By
IMF on Yemen
and Zimbabwe
Inner City Press Is
Told of TA To
Central Bank
Zim Arrears
By Matthew
Russell Lee, CJR PFT NY
Post
NEW YORK CITY,
January 17– When
the
International
Monetary Fund
held its
biweekly
embargoed
media briefing
on January 17,
Inner City
Press
submitted six
questions including
two on Yemen
and Zimbabwe
which the
IMF answered.
Inner City
Press asked,
"On Yemen,
does the
agreement in
Stockholm
between the
Houthis and
the government
/ Saudi and
Emirati led
Coalition make
it more likely
that the IMF
can provide
the assistance
it has said it
wants to? What
is the IMF
doing now?"
Spokesperson
Gerry Rice
said while
advising
donors to
address the
humanitarian
crisis, the
armed conflict
makes it difficult
for the IMF to
do more. He
mentioned the
Central Bank,
offering technical
assistance,
and the
procurement of
needed food. On Zimbabwe,
Inner City Press
asked "On
Zimbabwe, what
is the status
of the
country's debt
arrears to the
IMF and
others, and
what is teh
IMF's comment
on the recent
unrest /
crackdown
there?" Rice
expressed
concern and added
that as long
as the country
is in arrears,
there can be
no program.
Here's from
the
transcript:
RICE: question
about the
status of
where we are
with Yemen.
And said did
the agreement
in Stockholm
between the
Houthis and
the
governance,
the government
of Saudi and
Emirati led
coalition make
it more likely
that the IMF
can provide
the assistance
it has said it
wants to? So
what is the
IMF doing
now? I
don’t have a
great deal of
update on
Yemen from
what I said
the last time
which is that,
you know,
given the
armed conflict
and the
humanitarian
crisis, you
know, we can
only, we the
IMF, can only
have a limited
role in Yemen.
We are of
course
encouraging
the donor
efforts to
focus on the
humanitarian
situation
there which is
of great
concern and
the UN of
course is in
the
lead.
What we are
doing is
continuing to
provide
technical
assistance to
the Central
Bank to
identify any
major capacity
gaps and
supporting the
authorities
and donors in
identifying
measures that
would help
mitigate that
humanitarian
crisis
including by
facilitating
imports of
basic food
staples and
paying the
civil service
wages in the
whole of
Yemen....
I'll take one
more online
and that's
about Zimbabwe
and asking for
the status of
where we are
with the
countries debt
and relation
with the IMF
and did we
have any
comment on the
unrest and the
government
crackdown
there is the
question.
So in answer
to that, I
would say that
of course
Zimbabwe is
facing major
challenges and
just in terms
of the unrest,
we encourage
all
stakeholders
to collaborate
peacefully in
developing and
implementing
policies that
will stabilize
the economy
and promote
sustainable
and inclusive
growth.
On the overall
economic
situation,
debt and the
IMF, there has
been no real
change in what
I have said
here recently
which is
Zimbabwe
continues to
be in a
difficult
situation
regarding debt
with
protracted
arrears to
official
creditors
including
multilateral
creditors such
as the World
Bank which
severely
limits
Zimbabwe's
access to
international
financial
support.
In terms of
the IMF,
Zimbabwe has
in fact
cleared its
arrears to us,
to the Fund,
but our rules
preclude
lending to a
country that
is still in or
under arrears
to other
international
financial
situations. So
until that
particular
situation is
resolved, we
would not be
moving forward
with a
financial
support for
Zimbabwe.
I said here
the last time
that the
authority's
economic
policies we
felt were
headed in the
right
direction
broadly in
terms of
addressing the
fiscal deficit
and monetary
policy and so
on. I won't
repeat what I
said the last
time but
that’s where
we are on
Zimbabwe."
Inner City
Press also
asked about
Cameroon, and
"In Tunisia,
the General
Labor Union
says it reject
the "contact"
made between
the Tunisian
government
IMF. TGLU
spokesman Sami
al-Taheri said
the suspected
"contact" is a
"clear
infringement
of [Tunisia's]
sovereignty,"
the TGLU
spokesman
stressed
during a news
conference.
It comes as
the TGLU
constantly
slams the
government
over
accusations of
being in talks
with IMF
officials over
"national
issues." What
is the status
of IMF
contacts with
the
government,
and its
response to
TGLU?
In
Kenya, Stanbic
Bank has urged
the government
to reconsider
taking up the
IMF's
precautionary
loan facility
to ease debt
payment. What
are the IMF's
thoughts?
In St
Kitts &
Nevis, Prime
Minister
Timothy Harris
on Jan 16 said
his
administration
is using the
option
available to
it on whether
or not to make
public the
IMF
report on the
2017 Article
IV
Consultation
with St. Kitts
and
Nevis.
“We are not
the only
country in the
last five
years who have
exercised that
option. The
IMF reports in
particular
indicate where
there are
special
circumstances
they have
obliged in the
non-publication
in the
non-publication
of reports for
the very
reasons the
financial
secretary
says. What are
the IMF's
views on
withholding
the report?"
We'll have
more on this.
When
the IMF issued
a statement
about Gabon on
December 19 it
was to disbursed $99
million, what some see as
an unmerited
holiday
president for
Ali Bongo. The IMF
said, "On
December 19,
2018, the
Executive
Board of the
International
Monetary Fund
(IMF)
completed the
third review
of Gabon’s
economic
program
supported by
an extended
arrangement
under the
Extended Fund
Facility [1].
Completion of
the review
enables the
immediate
disbursement
of SDR 71.43
million (about
US$99
million). This
brings total
disbursements
under the
arrangement so
far to SDR
285.72 million
(about
US$395.9
million).
In completing
the third
review, the
Executive
Board approved
the
authorities’
requests for
waivers of
nonobservance
of a
performance
criterion and
modification
of performance
criteria.
Gabon’s
three-year,
SDR 464.4
million
extended
arrangement
(about US$ 642
million at the
time of
approval), the
equivalent of
215 percent of
Gabon’s quota,
was approved
by the
Executive
Board on June
19, 2017 (see
Press Release
No. 17/233).
The
government’s
reform
program,
supported by
the IMF, aims
to restore
macroeconomic
stability and
lay the
foundation for
inclusive
growth. It
also seeks to
attain debt
sustainability
at the
national level
and contribute
to the
external
stability of
the Central
African
Economic and
Monetary Union
(CEMAC).
Following the
Executive
Board
discussion,
Mr. Mitsuhiro
Furusawa,
Deputy
Managing
Director and
Acting Chair,
made the
following
statement:
“Gabon’s
performance
under the EFF
arrangement
has improved.
The
authorities
have taken
important and
difficult
actions to
keep the
program on
track despite
the October
2018
legislative
elections.
However, the
economic
recovery
remains
fragile and
further fiscal
consolidation
and decisive
reforms are
needed to
achieve strong
and
sustainable
growth.
“The
authorities
are committed
to continuing
with growth-
friendly
fiscal
consolidation.
This requires
steadfast
implementation
of measures to
boost non-oil
revenues and
contain
non-priority
spending,
while
protecting
social and
investment
spending.
Enhancing
budgetary
execution and
oil revenue
management,
and further
improving cash
and debt
management are
also
priorities.
“Safeguarding
banking sector
stability is
essential for
growth. The
authorities
plan to
accelerate the
liquidation of
the three
distressed
banks and
expeditiously
tackle the NPL
overhang to
support
financial
stability,
promote credit
to the private
sector, and
growth.
“Gabon’s
program
continues to
be supported
by the
implementation
of supportive
policies and
reforms by the
regional
institutions
in the areas
of foreign
exchange
regulations
and monetary
policy
framework and
to support an
increase in
regional net
foreign
assets, which
are critical
to the
program’s
success.”"
When the IMF held
its biweekly
embargoed media
briefing on
November
15, Inner City
Press
asked four
questions, two of
which were
answered, see
below. The
next day on
November 16
the IMF issued
this, about Gabon,
without
mentioning the
health
much less
dictatorship of
Ali Bongo:
" The IMF team
has reached
staff-level
agreement with
the
authorities on
policies that
could support
Executive
Board’s
approval of
the third
review.
The economy is
recovering,
and important
steps have
been taken
since the
completion of
the second
review to keep
the program on
track.
· The mission
agreed with
the
authorities on
policies and
measures to
pursue
growth-friendly
fiscal
consolidation,
preserve
external
stability and
support
inclusive
growth. The
authorities
are committed
to speed up
reforms
implementation.
An
International
Monetary Fund
(IMF) mission
led by Boileau
Loko visited
Libreville [1]
during
November 7–16
to conduct
discussions on
the third
review of
Gabon’s
extended
arrangement
under the
Extended Fund
Facility
(EFF). [2]
At the
conclusion of
the IMF
mission, Mr.
Loko issued
the following
statement:
“Economic
activity is
recovering,
with growth
estimated at
about [1.2]
percent in
2018 up from
0.5 percent in
2017, despite
lower-than-expected
oil
production.
Inflation
increased to
3.4 percent
(12-month
average) in
September
2018,
reflecting
higher food
prices and the
pass through
of rising
international
oil prices.
Fiscal
performance at
end-September
was better
than expected,
thanks to
higher than
targeted
non-oil
revenue
collection.
The recovery
is expected to
firm up in
2019 and the
medium-term
outlook is
still
promising,
with GDP
growth
projected to
reach 3.1
percent in
2019 and 5
percent in the
medium term.
Downside risks
to the outlook
include the
failure to
implement the
planned fiscal
consolidation,
lower global
growth and a
marked
tightening of
global
financial
conditions.
Staff
commended the
authorities’
efforts to
improve
program
implementation
since the
second review.
Most
end-September
2018 targets
were met. Most
program-supported
structural
reforms were
implemented,
albeit with
some delays.
Fiscal
consolidation
remains a
priority under
the program.
The mission
took note of
the
authorities’
commitment to
implement all
critical
measures in
the 2018
supplementary
budget to meet
the end-year
fiscal deficit
target. Fiscal
policy in 2019
aims at
further
enhancing
non-oil
revenue
mobilization,
containing the
wage bill, and
improving the
composition of
public
spending to
provide space
for priority
social and
capital
expenditure.
Improving
budgetary
execution,
aligning
expenditure
commitments
and cash flows
plans, and
fully
operationalizing
the Treasury
Single Account
will
strengthen
transparency,
cash
management,
and budget
monitoring.
Continued
efforts are
also needed to
enhance debt
and cash
management to
prevent the
accumulation
of domestic
and external
arrears.
The mission
highlighted
the fiscal
risks posed by
public
agencies.
Despite some
progress, the
financial
position of
several public
agencies and
enterprises
remains
precarious,
and unless
improved, it
could
represent
significant
contingent
liabilities
for the
government.
The
authorities
have renewed
their
commitment to
tighten
controls on
special
accounts
spending.
The mission
underscored
the need to
speed up the
liquidation of
the three
distressed
banks and
expeditiously
tackle the NPL
overhang to
strengthen the
banking sector
and foster
credit to the
private
sector.
Further
improving the
business
environment is
also critical.
The mission
welcomed the
authorities’
commitment to
implementing
policies
consistent
with the
stability of
the region’s
monetary
arrangement.
Continued
fiscal
consolidation
and tangible
actions to
strengthen
compliance
with foreign
exchange
regulations,
notably
regarding the
repatriation
of export
earnings, are
critical to
rebuild the
BEAC’s foreign
reserves.
The IMF
Executive
Board could
consider the
third review
in December
2018.
The mission
would like to
thank the
Gabonese
authorities
for the
constructive
discussions
and warm
hospitality.”
In terms of
lack of hospitality, the
UN of Antonio
Guterres has
not responded
to this Press
question:
"November
15-4: On
Gabon, what is
the SG's (and
separately Mr
Fall's /
UNOCA's)
comment and
action on the
move that many
consider
unconstitutional
to continue to
leave
unresolved the
health and
governing
status of Ali
Bongo? What is
the UN's
understanding
of if or when
he would
return? What
is the SG's
awareness and
engagement, if
any, in this?"
The IMF to its
credit
at least
answers
questions.
Back
on November 15 at the
briefing,
Inner City
Press also
asked, "On Sri
Lanka, any
updated
thinking or
action from
the IMF given
the
dissolution of
parliament, no
confidence in
Rajapaksa
motion? Who
are the IMF's
technical
counterparts?
Any changes?"
Rice said the
IMF continues
to monitor
the political
situation and
remain in
touch with its
"technical
counterparts."
Not yet
answered: "On
Cameroon,
while the
IMF's recent
report
discussed the
Cup of African
Nations, what
is the IMF's
assessment of
the impact of
the ongoing
conflict and
travel
restrictions
in the
country's
Anglophone
regions?
On Libya, the
US has said it
is “critical
is promoting
greater
transparency
of Libya’s
economic
institutions,
including the
Central Bank
of Libya.
These reforms
will support
much-needed
conversation
among Libyans
about
enhancing
fiscal
transparency
and promoting
a more
equitable
distribution
of the
country’s oil
resources. The
United States
stands ready
to support
this economic
dialogue, at
Libya’s
request and in
close
coordination
with the UN
Support
Mission for
Libya
(UNSMIL), the
World Bank,
and the
International
Monetary
Fund.” What is
the IMF doing
in/for Libya?
On Saudi
Arabia, can
you further
explain the
basis of Mr
Azour's
statement that
current and
foreseeable
responses to
the killing of
journalist
Jamal
Khashoggi will
no impact the
Saudi economy?
Asked whether
the IMF felt a
need to
re-examine its
expectations
for the
economy since
the Khashoggi
affair
erupted, Jihad
Azour,
director of
the Middle
East and
Central Asia
department at
the Fund, said
it did
not. 'What
would have an
impact is how
oil prices
will have
moved going
forward, and a
certain number
of other
indicators
like the pace
of fiscal
adjustment and
the reforms
that Saudi
authorities
will implement
going forward,'
Azour said." Back
on November
1, Inner City
Press asked
four
questions,
including, "On
Saudi Arabia,
what is the
IMF's estimate
of the impact
of l'affaire
Khashoggi on
the country's
economy, as
well as of the
US' call for a
(sequenced)
cessation of
hostilities in
its war on
Yemen?"
IMF
Spokesperson
Gerry Rice,
after reading
out this
"question from
Matthew Lee,"
emphasized
that the IMF
doesn't
do politics.
He said,
however, that
the IMF is
concerned about the
humanitarian
situation in
Yemen and
stands ready
to re-engage
although there
are no
operations
there now due
to the
conflict. On
Khashoggi's murder he
said it is too
early
to estimate how
much it will
impact confidence
in the Kingdom
- it already has -
and, in what
others may
take as news,
he answered
that the impact for
now is modest.
(Inner
City Press also asked
about the
"coup" in Sri
Lanka which
Rice said the
IMF is
monitoring and
remaining in
contact with
its counterparts
on a technical
level - but that's another
story.) The
Saudi kingdom
is still
dodging about
the death of Jamal
Khashoggi. And Czech
President
Miloš Zeman,
who's clung at a personal
adviser to Ye
Jianming,
controlled of
UN bribery
indictee
Patrick Ho
through the
China Energy
Fund
Committee, has
now said, “I
love
journalists,
that’s why I
may organize
a special
banquet for
them this
evening at the
Saudi embassy.”
It's this
Zeman who's
played a role
in Guterres
having China
Energy Fund
Committee
still accredited UN
ECOSOC, while
Guterres has had
Inner City
Press banned since
July 3. On May
17,
Inner City
Press'
reporting that
day, as
before,
included the
non-response
since November
2017 of the UN
Mission the
the Czech
Republic,
which holds
the presidency
of the UN
ECOSOC to
which CEFC
continues to
hold
consultative
status, while
CEFC's Ye
Jianming was
and remains an
adviser to
Czech
President
Zeman. Even as
the Mission in
New York
refused to
answer, on for
example 28
November 2017
and 6 February
2018, Inner
City Press'
reporting has
been picked up
in the Czech
Republic, on
12 January
2018 here,
then on 28 May
2018 here.
On June 4, a
belated
response from
the Czech
Mission to the
UN, published
by Inner City
Press in full
below along
with the
Press' follow
up questions
on June 4,
still not
answered as of
4 pm on June
5. Inner City
Press is also
informed that
Marie
Chatardova has
reached out
with the same
answer to the
Czech Press
Agency; some
say she is
under
consideration
by Zeman to
become the
country's
foreign
minister and
that this
Press question
unresponded to
by the Czech
Mission since
November could
be a problem.
Suddenly on
June 5,
Antonio
Guterres'
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric read
out an answer
(he rushed off
the podium so
follow up
question have
not yet been
possible).
Video here.
Then on June 22 and July
3 Guterres'
Security roughed up
Inner City
Press and have
banned it
since, while
blathering
about freedom
of the
press.
After
belatedly
and conflicted
statements
about
Khashoggi
from
Guterres, who
earlier this year
took a $930
million check
from Saudi
Crown Prince Mohammed
bin Salman,
now as
speech by
Turkey's
Erdogan, which
over-promised
(the "naked truth") and
under-delivered,
with its
presumption
that the King
is not involved.
It is noted
that Erdogan
has a record 73
journalists in
jail, without
due process like
Guterres'
dis-accreditation
and banned from
the UN list. Others
compromising
connections
are being revealed. Guterres'
Envoy on Youth
Jayathma
Wickramanayake
announced a
partnership
with MBS'
Misk
Foundation,
as recently as
September
26, 2018
(after
school bus bombing)
- and it
remains in
place...
(The IMF's Lagarde,
we note,
canceled on
Davos in the
Desert.) At
the October 10
Press-less UN
noon briefing
at which
Guterres'
spokesman Stephane
Dujarric by choice
had only two
questioners, one retired,
Dujarric
said Guterres
had
not spoken
to the Crown
Prince he took
the money
from. Now as
some banks
pull out of
Davos in the
Desert,
notably two
French banks
both with
operations in
the United
States are
still planning
to go:
Societe
Generale CEO
Frédéric Oudéa
and
BNP Paribas
Chairman Jean
Lemierre;
also a French
arms
manufacturer
Thales CEO
Patrice Caine.
We'll
have more on
this. On
October 15,
with Inner
City Press still
unable to
attend and
ask, included on
Guterres "banned"
list along
with political
activists,
thankfully the
Khashoggi
question was
asked, by Richard Roth: "Now that he's
home, is the
Secretary-General
planning to
meet or has he
met with the
Saudi UN
Ambassador?
What is the
Secretary-General's
comment
regarding
President
Trump's remark
this morning
that the Saudi
King said that
there were
rogue killers,
rogue actors
who were
responsible?
And it might
be nice if the
Secretary-General
stopped after
his Security
Council
appearance
tomorrow
morning
considering
some of the
events that
have happened
while he was
gone.
Just a
suggestion.
Thank you.
Spokesman Dujarric:
I’m always
happy to take
the
suggestions on
board.
You know, I
think the
Secretary-General
was very clear
in the
comments he
made, I think,
to some of
your
colleagues in
Indonesia, is
that he thinks
it's very
important for
the truth to
come
out. Our
understanding
is that,
obviously, the
Turks… Turkish
authorities
are
investigating.
I think we,
like everybody
else, would
like to know
what happened
to Mr. [Jamal]
Khashoggi.
And as the
Secretary-General
said, as we've
said from
here, we've
had… there
have been
contacts
between the UN
and the Saudi
authorities." At
what level? As
Inner City
Press showed,
Guterres
seemingly slept
in
on October
15. It was his
chief of staff
who presented
in the Fifth
Budget
Committee. And
this? On
October
14 from US Senator
Dick Durban,
this:
"Yesterday,
Khalid bin
Salman bin
Abdulaziz Al
Saud, Saudi
Ambassador to
the United
States, called
Durbin
directly from
Riyadh about
Khashoggi’s
disappearance. 'In
my call with
Ambassador bin
Salman, he
admitted to
knowing Mr.
Khashoggi and
even said he
counts him as
a
friend.
However,
Ambassador bin
Salman gave no
credible
explanation
for Mr.
Khashoggi’s
disappearance.
He refused to
comment
directly on
the video
showing Mr.
Khashoggi
entering the
Istanbul
consulate but
not exiting,
would not
respond to
reports of
intelligence
showing a plan
to lure Mr.
Khashoggi back
to Saudi
Arabia, would
not respond to
a request for
a third party
to
investigate,
and gave me no
timetable on
the Saudi’s
investigative
report.
I told
Ambassador bin
Salman that he
should expect
a very
negative
response from
both sides of
the aisle in
Congress if
Mr. Khashoggi
was in fact
kidnapped and
murdered.
And if that is
the case, I do
not believe
the U.S.
should
continue to be
party to
supporting the
Saudis in the
bloodshed in
Yemen -- a
halt that is
long overdue
given the
humanitarian
disaster
resulting from
that
conflict.
This recurring
theme of the
Saudi
government and
royal family
silencing
their critics,
such as the
case with Raif
Badawi and
Waleed
al-Khair,
along with the
fact that they
continue to
turn a blind
eye to the
export of
Wahabbi
extremism
makes it
increasingly
difficult to
accept Saudi
Arabia as
trusted ally
of the United
States.
Since Saudi
arms are being
used to ravage
Yemen and they
are apparently
complicit in
the
disappearance
of Mr.
Khashoggi, I
cannot support
President
Trump’s
proposed arms
sale.
Secretary
Mnuchin should
immediately
cancel his
upcoming trip
to Saudi
Arabia and
after a two
year delay,
the Trump
Administration
should finally
nominate a
U.S.
Ambassador to
Saudi
Arabia.'"
Earlier
Dujarric's
deputy
emailed
this to Inner
City Press: "Regarding
Mr. Khashoggi,
we have said
the following: The
Secretary-General
is very
concerned
about recent
reports of
violence
against
journalists,
including the
most recent
cases - the
reported
disappearance
of Jamal
Khashoggi and
the murder of
Victoria
Marinova in
Bulgaria. Both
publicly and
privately, the
Secretary-General
has often
raised this
issue with
Member States. It’s
also important
to note that
that there’s
also been a
very worrying
increase
increasing
violence,
sexual and
otherwise,
against women
journalists.
The
Secretary-General’s
position is
clear: a free
press is
essential for
peace, justice
and human
rights for
all. He
reiterates his
call on all
governments to
strengthen
press freedom,
including
ensuring that
there is
justice and
accountability
for crimes
committed
against
journalists." This
while
Guterres
himself has
roughed up and
banned the
critical Press - and
is now exposed
as putting it
on his
secret banned
list
that
includes
"political activists."
And so
too the story
about the
Saudi foreign
minister Adel
Ahmed
Al-Jubeir's
speech in
the UN General
Assembly that
Guterres
banned Inner
City Press
from, by his
state media
"UN News
Centre" run by
Alison Smale.
This story
merely
runs lines
from Al-Jubeir such as, "On
the conflict
in Yemen, the
Saudi Minister
said that
Houthi militia
continue to
manufacture
missiles and
carry out
activities
that
destabilize
the region.
Underscoring
the need for a
political
solution to
the crisis,
Minister
Al-Jubeir said
that Saudi
Arabia will
continue to
facilitate all
humanitarian
efforts to
alleviate the
suffering of
the Yemeni
people." This
story does not
mention the
Saudis bombing of
children in a
school bus. One
might think
Smale is just
wasting public
money, as
usual, by reproducing
the flat
coverage of UN
Meetings
Covering. But
it's worse:
the lack of analysis
or presenting
the other side
is selective.
Smale's UN
News Centre's
write
up of the
Myanmar speech
includes a
description of and
link to a
report on the
government's
killings.
Smale also
barred Inner City
Press from attending the
Reuters and
CPJ event on
Myanmar's
jailing of two
journalists, here.
We'll have more
on this - due
to Guterres
and Smale's
lawless censorship
Inner City
Press has had
to cover UNGA
73 from the
streets and is
only now
reviewing
Smale's
shameful
production.
Watch this site.
On
September 25,
after
meeting the Saudi
foreign
minister,
Guterres
gushed, "The
Secretary-General
met with H.E.
Mr. Adel
Al-Jubeir,
Minister of
Foreign
Affairs of the
Kingdom of
Saudi Arabia. The
Secretary-General
and the
Foreign
Minister
discussed
regional
issues of
mutual
interest,
including
Yemen and
Syria. The
Secretary-General
expressed
appreciation
to Saudi
Arabia for its
support to the
ongoing
reconciliation
process in the
Horn of Africa
and United
Nations youth
initiatives."
Not
a word on the
bombing of
school bus. Earlier
on
September 25
the UK Mission
to the UN
closed to the
press - all
press, apparently
- its event on
Addressing
Malnutrition
in Yemen. To his
credit, ICRC's
Peter
Maurer
released his
remarks, here,
including
calling for
"ceasing the
transfer of
weapons if
there is a
clear risk of
violations of
international
law." That
should mean
the host of
the meeting
would stop
such sales - and, as
didn't
happen this week,
incoming UN
Security
Council member
Germany would as
well. We'll
have more on
this. On
September
14 the NRC's
Saleem
Al-Shamiri in
Hodeidah said,
"Stability
within
Hodeidah is
becoming worse
and fear about
what might
happen
continuing to
increase.
Those
remaining in
Hodeidah know
they could
lose
everything,
including
their lives,
but for many,
it is not a
simple
decision to
leave. To
leave is to
abandon
everything
people know
and have
worked for,
with no
certainty
about the
future. If
people leave,
they don’t
know where
they will go,
how they will
find shelter,
what they will
eat. Many fled
here already
and the war
followed.
They’re tired
of running. One
of our
colleagues
here is
expecting her
baby any day.
These are
terrifying
circumstances
for her
delivery. She
says it is now
too late, too
uncertain and
too expensive
for her family
to leave. No
baby should be
born into a
situation like
this.”
The weekend of
7-9 September
marked one of
the deadliest
in Yemen’s war
so far, with
more than 84
conflict-related
fatalities
reported
within
Hodeidah
health
facilities
alone,
according to
reports
received from
Safer Yemen.
Fighting is
now pressing
in on Hodeidah
city from
several sides,
including
heavy ground
clashes and
sustained
aerial
bombardments.
Civilians in
Hodeidah
reported
airstrikes in
close
proximity to
the city’s
southern and
eastern
borders,
including up
to fifty
strikes on the
city fringes
on Wednesday
alone.
Houses, farms,
a flour mill
and a soft
drink factory
were among
civilian
buildings hit
by airstrikes
across
Hodeidah
governorates
over the last
fortnight.
We are highly
concerned
about the
security of
the Hodeidah
Port complex,
including
milling
facilities
housing enough
to feed 3.5
million Yemeni
people.
Aid agencies
in Yemen have
identified
close to
500,000 people
that had fled
homes in
Hodeidah
between June
and August. So
far in
September,
55,000 people
have been
displaced from
across the
governorate,
leaving more
than half a
million at
heightened
risk of hunger
and exposure
to diseases,
including
cholera.
ECHO reports
that the
number of
suspected
cholera cases
in Yemen has
now increased
for the
12thweek in a
row, to 9,245
suspected
cases. This
number adds to
more that
133,000 cases
of suspected
cholera
through 2018
thus far.
By 13
September,
seven vessels
were berthed
at Hodeidah
port, carrying
a 79,000
metric tons of
food and over
30,000 metric
tons of
critically-needed
gas oil. An
additional
three vessels
are queued to
deliver food
and fuel in
the coming
days. Food and
fuel
deliveries
through
Yemen’s Red
Sea Ports have
held steady
since June but
any disruption
or threat to
the safety of
shipments
could strangle
the Yemeni
economy and
impact access
to food for
more than 20
million
people." Inner
City Press, which
previously
at the UN
Security
Council
stakeout asked US
Ambassador
Nikki Haley
questions
about Jeffrey
Feltman and Cameroon
has now been
banned from
the UN for 70
days and
counting and
so asks like this,
on September
11.
We'll have more on
this. On
September 10 the new
UN High
Commissioner
for Human Rights
Michelle Bachelet
has had this to
say on Yemen
in her
opening speech: "Regarding
Yemen, I urge
all parties to
take stock of
the gravity of
the findings
of the Group
of Eminent
Experts. They
have
identified a
number of
individuals
who may be
responsible
for
international
crimes, and
that
confidential
list is now in
the Office. It
is crucial
that there be
continued
international
and
independent
investigations
into all
allegations of
violations of
international
humanitarian
law and war
crimes –
particularly
in light of
the apparent
inability of
the parties to
the conflict
to carry out
impartial
investigations.
Last month's
shocking
strike on a
bus carrying
schoolchildren
was followed
by another
horrific
series of
airstrikes
which left
dozens of
civilians and
children
killed and
injured in Al
Hudaydah. I
note the
recent
statement by
the Coalition
acknowledging
mistakes over
the airstrike
on the school
bus in Sa’ada,
and I will be
closely
following what
steps are
taken to hold
the
perpetrators
accountable
and provide
remedy and
compensation
to the
victims. There
should be
greater
transparency
over the
coalition’s
rules of
engagement and
the measures
taken to
ensure that
such tragedies
are not
repeated. The
recent Saudi
royal order
which appears
to provide a
blanket pardon
to members of
the Saudi
armed forces
for actions
taken in Yemen
is very
concerning." So
why has
Guterres done
a favor to
Saudi Arabia
putting it on
the "good child
killer"
list? We'll
have more on
this, and on
Bachelet's
response
(or not) to
the evidence
provided to
her on and
since her
first day
about shameful
censorship
of the Press
at and by the UN
Secretariat as
it pursues
the UN's role in
Yemen,
deferring to the
Saudis and
their armers.
And on this: On
September 8
Guterres' envoy
Martin
Griffiths
lavished
praise on the
government /
Hadi
delegation he
spent three
days with
in Geneva, in
a press
conference
featuring
qestions cut
off by the UN
and
from which though
in Geneva
Inner City
Press was banned
from by New
York-based,
Moscow
junketing Alison
Smale for
Guterres, soon
to be Lisbon
bound. After
Griffiths,
Hadi's Foreign Minister
Khaled Al
Yahami took
over the UN room to
denounce coup
plotters
and deny that
Sudan and Egypt
wouldn't open
their air
space. What
about the
injured
being able to
get to Oman?
Griffiths,
vetted by the Saudis before Guterres
gave him the
post
ostensibly for
the Brits,
wouldn't say.
He said every
action has a
repurcussion.
We'll
have more on
this. On
September 7,
with
the UN declining
to answer
basic
questions from
banned Inner
City Press
including
"September
6-3: On Yemen,
what is the
SG's response
to that the
Yemeni
government is
considering
not extending
the UN teams’
missions in
the country
after they
have proven
their bias,
Yemen’s human
rights
minister
Mohamed Askar
said on
Thursday,"
this from NRC
protection
and advocacy
adviser in
Yemen Suze
van Meegen: “This
week was due
to mark a
turning point
in Yemen’s
conflict as
parties
convened in
Geneva to
chart a way
forward.
Instead, we
have passed
another week
full of
violence and
devoid of
promise. While
parties to the
conflict
continue to
operate on the
basis of
differences,
Yemenis are
united in
their
experience of
violence,
deprivation
and grief.
Yemenis I met
this week all
tell me that
they are
losing hope in
the
possibility of
any solution
to the current
situation.
They are
exhausted,
People are
reaching their
tipping
point.”
The situation
in Hodeidah
city remains
exceptionally
fragile. Heavy
fighting is
currently
taking place
at the city’s
western and
southern
outskirts,
closer than at
any other
point since
the offensive
on Hodeidah
commenced in
June,
including
around
Hodeidah
airport, on
the city’s
southern
border.
Airstrikes and
helicopter
attacks have
been reported
across several
districts
south of
Hodeidah city,
and missiles
launched from
Yemen at
targets in
both Saudi
Arabia and the
Red Sea.
Reports
indicate that
jets have been
hovering over
Hodeidah city
for up to 16
hours a day.
Citizens in
Hodeidah
described
increasingly
militarised
conditions
inside the
city this
week, with an
increasing
number of
checkpoints,
trenches and
jersey
barriers
installed
across the
city. Most
residents stay
inside their
houses to try
to protect
themselves.
Tension in and
around the
city continues
to keep
prevent tens
of thousands
of city
residents from
returning.
People
remaining in
Hodeidah
report that
more than half
of all
businesses,
shops and
services have
closed,
including
whole blocks
of shopfronts
locked up
following the
departure from
the city of
owner-operators.
A shopkeeper
selling fabric
and clothing
told NRC staff
that he had
not sold a
single item
since the
second week of
August.... On
September 4, with
the UN declining
to answer
basic
questions from
banned Inner
City Press
about the previous,
non-Saudi
approved UN
envoy, this:
"UN Special
Envoy For
Yemen Affirms
Commitment To
Southern
Participation
In The
Political
Process: Amman,
4 September
2018 - Since I
assumed my
role as
Special Envoy
in March this
year, I have
consistently
affirmed that
there will be
no peace in
Yemen if we do
not listen to
a broad
cross-spectrum
of Yemeni
voices,
including
southern
groups, and
make sure that
they are
included in
the efforts to
reach a
sustainable
political
settlement. In
the past few
months, I have
consulted with
numerous
southern
groups to
reach a
consensus on
their
meaningful
participation
in the
political
process. I
have been
encouraged by
their openness
to dialogue
and to a
peaceful
resolution for
their
concerns. I
remain
committed to
reaching a
consensus with
them on their
participation
in the
political
process, and
look forward
to continuing
our
discussions in
the coming
weeks. I
urge all
Yemeni
stakeholders
to work
together to
create a
conducive
environment
for
negotiations
to end the war
and for the
stabilization
of the economy
and delivery
of basic
services to
the Yemeni
people."
We'll
see.
Also, Spain
under Pedro
Sanchez is
said to be belatedly
reviewing
its arms
sales to the Saudis.
Better late
than never - the
UN, it seems,
never
reviews anything,
no more how
outrageous or
ultimately
incriminating.
Where was UNSG
Guterres? In
China, after rebuffing
basic
questions from
banned
Inner City
Press on
August 31, here.
On
August 2,
the day
after the implicated
UK took over
presidency
of the UN
Security
Council while
denying
Press requests
under FOIA
and for
access, British
nominated (and
Saudi
vetted) UN envoy
Martin
Griffiths was to
brief the Council
and then a Press-less
press stakeout
(which he
later
canceled) -
when, just
before the
meeting, the
Saudi and Emirati
led Coalition
reported
bombed the
Al-Thourah
Hospital in Hodeidah,
killing 55
civilians.
While Griffith in
his speech
didn't even
mention these
airstrikes
(and he has
not answered
Inner City Press' online
question to
him about
why), on August 3
the
Saudi
Mission,
dutifully
amplified by
Al Arabiya to
which the UN
gives a ten
meter long
office that
Guterres and
his Deputy and team
often cravenly
appear in, blamed
the bombing on
the Houthis.
Seems like it
might require
an objective
investigation -
unlike the scam
45 day"review"
the UN held
to ban Inner
City Press for
life,
while turning
itself over to
the likes of
Al Arabiya. On
August 24 after
yet more
killing of
civilians by
the Saudi and
Emirati
Led Coalition
from which
Antonio
Guterres
smiling took a
$930 million
check, this:
"“We are
appalled by
conflict that
appears
entirely
ungoverned by
the laws of
war and
astounded at
the silence of
the many
governments
enabling it.
We cannot
comprehend any
possible moral
justification
for killing
civilians
fleeing to
safety as
their towns
become
battlegrounds.
Attacks on
civilians have
become a
deadly trend
in Yemen’s
war. The new
media reports
of civilian
casualties
follow recent
coalition
strikes on a
busload of
school
children that
killed 51
people, and
over three
years of
ceaseless
violence from
both parties
to the
conflict on
homes,
markets,
hospitals,
schools and
farms. More
than 350,000
Yemeni people
have fled
violence along
Yemen’s west
coast since
the beginning
of June,
adding to the
three million
displaced
through the
course of the
war. People
forced to flee
are not simply
numbers, they
are
individuals
forced to
leave
everything
they have
behind in an
effort to stay
alive.
This war is
not only a
Yemeni
problem, it is
a global one.
The multiple
nations
supplying
intelligence,
arms and
logistical
support to
enable the
violence are
implicated in
a conflict
that has
killed
thousands and
will not
subside
without
conscious and
meaningful
action.
The UK, US,
France, Iran
and all others
contributing
to the
conflict in
Yemen must use
their
influence to
bring about an
immediate and
permanent end
to the
violence. We
call on the
countries
funding and
fuelling the
war to ensure
that civilians
and civilian
infrastructure
are protected
from attack,
and that
humanitarian
aid is allowed
to reach those
who need it.'" The
UK and France
are both
complicit in
the killing of
civilians in
Cameroon by
Paul Biya -
and in the
lifetime ban
Guterres'
Alison Smale
imposed on
Inner City Press on
August 17. On
August 13,
for a UN noon
briefing
Inner City remained
banned from, it e-mailed
the spokesmen
for Antonio
"$930 Million
Guterres this
question:
"August 13-2:
On Yemen, what
is the comment
of the SG and,
separately,
his envoy
Griffiths on
reports that
Saudi and
Emirati Led
Coalition-backed
militias
actively
recruit
al-Qaida
militants, or
those who were
recently
members,
because
they’re
considered
exceptional
fighters. One
Yemeni
commander who
was put on the
U.S. terrorism
list for
al-Qaida ties
last year
continues to
receive money
from the UAE
to run his
militia,.
Another
commander,
recently
granted $12
million for
his fighting
force by
Yemen’s
president, has
a known
al-Qaida
figure as his
closest aide.
In one case, a
tribal
mediator who
brokered a
deal between
the Emiratis
and al-Qaida
even gave the
extremists a
farewell
dinner. What
does the UN
know / say /
do about this?" Even when
Inner City
Press submitted the
question
again, to Guterres'
email address
and that of his
Deputy SG and
Communicator
UK USG Alison
Smale, there
has been no
answer more
than two days
later, in the
face of this:
"A senior US
official says
the UAE paid
money to
tribal leaders
in Yemen to
rout al-Qaeda
from its
strongholds.
Wednesday's
remarks
followed AP
investigation
outlining how
Emirati forces
cut secret
deals with the
militants to
get them to
abandon
territory. The
official says
money "has
exchanged
hands" and
that it often
went to
"sheikhs in
areas that
have
collaborated
or allowed
al-Qaida to
exist." He
didn't
elaborate on
how much was
paid, but says
the Emiratis'
payments to
tribal sheikhs
allowed them
to 'ally
themselves to
the Emiratis.'" One wag
might note the
handed
$930 million
check, half
Emerati, to
Guterres; the UAE
already bought the
UN's
Bernardino
Leon and, some
say, Ghassam
Salame. Today's UN
under Guterres
is corrupt,
and censors.
On
August 9, for
a UN noon briefing
Inner City remained
banned from, it e-mailed
the spokesmen
for Guterres
this question:
"August 9-3:
On Yemen, what
is the SG's
comment and
action on 'airstrikes
in northern
Yemen have
targeted a
busy market
and a bus,
killing at
least 20
people,
including
children, and
wounding as
many as 35.
ICRC said a
hospital
supported by
the
organisation
had received
dozens of
casualties
after the
attack at a
market in
Dahyan in
Sa’ada
governorate.'"
At the UN
Security
Council, from
which Guterres
has
also banned Inner
City Press, UK
Deputy
Ambassador
Jonathan Allen
was asked "the
reaction to
the bombing of
a school bus
in northern
Yemen? Dozens
of very young
children,
videos showing
many under the
age of ten
injured and/or
killed in a
strike that
the Saudis say
was justified. Allen: Well,
we've seen
those reports.
It's very
important as
we've said
repeatedly
that all
parties to the
conflict in
Yemen adhere
to
International
Humanitarian
Law. Where
there is an
incident of
this sort,
it's important
this
investigated
thoroughly and
the
conclusions of
that
investigation
are shared and
are learned
from and we'll
be calling for
that in this
incidence as
well. As
President, I'm
afraid I don't
have anything
to say on
that. This is
not something
that the
Council has
discussed
recently. Q: Has
anybody asked
the Presidency
to discuss it
in AOB?
Allen: As
of this
moment, I am
not aware of
any such
requests." At
the beginning
of the month the
UK prepped the
correspondents
it feeds cake to,
as it
sells bombs to
Saudi
Arabia -
while refusing
to answer questions
from Inner
City Press on
Yemen, Western
Sahara and Cameroon.
On
July 30 Guterres'
sleazy basis
for roughing
up and banning
Inner City
Press for 27
days and
counting was reported
in the Columbia
Journalist
Review: Guterres'
spokesman Stephane
Dujarric has
gone
further, in an article
published July
30 by the
Columbia
Journalism
Review. Dujarric - who
Inner City
Press
directed to
the CJR
reporter to -
is quoted
that " Lee
Periscoped
while
shouting, 'Fuck
you!'
repeatedly.
(Lee says he
was
complaining
that Dujarrac
had given the
Al Jazeera
crew a private
interview, and
excluded him.)
'He
creates an
atmosphere of
incivility
within our
working
environment,'
Dujarrac says."
This is a lie.
Inner City
Press on June 19
when Dujarric
gave a "private
briefing" to Al
Jazeera about
Nikki Haley
and Mike
Pompeo
announcing the
US pull out
from the UN
Human Right
Council said
in the hall
that is was a
"sleazefest."
After closing
the door of
the focus booth
it has been
confined to work in
for two years
by
Dujarric, and long
after the Al
Jazeera trio
including
James Bayes
and Whitney
Hurst were
done, said on
Periscope, F-You. Periscope
video - still
online
during this 27
day "investigation" -
here.
So
Dujarric is a
censor,
justifying the
beating up and
banning of a
journalist for
something he
broadcast in
a soundproof
booth to his
audience. This
is disgusting, all
the more so
because as
Inner City
Press has reported,
Dujarric told
an
interlocutor
on June 20,
before the two
beat-downs of
Inner City Press,
that things
would be worse
for it. Guterres and
Dujarric and
it seems Smale
are.. thugs. Disgusting.
On Yemen, the
CJR article
quotes Inner
City Press:
"The Saudis
buy UK weapons
to bomb
Yemen—but the
UN envoy to
Yemen is
British." All
true.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|