On Sri
Lanka, IMF
Tells ICP External
Debt Cost's
Issue for
Creditors, Not
It
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
March 12,
updated -- At
the
International
Monetary
Fund's
biweekly
embargoed
briefing on
February
19,
Inner City
Press asked
IMF
spokesperson
Gerry Rice
"In
Sri Lanka, the
IMF
Post-Program
Monitoring
mission led by
IMF official
Todd Schneider
concluded
there is no
urgent need,
while others
say there's a
need to retire
or refinance
high cost
external debt
and that 'the
IMF last year
warned the
island was
vulnerable to
sudden
external
shocks due to
high levels of
foreign
commercial
borrowings.'
What is the
IMF's view of
Sri Lanka's
debt and the
new
government's
position?"
Not during the
briefing --
then, Rice
responded to
Inner City
Press question
about Yemen --
but some hours
afterwards,
the following
response
arrived,
attributable
to IMF
Spokesperson
Gerry Rice:
“The
staff’s view
of Sri Lanka’s
debt position
has not
changed since
the Article
IV
consultation,
which
highlighted
the high
external debt
burden and a
rising cost
for external
financing as
Sri Lanka
shifts to
middle-income
status and
bilateral
concessional
debt is
replaced with
borrowing on
commercial
terms. The
accompanying
debt
sustainability
analysis (DSA)
assessed Sri
Lanka’s public
and publicly
guaranteed
debt as
elevated, and
subject to a
number of
risks, but
sustainable
over the
medium-term.
“The recent
mission’s
statement was
that there is
no immediate
balance of
payments need,
as Sri Lanka
maintains
central bank
foreign
exchange
reserves in
excess of
three months
of import
cover, and the
overall
balance of
payments is
projected to
improve with
the recent
decline in oil
prices.
The appears to
be
concerned
about the high
cost of some
public
external debt
and is
exploring
options for
reducing the
interest
burden and
increasing
fiscal space.
This is an
issue between
Sri Lanka and
its
(bilateral)
creditors.”
Next, we'll
turn to those
creditors. Can
you say,
String of pearls?
Watch this
site.
After
Sri Lanka's
new government
spoke of doing
another local
investigation
into war
crimes in
2009, and
asking for a
suspension of
the UN Human
Rights Council
process, Inner
City Press on
February 13
went to
Foreign
Minister
Mangala
Samaraweera's meeting
with UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon.
No other media
at the UN
attended; only
the UN's own
in-house UN
Photo and UN
TV. But
accompanying
Mangala
Samaraweera
were outgoing
Ambassador
Palitha Kohona
and others. Video
here.
Ban Ki-moon,
before Inner
City Press was
whisked out of
the meeting,
told Mangala
Samaraweera he
had met him
after the
tsunami - that
is, when Ban
was a South
Korean
diplomat.
On February
17, after High
Commissioner
Prince Zeid
recomended and
got for Sri
Lanka a six
month deferral
of action,
Ban's deputy
spokesperson
Farhan Haq,
asked ofShavendra
Silva by IPS, said
"the
Secretary-General
is aware that
the new
administration
is planning to
set up a
domestic
accountability
mechanism and
will be
carefully
assessing
developments.
The
Secretary-General,
as you're
aware, met
with the
Minister of
External
Affairs of Sri
Lanka last
Friday, 13
February, and
stressed the
importance of
Sri Lanka to
show firm and
clear
commitment to
accountability,
reconciliation
and human
rights.
He also
encouraged the
Government to
engage
continuously
with the High
Commissioner
for Human
Rights.
Advancing
accountability,
like other
parts of the
post-war
agenda in Sri
Lanka, will
lay the basis
for the
country to
make further
progress on
peace,
democracy and
development.
The UN remains
committed to
support Sri
Lanka’s
efforts to
address the
postwar
agenda.
The
Secretary-General
is also aware
of reactions
from various
communities to
the decision
by the Human
Rights
Council, and
the
Secretary-General
will
positively
engage with
the new
Government and
support its
efforts."
This is
shameful all
around, in
light of talk
of
accountability.
Earlier
on March 12
Inner City
Pres also
asked Gerry
Rice:
"in
Yemen,
the World Bank
has suspended
its programs
due to the 'dangerous
political and
security
situation.'
What is the
status of the
IMF's
programs, and
its estimate
of impacts of
the Houthi /
Hadi
stand-off?"
Rice read out
the question
then replied,
We are
monitoring the
situation very
closely and
will be able
to say more
once it has
stabilized
just a bit.
But what if it
doesn't
stabilize?
On
Bangladesh, by
contrast, the
IMF's Rodrigo
Cubero on
March 10 said
" the
resurgence of
unrest in
recent months
is taking a
toll on the
economy..
upside risks
from
unrest-related
supply
disruptions...
Should calm be
restored and
uncertainty
abate, growth
should
strengthen to
6˝ percent in
FY16."
Of
this, Inner
City Press
submitted this
question to
the IMF:
On
Bangladesh, Mr
Cubero said
“should calm
be restored
and
uncertainty
abate, growth
should
strengthen to
6˝ percent in
FY16.” Does
the IMF
believe that
the
government's
crackdown
is the way to
restore calm
or another
approach
should be
used?
Update:
After the
briefing, an
IMF
Spokesperson
provided this
to Inner City
Press on Bangladeshh:
"Our
most recent
press release
summarizes our
views on the
economy and
the near-term
outlook – we
would not
comment beyond
that.”
Inner
City Press has
been told to
expect a
response to
its question
about Sri
Lanka, but not
yet for some
reason to this
one on Ghana:
On
Ghana and the
draft
agreement, is
there any
procedure for
civil society
organizations
to view it
before it goes
to the IMF
Board?
Does the draft
agreement
contain any
provisions on
access to
information?
Watch this
site.
Previously,
on February 5,
Rice answered
on the IMF's
process in
Ghana (and in
Mongolia, see
below).
Inner City
Press asked
"In Ghana,
President
Mahama on Feb
3 said, 'Ghana
is committed
to securing an
IMF programme
and we are
confident that
we will reach
agreement with
the IMF by the
end of this
quarter.' What
is the process
/ status at
the IMF?"
IMF
spokesperson
Rice said
there has been
"good
progress," and
mentioned
"cleaning up
the payroll"
and "medium
term reforms,"
as well as
considering
the impact of
declining oil
prices.
On
August 28,
2014 on Ghana
Inner City
Press had
asked
“Convention
People’s Party
chair Samia
Nkrumah has
said, 'It will
be erroneous
to accept the
fact that IMF
conditionalities
could not be
rejected since
in 1965,
Ghana, under
the First
President, Dr
Kwame Nkrumah,
rejected the
proposal of
the IMF when
they
recommended
the sale of
national
assets such as
factories in
exchange for a
loan.' What is
the IMF's
response?”
Rice
then said that
the IMF team
will be in
Accra in
September.
Things have
moved since
then. But what
about
transparency?
On February 5
about
Mongolia,
Inner City
Press asked, "what
is the process
forward on
their request
for an IMF
stand-by
arrangement?
When will a
visit to the
country take
place?"
Rice replied,
"The IMF has
received a
request from
the Mongolian
authorities to
begin
discussions of
possible
support to
Mongolia. The
IMF will be
sending a team
to Ulaanbaatar
soon to
initiate these
discussions."
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2014 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|