IMF
Answers ICP on
Austerity in
Jamaica, Not
on Antigua
Corruption
Case
By Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
October 29 --
Amid
complaints
about the
impact of
International
Monetary Fund
programs,
Inner City
Press on
October 29
asked IMF
spokesperson
Gerry Rice “in
Jamaica, the
National
Democratic
Movement has
blamed the IMF
for the
country's
'health-care
system
becoming a
national
disgrace.'
What is the
IMF's
response?”
Rice
during the
IMF's
embargoed
briefing read
out this
question,
audio here,
and said he
does not
agree, that
Jamaica's
2015-16 budget
includes an
increase for
the Ministry
of Health. Audio
of full answer
here.
The IMF
left
unanswered,
for now, Inner
City Press'
question about
Antigua
and Barbuda,
below; there
will be more
about Dominica.
The IMF,
it seems,
should be more
responsive:
the Gleaner
for example
opines that
“in 2014,
Jamaica paid
$138 million
more to the
IMF than it
received from
it. We are
constantly
being told
Jamaica passed
the IMF test.
Look at the
punitive
primary
surplus
imposed on
Jamaica. At
7.5%, it is
way above what
is being asked
of any other
country in the
IMF program.
It is 4% for
Cyprus, 3% for
Ireland, 3%
for Greece, 3%
for Portugal
and a puny 1%
for Ukraine.
One has to
wonder why
Jamaica is
being treated
this way.”
Here
are two other
questions
Inner City
Press
submitted on
October 29,
still without
answer:
On Antigua
& Barbuda,
in light of
recent
comments by
IMF Mission
Chief Arnold
McIntyre, what
is the IMF's
view of and
comment on the
information in
the US FBI's
charge sheet
and indictment
of Antigua's
former
ambassador
(and former UN
PGA) John
Ashe,
particularly
with regard to
corruption in
the country?
In light of
the UN Special
Rapporteur's
report on
human rights
(non)
compliance by
the World
Bank,
presented this
week at the
UN, please
summarize how
the IMF
considers the
human rights
impacts on its
decisions.
We'll
have more on
this.
On September
17 amid the
refugee
crisis, Inner
City Press
asked IMF
spokesperson
Gerry
Rice
"what does the
IMF see as its
role in the
current
refugee
crisis, both
some countries
of arrival,
and in the
countries
people are
leaving?"
Rice
replied, in
the televised
briefing:
I want to take
a question
from our
colleague
[Inner City
Press] because
he’s asking
about another
issue that’s
very much on
our minds I
think these
days which is
-- he’s asking
what does the
IMF see as its
role in the
current
refugee
crisis, both
countries of
arrival and
countries
where people
are leaving.
Well the first
thing I’d say
is obviously
this is a
massive
humanitarian
crisis. The
concern first
and foremost
is for the
people
effected and
the IMF shares
that concern.
The magnitude
of the crisis
is indeed
extraordinary.
As you know
European
political
leaders are
working
together on
the response
and we believe
managing the
crisis will
indeed require
collective
concerted
action. On the
implications
which he was
asking about,
on the
economic cost,
on the fiscal
dimensions,
obviously the
crisis is
still
evolving, so
it’s too early
for us to
estimate
specific
fiscal impact.
It’s going to
be case by
case in terms
of countries,
however past
international
experience
with surges in
immigration
suggest the
speed with
which
immigrants are
integrated
into the labor
force is a
crucial
factor.
On the
European
dimension of
this crisis
there are many
factors at
play and it’s
difficult to
make again an
economic
assessment at
this moment
but we are
working on it
and we will be
coming back to
you in due
course on
this. I just
want to
finally
mention that
Europe is not
the only
region
affected by
this issue.
Many countries
in the Middle
East and North
Africa, for
example,
perhaps most
notably Jordan
and Lebanon
have been
hosting large
numbers of
refugees from
conflict areas
including Iraq
and Syria and
they have been
shouldering
heavy burdens
in
accommodating
the refugees
basic needs
for multiple
years now.
The IMF has
been involved
in this issue
in terms of
dialogue, in
terms of
urging the
international
community and
most
specifically
in our
programs where
needed and
where
appropriate.
We have been
trying to
create -- help
countries
create the
fiscal space
which is
something that
we can help
them with
specifically.
Create the
fiscal space
to accommodate
some of these
large refugee
issues. This
was the case
for example in
Jordan
recently."
We'll have
more on this.
Inner
City Press
also asked the
IMF, "In
Tunisia,
Managing
Director
Lagarde was
quoted that
'It is
necessary to
really work
and to
consider that
these economic
reforms are a
priority,
decisive.' Can
you say if
these reforms
include ending
or limited
subsidies and
tax increases
on, for
example,
gasoline? What
process and
timeline does
the IMF
envision for
Tunisia?"
After
the embargoed
briefing
ended, this
was provided
by IMF:
“These reforms
include a
sound banking
system, a more
efficient
government and
civil service,
a fair and
efficient tax
system,
investment-oriented
public
spending, a
business
environment
more conducive
to investor
risk taking,
and a modern
social safety
net are key to
maintaining
growth and
creating jobs
in Tunisia. On
energy subsidy
reforms, the
decline in
international
oil prices led
to a 1.6
percent of GDP
decline in
energy
subsidies in
2015. What is
important next
is to make
sure that the
decline in
energy
subsidies
remains
sustainable
through the
implementation
of a new
automatic fuel
price formula,
which is
expected by
the end of
this year.
"The IMF
envisions that
key reforms in
the banking
sector—completion
of the public
bank
recapitalization
process, and
adoption of
key laws such
as the banking
and bankruptcy
laws—as well
as adoption of
a tax package
aimed at
promoting
greater
equity,
efficiency and
simplification—
are
implemented by
the end of
2015, which is
when the
current
arrangement is
set to
expire.”
Inner
City Press
asked the IMF,
"what is the
IMF's response
to the
argument by
the Minority
group in
Ghana's
Parliament for
the IMF deal
to placed
before the
legislature
for
review?"
Rice said the
IMF leaves
that up to the
nation
concerned,
it's a matter
of national
legislation.
A new
International
Monetary Fund
study, out
from embargo
on September
15, says
that
"financial
inclusion is
mentioned
under several
of the United
Nations
Sustainable
Development
Goals (SDGs)"
and that "this
year’s
post-2015
Development
Agenda
squarely puts
financial
inclusion as a
key objective
for United
Nations member
countries."
So how
will real
financial
inclusion be
addressed
during the UN
General
Assembly
ministerial
week, from on
September 28
with
Presidents
Obama of the
US and Buhari
of Nigeria,
through Peru
on September
29 and India
on October 1?
Inner
City Press
asked the IMF
on September
3, and will be
asking
countries. Of
the above
named
countries, the
IMF report
("Financial
Inclusion: Can
It Meet
Multiple
Macroeconomic
Goals?" by
Ratna Sahay,
Martin Cihák,
Papa N’Diaye,
Adolfo
Barajas,
Srobona Mitra,
Annette Kyobe,
Yen Nian Mooi,
and Seyed Reza
Yousefi)
states
"Nigeria: The
comprehensive
Financial
Inclusion
Strategy in
2012 aims to
reduce the
exclusion rate
from 46
percent of the
adult
population (in
2010) to 20
percent by
2020. Working
across key
stakeholders,
the strategy
seeks to
address five
major barriers
to financial
inclusion: (1)
income; (2)
physical
access; (3)
financial
literacy; (4)
affordability;
and (5)
eligibility.
"Peru:
e-money. The
authorities
have taken
various
measures to
expand access
and usage of
financial
services. In
2014 the
“financial
inclusion
opportunities
map,” an
interactive
tool, was
launched. It
promotes an
innovative
“Peruvian
model” based
on the 2012
electronic
e-money
legislation
and a new
unified mobile
payments
platform that
links various
providers of
financial
services with
customers.
"India: the
Reserve Bank
of India’s
long-standing
policy on
priority
sector lending
(PSL) requires
banks to set
aside 40
percent of
their assets
to priority
sectors. Most
public sector
banks meet
this
requirement,
but end up
with high
nonperforming
loans and
concentrated
credit
risk.
Recently, the
Pradhan
Mantri Jan
Dhan Yojana
[PMPDY], a
financial
inclusion
initiative,
was launched
with the goal
of opening a
bank account
for every
household."
India's seems
like a
particularly
illuminating
approach,
including to
the US, of
which the
report states
"The United
States: the
recently
completed
Financial
Sector
Assessment
Program (FSAP)
(IMF, 2015d)
calls for
financial
inclusion to
feature more
prominently on
the U.S.
policy
agenda. The
Global Findex
survey ranks
the United
States 27th
out of 147
countries in
terms of the
percentage of
adults with a
bank account
in a formal
financial
institution,
and a 2013
Federal
Deposit
Insurance
Corporation
(FDIC) survey
finds that 20
percent of
U.S.
households are
'underbanked'
and 8 percent
are
'unbanked.'
More work is
needed."
We, and NCRC,
will have more
on this.
Back on
September 3
when the
International
Monetary Fund
resumed its
biweekly
embargoed
media
briefings,
Inner City
Press
submitted four
questions.
Inner City
Press asked:
"Who from the
IMF is coming
to the UN
General
Assembly (and
SDGs, etc)
week in late
September, and
what is their
program? What
meeting will
they
participate
in? What do
they hope to
accomplish?"
IMF Deputy
Spokesperson
William Murray
answered, as
fast
transcribed by
InnerCityPro:
“Matthew, and
others, the
Managing
Director is
scheduled to
attend the
UNGA
particularly
the SDGs
segment in
late
September.
There was a
previous
meeting in
Addis Ababa we
participated
in at a high
level that
dealt with the
SDGs... The
IMF's
Executive
Board recently
endorsed a 50%
increase in
access to all
the funds
concessional
lending
facilities and
to maintain a
0% rate for
low income
countries that
struggle with
disasters and
conflict. The
Executive
Board of the
Fund has
endorsed IMF's
engagement in
sustainable
inclusive
growth, on
which we'll be
elaborating in
the weeks and
months to
come.”
One
focus should
be financial
inclusion, on
which we'll
have more
during UNGA
week.
In the
meanwhile,
Murray also
said Managing
Director
Christine
Lagarde is
about to
arrive in
Ukraine for
"opportunistic"
meetings with
the
authorities,
and an IMF
mission team
will go there
on September
22.
On
September 3,
Inner City
Press also
submitted
questions
about Nepal
and Grenada,
as well as
this:
"In Indonesia
the Vice
Speaker of the
House of
Representatives
Taufik
Kurniawan
recently said,
'We do not ask
for IMF
support in
crisis;' at
the UN in NY
on Sept 2, the
Vice
Chairman of
the House of
Representatives
of Indonesia
H. Fadli Zon
told Inner
City Press
much the same
thing. What is
the IMF's
response to
these
criticisms or
resistance to
the IMF, from
elected
representatives
of the country
where the IMF
now plans its
2018 Annual
Meetings?"
We hope
to receive
answers.
Back on
July 8 when
the
International
Monetary Fund
released
reviews and
papers about
the United
States,
complete with
support of the
Dodd Frank Act
and mentions
of anti money
laundering
protection
Inner City
Press asked
about the
proposal to
raise the
definition of
Systemically
Important
Financial
Institution
from $50
billion up to
$500 billion
and if tight
AML strictures
are to blame
for cutting
off
remittances to
Somalia.
Aditya
Narain, IMF
mission chief
for the
Financial
Sector
Assessment
Program and
deputy
director,
Monetary and
Capital
Markets
department,
told Inner
City Press
that the IMF
believes such
definition
should give
predictability,
but should be
based on risk
and not
necessarily
only asset
size.
Narain
told Inner
City Press,
"On the first
one, our
general belief
is that
supervisory
approaches
should be risk
based, and
therefore the
materiality
and
proportionality
of
institutions
should be
taken into
account for to
develop
supervisory
frameworks. At
the same time,
we also
recognize that
it’s important
to have some
clear rules,
regarding a
unit, in this
case size of
institutions,
because not
only does it
set a baseline
of
expectations,
but it also
provides a
useful
framework for
people to
anchor their
expectations
on. So that’s
why, in a
sense we would
agree that
it’s important
to make these
approaches
risk based and
therefore not
dependent on
size alone. I
should add
also, that our
only political
ideology is
financial
stability, for
the purpose of
this exercise.
But
will this be
used FOR the
Senator
Richard Shelby
draft bill?
On
remittances,
Aditya Narain
said it is an
important
question but
one that the
IMF is dealing
with in other
venues; it
apparently
wasn't raised
to the US
during this
process. Why
not?
Narain
told Inner
City Press,
"On the
regulatory
question, this
is an issue
which is being
discussed in
several forums
where the IMF
has been
participating,
and this is an
issue not just
for the US,
although it
has been most
discussed in
the context of
the US, but
the effects of
the AML on
remittances
and the
result, the
stringent
adherence to
standards has
led to a
concern more
globally that
might be
affecting the
flow of
remittances to
those
jurisdictions...
where such
remittances
and the
channels
through which
they flow are
more
important. We
have not
discussed
this... there
is work
ongoing in the
Fund,
including in
collaboration
with other
institutions
like the World
Bank... and we
expect to be
able to have
more
information on
this in a few
months time."
In the
embargoed
media
conference
call, two
questions in a
row went to
the Financial
Times, which
opined that
the IMF report
takes the side
of the
Democratic
Party. The IMF
disagreed. The
IMF said, in
writing, “As
the epicenter
of the global
financial
crisis that
began in 2008,
the United
States passed
a major law in
2010, the
Dodd-Frank
Act, to reform
its financial
system.
Officials need
to complete
the rulemaking
under the law,
while parts of
reform agenda
face
legislative
proposals to
water them
down.”
Central
Banking asked
two questions
and Reuters
one, on
federal
insurance
regulation.
Watch this
site.
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2015 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|