
IMF's
response?" IMF
Spokesperson
Gerry Rice
said Matthew
Lee has
asked about
the status
and that an
IMF team is
still in
Islamabad
discussing a potential
new program;
he would not
confirm if a
$5 to $6 billion
request is
expected. Now
on November 20
the IMF has
issued this:
"An
International
Monetary Fund
(IMF) mission
led by Harald
Finger visited
Islamabad from
November 7-20,
2018 to
initiate
discussions on
a financial
arrangement
with the IMF
requested by
the Pakistani
authorities to
support their
economic
reform
program. At
the end of the
visit, Mr.
Finger made
the following
statement:
“The IMF
mission has
been engaged
in productive
discussions
with the
Pakistani
authorities on
economic
policies and
reforms that
could be
supported by a
financial
arrangement
with the IMF.
In this
context, there
has been broad
agreement on
the need for a
comprehensive
agenda of
reforms and
policy actions
aimed at
reducing the
fiscal and
current
account
deficits,
bolstering
international
reserves,
strengthening
social
protection,
enhancing
governance and
transparency,
and laying the
foundations
for a
sustainable
job-creating
growth path.
“Our dialogue
with the
Pakistani
authorities
will continue
over the
coming weeks.
“The team is
grateful to
the
authorities
for open and
constructive
discussions.
The team met
with Minister
of Finance,
Revenue and
Economic
Affairs Asad
Umar; Minister
of Planning
Khusro
Bakhtiar,
Minister of
State for
Revenues
Muhammad
Hammad Azhar,
Advisor to the
Prime Minister
for Commerce
Abdul Razak
Dawood,
Advisor to the
Prime Minister
for
Institutional
Reforms and
Austerity
Ishrat
Hussain, SBP
Governor Tariq
Bajwa, BISP
Chairwoman
Sania Nishtar,
Finance
Secretary Arif
Ahmed Khan,
FBR Chairman
Mohammad
Jehanzeb Khan,
provincial
Finance
Ministers,
parliamentarians,
other senior
officials, and
representatives
of the donor
community." On
November
15Inner City
Press also
asked, "On Sri
Lanka, any
updated
thinking or
action from
the IMF given
the
dissolution of
parliament, no
confidence in
Rajapaksa
motion? Who
are the IMF's
technical
counterparts?
Any changes?"
Rice said the
IMF continues
to monitor
the political
situation and
remain in
touch with its
"technical
counterparts."
Not yet
answered: "On
Cameroon,
while the
IMF's recent
report
discussed the
Cup of African
Nations, what
is the IMF's
assessment of
the impact of
the ongoing
conflict and
travel
restrictions
in the
country's
Anglophone
regions?
On Libya, the
US has said it
is “critical
is promoting
greater
transparency
of Libya’s
economic
institutions,
including the
Central Bank
of Libya.
These reforms
will support
much-needed
conversation
among Libyans
about
enhancing
fiscal
transparency
and promoting
a more
equitable
distribution
of the
country’s oil
resources. The
United States
stands ready
to support
this economic
dialogue, at
Libya’s
request and in
close
coordination
with the UN
Support
Mission for
Libya
(UNSMIL), the
World Bank,
and the
International
Monetary
Fund.” What is
the IMF doing
in/for Libya?
On Saudi
Arabia, can
you further
explain the
basis of Mr
Azour's
statement that
current and
foreseeable
responses to
the killing of
journalist
Jamal
Khashoggi will
no impact the
Saudi economy?
Asked whether
the IMF felt a
need to
re-examine its
expectations
for the
economy since
the Khashoggi
affair
erupted, Jihad
Azour,
director of
the Middle
East and
Central Asia
department at
the Fund, said
it did
not. 'What
would have an
impact is how
oil prices
will have
moved going
forward, and a
certain number
of other
indicators
like the pace
of fiscal
adjustment and
the reforms
that Saudi
authorities
will implement
going forward,'
Azour said." Back
on November
1, Inner City
Press asked
four
questions,
including, "On
Saudi Arabia,
what is the
IMF's estimate
of the impact
of l'affaire
Khashoggi on
the country's
economy, as
well as of the
US' call for a
(sequenced)
cessation of
hostilities in
its war on
Yemen?"
IMF
Spokesperson
Gerry Rice,
after reading
out this
"question from
Matthew Lee,"
emphasized
that the IMF
doesn't
do politics.
He said,
however, that
the IMF is
concerned about the
humanitarian
situation in
Yemen and
stands ready
to re-engage
although there
are no
operations
there now due
to the
conflict. On
Khashoggi's murder he
said it is too
early
to estimate how
much it will
impact confidence
in the Kingdom
- it already has -
and, in what
others may
take as news,
he answered
that the impact for
now is modest.
(Inner
City Press also asked
about the
"coup" in Sri
Lanka which
Rice said the
IMF is
monitoring and
remaining in
contact with
its counterparts
on a technical
level - but that's another
story.) The
Saudi kingdom
is still
dodging about
the death of Jamal
Khashoggi. And Czech
President
Miloš Zeman,
who's clung at a personal
adviser to Ye
Jianming,
controlled of
UN bribery
indictee
Patrick Ho
through the
China Energy
Fund
Committee, has
now said, “I
love
journalists,
that’s why I
may organize
a special
banquet for
them this
evening at the
Saudi embassy.”
It's this
Zeman who's
played a role
in Guterres
having China
Energy Fund
Committee
still accredited UN
ECOSOC, while
Guterres has had
Inner City
Press banned since
July 3. On May
17,
Inner City
Press'
reporting that
day, as
before,
included the
non-response
since November
2017 of the UN
Mission the
the Czech
Republic,
which holds
the presidency
of the UN
ECOSOC to
which CEFC
continues to
hold
consultative
status, while
CEFC's Ye
Jianming was
and remains an
adviser to
Czech
President
Zeman. Even as
the Mission in
New York
refused to
answer, on for
example 28
November 2017
and 6 February
2018, Inner
City Press'
reporting has
been picked up
in the Czech
Republic, on
12 January
2018 here,
then on 28 May
2018 here.
On June 4, a
belated
response from
the Czech
Mission to the
UN, published
by Inner City
Press in full
below along
with the
Press' follow
up questions
on June 4,
still not
answered as of
4 pm on June
5. Inner City
Press is also
informed that
Marie
Chatardova has
reached out
with the same
answer to the
Czech Press
Agency; some
say she is
under
consideration
by Zeman to
become the
country's
foreign
minister and
that this
Press question
unresponded to
by the Czech
Mission since
November could
be a problem.
Suddenly on
June 5,
Antonio
Guterres'
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric read
out an answer
(he rushed off
the podium so
follow up
question have
not yet been
possible).
Video here.
Then on June 22 and July
3 Guterres'
Security roughed up
Inner City
Press and have
banned it
since, while
blathering
about freedom
of the
press.
After
belatedly
and conflicted
statements
about
Khashoggi
from
Guterres, who
earlier this year
took a $930
million check
from Saudi
Crown Prince Mohammed
bin Salman,
now as
speech by
Turkey's
Erdogan, which
over-promised
(the "naked truth") and
under-delivered,
with its
presumption
that the King
is not involved.
It is noted
that Erdogan
has a record 73
journalists in
jail, without
due process like
Guterres'
dis-accreditation
and banned from
the UN list. Others
compromising
connections
are being revealed. Guterres'
Envoy on Youth
Jayathma
Wickramanayake
announced a
partnership
with MBS'
Misk
Foundation,
as recently as
September
26, 2018
(after
school bus bombing)
- and it
remains in
place...
(The IMF's Lagarde,
we note,
canceled on
Davos in the
Desert.) At
the October 10
Press-less UN
noon briefing
at which
Guterres'
spokesman Stephane
Dujarric by choice
had only two
questioners, one retired,
Dujarric
said Guterres
had
not spoken
to the Crown
Prince he took
the money
from. Now as
some banks
pull out of
Davos in the
Desert,
notably two
French banks
both with
operations in
the United
States are
still planning
to go:
Societe
Generale CEO
Frédéric Oudéa
and
BNP Paribas
Chairman Jean
Lemierre;
also a French
arms
manufacturer
Thales CEO
Patrice Caine.
We'll
have more on
this. On
October 15,
with Inner
City Press still
unable to
attend and
ask, included on
Guterres "banned"
list along
with political
activists,
thankfully the
Khashoggi
question was
asked, by Richard Roth: "Now that he's
home, is the
Secretary-General
planning to
meet or has he
met with the
Saudi UN
Ambassador?
What is the
Secretary-General's
comment
regarding
President
Trump's remark
this morning
that the Saudi
King said that
there were
rogue killers,
rogue actors
who were
responsible?
And it might
be nice if the
Secretary-General
stopped after
his Security
Council
appearance
tomorrow
morning
considering
some of the
events that
have happened
while he was
gone.
Just a
suggestion.
Thank you.
Spokesman Dujarric:
I’m always
happy to take
the
suggestions on
board.
You know, I
think the
Secretary-General
was very clear
in the
comments he
made, I think,
to some of
your
colleagues in
Indonesia, is
that he thinks
it's very
important for
the truth to
come
out. Our
understanding
is that,
obviously, the
Turks… Turkish
authorities
are
investigating.
I think we,
like everybody
else, would
like to know
what happened
to Mr. [Jamal]
Khashoggi.
And as the
Secretary-General
said, as we've
said from
here, we've
had… there
have been
contacts
between the UN
and the Saudi
authorities." At
what level? As
Inner City
Press showed,
Guterres
seemingly slept
in
on October
15. It was his
chief of staff
who presented
in the Fifth
Budget
Committee. And
this? On
October
14 from US Senator
Dick Durban,
this:
"Yesterday,
Khalid bin
Salman bin
Abdulaziz Al
Saud, Saudi
Ambassador to
the United
States, called
Durbin
directly from
Riyadh about
Khashoggi’s
disappearance. 'In
my call with
Ambassador bin
Salman, he
admitted to
knowing Mr.
Khashoggi and
even said he
counts him as
a
friend.
However,
Ambassador bin
Salman gave no
credible
explanation
for Mr.
Khashoggi’s
disappearance.
He refused to
comment
directly on
the video
showing Mr.
Khashoggi
entering the
Istanbul
consulate but
not exiting,
would not
respond to
reports of
intelligence
showing a plan
to lure Mr.
Khashoggi back
to Saudi
Arabia, would
not respond to
a request for
a third party
to
investigate,
and gave me no
timetable on
the Saudi’s
investigative
report.
I told
Ambassador bin
Salman that he
should expect
a very
negative
response from
both sides of
the aisle in
Congress if
Mr. Khashoggi
was in fact
kidnapped and
murdered.
And if that is
the case, I do
not believe
the U.S.
should
continue to be
party to
supporting the
Saudis in the
bloodshed in
Yemen -- a
halt that is
long overdue
given the
humanitarian
disaster
resulting from
that
conflict.
This recurring
theme of the
Saudi
government and
royal family
silencing
their critics,
such as the
case with Raif
Badawi and
Waleed
al-Khair,
along with the
fact that they
continue to
turn a blind
eye to the
export of
Wahabbi
extremism
makes it
increasingly
difficult to
accept Saudi
Arabia as
trusted ally
of the United
States.
Since Saudi
arms are being
used to ravage
Yemen and they
are apparently
complicit in
the
disappearance
of Mr.
Khashoggi, I
cannot support
President
Trump’s
proposed arms
sale.
Secretary
Mnuchin should
immediately
cancel his
upcoming trip
to Saudi
Arabia and
after a two
year delay,
the Trump
Administration
should finally
nominate a
U.S.
Ambassador to
Saudi
Arabia.'"
Earlier
Dujarric's
deputy
emailed
this to Inner
City Press: "Regarding
Mr. Khashoggi,
we have said
the following: The
Secretary-General
is very
concerned
about recent
reports of
violence
against
journalists,
including the
most recent
cases - the
reported
disappearance
of Jamal
Khashoggi and
the murder of
Victoria
Marinova in
Bulgaria. Both
publicly and
privately, the
Secretary-General
has often
raised this
issue with
Member States. It’s
also important
to note that
that there’s
also been a
very worrying
increase
increasing
violence,
sexual and
otherwise,
against women
journalists.
The
Secretary-General’s
position is
clear: a free
press is
essential for
peace, justice
and human
rights for
all. He
reiterates his
call on all
governments to
strengthen
press freedom,
including
ensuring that
there is
justice and
accountability
for crimes
committed
against
journalists." This
while
Guterres
himself has
roughed up and
banned the
critical Press - and
is now exposed
as putting it
on his
secret banned
list
that
includes
"political activists."
And so
too the story
about the
Saudi foreign
minister Adel
Ahmed
Al-Jubeir's
speech in
the UN General
Assembly that
Guterres
banned Inner
City Press
from, by his
state media
"UN News
Centre" run by
Alison Smale.
This story
merely
runs lines
from Al-Jubeir such as, "On
the conflict
in Yemen, the
Saudi Minister
said that
Houthi militia
continue to
manufacture
missiles and
carry out
activities
that
destabilize
the region.
Underscoring
the need for a
political
solution to
the crisis,
Minister
Al-Jubeir said
that Saudi
Arabia will
continue to
facilitate all
humanitarian
efforts to
alleviate the
suffering of
the Yemeni
people." This
story does not
mention the
Saudis bombing of
children in a
school bus. One
might think
Smale is just
wasting public
money, as
usual, by reproducing
the flat
coverage of UN
Meetings
Covering. But
it's worse:
the lack of analysis
or presenting
the other side
is selective.
Smale's UN
News Centre's
write
up of the
Myanmar speech
includes a
description of and
link to a
report on the
government's
killings.
Smale also
barred Inner City
Press from attending the
Reuters and
CPJ event on
Myanmar's
jailing of two
journalists, here.
We'll have more
on this - due
to Guterres
and Smale's
lawless censorship
Inner City
Press has had
to cover UNGA
73 from the
streets and is
only now
reviewing
Smale's
shameful
production.
Watch this site.
On
September 25,
after
meeting the Saudi
foreign
minister,
Guterres
gushed, "The
Secretary-General
met with H.E.
Mr. Adel
Al-Jubeir,
Minister of
Foreign
Affairs of the
Kingdom of
Saudi Arabia. The
Secretary-General
and the
Foreign
Minister
discussed
regional
issues of
mutual
interest,
including
Yemen and
Syria. The
Secretary-General
expressed
appreciation
to Saudi
Arabia for its
support to the
ongoing
reconciliation
process in the
Horn of Africa
and United
Nations youth
initiatives."
Not
a word on the
bombing of
school bus. Earlier
on
September 25
the UK Mission
to the UN
closed to the
press - all
press, apparently
- its event on
Addressing
Malnutrition
in Yemen. To his
credit, ICRC's
Peter
Maurer
released his
remarks, here,
including
calling for
"ceasing the
transfer of
weapons if
there is a
clear risk of
violations of
international
law." That
should mean
the host of
the meeting
would stop
such sales - and, as
didn't
happen this week,
incoming UN
Security
Council member
Germany would as
well. We'll
have more on
this. On
September
14 the NRC's
Saleem
Al-Shamiri in
Hodeidah said,
"Stability
within
Hodeidah is
becoming worse
and fear about
what might
happen
continuing to
increase.
Those
remaining in
Hodeidah know
they could
lose
everything,
including
their lives,
but for many,
it is not a
simple
decision to
leave. To
leave is to
abandon
everything
people know
and have
worked for,
with no
certainty
about the
future. If
people leave,
they don’t
know where
they will go,
how they will
find shelter,
what they will
eat. Many fled
here already
and the war
followed.
They’re tired
of running. One
of our
colleagues
here is
expecting her
baby any day.
These are
terrifying
circumstances
for her
delivery. She
says it is now
too late, too
uncertain and
too expensive
for her family
to leave. No
baby should be
born into a
situation like
this.”
The weekend of
7-9 September
marked one of
the deadliest
in Yemen’s war
so far, with
more than 84
conflict-related
fatalities
reported
within
Hodeidah
health
facilities
alone,
according to
reports
received from
Safer Yemen.
Fighting is
now pressing
in on Hodeidah
city from
several sides,
including
heavy ground
clashes and
sustained
aerial
bombardments.
Civilians in
Hodeidah
reported
airstrikes in
close
proximity to
the city’s
southern and
eastern
borders,
including up
to fifty
strikes on the
city fringes
on Wednesday
alone.
Houses, farms,
a flour mill
and a soft
drink factory
were among
civilian
buildings hit
by airstrikes
across
Hodeidah
governorates
over the last
fortnight.
We are highly
concerned
about the
security of
the Hodeidah
Port complex,
including
milling
facilities
housing enough
to feed 3.5
million Yemeni
people.
Aid agencies
in Yemen have
identified
close to
500,000 people
that had fled
homes in
Hodeidah
between June
and August. So
far in
September,
55,000 people
have been
displaced from
across the
governorate,
leaving more
than half a
million at
heightened
risk of hunger
and exposure
to diseases,
including
cholera.
ECHO reports
that the
number of
suspected
cholera cases
in Yemen has
now increased
for the
12thweek in a
row, to 9,245
suspected
cases. This
number adds to
more that
133,000 cases
of suspected
cholera
through 2018
thus far.
By 13
September,
seven vessels
were berthed
at Hodeidah
port, carrying
a 79,000
metric tons of
food and over
30,000 metric
tons of
critically-needed
gas oil. An
additional
three vessels
are queued to
deliver food
and fuel in
the coming
days. Food and
fuel
deliveries
through
Yemen’s Red
Sea Ports have
held steady
since June but
any disruption
or threat to
the safety of
shipments
could strangle
the Yemeni
economy and
impact access
to food for
more than 20
million
people." Inner
City Press, which
previously
at the UN
Security
Council
stakeout asked US
Ambassador
Nikki Haley
questions
about Jeffrey
Feltman and Cameroon
has now been
banned from
the UN for 70
days and
counting and
so asks like this,
on September
11.
We'll have more on
this. On
September 10 the new
UN High
Commissioner
for Human Rights
Michelle Bachelet
has had this to
say on Yemen
in her
opening speech: "Regarding
Yemen, I urge
all parties to
take stock of
the gravity of
the findings
of the Group
of Eminent
Experts. They
have
identified a
number of
individuals
who may be
responsible
for
international
crimes, and
that
confidential
list is now in
the Office. It
is crucial
that there be
continued
international
and
independent
investigations
into all
allegations of
violations of
international
humanitarian
law and war
crimes –
particularly
in light of
the apparent
inability of
the parties to
the conflict
to carry out
impartial
investigations.
Last month's
shocking
strike on a
bus carrying
schoolchildren
was followed
by another
horrific
series of
airstrikes
which left
dozens of
civilians and
children
killed and
injured in Al
Hudaydah. I
note the
recent
statement by
the Coalition
acknowledging
mistakes over
the airstrike
on the school
bus in Sa’ada,
and I will be
closely
following what
steps are
taken to hold
the
perpetrators
accountable
and provide
remedy and
compensation
to the
victims. There
should be
greater
transparency
over the
coalition’s
rules of
engagement and
the measures
taken to
ensure that
such tragedies
are not
repeated. The
recent Saudi
royal order
which appears
to provide a
blanket pardon
to members of
the Saudi
armed forces
for actions
taken in Yemen
is very
concerning." So
why has
Guterres done
a favor to
Saudi Arabia
putting it on
the "good child
killer"
list? We'll
have more on
this, and on
Bachelet's
response
(or not) to
the evidence
provided to
her on and
since her
first day
about shameful
censorship
of the Press
at and by the UN
Secretariat as
it pursues
the UN's role in
Yemen,
deferring to the
Saudis and
their armers.
And on this: On
September 8
Guterres' envoy
Martin
Griffiths
lavished
praise on the
government /
Hadi
delegation he
spent three
days with
in Geneva, in
a press
conference
featuring
qestions cut
off by the UN
and
from which though
in Geneva
Inner City
Press was banned
from by New
York-based,
Moscow
junketing Alison
Smale for
Guterres, soon
to be Lisbon
bound. After
Griffiths,
Hadi's Foreign Minister
Khaled Al
Yahami took
over the UN room to
denounce coup
plotters
and deny that
Sudan and Egypt
wouldn't open
their air
space. What
about the
injured
being able to
get to Oman?
Griffiths,
vetted by the Saudis before Guterres
gave him the
post
ostensibly for
the Brits,
wouldn't say.
He said every
action has a
repurcussion.
We'll
have more on
this. On
September 7,
with
the UN declining
to answer
basic
questions from
banned Inner
City Press
including
"September
6-3: On Yemen,
what is the
SG's response
to that the
Yemeni
government is
considering
not extending
the UN teams’
missions in
the country
after they
have proven
their bias,
Yemen’s human
rights
minister
Mohamed Askar
said on
Thursday,"
this from NRC
protection
and advocacy
adviser in
Yemen Suze
van Meegen: “This
week was due
to mark a
turning point
in Yemen’s
conflict as
parties
convened in
Geneva to
chart a way
forward.
Instead, we
have passed
another week
full of
violence and
devoid of
promise. While
parties to the
conflict
continue to
operate on the
basis of
differences,
Yemenis are
united in
their
experience of
violence,
deprivation
and grief.
Yemenis I met
this week all
tell me that
they are
losing hope in
the
possibility of
any solution
to the current
situation.
They are
exhausted,
People are
reaching their
tipping
point.”
The situation
in Hodeidah
city remains
exceptionally
fragile. Heavy
fighting is
currently
taking place
at the city’s
western and
southern
outskirts,
closer than at
any other
point since
the offensive
on Hodeidah
commenced in
June,
including
around
Hodeidah
airport, on
the city’s
southern
border.
Airstrikes and
helicopter
attacks have
been reported
across several
districts
south of
Hodeidah city,
and missiles
launched from
Yemen at
targets in
both Saudi
Arabia and the
Red Sea.
Reports
indicate that
jets have been
hovering over
Hodeidah city
for up to 16
hours a day.
Citizens in
Hodeidah
described
increasingly
militarised
conditions
inside the
city this
week, with an
increasing
number of
checkpoints,
trenches and
jersey
barriers
installed
across the
city. Most
residents stay
inside their
houses to try
to protect
themselves.
Tension in and
around the
city continues
to keep
prevent tens
of thousands
of city
residents from
returning.
People
remaining in
Hodeidah
report that
more than half
of all
businesses,
shops and
services have
closed,
including
whole blocks
of shopfronts
locked up
following the
departure from
the city of
owner-operators.
A shopkeeper
selling fabric
and clothing
told NRC staff
that he had
not sold a
single item
since the
second week of
August.... On
September 4, with
the UN declining
to answer
basic
questions from
banned Inner
City Press
about the previous,
non-Saudi
approved UN
envoy, this:
"UN Special
Envoy For
Yemen Affirms
Commitment To
Southern
Participation
In The
Political
Process: Amman,
4 September
2018 - Since I
assumed my
role as
Special Envoy
in March this
year, I have
consistently
affirmed that
there will be
no peace in
Yemen if we do
not listen to
a broad
cross-spectrum
of Yemeni
voices,
including
southern
groups, and
make sure that
they are
included in
the efforts to
reach a
sustainable
political
settlement. In
the past few
months, I have
consulted with
numerous
southern
groups to
reach a
consensus on
their
meaningful
participation
in the
political
process. I
have been
encouraged by
their openness
to dialogue
and to a
peaceful
resolution for
their
concerns. I
remain
committed to
reaching a
consensus with
them on their
participation
in the
political
process, and
look forward
to continuing
our
discussions in
the coming
weeks. I
urge all
Yemeni
stakeholders
to work
together to
create a
conducive
environment
for
negotiations
to end the war
and for the
stabilization
of the economy
and delivery
of basic
services to
the Yemeni
people."
We'll
see.
Also, Spain
under Pedro
Sanchez is
said to be belatedly
reviewing
its arms
sales to the Saudis.
Better late
than never - the
UN, it seems,
never
reviews anything,
no more how
outrageous or
ultimately
incriminating.
Where was UNSG
Guterres? In
China, after rebuffing
basic
questions from
banned
Inner City
Press on
August 31, here.
On
August 2,
the day
after the implicated
UK took over
presidency
of the UN
Security
Council while
denying
Press requests
under FOIA
and for
access, British
nominated (and
Saudi
vetted) UN envoy
Martin
Griffiths was to
brief the Council
and then a Press-less
press stakeout
(which he
later
canceled) -
when, just
before the
meeting, the
Saudi and Emirati
led Coalition
reported
bombed the
Al-Thourah
Hospital in Hodeidah,
killing 55
civilians.
While Griffith in
his speech
didn't even
mention these
airstrikes
(and he has
not answered
Inner City Press' online
question to
him about
why), on August 3
the
Saudi
Mission,
dutifully
amplified by
Al Arabiya to
which the UN
gives a ten
meter long
office that
Guterres and
his Deputy and team
often cravenly
appear in, blamed
the bombing on
the Houthis.
Seems like it
might require
an objective
investigation -
unlike the scam
45 day"review"
the UN held
to ban Inner
City Press for
life,
while turning
itself over to
the likes of
Al Arabiya. On
August 24 after
yet more
killing of
civilians by
the Saudi and
Emirati
Led Coalition
from which
Antonio
Guterres
smiling took a
$930 million
check, this:
"“We are
appalled by
conflict that
appears
entirely
ungoverned by
the laws of
war and
astounded at
the silence of
the many
governments
enabling it.
We cannot
comprehend any
possible moral
justification
for killing
civilians
fleeing to
safety as
their towns
become
battlegrounds.
Attacks on
civilians have
become a
deadly trend
in Yemen’s
war. The new
media reports
of civilian
casualties
follow recent
coalition
strikes on a
busload of
school
children that
killed 51
people, and
over three
years of
ceaseless
violence from
both parties
to the
conflict on
homes,
markets,
hospitals,
schools and
farms. More
than 350,000
Yemeni people
have fled
violence along
Yemen’s west
coast since
the beginning
of June,
adding to the
three million
displaced
through the
course of the
war. People
forced to flee
are not simply
numbers, they
are
individuals
forced to
leave
everything
they have
behind in an
effort to stay
alive.
This war is
not only a
Yemeni
problem, it is
a global one.
The multiple
nations
supplying
intelligence,
arms and
logistical
support to
enable the
violence are
implicated in
a conflict
that has
killed
thousands and
will not
subside
without
conscious and
meaningful
action.
The UK, US,
France, Iran
and all others
contributing
to the
conflict in
Yemen must use
their
influence to
bring about an
immediate and
permanent end
to the
violence. We
call on the
countries
funding and
fuelling the
war to ensure
that civilians
and civilian
infrastructure
are protected
from attack,
and that
humanitarian
aid is allowed
to reach those
who need it.'" The
UK and France
are both
complicit in
the killing of
civilians in
Cameroon by
Paul Biya -
and in the
lifetime ban
Guterres'
Alison Smale
imposed on
Inner City Press on
August 17. On
August 13,
for a UN noon
briefing
Inner City remained
banned from, it e-mailed
the spokesmen
for Antonio
"$930 Million
Guterres this
question:
"August 13-2:
On Yemen, what
is the comment
of the SG and,
separately,
his envoy
Griffiths on
reports that
Saudi and
Emirati Led
Coalition-backed
militias
actively
recruit
al-Qaida
militants, or
those who were
recently
members,
because
they’re
considered
exceptional
fighters. One
Yemeni
commander who
was put on the
U.S. terrorism
list for
al-Qaida ties
last year
continues to
receive money
from the UAE
to run his
militia,.
Another
commander,
recently
granted $12
million for
his fighting
force by
Yemen’s
president, has
a known
al-Qaida
figure as his
closest aide.
In one case, a
tribal
mediator who
brokered a
deal between
the Emiratis
and al-Qaida
even gave the
extremists a
farewell
dinner. What
does the UN
know / say /
do about this?" Even when
Inner City
Press submitted the
question
again, to Guterres'
email address
and that of his
Deputy SG and
Communicator
UK USG Alison
Smale, there
has been no
answer more
than two days
later, in the
face of this:
"A senior US
official says
the UAE paid
money to
tribal leaders
in Yemen to
rout al-Qaeda
from its
strongholds.
Wednesday's
remarks
followed AP
investigation
outlining how
Emirati forces
cut secret
deals with the
militants to
get them to
abandon
territory. The
official says
money "has
exchanged
hands" and
that it often
went to
"sheikhs in
areas that
have
collaborated
or allowed
al-Qaida to
exist." He
didn't
elaborate on
how much was
paid, but says
the Emiratis'
payments to
tribal sheikhs
allowed them
to 'ally
themselves to
the Emiratis.'" One wag
might note the
handed
$930 million
check, half
Emerati, to
Guterres; the UAE
already bought the
UN's
Bernardino
Leon and, some
say, Ghassam
Salame. Today's UN
under Guterres
is corrupt,
and censors.
On
August 9, for
a UN noon briefing
Inner City remained
banned from, it e-mailed
the spokesmen
for Guterres
this question:
"August 9-3:
On Yemen, what
is the SG's
comment and
action on 'airstrikes
in northern
Yemen have
targeted a
busy market
and a bus,
killing at
least 20
people,
including
children, and
wounding as
many as 35.
ICRC said a
hospital
supported by
the
organisation
had received
dozens of
casualties
after the
attack at a
market in
Dahyan in
Sa’ada
governorate.'"
At the UN
Security
Council, from
which Guterres
has
also banned Inner
City Press, UK
Deputy
Ambassador
Jonathan Allen
was asked "the
reaction to
the bombing of
a school bus
in northern
Yemen? Dozens
of very young
children,
videos showing
many under the
age of ten
injured and/or
killed in a
strike that
the Saudis say
was justified. Allen: Well,
we've seen
those reports.
It's very
important as
we've said
repeatedly
that all
parties to the
conflict in
Yemen adhere
to
International
Humanitarian
Law. Where
there is an
incident of
this sort,
it's important
this
investigated
thoroughly and
the
conclusions of
that
investigation
are shared and
are learned
from and we'll
be calling for
that in this
incidence as
well. As
President, I'm
afraid I don't
have anything
to say on
that. This is
not something
that the
Council has
discussed
recently. Q: Has
anybody asked
the Presidency
to discuss it
in AOB?
Allen: As
of this
moment, I am
not aware of
any such
requests." At
the beginning
of the month the
UK prepped the
correspondents
it feeds cake to,
as it
sells bombs to
Saudi
Arabia -
while refusing
to answer questions
from Inner
City Press on
Yemen, Western
Sahara and Cameroon.
On
July 30 Guterres'
sleazy basis
for roughing
up and banning
Inner City
Press for 27
days and
counting was reported
in the Columbia
Journalist
Review: Guterres'
spokesman Stephane
Dujarric has
gone
further, in an article
published July
30 by the
Columbia
Journalism
Review. Dujarric - who
Inner City
Press
directed to
the CJR
reporter to -
is quoted
that " Lee
Periscoped
while
shouting, 'Fuck
you!'
repeatedly.
(Lee says he
was
complaining
that Dujarrac
had given the
Al Jazeera
crew a private
interview, and
excluded him.)
'He
creates an
atmosphere of
incivility
within our
working
environment,'
Dujarrac says."
This is a lie.
Inner City
Press on June 19
when Dujarric
gave a "private
briefing" to Al
Jazeera about
Nikki Haley
and Mike
Pompeo
announcing the
US pull out
from the UN
Human Right
Council said
in the hall
that is was a
"sleazefest."
After closing
the door of
the focus booth
it has been
confined to work in
for two years
by
Dujarric, and long
after the Al
Jazeera trio
including
James Bayes
and Whitney
Hurst were
done, said on
Periscope, F-You. Periscope
video - still
online
during this 27
day "investigation" -
here.
So
Dujarric is a
censor,
justifying the
beating up and
banning of a
journalist for
something he
broadcast in
a soundproof
booth to his
audience. This
is disgusting, all
the more so
because as
Inner City
Press has reported,
Dujarric told
an
interlocutor
on June 20,
before the two
beat-downs of
Inner City Press,
that things
would be worse
for it. Guterres and
Dujarric and
it seems Smale
are.. thugs. Disgusting.
On Yemen, the
CJR article
quotes Inner
City Press:
"The Saudis
buy UK weapons
to bomb
Yemen—but the
UN envoy to
Yemen is
British." All
true.
On July 5,
hours before
Guterres' (and
the UK's and
Saudis') envoy
Martin Griffiths briefed
the UN
Security Council,
Guterres' UN
banned Inner
City Press
from entering,
and it has
been banned
for 12 days
and counting
since. Fox
News story here
("UN roughs
up, ejects,
bans reporter
from
headquarters:
Caught on
tape");
petition to
Guterres here;
GAP blogs I
and II (“Harassment
of US
Journalist
Intensifies at
the
UN”). On
July 30 (Inner
City Press is
still banned from
the UN with no
end in sight),
US State Department
spokesperson Heather
Nauert issued a
read-out
including that
"Secretary
Pompeo met
today in
Washington, DC
with Oman’s
Minister
Responsible
for Foreign
Affairs, Yusuf
bin Alawi, who
participated
in the July
24-26
Ministerial to
Advance
Religious
Freedom.
On Yemen, they
affirmed the
importance of
continued
support for
the efforts of
UN Special
Envoy Martin
Griffiths and
emphasized the
need for all
parties to
show restraint
to avoid
further
escalation of
hostilities." All
parties. The
UK becomes
president of
the UN Security
Council on August
1; watch this
site. On
July 20, NRC
on Hodeidah said
that "airstrikes,
mortar fire,
missiles and
shelling
continue to
kill, injure
and threaten
the safety of
civilian
populations,
particularly
in At Tuhayat
and Zabid
districts. NRC’s
staff inside
Hodeidah city
have described
it as a “ghost
town”, where
the bulk of
shops and
restaurants
have been
closed by
proprietors
fleeing the
city. Through
the course of
the week,
residents of
Hodeidah city
heard
low-flying
jets and heavy
airstrikes on
the outskirts
of the city. The
price of
women’s
sanitary items
has risen by
more than 15%
since May,
creating major
challenges for
women in
already
challenging
circumstances,
many of whom
are without
access to
clean water. Ali Al
Hajori, in
Hajjah, said
that 'conditions
here are
becoming
worse. People
aren’t only
arriving from
Hodeidah now,
but from areas
in the north
too. They come
in the heat
and dust with
everything
they can
carry, but it
usually isn’t
enough for
them to
survive beyond
a few days. We
are stretching
the aid we
have to reach
as many people
as possible
but it will
never
compensate for
what they lose
by leaving
their homes.' Isaac
Ooko,NRC’s
Area Manager
in Hodeidah said
that 'people
are living in
pathetic
conditions,
not fit for
humans and
completely
untenable for
those who are
most
vulnerable. I
am incredibly
proud of our
teams for
fronting up
each day to
make it
possible for
people to live
with dignity
in a situation
that otherwise
strips it from
them. What
might appear
to be a pause
to the outside
world, doesn’t
feel the same
for those of
us seeing what
it means for
people here.'
Yemen’s
Protection
Cluster
reported
severe damage
to the main
water tanks in
Al Tuhayet
district
earlier this
month, leaving
close to
100,000 people
without safe
water and at
heightened
risk of
communicable
diseases.
NRC’s staff in
Hodeidah are
continuing to
carry out our
usual cholera
prevention
programs,
focused on
ensuring
people have
access to safe
water and
hygiene
material." The
UN has a shameful
record
with cholera,
having killed
over 10,000
people in Haiti
with the
cholera UN
Peacekeeping
brought, with
not a
penny in
restitution.
On
July 13,
unable
to go to the
UN's noon
briefing as it had
been been unable
to attend
Guterres' July
12 press
conference at which
not a single
Yemen question
was asked,
Inner City
Press wrote to
Guterres'
spokesmen: "
Saudi King
Salman has
‘pre-exonerated’
all troops
fighting in
Yemen from any
accountability
issues they
may face over
their conduct
in the war, in
which
thousands of
civilians have
been killed
and wounded. A
statement
announcing the
early pardon,
released by
Saudi Arabia's
state news
agency SPA,
said the
pardon extends
to “all
military men
across the
armed forces”
taking part in
Operation
Restoring
Hope.” Given
that the SG
accepted
Saudi's $930
Million check,
what is his
comment?" There
was no answer
for four days.
On July
17, Guterres'
deputy
spokesman Farhan
Haq e-mailed
Inner City
Press that "Regarding
your earlier
question on
Yemen, we have
the following: We
are aware of
the reported
royal decree
by King
Salman. The
United Nations
does not
endorse
amnesties for
genocide, war
crimes, crimes
against
humanity or
gross
violations of
human rights. The
Secretary-General
has
consistently
reminded all
parties to the
conflict of
their
obligation to
adhere to
international
humanitarian
law, including
taking steps
to protect
civilians and
civilian
infrastructure. We
emphasize once
again that a
negotiated
political
settlement
through
inclusive
intra-Yemeni
dialogue is
the only way
to end the
conflict and
address the
ongoing
humanitarian
crisis." So
what about
that $930 million
check? And the
ongoing ban of
Inner City
Press? We'll
have more on
this. On
June 26 as
Guterres
proposed to
Security
Council to
continue to
list the Saudi
and now Emirati
led Coalition
as "good"
child killers,
Guterres' spokesman
said this
classification
is for parties
who "engage."
Inner City
Press asked if
the $930
million check
was part of the
engagement and
Dujarric
archly said
No. On
June 29,
NRC NRC
staffer, Lolah
Alkahtani, in
Sana’a: "I
am worried
that this war
will kill my
family in
Hodeidah, and
that it will
destroy our
house which my
father built
after spending
all his life
saving for it.
The word
worried
doesn’t even
describe a bit
of how we
feel.”
NRC
staffer,
Saleem
Al-Shamiri, in
Sana’a, said
"My
family in
Hodeidah city
think any
moment a bomb
will explode,
or clashes
will reach
their homes. I
have felt this
situation
myself in
2011, and
understand the
fear and panic
they feel now. While
the past days
have been
quiet, family
and friends I
have spoken to
tell me that
people don’t
dare leave
their houses.
Only a few
grocery shops
are open, and
many people
going hungry.
I sent some
money to my
family so they
can buy food,
as most people
don’t have
anything left
in their
houses. I’m
concerned that
they won’t be
able to find
food or clean
water to
survive while
the offensive
drags on.”
NRC
continued: The
fighting in
Hodeidah
continues but
is on a
relative pause
while the UN
envoy is
allowed
further time
to mediate
between the
parties to the
conflict in an
attempt to
restart peace
negotiations.
The situation
in the wider
Hodeidah area
is volatile,
and fighting
continues in
Hodeidah’s
southern
districts.
Airstrikes
have been
ongoing around
the city
although they
have slowed
this week.
People inside
Hodeidah city
tell NRC staff
that the
situation
continues to
be calm, with
only a few
clashes
reported
during the
night. Some
roads within
the city are
reportedly
closed or
partially
blocked by
defensive
entrenchments.
People inside
the city tell
NRC that most
shops,
especially in
the southern
side of the
city, remain
closed as
shopkeepers
are too scared
to open them.
Electricity is
still
unavailable in
many areas and
water remains
scarce. Most
people do not
leave their
houses unless
it’s urgent.
Many don’t
have adequate
food in their
homes and are
at the brink
of going
hungry.
Money exchange
shops are
reported to
remain mostly
closed. This
is a serious
concern in
Yemen, where
people have
been
struggling
with an
increasing
lack of cash
liquidity in
the past few
years of the
conflict.
Without access
to cash, and
with
reportedly
rising prices
of basic
goods,
civilians who
could
otherwise
survive may be
left without
food and other
necessities." Last
week, Dujarric
spoonfed sound
bytes to Al
Jazeera and is
working with
them to try to
further restrict
Inner City
Press, here -
Inner City
Press was in
fact ousted on
June 22, video
here,
story here.
On
June 26, MSF's
Caroline
Seguin gave
the following
account: "SELC-backed
forces are
currently
fighting Ansar
Allah troops
for Hodeidah
airport,
located a few
kilometers
south of the
city center.
It is very
difficult to
assess the
situation, as
we don’t have
MSF staff
inside
Hodeidah yet.
But [Yemeni]
medical staff
we work with
have reported
airstrikes and
shelling
inside the
city, and
people have
started
stockpiling
food and fuel. Ansar
Allah forces
have been very
active in
Hodeidah,
digging
trenches and
building
barricades,
[and]
deploying
troops near
civilian areas
such as
residential
zones,
hospitals, and
hotels, which
is very
worrying.
Hodeidah’s
water system
has been
affected by
these
excavations,
and water
shortages are
being reported
by residents.
Electricity
has been out
for years, and
people are
using
generators
when they can
afford them.
It is
difficult to
estimate how
many people
fled the city
so far. Inside
Hodeidah,
population
movements have
been observed
from the south
of the city to
the north.
Some displaced
families have
moved further
to neighboring
Dhamar and Ibb
governorates,
and to the
capital
Sana’a, where
they can rent
houses or stay
with
relatives.
Since the war
began in March
2015, the
average price
of fuel has
more than
doubled, so
fleeing the
city can cost
families a lot
of money." The
UN says
Griffiths
will meet with
propped up
"president'
Hadi on June
27, in Aden. Inner
City Press on
May 29 asked
Guterres'
spokesman Stephane
Dujarric about
the Saudi led
Coalition's
and UAE's moves on
Hodeida. On
June 20
after UAE
foreign
minister Anwar
Gargash delivered
the final threat (the UAE
Diplomatic Academy
has former UN
envoy to
Libya Bernardino
Leon) and
after
Dujarric
announced the
withdrawal by the
UN of its
international
staff from
Hodeidah, the
assault
began. Now on
June 21, from
the
UN's British
envoy
Martin Griffiths,
this: "I will
continue my
consultations
with all
parties to
avoid further
military
escalation in
Hudaydah,
which I fear
would have
severe
political and
humanitarian
consequences. My
priority now
is to avoid a
military
confrontation
in Hudaydah
and to swiftly
return to
political
negotiations. I
am encouraged
by the
constructive
engagement of
the Ansar
Allah
leadership in
Sana’a and I
look forward
to my upcoming
meetings with
President Hadi
and the
Government of
Yemen. I am
confident that
we can reach
an agreement
to avert any
escalation of
violence in
Hudaydah. While
in Sana’a, I
also briefed
the Security
Council on 18
June and
announced my
intention to
relaunch
political
negotiations
in the coming
weeks. I
reiterate the
commitment of
the United
Nations to
reach a
negotiated
political
settlement to
end the
conflict in
Yemen. I
welcome the
commitment and
willingness of
the parties to
engage in a UN
facilitated
intra-Yemeni
political
process."
On June 18 before
Griffiths briefed
the Security
Council, on
the way in, UK
Ambassador
Karen Pierce
said that
Griffiths is
working
closing with
the Coalition
- that is,
though
assaulting
Hodeidah. But why
then would the
Houthis trust
him? Inner
City Press was
previously
informed,
from high in
the UN
Department of
Political
Affairs, that
Saudi Arabia
and the UK chose
Griffiths and
Guterres went
along. More
recently
Guterres has mock
dressed up as
a FIFA World
Cup referee and
Inner City
Press'
livestream
Periscope
account was
suspended
by Twitter for
showing UN
reacting to
the World Cup
and a screen
installed by
the Russian
Mission to the
UN. But the
above, though
Inner City Press
was unable to
Periscope it,
is what Pierce said.
After the
meting, after
push back at
censorship and with
Inner City
Press'
Periscope
restored, it
asked Russia's
deputy
ambassador who
is calling the
shots
on Hodeidah:
the UAE?
Saudi? Yemen
national army?
Mercenaries? Periscope
here.
He
said that
wasn't
discussed in
the consultations.
How not?
Watch
this site.
The
assault is
proceeding.
There was
a UN Security
Council
meeting about
it at noon on
June 14,
behind closed doors,
at the request of
the UK. Afterward Inner
City Press
asked
President of
the Council for
June Nebenzia
what the UAE
or Saudi
Arabia had
responded, to
the UN or its
envoy.
Nebenzia said
envoy
Martin
Griffiths
works behind
the scenes.
But for whom?
On the way in,
UK Ambassador
Karen
Pierce said
the meeting
was closed so
that the
Council could
hear about the
military
situation on
the ground,
from the UN. Inner
City Press
audibly asked,
from who?
But there was
no answer, and the
question was not
included in
the UK
transcript,
below.
So in the June
14 UN noon briefing
Inner City
Press asked,
UN transcript
here:
Inner City
Press: At the
stakeout, the
UK Ambassador,
Karen Pierce,
said that…
that the
meeting… the
consultation
on Hodeidah is
closed because
the UN is
going to be
providing
detailed
information
about the
actual
situation on
the
ground.
So, I wanted
to know, can
you say who…
who from the
UN is going to
be providing
that
briefing?
And is it… can
you tell us,
you know, as
much as you
can publicly
about what's
happening
there?
Deputy
Spokesman:
The briefing,
as… as I was
going into
this, the
intention was
for it to have
the Assistant
Secretary-General
for
Humanitarian
Affairs,
Ursula
Mueller, brief
the Security
Council on the
humanitarian
conditions in
Hodeidah.
At the top of
the briefing,
I did point
out what our
Humanitarian
Coordinator
for Yemen,
Lise Grande,
is saying
about the
situation
there and
about the work
that we're
undertaking to
help the
estimated
600,000
civilians in
the
city.
There's a
press release
from her with
more details.
Inner
City Press:
I
guess… my
question is
just, because
Karen Pierce
referred
specifically
to military
information,
she said the
meeting had to
be closed
because they
want to know
the stat… the
military
status of the
assault on
Hodeidah.
And so I guess
I'm wondering,
does Ms.
Mueller…
who's… who's
providing from
the UN system…
who's
providing that
information?
Is it through
OCHA (Office
for the
Coordination
of
Humanitarian
Affairs)?
Is there
some…?
Deputy
Spokesman:
I believe
that…
regarding
political
developments
that Martin
Griffiths will
also be
calling in to
that briefing.
Inner
City Press:
Right, but she
kept using the
word
“military”.
That's why…
I'm just
trying to
figure out if
there's some…
is it the
national staff
that are in
Hodeidah that
would provide
this
information?
Deputy
Spokesman:
There…
obviously, the
details that
are going on
in closed
consultations
are by
definition
details to
which I'm not
privy, so I
wouldn't be
able to
express those." So
the UN's
knowledge is
withheld from
the UN
spokespeople?
On June 15, Haq
repeatedly
said, the UN
is on holiday; state
media like
Egypt's Akhbar al
Yom could come
in to work but
Inner City Press cannot.
This
is today's
UN. From
the UK's June
14 transcript,
omitting Inner
City Press' question,
here's from
Pierce's opening statement:
"We wanted it
closed because
we'd like to
have quite a
lot of detail
from the UN
about what's
actually
happening on
the ground. As
there is a
military
operation
ongoing, we
think we'll
get more of
that detail if
it's closed. I
think that's
perfectly
reasonable. We
hope also to
hear something
about Houthi
dispositions
because some
of what we
hear suggests
there may have
been mining of
the harbour by
the Houthis.
So we're very
interested in
that. Beyond
that, I'd like
to echo what
the Foreign
Secretary said
in London
yesterday. Now
the military
operation is
underway we
look to all
parties to act
in accordance
with
international
humanitarian
law,
protection of
civilians. But
I also want to
recall that
the coalition
is acting in
Yemen at the
request of the
legitimate
Yemeni
government and
this request
was made after
the Houthis
came into
force in 2014.
So I think
that's an
important
point.... We've
seen some very
helpful
statements
from the UAE
about their
respect for
international
humanitarian
law but also
their
willingness to
work with the
UN." On
June 13 Inner
City Press asked
Guterres'
spokesman Stephane
Dujarric, UN
transcript here: Inner
City
Press: I
wanted to ask
you, on Yemen who
the UN thinks
is calling the
shots. The
various calls
that were made
to not begin
the assault
which began
last night,
many people
are saying the
UAE [United
Arab Emirates]
as opp… not as
opposed to but
along with
Saudi Arabia,
but that the
UAE is very
central to
it. And
so, I guess I…
and they made
the
threat.
The Foreign
Minister of
the UAE said,
48 hours and
we're going
in. Did
the
Secretary-General
or Mart… or…
or Mr. Martin
Griffiths… at
what level
have they
reached out to
the UAE to…?
Spokesman:
They've
reached to…
they've been
speaking to
various
parties to
those who have
influence on
the parties,
but I'm not
going to get
into details
about that.
Inner
City Press:
And
I'm asking in
part because
former UN
envoy to
Libya,
Bernardino
León, with
some fanfare,
went to be… is
a… I don't
know if he's
the head of,
but he's a
major figure
in the UAE
Diplomatic
Academy…?
Spokesman:
I recall.
Inner
City Press:
Yeah,
exactly.
So, I guess
I'm wondering…
obviously,
he's no longer
with the UN,
but I would
assume he's
someone that
UN people
know… this
seems like a
diplomatic
gambit to make
a threat…
Spokesman:
I'm not aware
that Mr. León
has had any
contact with
anyone at the
UN.
Inner
City Press:
Okay.
And I guess,
given… given
that… that…
the… the
statement by
UNICEF about
the impact on
children in…
in Hodeidah —
and this was a
statement made
before the
assault began
— and given
the… the… the
children and
armed conflict
mandate, would
you say that
this is
inconsistent
with having
listed the
Coalition, or
does it cause
a rethinking
of listing the
Coalition as
one that takes
children's
safety
seriously?
Spokesman:
The safety and
the violence…
the safety of
children, the
violence
caused upon
children, is
one of great
concern to the
Secretary-General
that has been
going on in
Yemen.
There is a
process under
which the
report of… the
Secretary-General's
report on
children and
armed conflict
is being
produced.
It should be
coming out
soon-ish.
That report
will look back
at 2017, and
you'll be free
to make your
own analysis." Inner
City Press put
the same
question about
reaching out
to the UAE to
Sweden's
deputy
ambassador
Carl Skau,
video here;
he said the key
is to support
Griffiths (who
is in Amman).
Military vehicles
moved on Hodeida firing and
bombs were
dropped.
Saudi TV said
the "liberation
of the port of
Hodeida is a
milestone in
our struggle
to regain
Yemen from the
militias.” Houthi-run
Al Masirah said
they hit
a Saudi
coalition ship
near Hodeida
with two
land-to-sea
missiles. "The
targeted ship
was carrying
troops
prepared for a
landing on the
coast of
Hodeida." Guterres
was silent. But
at 7 am on
June 13, ICRC
put out a
statement
including from Robert
Mardini, their
regional
director for
the Near and
Middle East that "lifelines
to the outside
world must be
maintained,
including the
Hodeida port
and the Sana'a
airport. Real
people, real
families, will
suffer if no
food is
getting in,
and we are
concerned that
ongoing
military
operations
continue to
hamper the
arrival of
essential
goods.... The
ICRC – working
in line with
international
humanitarian
law - urges
all parties to
the conflict
to respect
civilian life
by taking
every possible
measure to
protect
civilians, and
to allow safe
passage for
those who want
to escape the
fighting. All
persons
captured in
relation to
the ongoing
hostilities
must be
treated
humanely, and
the ICRC
should be
given access
to detention
facilities
holding
them."
The Council
meets on
June 13 at 10
am - about
Central Africa
including
Cameroon. The
General Assembly meets at
3 pm about
Gaza. Watch
this site.
Earlier on
June 12,
the Norwegian
Refugee
Council
reports that "fighting
along Yemen’s
west coast is
closing-in on
the port city
of Hodeida. The
city is tense,
amid media
reports of
airstrikes
inside the
city, most
notably in the
Al-Doraihimi
District and
the Southern
part of
Hodeida
governorate.
NRC has not
evacuated our
staff in
Hodeida, but
we continue to
monitor the
situation
extremely
closely." NRC
Country
Director in
Yemen Mohamed
Abdi said: "The
UK government
has warned aid
agencies that
it has
received
information
from Coalition
forces the
city will be
attacked in
the coming
days. Any
attack will
have
catastrophic
consequences
for civilians
– risking
hundreds of
thousands of
lives. We call
on all parties
to the
conflict to
refrain from
any further
military
activities in
and around
Hodeida city. We
urge the US,
UK and France
– as those
country that
can influence
the Coalition
- to
immediately
issue a clear
and
unequivocal
warning
against an
attack on
Hodeida city
or port." As to
the UK, Inner
City Press has
also since 2017
been pursuing
from the
Foreign and
Commonwealth
Office
information
about Yemen
under the
Freedom of
Information
Act 2000. In
February 2018,
after 170
days, FCO
denied Inner
City Press'
request in
full. Inner
City Press
immediately
sought an
internal
review and FCO. Now
that has resulted
in the
release of
some superficial
documents about
Yemen, here, including for
example "7.
The UN Special
Envoy has said
the next round
of peace talks
are not likely
to start
before the end
of March.
[REDACTED] The
next phase of
preparations needs
to focus on
reinforcing
efforts of the
Military
De-escalation
and
Coordination
Committee.
Meanwhile, HMG
is continuing
to work
closely with
the UN,
US and World
Bank on the
socio-economic
confidence
building
measures.
8. Military
activity
continues with
isolated
clashes
throughout the
country. [REDACTED]
Since December
there has been
significant
military
movement around
Sana’a
[REDACTED]
there are
reports of
Houthi/Saleh
forces moving from
Taiz to
reinforce
positions in
Sana’a.
[REDACTED]
Houthi/Saleh
forces
continue to
target Saudi
Arabia with
ballistic
missiles with
accuracy." The
rest is,
for example,
about interest in
women in the failing
peace process,
and the denial of
all other
records. The
"internal
review" denial
letter
states, "The
disclosure of
information
detailing our
relationship
with the Yemen
and Cameroon
governments
could
potentially
damage the
bilateral
relationship
between the UK
and Yemen and
Cameroon. This
would reduce
the UK
government's
ability to
protect and
promote UK
interests
through its
relations with
Yemen and
Cameroon which
would not be
in the public
interest. For
these reasons
we consider
that, the
public
interest in
maintaining
this exemption
outweighs the
public
interest in
disclosing
it." Yes, the
UK promotes
its interests.
We will be
pursuing this
- watch this
site. On
June 11, even
as Doctors
Without Borders
MSF said that "this
morning's
attack on an
MSF cholera
treatment
center by the
Saudi and
Emirati-led
coalition
(SELC) shows
complete
disrespect for
medical
facilities and
patients,"
Guterres took
three
pre-picked
questions and
claimed
there is a
"lull" in
fight in
Yemen. Do they
not have the
Internet on his
38th floor of
the UN? Or is
this the effect of
The Check,
like some say
of the Golden
Statue? Inner
City Press,
not called on
and with the
noon briefing
canceled by
Dujarric,
audibly asked
Guterres about
the bombing of
the MSF clinic.
Periscope
video here.
Nothing. On
Sunday June 10
the UN
Security
Council has
scheduled a closed
door meeting
on Yemen
for June 11 at 11 am.
Inner City
Press asked
the Presidency of
the Council
for June who
requested it
and who will do the
briefing.
The response
was that both
the UN
Department of
Political
Affairs and OCHA
will brief and
that the UK
requested it.
On the UK
Mission's twitter
feed, nothing.
And the UK
Foreign and
Commonwealth
Office denied
in full Inner
City Press's
Freedom of Information
Act request
about Yemen. Two hours
before the
UNSC briefing
US Secretary
of State Mike
Pompeo
issued this
statement: "The
United States
is closely
following
developments
in Hudaydah,
Yemen. I
have spoken
with Emirati
leaders and
made clear our
desire to
address their
security
concerns while
preserving the
free flow of
humanitarian
aid and
life-saving
commercial
imports.
We expect all
parties to
honor their
commitments to
work with the
UN Office of
the Special
Envoy of the
Secretary
General for
Yemen on this
issue, support
a political
process to
resolve this
conflict,
ensure
humanitarian
access to the
Yemeni people,
and map a
stable
political
future for
Yemen." We'll
have more on
this. On
June 7, Inner
City Press
asked Dujarric
again, UN transcript
here: Inner
City Press: in
terms of
Yemen, just in
terms of
Martin
Griffiths and
his plan, it
seems like
the… the
Norwegian
Refugee
Council (NRC)
has called on
the Saudi-led
coalition to
investigate
the… a bomb
that fell
right next to
its facility
in Sana’a on 5
June.
And I'm just
wondering,
one, is Mr.
Griffiths or
whoever here
in the
Secretariat is
looking at
this, are they
satisfied with
the way in
which the
Saudi-led
coalition has
investigated
and acted on
its
bombs?
And what's the
status of the
children and
armed conflict
report, which
I know last
year they were
upgraded in
terms of
their attempts
to minimize
civilian
casualties.
And it looks
like NRC is
saying these
steps are not
having any
impact.
Spokesman:
Well, the
report should
be out
soon.
The report
will be
looking at the
year of
2017.
Right?
But it will be
sent to the
Council
probably not…
next couple
weeks, not too
long from
now. We
have been
continuously
concerned with
the civilian
death toll,
the attacks on
civilians, the
attack on
civilian
infrastructure.
And we have
repeatedly
called on the
coalition and
other parties
to fully
investigate
those
incidents." Back
on June 1
Inner City
Press asked UN
Security Council President
for June
Vassily
Nebenzia, who
said that
seizing
Hodeida would
not accomplish
much and that
he hoped UN envoy
Martin
Griffiths
would be in
Sana'a soon
to speak
with the
Houthis. On
June 2 Martin
Griffiths
landed,
perhaps as the
velvet glove of
the Saudi
and UAE military offensive.
Shouldn't the
UN be
providing more
transparency,
rather
than a Secretary
General who refuses
to answer even
budget
questions and
still restricts
the
Press?
On June 5,
Inner City
Press asked Jonathan
Allen the
deputy
ambassador of
the UK,
penholder on
Yemen, about
requests to
help seize
Hodeida. UN
video here. From the
UK transcript:
Inner City
Press: As the
penholder on
Yemen, what do
you make of
these requests
to the US to
help with
taking over
the port of
Hodeida.
What’s the
status of your
view of what’s
happening on
the ground? Amb Allen: "I’ve
seen those
reports as
well. We
support
everything
Martin
Griffiths is
trying to do
to bring about
a political
solution in
Yemen. That’s
vital. He will
be talking to
the parties
and he’ll be
bringing
forward
proposals in
due course so
we wait to see
what he has to
say about
that." And what
happens until
then? Is
Griffiths
essentially
trying to talk
the Houthis
into giving up
Hodeida?
On May 29
in
response to
Inner City
Press'
question, Dujarric
said, "We are
extremely
concerned
about the
situation
around Hodeida [and
have]
already
started to
take
precautionary
measures in
terms of
ramping up
assistance and
redefining
contingency
plans in case
there is
further
escalation.Increased
fighting would
unleash even
more
internally
displaced
people."
(Agence France
Presse AFP
wrote it up as
if the UN
had said it
unilateral, a
proactive statement
- but it was a
response to the
Press. If the
UN was so concerned,
why didn't it
say anything until
asked?)
Inner City
Press on May 7
asked the
Deputy UN
Ambassador of
the UK,
penholder on
Yemen and arms
seller to
Saudi Arabia,
a Yemen
question on
which they
were, they
said, to
revert, see
Periscope
video here
and below. But
in three
days, there had
been no
response from
the UN Mission
of the UK,
which this
year denied in
full Inner
City Press'
request
about Yemen
and Cameroon
under the UK
Freedom of
Information
Act. So on May
10 Inner City
Press asked
again, video here.
And soon this
comment, from
a Spokesperson
for the UK
Mission: “The
UK is closely
following the
situation on
the Yemeni
island of
Socotra. We
continue to
engage all
parties to
reinforce
Yemen’s
sovereignty
and
territorial
integrity, as
well as the
need for
de-escalation.
The Yemeni
people have
already
suffered
immeasurably
as a result of
the ongoing
conflict in
Yemen. Yemen
cannot afford
further
divisions. We
call on all
parties to the
conflict to
support the
UN-led
political
process." A day
earlier on
May 9, the US
State
Department
issued this:
"The United
States is
closely
following the
situation on
the Yemeni
island of
Socotra and
engaging with
all parties to
reinforce
Yemen’s
sovereignty
and
territorial
integrity, as
well as the
need for
de-escalation
and
dialogue.
Political
dialogue is
necessary for
the Republic
of Yemen
Government to
rightfully
ensure the
safety and
security of
its residents
on Socotra and
throughout the
rest of the
country.
The Socotra
archipelago
has been
designated by
UNESCO as a
World Heritage
site.
The Yemeni
people, along
with their
unique
cultural and
natural
heritage, have
already
suffered
immeasurably
as a result of
the ongoing
conflict in
Yemen.
Yemen cannot
afford further
divisions.
The United
States calls
on all parties
to the
conflict to
focus on and
embrace the
UN-led
political
process, with
the unified
aim of a safe,
secure, and
prosperous
Yemen." At to
the UN, the
occasion for
the check
giving was
Guterres
accepting a
$930 million
check for the
2018 Yemen
Humanitarian
Response Plan.
But that's not
the only
buying going
on. Former UN
Yemen envoy
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
reportedly
went to the
United Arab
Emirates
seeking a paid
job like
Bernardino
Leon got
there,
negotiated
while still
with the UN.
The UAE is
also said to
be looking for
a place or
landing for UN
counter-terrorism
official
Jahangir Khan.
Would this be
ethical? Inner
City Press
asked that on
April 25, see
below - and on
May 3 asked
about the
UAE's
deployment on
Socotra
Island. UN
transcript here and
below. And
while the UN
and envoy
Martin
Griffiths have
had nothing to
say, now even
Hadi is
complaining.
“The
government is
considering
sending a
letter to the
United Nations
demanding the
dismissal of
the Emiratis
from the
Yemeni
intervention,”
a Hadi
official said,
adding that
"the UAE has
occupied the
airport and
seaport of
Socotra
island,
despite the
Yemeni
government's
presence
there. What
the UAE is
doing in
Socotra is an
act of
aggression."
And the UN and
its envoy
remain silent.
On May 7 Inner
City Press
asked UK
Ambassador
Allen about it
and he said he
was not aware,
his spokesman
would revert.
Here's what
Inner City
Press asked
the UN on May
3: Inner City
Press: on
Yemen, and
it's a
specific
question, the
UAE (United
Nations Arab
Emirates) has
deployed some
100 soldiers
to Socotra
Island, which
is a UNESCO
World Heritage
Site.
And the
residents
there — it's
part of
Yemen.
It's not part
of the UAE —
have been
protesting
it. And
I'm wondering
whether it's
something that
Mr. Martin
Griffiths is
aware of and
whether he
thinks it's a…
complies with…
even with
international
law or is a
useful step to
have the UAE
making a
military
deployment on
Yemen Socotra
Island.
Deputy
Spokesman:
"We haven't
made any
comment on
this.
I'll see
whether
there's any
particular
position that
Mr. Griffiths
is
taking.
But his work,
as you know,
is focused
primarily on
making sure
that the
parties to the
Yemen peace
process get
back to the
table." Six
hours later,
nothing from
Haq or
Griffiths. On
April 25 Inner
City Press
asked
Guterres'
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric, UN
transcript here: Inner
City Press:
There are
published
reports that
the United
Arab Emirates
(UAE) is
seeking to
create an
offer position
to Mr.
Jehangir Khan,
a current UN
official, in
the same way
that
Bernardino
León moved
from being the
UN envoy in
Libya to
working for
the diplomatic
one.
It's said that
they're
seeking a
counter-terrorism
post for
him.
It's also said
that Mr.
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed
recently
visited the
UAE and sought
a UAE-funded
position.
I don't know…
can you
distinguish…
one, would it
be against UN
rules for a
current UN
official to be
seeking a job…
Spokesman:
First of all,
on Mr.
Jehangir Kahn,
as far as I
understand,
those reports
are
false.
Second…
Inner
City
Press:
Ismail Ould
Cheikh Ahmed.
Spokesman:
…On Ismail
Ould Cheikh
Ahmed, he no
longer works
with the
United
Nations, so I
have no way to
verify what
his
whereabouts
are. And
I know that he
discharged his
role as
Special Envoy
with complete
impartiality
and only
keeping the
interests of
the United
Nations at the
centre of his
work.
Inner City
Press:
Are there any
kind of what's
called
anti-revolving-door
provisions?
Meaning, would
the
Secretary-General
view it as
normal and
fine if a
recent UN
official went
to work, you
could say it's
hypothetical,
but since it
happened in
the case
Bernardino
León, what are
the current
rules and best
practices for
UN officials
when they
leave a UN
post?
Spokesman:
I think
everyone
expects people
to use their
best
judgment.
Evelyn?"
We'll
have more on this.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in
the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-2015 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
for
|