IMF
Tells ICP "No
Time Line" on
Yemen or
Burundi, Is
Nepal "Qualified"?
By Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, May
28, updated --
On the day
Yemen talks
were supposed
to resume in
Geneva, but
were canceled
by the UN,
Inner City
Press asked
the
International
Monetary Fund
for the status
of its program.
IMF
spokesperson
William Murray
read out the
question --
"on Yemen,
given the
cancellation
or
postponement
of the talks
that had been
scheduled to
begin today
(May 28) in
Geneva, what
is the status
of the IMF's
program and
any review of
it?" -- then
read out a
response:
"I’ve
got 2 separate
questions from
Matthew Lee,
of Inner City
Press.
Matthew’s
question on
Yemen, given
the
cancellation
of talks,
what’s the
status of the
IMF’s program?
A: In
the context of
Yemen and the
IMF, the sit
is still under
review and
being closely
monitored. We
don’t have a
time line yet
established
for any active
resumption of
discussions
over
completion of
the review of
the existing
Yemen program.
The program is
still in place
but we’re
monitoring
developments
in Yemen. Come
back to us as
time goes on.
"
But
in place with
whom? Hadi in
exile? The
Houthis?
Likewise on Burundi,
Inner City
Press asked
Murray about
the status of
the IMF's
"pre-election"
program, now
that the legislative
elections have
been briefly
delayed, and
questions loom
over the
presidential
elections (the
UN Security
Council "penholder,"
France, told
Inner City
Press on May
27 that the
conditions for
elections are
not met).
Murray, citing
the "current
security situation,"
said
"Well,
another
situation
under review,
but let me
give you our
current view
on Burundi. Of
course the
background is
well known,
current
developments.
We are
following
those
developments
closely,
regarding the
extended
credit
facility,
that’s the
facility that
has been in
place for some
time. The
program was
recently
approved and
it’s fair to
say that given
current
security, and
political
issues, the
timing of our
next
discussion
with the
authorities is
yet to be
determined. We
shall continue
to monitor the
situation in
Burundi and if
possible, will
determine that
at a later
stage, when to
set the time
for a second
review of the
credit
facility."
On Nepal, on
which Inner
City Press
asked the IMF
again about
any debt
relief or use
of new
facilities,
Murray said:
"Just
to give you a
quick status
report on
Nepal, we had
a mission on
the ground,
they’ve done
an initial
assessment.
It’s not final
yet. They will
be going back
to Kathmandu
to complete
some analytics
because there
was another
very very
severe
earthquake.
There is a
plan for a
donors meeting
in late June,
June 25 I
believe, a lot
of that
analysis which
we’re also
doing on the
macro economic
front with the
World Bank and
other
multilateral
institutions,
that will all
feed into the
June 25 donors
conference, at
which point I
would expect a
very active
strategy for
Nepal to
surface. Right
off the top,
we have a
rapid credit
facility that
Nepal could
certainly have
access to,
which is one
option. In
terms of debt
relief, that
is pending
further
analysis. As
you know we’ve
had some
reforms in our
credit
facilities
that have
certain
conditions
attached to
how a country
can qualify
for debt
relief. It’s
unclear at
this juncture
whether Nepal
does or not,
but certainly
it’s under
review."
We'll
have more on
this.
Back on May
14, Inner City
Press asked
IMF
spokesperson
Gerry Rice:
"On Burundi,
after the
IMF's
announcement
of $6.9
million in the
run up to
elections, now
with General
Godefroid
Niyombare
saying Pierre
Nkurunziza is
no longer in
power, what is
the status of
the IMF's
funds and
program, when
will it be
reviewed?"
Rice
took this
question and
replied that
the "IMF is
following the
current
developments
in Burundi
very
closely.
The
Fund-supported
program that
was recently
approved, it's
fair to say
that given the
current
security
situation, the
timing of our
next
discussions
with the
authorities
has yet to be
determined."
Tw weeks
ago on April
30, the IMF
told Inner
City Press on
Burundi
"Many thanks
for your
question.
Please see our
line
below:
'We are
continuing to
monitor
developments
in Burundi.
Regarding the
ECF-supported
program that
was recently
approved, our
next meeting
with the
authorities is
tentatively
scheduled to
take place in
June, at which
time we will
assess
progress
toward the
completion of
the 7th
review.'"
So, no
more June?
On May
14 Rice also
answered Inner
City Press on
Nepal, saying
an IMF team is
"on the
ground" and
considering
all feasible
options. Debt
relief?
On
Ghana, ICP
asked "On
Ghana, does
the IMF have
any comment or
view on the
country upping
its monetary
policy rate up
to 22 percent,
and on the
decline in
value of the
cedi? How does
this impact
the IMF
program?"
The
IMF responded,
after the
briefing:
"We
welcome Bank
of Ghana's
commitment to
reduce
inflation and
bring it
gradually down
to its medium
term target,
as envisaged
under the
IMF-supported
program. The
increase in
the policy
interest rate
decided by
Bank of
Ghana's
monetary
policy
committee
yesterday (May
13) aims at
mitigating
inflationary
pressures,
such as those
related to the
depreciation
of the
exchange rate,
in order to
achieve the
inflation
objective."
On
Jamaica, ICP
asked "On
Jamaica, it is
reported that
the IMF's “new
chief of
missions to
Jamaica, Uma
Ramakrishnan,
said yesterday
that the
missing of the
nominal
primary
surplus target
by the country
under its
Extended Fund
Facility is
not a big
deal.” Can you
clarify the
IMF's position
on the missing
of this
target?"
The
IMF responded,
after the
briefing:
Here
is our answer
on Jamaica:
n The
staff team
that was in
Jamaica from
May 4-12
provided its
perspective on
this in the
press release
that was
issued on
Tuesday.
n
Implementation
of Jamaica’s
EFF-supported
reform program
remains
strong. All
quantitative
performance
targets
through
end-March were
met, with the
exception of
the target for
the primary
surplus of the
central
government,
which was
narrowly
missed as
revenue came
in lower than
projected in
2014/15.
n While
the target was
missed in
nominal
(Jamaican
dollar) terms,
the primary
surplus is
still
estimated at
7.5 percent of
GDP in
2014/15—the
central fiscal
anchor of the
program.
n At the
press
conference,
the team
explained that
deviations
under IMF
programs do
happen, and it
was also noted
that one
missed
performance
criterion over
eight reviews
is still an
exceptionally
strong
performance by
IMF standards.
n The
staff team
indicated that
in its view,
the
authorities
remain well on
track to
achieve the
central goals
of their
economic
reform
program, and
the team
explained that
a missed
performance
criterion can
be waived by
the IMF’s
Executive
Board under a
standard
procedure.