On
Zambia IMF Cites Non
Performing Loans As Inner City
Press Asks Of Corruption
By Matthew
Russell Lee, CJR PFT NY
Post
NEW YORK CITY,
August 2 – When
the
International
Monetary Fund
held its
biweekly
embargoed
media briefing
on July 25,
Inner City
Press
submitted five
questions including
on Jamaica
and Lebanon
which the
IMF answered, see
below. On August
2 on Zambia
the IMF said, "On July
24, 2019, the
Executive
Board of the
International
Monetary Fund
(IMF)
concluded the
Article IV
consultation
[1] with
Zambia.
Zambia’s
development
strategy has
focused on a
rapid-scaling
up of public
investment to
address the
country’s
infrastructure
needs. While
public
investment has
increased
sharply,
economic
growth remains
well below
levels seen
earlier this
decade and is
estimated at
3.7 percent in
2018.
Inflation
averaged 7
percent in
2018, but a
depreciation
of the
currency late
in 2018 and
again this
spring coupled
with food
price rises
has pushed
inflation
above 8
percent.
Fiscal
revenues
exceeded
budget targets
in 2018, but
the deficit
widened above
10½ percent on
a commitment
basis (over 8
percent of GDP
on a cash
basis) due to
a rising
interest bill
and a surge in
public
investment
reflecting
faster than
expected
execution of
public
investment
projects.
Total public
and
publicly-guaranteed
(PPG) debt
including
arrears at
end-2018 was
78 percent of
GDP. The
current
account
deficit
widened to 2.6
percent of GDP
in 2018 due to
higher imports
and debt
service, while
reserves
declined from
2.4 months of
import cover
in 2017 to 1.9
months at
end-2018.
The outlook is
clouded by the
ongoing
drought and
heightened
debt
vulnerabilities.
Growth is
projected to
slow to 2
percent in
2019,
reflecting a
decline in
mining sector
activity in an
uncertain
environment
for mining
companies and
the drought’s
impact on
hydro power
production.
Absent
significant
policy
adjustments,
growth is
likely to
remain subdued
over the
medium term as
expenditure
arrears and an
ongoing forced
adjustment in
response to
increasing
debt-related
pressures
weigh on the
private
sector.
Inflation is
projected to
remain above
the top of the
Bank of
Zambia’s (BoZ)
target band in
2019 and 2020.
The BoZ
increased the
policy rate by
50 bps to
10.25 percent
in May. While
the central
bank has moved
to shore up
reserves as
market
conditions
have
permitted,
reserves are
projected to
decline to 1.6
months of
import cover
by end-2019.
Key risks
include the
uncertain
impact of the
drought, a
potential
tightening of
global
financial
conditions, a
further
escalation in
trade
tensions, and
the uncertain
growth
dividend from
recent
infrastructure
investments.
Executive
Board
Assessment
[2]
Executive
Directors
agreed with
the thrust of
the staff
appraisal.
They noted the
deterioration
in
macroeconomic
outcomes in
Zambia and
heightened
vulnerabilities
due to the
ongoing
drought and
recent policy
slippages.
Directors
welcomed the
Cabinet
decision in
late May to
indefinitely
postpone the
contracting of
all new
non‑concessional
loans, cancel
some committed
but
undisbursed
loans and
enhance the
control and
management of
disbursements
of
foreign‑financed
loans, and to
strictly
adhere to
public
financial
management
rules under
the 2018 PFM
Act. Directors
emphasized
that strong
actions would
be needed to
reduce
debt‑related
vulnerabilities
and called for
continued
efforts to
enhance debt
management and
transparency.
They urged the
authorities to
address
weaknesses in
procurement
and in project
selection and
management to
ensure
prioritization
and greater
investment
efficiency.
They also
stressed that
stronger
procedures are
needed to
ensure that
budget
execution
reflects the
authorities’
fiscal goals.
Directors
noted the
importance of
ongoing and
future
technical
assistance in
enhancing the
authorities’
capacity in
these
areas.
Directors
welcomed the
recent
monetary
tightening by
the Bank of
Zambia (BoZ).
They
underscored
the important
role for
forward‑looking
monetary
policy in
securing
macroeconomic
stability and
supporting
reserves, in
conjunction
with a
reorientation
of the fiscal
stance. They
commended
BoZ’s actions
to implement
the
recommendations
of the 2017
FSAP,
including
strengthening
its
supervisory
capacity and
enhancing the
crisis
preparedness
framework.
Directors
urged the
authorities to
closely
monitor
pressures from
the
macrofinancial
linkages
between the
financial
system and the
sovereign.
They also
recommended
continuing to
address
nonperforming
loans." How?
By
foreclosing?
We'll have
more on this.
On July 25
on
Jamaica Inner
City Press
asked, "given
that the
$1.6-billion
Precautionary
Stand-By
Arrangement
comes to an
end in
November,
please state
and explain
what the
functions will
be of the IMF
office that,
unlike
elsewhere, is
to remain in
the country
for two years
after the
expiration of
the SBA."
Spokesman
Gerry Rice,
after reading
out the
question from
"our friend
Matthew Lee in
New York" - these
days covering
it from the
U.S. District
Court for the
Southern
District of
New York SDNY
amid cases
about for
example Nigerian
oil and
GSE
bonds
- replied
that it is be no
means unheard
of for the IMF
to keep and
office behind
after a
program. Inner
City Press
might add that
it has given
rise to enough
concern among
some Jamaicans that
the IMF wrote
to the Gleaner...
From
the IMF
transcript, Rice:
"On
that one, I'd
like to refer
to a letter
that was
actually
published by
our mission
chief in
Jamaica, Uma
Ramakrishnan
and that was
published in
the Glean[e]r
newspaper in
Jamaica just
yesterday. So,
I urge you to
take a look at
that. I would
also add that
since 2013, we
have had
consecutive
IMF-supported
programs.
Jamaica has
established an
exemplary
track record
of economic
reform
achieved
through
commitment and
implementation
of the
Economic
Reform
Program. Now
in that
context then,
IMF and the
Jamaica
Government
consider it
useful to have
that office
open,
remaining open
in Jamaica
with the
ResRep to
continue the
support in the
post-program
period, and as
we transition
from program
to the Article
IV annual
process with
Jamaica, and
to continue to
support
Jamaica with
capacity
building. And
what I can say
is, you know,
the question
said that this
as suggested
that this was
unlike
elsewhere. In
fact, this is
not an unusual
arrangement,
so it's not
unique to
Jamaica by any
means."
On
Lebanon Inner
City Press
asked, "what
is the IMF's
comment on or
response to PM
Hariri having
said, "I know
the IMF has
some
reservations,
but also if we
want to adopt
everything the
IMF does ...
(well then it
also) proposes
that we leave
the Lebanese
pound to
float, that it
go up and down
as it wants."
The IMF had
also requested
an increase of
fuel excise in
addition to an
increase in
VAT, Hariri
said.
What is the
IMF's
comment?" On
this, Spokesperson
Rice said,
"What's the
IMF's comment
on that? I
would refer
you to the
recent
concluding
statement of
our staff
mission to
Lebanon which
said, amongst
other things,
rebalancing
the economy in
the current
framework of
an exchange
rate peg
requires
strong
implementation
of a large and
credible
fiscal
adjustment and
ambitious
structural
reforms." We'll
have more on
this.
Back
on June 27,
on
Pakistan
Inner City
Press
asked, "On
Zimbabwe, what
is the IMF's
response to
Finance
Minister
Mthuli Ncube
saying 'The
first order of
business is to
clear the
arrears and
then move on
to phase two,
which is the
bilateral
discussions
with the Paris
Club'
- asked if
Zimbabwe would
seek financing
from the IMF
next year,
Ncube said: 'Why
not? We can
only ask, they
can only say
no'?"
Camilla
Andersen,
Assistant
Director of the
IMF's
Communications
Department, read
out Inner City
Press'
question and
replied among
other things
that while Zimbabwe
has cleared
its arrears to
the IMF, other
debts
that would
have to be
cleared
remain. She
cited the
Staff Managed
Program running
into 2020
(transcript to
come).
On
Moldova Inner
City Press
asked, "On
Moldova,
please confirm
or deny this
from the
government:
"The head of
the IMF
mission, Ruben
Atoyan, said
that the
International
Monetary Fund
had quite
attentively
monitored the
situation in
Moldova and
that the Fund
showed full
openness to
help
Moldova.
... The
resumption of
the
negotiations
with the
International
Monetary Fund
and
implementation
of the
provisions of
the memorandum
of economic
and financial
policies will
allow Moldova
receiving the
last two
installments
of the
financing
program on
behalf of the
Fund, worth
about 66
million
Dollars."
The IMF's
Camilla Andersen
replied among
other things
that the the
IMF has disbursed
$112 million
under the
program and
continues to
assess (full
transcript to
come).
Back on
June 13 Inner
City Press asked, "what
is the IMF's
response to JI
leader Sirajul
Haq criticism
of the "budget
of IMF purely
concentrating
only on
increasing
taxes and
prices of
essential
commodities,
and was just
read out by
its
slaves.
He said the
budget did not
care about
reducing the
problems of
common man and
price hike,
adding that it
was just a
jugglery of
figures and
words which
was
incomprehensible
even to the
economic
champions of
the
government."
IMF
Spokesperson
Gerry Rice in
the briefing
said, transcript and
video here: "There
is a question
on Pakistan,
from our
friend Matthew
Lee in New
York, asking
in summary
what is the
IMF's response
to the
criticism of
the Pakistani
budget which
was recently
announced that
the IMF is
purely
concentrating
on increasing
taxes and
prices and
doesn’t care
about reducing
the problems
of the common
man. Again,
stepping back,
Pakistan has
requested a
program from
the IMF. Last
month we
reached a
staff level
agreement on
that program
so that’s now
under
discussion.
So, I don’t
really have a
specific
comment on the
budget.
But in terms
of our
discussions, I
can say that
we are talking
about broadly
how to restore
stronger, more
balanced
growth by
reducing
domestic and
external
imbalances,
improving the
business
environment,
strengthening
institutions,
increasing
transparency
and
importantly
protecting
social
spending. So
that last part
does indeed
speak broadly
to the point
that Matthew
is raising,
that social
spending is
and protecting
social
spending is in
fact an
important part
of the
discussion
that we are
having on a
program with
Pakistan."
Inner
City Press asked
asked, "On
Kenya, please
state the
status with
the IMF given
reports that
the country is
"on course to
renewing its
$1.5 billion
standby credit
facility with
the IMF
signing a deal
with selected
banks to
release close
to Ksh1
trillion ($10
billion) in
loans to the
private sector
despite the
prevailing
rate
caps."
On the
upcoming June
25-26 Bahrain
conference on
Palestine,
given that the
IMF has said
it "has been
invited to the
meeting and
expects to
attend, along
with other
international
financial
institutions,"
please state
if the IMF
understands
that the wider
United Nations
will attend,
and/or has
been invited."
Rice said,
"There
is a question
on Kenya.
“Please give
the status of
the IMF
program with
Kenya given
reports that
it's on course
to renew its
standby credit
facility.” And
on that about
all I can say
is that
negotiations
indeed are
ongoing on a
Fund supported
program. I
don't have a
timetable on
that but with
the
negotiations
are underway."
Inner City
Press asked asked,
again, for an
update on
Haiti.
Rice
said,
"There is a
final question
online that I
want to take
which is on
Haiti and
asking about
developments
there and the
status of IMF
discussions on
a program. And
again, this is
a case where
recently there
have been
protests on
the streets
and some
violence I'm
sad to say.
So, on that
front of
course as
always, we
express our
condolences
for the loss
of life there
in Sunday's
demonstrations
in particular.
And, what I
can also say
is that of
course we hope
that the
dialogue can
go forward
there and, you
know,
eliminate the
violence
that’s taking
place and that
we can have
some consensus
around a
reform
agenda.
On the program
and
discussions
around the
program, given
the time that
has now
elapsed since
the IMF team
reached a
staff level
agreement,
that was back
in March. And
given the
changes in
Haiti's'
economic
situation a
reassessment
of the
economic
framework and
of the
measures
needed to
stabilize and
support the
economy is
going to be
needed before
we would be in
the position
to propose a
program to our
executive
board. That
said, we look
forward to
engaging with
Haiti's new
government as
soon as
feasible to
find the best
way forward
and to protect
the most
vulnerable
groups,
improve
governance and
secure
macroeconomic
stability. So
that’s where
we are on
Haiti."
It's appreciated.
On May
23 Inner City
Press asked, "what
is the IMF's
response to /
comment or
explanation
on the
May 15 letter
addressed to
Congolese
Prime Minister
Clement
Mouamba that
"The advisers
to the
Republic wish
to make you
aware of the
major risk of
the
programme’s
rejection by
the IMF’s
board,” said
Congo hired
French
financial
advisers
Lazard and
more recently
Parnasse, a
firm employing
former IMF
Managing
Director
Dominique
Stauss-Kahn,
to assist it
in the
negotiations
with the Fund.
How is this
not a conflict
of interest?"
IMF spokesperson
Gerry Rice to his
credit took
the question,
on camera,
emphasizing
that the
discussion have
been only
between IMF
staff and the
authorities,
no one else.
He said that
address the
conflict of
interest
question. He
also noted the
IMF's May 9
announcement
of a staff
level
agreement. But
when will it
go to the
Board?
On
Barbados, Inner
City Press
asked for
"
the IMF's
response to
Senator
Crystal Drakes
saying
that the Mia
Mottley
administration
may have hit
the benchmarks
set under the
IMF-sanctioned
Barbados
Economic
Recovery and
Transformation
programme but
is ignoring
it’s sustained
and impending
collateral
damage to the
society.
“All of this
has come at a
social cost.
Meeting those
targets have
been economic
winds but
socially we
have paid a
serious price
for meeting
those
targets.
“In reducing
our debt and
closing the
fiscal gap,
Barbadians had
to give up
their wealth,
particularly
the vulnerable
group of
pensioners.
“Their
disposable
income through
higher taxes
and user fees,
has resulted
in persons
falling below
the poverty
line.”
Rice
said the IMF's
discussions
had been with
social
partners
including the
unions and
that the floor
for social
spending had
been met, by
an ample
margin, in
December and
March.
More on
this, including
transcript, to
follow. And on
this:
As
China uses its
Belt and Road
Initiative to
take over ports in
Sri Lanka and
prospectively
Kenya, while
using supposed
NGOs to bribe
UN officials
including bidding
on an oil company
owned by
Gulbenkian
Foundations
whose payments
to UN
Secretary
General
Antonio
Guterres were
omitted from
his public
financial disclosure
covering 2016,
even the IMF's
Christine Lagarde is
genuflecting
in Beijing,
albeit
less cravenly
than Guterres.
Unlike
Guterres' obsequious
blue washing
of BRI,
Lagarde in her
April 26
speech as
least gently
chided China
for
unsustainable
loans. She
said, "The BRI
is clearly
having an
impact. From
stimulating
infrastructure
investment to
developing new
global supply
chains, some
of the
promises of
BRI are being
realized.
Consider
Kazakhstan,
where a new
manufacturing
zone is
beginning to
unleash
previously
untapped
economic
potential. Or
look at
Senegal, where
robust
economic
growth of over
6 percent in
each of the
last four
years was
supported
partly by
BRI-linked
investment
projects,
including the
construction
of a new
highway
linking the
airport to
three large
cities. At the
same time,
history has
taught us
that, if not
managed
carefully,
infrastructure
investments
can lead to a
problematic
increase in
debt. I have
said before
that, to be
fully
successful,
the Belt and
Road should
only go where
it is needed.
I would add
today that it
should only go
where it is
sustainable,
in all
aspects." But
what does this
mean in terms
of the BRI
loans to Sri
Lanka, and to
the Kenya
railroad?
We'll have more on
this.
More
here.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|