IMF
Urges Afghans
To Seek Kabul
Bank Assets,
Impunity Like
US
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, May
21 -- With Afghanistan
in transition,
the
International
Monetary Fund
today issued a
report that
"several
reforms have
been delayed."
On banks, the
IMF's Article
IV review says
“Directors
concurred
that continued
efforts are
needed to
strengthen the
banking
system and
promote
financial
deepening.
They
encouraged the
central
bank to
monitor the
banking system
closely and
enforce
prudential
regulations
decisively.
They looked
forward to the
rapid
implementation
of the
strategic plan
for
strengthening
financial
sector
supervision
and
recommended
the prompt
passage and
implementation
of the new
banking law,
amendments to
the central
bank
law, and
provisions to
assure
adequate legal
protection of
central
bank
supervisory
staff. They
encouraged
stronger
efforts to
recover
Kabul Bank
assets and
finalize the
privatization
of New Kabul
Bank.”
Last week John
Sopko, the US
special
inspector
general for
Afghanistan
reconstruction
(SIGAR), said
that the 2010
collapse of
Kabul Bank was
triggered by
$935 million
skimmed and
stolen, 92% of
it by a mere
19 people. He
said, “it
shows how the
patronage
system and the
failure to
prosecute
people guilty
of gross fraud
and abuse is
undermining
the Afghan
economy.”
Then again,
there have
been few
prosecutions
for even
larger,
predatory
lending
triggered bank
failures in
the United
States.
While Ukraine
and Greece
were the
subjects of
the first six
questions
taken at the
International
Monetary
Fund's May 8
embargoed
briefing, the
IMF impacts
countries all
over the
world.
On May 8 and again
on May 13,
we covered
Ghana.
On
Ghana, Inner
City Press
asked: the
Secretary-General
of the Trades
Union Congress
Kofi Asamoah
spoke out on
May Day
against the
government
seeking an IMF
program. What
does the IMF
make of it,
and would the
IMF consult
with such
opponents if a
program were
requested?
On May 8, spokesperson
Gerry Rice
answered:
I have
a couple of
questions. And
I'll take some
of them and
get back on
other ones
off-line. On
Ghana, the
Secretary
General of the
Trade Union
Congress spoke
out on May Day
against the
government
seeking an IMF
program. What
does the IMF
make of it and
would the IMF
consult with
such opponents
if a program
were
requested?
Just
to remind, the
Ghanaian
authorities
have not
requested a
new program
from the IMF.
The Board, our
Board
discussed the
Article IV
review on
Ghana on May
the 5th, and
we will have a
press release
on that in due
course.
Let me
just add, as
usual, the IMF
consults with
a wide range
of
stakeholders,
and in
particular the
Ghana team has
had meetings
with the Trade
Union during
its visits to
Accra to
exchange views
on the
country's
outlook and
challenges.
Now
the
press release
is out,
stating among
other things
that
In
light of
current
imbalances,
Directors
recommended a
more ambitious
medium-term
consolidation
path to
stabilize
public debt
and debt
service at
sustainable
levels. While
the risk of
debt distress
remains
moderate,
Directors
expressed
concerns about
the high debt
service-to-revenue
ratio. A
stronger
medium-term
adjustment
could set off
a virtuous
cycle of lower
fiscal
deficits and
falling
interest
rates,
creating space
for social and
infrastructure
spending and
crowding-in of
private sector
activity.
We'll
have more on
this "virtuous
cycle" and
"crowing in of
private sector
activity." On
May 8, Inner
City Press
also asked:
In
Pakistan, PTI
Information
Secretary KPK
and MNA Ayesha
Gulalai has
said, “it is
very
unfortunate
that
Pakistan's
budget is
being prepared
by the IMF in
Dubai..
instead of
taxing the 4
million
wealthy
identified by
the FBR,
burden is
being passed
on to the
already
burdened
masses.” What
is the IMF's
response?
On
Madagascar,
when George
Tsibouris on
May 6 said the
government
agreed to
"address the
issue of fuel
price
subsidies over
time," can you
be more
specific on
how much time
the IMF
envisions?
Also, can the
IMF be more
specific about
what is
referred to by
"creating a
level playing
field for the
private
sector"?
While
the Managing
Director is in
Morocco, can
you answer if
Western Sahara
is included by
the IMF in
Morocco's
data, and what
impact the IMF
believes the
Western Sahara
issue has on
Morocco's
economy and
economic
prospects?
This
last one,
Inner City
Press
also asked two
weeks ago,
and again more
recently on
connection
with the IMF's
Ukraine
program. It
was not
answered,
during or
since Managing
Director
Lagarde's trip
to Morocco.
Watch this
site.
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2014 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|